Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Major Operation
Jan 1, 2006

Well, if you were waiting for conversion numbers to see if Hogaak was actually oppressively good or just over-represented, it looks like it is the former.

What would these numbers have looked like with Bridge from Below still around? 40% Hogaak?

https://twitter.com/MTGGoldfish/status/1155075408733229056

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DangerDongs
Nov 7, 2010

Grimey Drawer
Wizards should do a "what-if" month every now and then to see what a format could potentially look like for a short period of time as a trial run.

I would like a What-If Month of looting and stirrings banned, and if the format seems better for it then make it permanent.

Orange Fluffy Sheep
Jul 26, 2008

Bad EXP received

Panzeh posted:

Yes. I was making fun of people thinking brainstorm and wasteland are genius cards.

They are but I can clearly see you aren't at the genius level to appreciate them.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
70% conversion rate despite having opponents maindecking narrow hate that's worthless in any other matchup

~healthy metagame~

Time
Aug 1, 2011

It Was All A Dream
Modern seems like it isn’t far from being in a good place. Last mc was great and I think if you ban hogaak this format would be fun too. U/W, humans, jund and chalice decks are all in a good place even if looting stays but the hogaak decks go and that seems like a good format to me.

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

The kind of aggro deck you’re pining for flat out doesn’t exist in Modern right now. As it turns out decks that can’t beat a resolved Batterskull happen to be pretty mediocre against everything else running around in Modern.

But Stoneforge Mystic might actually help give that kind of deck a shot in the arm because, hey, the best decks for Swords very often end up being decks that want to swing sideways a bunch!

Lone Goat
Apr 16, 2003

When life gives you lemons, suplex those lemons.




TheKingofSprings posted:

The kind of aggro deck you’re pining for flat out doesn’t exist in Modern right now. As it turns out decks that can’t beat a resolved Batterskull happen to be pretty mediocre against everything else running around in Modern.

But Stoneforge Mystic might actually help give that kind of deck a shot in the arm because, hey, the best decks for Swords very often end up being decks that want to swing sideways a bunch!

are you sitting on 50 SFMs you can't unload? because you've been squealing about it being unbanned for years now

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Lone Goat posted:

are you sitting on 50 SFMs you can't unload? because you've been squealing about it being unbanned for years now

Stoneforge Mystic is one of my favorite cards :shrug:

Mat Cauthon
Jan 2, 2006

The more tragic things get,
the more I feel like laughing.



I hope we just get some kind of utility hoser card for Hogaak in Eldraine, because they're not banning Looting and another six months of this same conversation might actually kill me.

Be extra great if it was a Spirit too, thanks in advance WOTC.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

TheKingofSprings posted:

Stoneforge Mystic is one of my favorite cards :shrug:

Stoneforge mystic is a boring rear end 4/4 lifelink.

CharlieFoxtrot
Mar 27, 2007

organize digital employees



Pro players "generating five figures in sales" based on their deck techs, is this what people were talking about with the OP scene as a driver

https://twitter.com/SamuelHBlack/status/1154986279047696384

jassi007
Aug 9, 2006

mmmmm.. burger...

CharlieFoxtrot posted:

Pro players "generating five figures in sales" based on their deck techs, is this what people were talking about with the OP scene as a driver

https://twitter.com/SamuelHBlack/status/1154986279047696384

A single deck tech of which there are several, back when they used to broadcast events frequently. Imagine if they advertised 20 events and generated $50k in additional sales from promotions, that'd be an additional $1,000,000 in sales a year. That being said, what Sam doesn't get is the cost of OP vs. the cost of supporting streamers is probably way better value for WotC. I wish that wasn't exactly the case but it likely is. Magic is better as a paper product but it is probably more popular in the Arena digital format.

shades of blue
Sep 27, 2012
SFM should be unbanned but if you think it wouldn't be super impactful you're nuts.

Also, the only decks in Modern that are super interested in playing SFM are probably aggro decks or d&t style decks. Maybe the Bant Snow deck wants to play it as well idk.

shades of blue
Sep 27, 2012

jassi007 posted:

A single deck tech of which there are several, back when they used to broadcast events frequently. Imagine if they advertised 20 events and generated $50k in additional sales from promotions, that'd be an additional $1,000,000 in sales a year. That being said, what Sam doesn't get is the cost of OP vs. the cost of supporting streamers is probably way better value for WotC. I wish that wasn't exactly the case but it likely is. Magic is better as a paper product but it is probably more popular in the Arena digital format.

That was also a deck tech for a completely insane draft deck and it's unclear if they could demonstrate successful crazy poo poo like it so often.

sit on my Facebook
Jun 20, 2007

ASS GAS OR GRASS
No One Rides for FREE
In the Trumplord Holy Land
What if we settled on unbanning Stoneforge and banning Batterskull

uggy
Aug 6, 2006

Posting is SERIOUS BUSINESS
and I am completely joyless

Don't make me judge you

Sampatrick posted:

SFM should be unbanned but if you think it wouldn't be super impactful you're nuts.

Also, the only decks in Modern that are super interested in playing SFM are probably aggro decks or d&t style decks. Maybe the Bant Snow deck wants to play it as well idk.

Ya I’m just not sure, ya know? Modern has changed so much. I feel like people said the same poo poo about bbe and jace and I’m not sure they were super impactful.

I don’t think sfm would make death and taxes that much better but I also suck at deck building and predicting metas

shades of blue
Sep 27, 2012

uggy posted:

Ya I’m just not sure, ya know? Modern has changed so much. I feel like people said the same poo poo about bbe and jace and I’m not sure they were super impactful.

I don’t think sfm would make death and taxes that much better but I also suck at deck building and predicting metas

I mean, assuming Hogaak eats a ban, it's highly likely that the best deck ends up being Phoenix or maybe Humans and SFM is really good against both of those decks. SFM is also good against Narset and baby Teferi. Kolaghan's Command technically hits both halves of SFM but if Modern is in a place where Kommand is a reasonable card to play, then I think we're doing fine. There are also a variety of reasons why Jace hasn't been insanely impactful but it's definitely a staple of the format at this point.

neaden
Nov 4, 2012

A changer of ways
Everyone's bad at predicting metas pretty much. Having the occasional test tournament with different ban lists is probably the only way to really have an idea of what would work.

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016
The thing Ive never bought about the 'sfm mystic would homogenize fair white decks' argument is that while it is techically true it ignores the fact that all but one fair white deck is unplayable trash that could use the power boost sfm would provide to keep up with the rest of the format.

shades of blue
Sep 27, 2012

AnEdgelord posted:

The thing Ive never bought about the 'sfm mystic would homogenize fair white decks' argument is that while it is techically true it ignores the fact that all but one fair white deck is unplayable trash that could use the power boost sfm would provide to keep up with the rest of the format.

Not only that, but the only fair white deck that's actually good is u/w and u/w would probably just rather play Narsets and Teferis

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


Jabor posted:

70% conversion rate despite having opponents maindecking narrow hate that's worthless in any other matchup

~healthy metagame~

and the sort of core problem in modern, to me, is that they’ll ban hogaak and then NOT unban bridge, and hogaakless bridgevine— despite being a completely fine, balanced deck that plays in a creative and interesting way— will never exist again

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

and the sort of core problem in modern, to me, is that they’ll ban hogaak and then NOT unban bridge, and hogaakless bridgevine— despite being a completely fine, balanced deck that plays in a creative and interesting way— will never exist again

Bridgevine is an abomination that should never have existed and even though bridge may have died for hogaak/looting's sins that doesnt mean it was a fair card that is ok in modern.

Its exists in the same space as something like simian-spirit guide, someone was going to break it eventually.

AnEdgelord
Dec 12, 2016
Basically patrick sullivan was right and they should have banned bridge and looting together, the problem we see now is the result of WotC opting for a half measure.

uggy
Aug 6, 2006

Posting is SERIOUS BUSINESS
and I am completely joyless

Don't make me judge you
I just don’t see why magic doesn’t go the route of esports where they have “seasons.” Just gently caress with the ban list every 6 months or year to give fresh decks new beginnings.

Mat Cauthon
Jan 2, 2006

The more tragic things get,
the more I feel like laughing.



The answer, just like everything else, is the secondary market. Also that sort of rotating status quo is what Standard exists for.

God, can you imagine the salt if WOTC said "hey every six months we're going to randomly ban a bunch of cards to shake up modern "?

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010

uggy posted:

I just don’t see why magic doesn’t go the route of esports where they have “seasons.” Just gently caress with the ban list every 6 months or year to give fresh decks new beginnings.

probably because constant bans piss off everyone, doubly so when substantial investments can be made worthless in a single stroke.

uggy
Aug 6, 2006

Posting is SERIOUS BUSINESS
and I am completely joyless

Don't make me judge you
Feels no different than buying into a deck and having it become obsolete in 6 months cause new cards wreck the format

Voyager I
Jun 29, 2012

This is how your posting feels.
🐥🐥🐥🐥🐥

Mr. Locke posted:

IT'S NOT ABOUT loving POWER LEVEL.

You're basing a lot of your argument off of things that don't exist. For instance, the five-card package you're describing of 4 SFM and 1 Batterskull isn't real. Nobody is running a playset of Stoneforge in a list where copies 2+ are 1/2s with no text, and the rest of the package isn't Modern legal. You could probably find something close enough to SoFi, but Jitte doesn't have a substitute and is arguably Mystic's most important partner-in-crime to begin with.

Similarly, you're overstating Batterskull's raw power level. I'm certainly not arguing that it's a weak card, but nobody's running casual Batterskulls in Tron because if they have 5 mana to hardcast it they probably have 6+ mana to cast even meaner motherfuckers like Wurmcoil Engine for the same job (or they're bringing in Thragtusks so they don't have to wait for a combat step to get out of burn range).

Likewise, it's definitely not something that goes into every deck with White mana (just like it's not in Legacy). I mean hell, Humans is a gigantic pile of three-mana creatures and they haven't bothered making room for Collected Company in ages. Cheating out a 4/4 Lifelinker isn't better than playing harder at what they're already doing, and losing to aggro decks isn't a problem that Humans are focused on solving.


It would probably be a big boost to the various Hatebears / Taxes lists that used to show up in the format, but given that we're talking about those decks in the past tense I'm comfortable saying that's a good thing.


uggy posted:

Feels no different than buying into a deck and having it become obsolete in 6 months cause new cards wreck the format

New cards trashing the format is an aberration that is expected to be corrected in the long run. There is not a format where people spend four digits on decks that are explicitly temporary.

Voyager I fucked around with this message at 19:14 on Jul 27, 2019

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010

Voyager I posted:

You could probably find something close enough to SoFi, but Jitte doesn't have a substitute and is arguably Mystic's most important partner-in-crime to begin with.

uh, isn't sword of fire and ice modern legal?

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

uggy posted:

I just don’t see why magic doesn’t go the route of esports where they have “seasons.” Just gently caress with the ban list every 6 months or year to give fresh decks new beginnings.

That’s standard

Also yugioh does that and it blows

Voyager I
Jun 29, 2012

This is how your posting feels.
🐥🐥🐥🐥🐥

A big flaming stink posted:

uh, isn't sword of fire and ice modern legal?

EDIT: lol it is. Not exactly the bane of the format.

Mat Cauthon
Jan 2, 2006

The more tragic things get,
the more I feel like laughing.



uggy posted:

Feels no different than buying into a deck and having it become obsolete in 6 months cause new cards wreck the format

There's a huge difference between "the introduction of new cards shifted the viability of certain decks or archetypes" and "we are unilaterally outlawing certain cards in order to shift the dynamics of a format in order to up the entertainment value".

You could argue that WOTC, being in charge of design, has some idea of how a format will change in response to new cards or mechanics but that's a very deterministic view that overlooks a lot of other factors.

At the end of day it won't happen because it would crater the secondary market and probably do more harm to the format than good. There's more than enough evidence to show that WOTC is very bad at tweaking these sorts of things anyway, why you would want more meddling is beyond me.

Mat Cauthon fucked around with this message at 19:25 on Jul 27, 2019

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012
Hmm yes I love that my 500$ deck was completely invalidated; now I can play airplane waifus: http://yugiohtopdecks.com/deck/7916

little munchkin
Aug 15, 2010

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

and the sort of core problem in modern, to me, is that they’ll ban hogaak and then NOT unban bridge, and hogaakless bridgevine— despite being a completely fine, balanced deck that plays in a creative and interesting way— will never exist again

what on earth are you even talking about

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


little munchkin posted:

what on earth are you even talking about

why is glimpse of nature banned

why is rite of flame banned

if these cards were unbanned, would the decks they create have any impact on the format whatsoever? elves doesn’t have wirewood symbiote, quirion ranger, natural order or gaea’s cradle. storm doesn’t have ponder, preordain, or even gitaxian probe! the modern banlist is way too loving long

JerryLee
Feb 4, 2005

THE RESERVED LIST! THE RESERVED LIST! I CANNOT SHUT UP ABOUT THE RESERVED LIST!

Mat Cauthon posted:

The answer, just like everything else, is the secondary market. Also that sort of rotating status quo is what Standard exists for.

God, can you imagine the salt if WOTC said "hey every six months we're going to randomly ban a bunch of cards to shake up modern "?

It's possible for people to want a "rotating status quo" but with a less restricted card pool than Standard. Whether Wizards should actually do it is another matter, since you can only make so many formats without harmfully balkanizing things, but "that's what standard is for!" is not actually an answer.

shades of blue
Sep 27, 2012

DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:

why is glimpse of nature banned

why is rite of flame banned

if these cards were unbanned, would the decks they create have any impact on the format whatsoever? elves doesn’t have wirewood symbiote, quirion ranger, natural order or gaea’s cradle. storm doesn’t have ponder, preordain, or even gitaxian probe! the modern banlist is way too loving long

Yes, obviously glimpse of nature elves and rite of flame storm would be completely insane wtf

suicidesteve
Jan 4, 2006

"Life is a maze. This is one of its dead ends.


Voyager I posted:

New cards trashing the format is an aberration that is expected to be corrected in the long run. There is not a format where people spend four digits on decks that are explicitly temporary.

*points to literally every pauper, modern and legacy deck he has ever owned*

Elyv
Jun 14, 2013



hogaak only got one copy into t8, guess it was overblown

https://twitter.com/karsten_frank/status/1155189515323133953

hmm

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


Sampatrick posted:

Yes, obviously glimpse of nature elves and rite of flame storm would be completely insane wtf

evaluate that statement. what is elves drawing to? how does it chain off with 1) no ability to bounce visionaries, 2) no lands that tap for more than 1 mana and 3) no natural order? like, imagine an explosive elves turn, then just imagine if the deck was cocoing into half of the Vizier combo instead. It would be a deck, it wouldn’t be an absurd deck.

Same with storm. Is the reason UR storm not a deck right now that there’s not quite enough fast mana? Or is it just that Phoenix is a better way to play UR? How are you building to 20 storm without ponder or preordain? force of negation can interrupt you and you can’t force back to protect yourself.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply