|
Who do you wish to win the Democratic primaries? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Biden, the Inappropriate Toucher |
|
18 | 1.46% |
| Bernie Sanders, the Hand Flailer |
|
665 | 54.11% |
| Elizabeth Warren, the Plan Maker |
|
319 | 25.96% |
| Kamala Harris, the Cop Lord |
|
26 | 2.12% |
| Cory Booker, the Super Hero Wannabe |
|
5 | 0.41% |
| Julian Castro, the Twin |
|
5 | 0.41% |
| Kirsten Gillibrand, the Franken Killer |
|
5 | 0.41% |
| Pete Buttigieg, the Troop Sociopath |
|
17 | 1.38% |
| Robert Francis O'Rourke, the Fake Latino |
|
3 | 0.24% |
| Jay Inslee, the Climate Alarmist |
|
8 | 0.65% |
| Marianne Williamson, the Crystal Queen |
|
86 | 7.00% |
| Tulsi Gabbard, the Muslim Hater |
|
23 | 1.87% |
| Andrew Yang, the $1000 Fool |
|
32 | 2.60% |
| Eric Swalwell, the Insurance Wife Guy |
|
2 | 0.16% |
| Amy Klobuchar, the Comb Enthusiast |
|
1 | 0.08% |
| Bill de Blasio, the NYPD Most Hated |
|
4 | 0.33% |
| Tim Ryan, the Dope Face |
|
3 | 0.24% |
| John Hickenlooper, the Also Ran |
|
7 | 0.57% |
| Total: | 1229 votes | ||
|
Chilichimp posted:in the current context of no-cash-bail and the progressive movement, In a post 1964 world, why should someone even think about increased bail, ever, if not to serve the New Jim Crow state?
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 16:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:16 |
|
|
Phone posted:why are you like this? If posters ITT can justify 2nd picking Williamson even if she might be anti-vax, then I can justify her having a boring bail opinion ~at some point in the past~ (I cannot stress enough how lazy and loving stupid it is to link the screenshot of a headline) for my 3rd choice.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
Guys chill out, on this one issue, if we ignore a ton of other issues, Kamala served segregationist interests ONLY ONCE, relax jfc.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:00
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:In a post 1964 world, why should someone even think about increased bail, ever, if not to serve the New Jim Crow state? Potato Salad posted:Guys chill out, on this one issue, if we ignore a ton of other issues, Kamala served segregationist interests ONLY ONCE, relax jfc. Came for the "Copmala" takes; am satisfied with the "Uncle Tomala" takes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:If posters ITT can justify 2nd picking Williamson even if she might be anti-vax, then I can justify her having a boring bail opinion ~at some point in the past~ (I cannot stress enough how lazy and loving stupid it is to link the screenshot of a headline) for my 3rd choice. Do you actually have any positives for your third choice or are you just trying to rationalize accepting lovely people Cause 3rd choice in any normal primary would be some drat faint praise
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:04
|
|
|
Unoriginal Name posted:Do you actually have any positives for your third choice or are you just trying to rationalize accepting lovely people It's faint praise in this primary. I don't anticipate ever having to vote for her, though I prefer her of the centrists in the crowded field.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:06
|
|
|
The new Yorker did an article about how gillibrand screwed franken and how everyone hates gillibrand for the one objectively good thing she did
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:07
|
|
|
A big flaming stink posted:The new Yorker did an article about how gillibrand screwed franken and how everyone hates gillibrand for the one objectively good thing she did That article sucks poo poo lmao https://twitter.com/Ugarles/status/1153298025823002628
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:08
|
|
|
A big flaming stink posted:The new Yorker did an article about how gillibrand screwed franken and how everyone hates gillibrand for the one objectively good thing she did I have no idea why she's still even in this race. Phone posted:That article sucks poo poo lmao The strongest argument that can be made for Franken is he's on the Biden-end of the creep scale, not the Trump-end. Which is a preeeeeeeeeeetty lovely argument. Chilichimp fucked around with this message at 17:11 on Jul 22, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:08
|
|
|
I think the current summary of thread preferences is as follows: Bernie > .... > Warren > Giant Meteor > Castro/Booker > Sapient Self Help Book > Third Party > Harris > Trump > Biden Also Imagine still defending Franken to this day.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:11
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:It's faint praise in this primary. I don't anticipate ever having to vote for her, though I prefer her of the centrists in the crowded field. Again, why
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:13
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the current summary of thread preferences is as follows: Ellipses/Right Angle Bracket 2020
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:17
|
|
|
Unoriginal Name posted:Again, why *looks at Biden, Buttigeig, Booker and Beto* Biden's a creep with no idea what the current democratic base wants. Buttigieg is a political novice who's political height at this point is mayor of a college town. Booker has some problematic alliances with defense contractors and charter schools. Beto is a 3rd way shithead who thinks we can heal the country by participating in dialogue and finding common ground with republicans. I guess you could cram some other candidates into this category and tell me they're better? I'm not really putting a ton of thought into my ~3rd choice~ and I'm not sure why you'd put a ton of effort into making me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the current summary of thread preferences is as follows: This seems accurate, assuming that SSHB is Buttergreg (really it's all the centrist candidates) Chilichimp posted:
You're the one crying because you want to kiss and hug Kamala Harris and other posters think you're being dumb/weird
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:22
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:You're the one crying because you want to kiss and hug Kamala Harris and other posters think you're being dumb/weird Thanks for projecting creepy sexual imagery on me, Failed Imagineer. It's a good and cool argument, I'll totes reconsider how my testicles are influencing my decision-making.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:27
|
|
|
The correct 3rd choice is Jay Inslee.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:29
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Thanks for projecting creepy sexual imagery on me, Failed Imagineer. It's a good and cool argument, I'll totes reconsider how my testicles are influencing my decision-making. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:30
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The correct 3rd choice is Jay Inslee. nah, it’s whoever the brain genius is who came up with this scheme https://twitter.com/AJentleson/status/1153334905608294402
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:31
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The correct 3rd choice is Jay Inslee. Jay will be a bangin' Interior Sec. Phone posted:nah, it’s whoever the brain genius is who came up with this scheme Pelosi is a loving waste... twitter reporters are framing it like SHE won. All she "won" was not having to make republicans argue for medicare/ss cuts in an election year.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:31
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Jay will be a bangin' Interior Sec. Great, now you want to bang jay. You’re being real adult here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:33
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:The correct 3rd choice is Jay Inslee. Naw. Inslee only contributes to global warming with how much of a hot wet fart his campaign is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:33
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Naw. Inslee only contributes to global warming with how much of a hot wet fart his campaign is. If we had a president who was actually going to do the green new deal and address global warming but was poo poo on everything else, that would be pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:34
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Jay will be a bangin' Interior Sec. Pelosi "won" in that she made it the next Speaker's problem, not hers. Typical old person burning the exit on the way out.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:38
|
|
|
Phone posted:Great, now you want to bang jay. The absolute state of this.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:38
|
|
|
She should've refused to raise the debt ceiling until the camps were closed but that would require some moral clarity and a loving spine.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the current summary of thread preferences is as follows: Gravel is my second choice, Williamson my third. They're the only anti-imperialists running I think
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:00
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:though I prefer her of the centrists in the crowded field. Actually I agree with this.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:21
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:If we had a president who was actually going to do the green new deal and address global warming but was poo poo on everything else, that would be pretty good. What does that have to do with Inslee?
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
mandatory lesbian posted:Gravel is my second choice, Williamson my third. They're the only anti-imperialists running I think "But Gabbard is totally sincerely running as an anti-imperialist!" |/ 
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
i forgot gabbard was even in the primary
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
why are there so many people in this primary , knowing full well they don’t have a chance . Who would buy a book by Corey Booker or tulsi gabbard ? They have no chance at all
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Punk da Bundo posted:why are there so many people in this primary , knowing full well they don’t have a chance . Who would buy a book by Corey Booker or tulsi gabbard ? They have no chance at all There's lots of good reasons. Increasing name recognition for future races, running for a cabinet position, they think it'll go down to a brokered convention where who the gently caress knows what will happen, they're having an affair and need an excuse to be away from home, they're lonely, etc.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
Punk da Bundo posted:why are there so many people in this primary , knowing full well they don’t have a chance . Who would buy a book by Corey Booker or tulsi gabbard ? They have no chance at all Booker is running for VP, Tulsi's just trying to stay relevant.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
Some Polls to look at https://twitter.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1153343240306864129 http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_1907190926.pdf
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/andrewperezdc/status/1153352713419272192
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:56
|
|
|
Gripweed posted:There's lots of good reasons. Increasing name recognition for future races, running for a cabinet position, they think it'll go down to a brokered convention where who the gently caress knows what will happen, they're having an affair and need an excuse to be away from home, they're lonely, etc. There's also literally no downside. For the 2018 cycle, Seth Moulton raised 2.3 million for his congressional run overall. Right now he is sitting at 1.9 million for the presidency. Worst case scenario he transfers over his money from his failed presidential campaign into his congressional run.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Some Polls to look at Unfortunate that "Medicare if you want it" was such a well-constructed Trojan horse. Fuuuuuuuck Third Way.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 19:01
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Some Polls to look at Christ that M4A question couldn't be any goddamn clearer.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 19:02
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Some Polls to look at Sounds like most people are wrong and want a public option
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 19:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 14:16 |
|
|
Marianne opponents are in good company https://twitter.com/FullFrontalSamB/status/1153328212509962241
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2019 19:02
|
|