Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ImpAtom
May 24, 2007


Wouldn't this mean that the 2019 Lion King is the real one which got unfairly replaced by the original animated one?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Darth TNT
Sep 20, 2013

I don't get it?

Kassad
Nov 12, 2005

It's about time.

Darth TNT posted:

I don't get it?

The other family in Us are like the real one, but wrong.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



ImpAtom posted:

Wouldn't this mean that the 2019 Lion King is the real one which got unfairly replaced by the original animated one?

Not sure why I clicked that.

Larryb
Oct 5, 2010

New trailer for the upcoming Netflix exclusive Rocko's Modern Life movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Now4KeAiys

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

Larryb posted:

New trailer for the upcoming Netflix exclusive Rocko's Modern Life movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Now4KeAiys

I do not like these voices. I don't even know they are different actors, they are just wrong.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

I do not like these voices. I don't even know they are different actors, they are just wrong.

I mean, they are 20 years older
But I’m fairly sure they’re all the exact same voice actors

Larryb
Oct 5, 2010

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

I do not like these voices. I don't even know they are different actors, they are just wrong.

As far as I'm aware, every actor from the series has returned to reprise their roles in this movie. It has been 20 years though so it's possible a few of them might just be out of practice.

J-Spot
May 7, 2002

Philburt sounded pretty off there but Rocko was fine. The rest of the characters didn't have enough lines to really judge.

Digamma-F-Wau
Mar 22, 2016

It is curious and wants to accept all kinds of challenges
https://twitter.com/AGuyWhoDraws/status/1155243169006514176

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Larryb posted:

As far as I'm aware, every actor from the series has returned to reprise their roles in this movie. It has been 20 years though so it's possible a few of them might just be out of practice.

Or 20 years older. That said though Nickelodeon voice actors probably have been in the same job and probably in some cases the same characters for those whole 20 years and then some.

Interesting that it looks like the Bigheads haven't changed much except they might actually have adjusted better, if only because Ed's burnt-out cynicism means he gets along so much better with his son.

Mamkute
Sep 2, 2018
We're back! A Dinosaur's Story is a dinosaur movie where none of the dinosaurs eat anyone. The Ravens do (eat people) because they do not need to be friends with humans.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord
By far the best part of "we're back" is that the villain actually has a really good backstory but they cut it out and didn't ever fully animate it so in the actual movie there is kinda just no real explanation for anything and he just has some crows for no reason and then they just eat him suddenly for no reason.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCzHlm9Wr3A

Robindaybird
Aug 21, 2007

Neat. Sweet. Petite.

and We're Back is just 'You're a bad person if you like spooky things' not even the performers of the circus save for the really unfunny clown who somehow missed the memo of what type of circus it is, but it's treated like anyone who likes horror and spooky stuff is bad.

And also who the hell asks for a thanksgiving hat?

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
A weirdly oversexualized little girl

Rahonavis
Jan 11, 2012

"Clevuh gurrrl..."

Screweyes: Runs a horror show for people who like scary things. Tells the main characters to scram so he can continue to entertain people who appreciate weird creepy stuff without being judged for it. Gets judged anyway and is declared the villain.

Neweyes: Reads children’s minds without their knowledge as they sleep. Poaches wild animals from their natural environment and time. Feeds animals a sketchy dietary supplement of his own invention that makes them not only tame but harmless. Sends the animals to the future to be airdropped into the Hudson River so they can find their way to a museum where they’ll spend their lives in a room inside a building inside a city for the amusement of children. Does not at any point feel it necessary to explain cities, children (or humans in general), time travel, why they aren’t going to meet other nonavian dinosaurs to the animals, despite the fact that they can understand English.

Is the hero. Because he says so.

Andorra
Dec 12, 2012
I watched that movie as a kid because I loved the book it's based on so much, and I absolutely hated it. It really ticked little kid me off, the movie having so little to do with the book.

doomrider7
Nov 29, 2018

Andorra posted:

I watched that movie as a kid because I loved the book it's based on so much, and I absolutely hated it. It really ticked little kid me off, the movie having so little to do with the book.

What was changed?

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Sleeveless posted:

The most unrealistic episode of Batman Beyond was the Egg Baby one because the sitcom cliche of having to carry around a sack of flower or a doll for a project in high school was already an entire generation in the ground by the time it aired.

I've seen kids do it at the school I teach at this year.

Charlz Guybon fucked around with this message at 08:07 on Jul 30, 2019

Andorra
Dec 12, 2012

doomrider7 posted:

What was changed?

It's been a very, very long time since I've read or seen either, but as I recall the entirety of the book is an alien dinosaur gives the group of dinosaurs smart pills, warps them to the present, the dinosaurs make a mess in a parade, then reach the museum where they meet the curator lady and get jobs posing in exhibits. The End. Anything else involving a circus, an evil crow man, kids, or whatever else is in that movie is new. I mean to be fair, it's a picture book, so it's not like the filmmakers had 80 minutes of material to work with. And now that I do a brief GIS I notice that the character designs in the movie are really ugly in comparison. Maybe it's nostalgia talking.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Andorra posted:

It's been a very, very long time since I've read or seen either, but as I recall the entirety of the book is an alien dinosaur gives the group of dinosaurs smart pills, warps them to the present, the dinosaurs make a mess in a parade, then reach the museum where they meet the curator lady and get jobs posing in exhibits. The End. Anything else involving a circus, an evil crow man, kids, or whatever else is in that movie is new. I mean to be fair, it's a picture book, so it's not like the filmmakers had 80 minutes of material to work with. And now that I do a brief GIS I notice that the character designs in the movie are really ugly in comparison. Maybe it's nostalgia talking.

A lot of kids movies from the 80s and 90s based on short books get really, really weird like that. Actually modern ones too.

I suppose otherwise they'd be really, really short. I remember a The Little Engine That Could animated movie I loved as a kid and rewatching it on YouTube I'm surprised to see it's 30 minutes long and finishing it it's like 'Huh, that's really all there was to it'. I suppose it's not a big problem given it's beautifully animated and presented.

Aces High
Mar 26, 2010

Nah! A little chocolate will do




that's the one with Kath Soucie voicing the little engine? I had that on VHS as a kid, I watched that so many times. Not only is the animation amazing the music is top notch as well, and the song is catchy.

Even though it's only like 25-30 minutes long I always liked how it didn't feel too short or like it dragged along, it was so tightly scripted that it felt just as long as it needed to be

doomrider7
Nov 29, 2018

Ghost Leviathan posted:

A lot of kids movies from the 80s and 90s based on short books get really, really weird like that. Actually modern ones too.

I suppose otherwise they'd be really, really short. I remember a The Little Engine That Could animated movie I loved as a kid and rewatching it on YouTube I'm surprised to see it's 30 minutes long and finishing it it's like 'Huh, that's really all there was to it'. I suppose it's not a big problem given it's beautifully animated and presented.

I remember reading that they added a bunch of stuff to James and the Giant Peach like the fight vs the fish head ship and a few other things. God I love that movie.

Kart Barfunkel
Nov 10, 2009


doomrider7 posted:

I remember reading that they added a bunch of stuff to James and the Giant Peach like the fight vs the fish head ship and a few other things. God I love that movie.

Yeah all the underwater stuff essentially replaced a similar sequence in the book where they’re dealing with a group of cloud people instead. I think the change works.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
Did they have Roald Dahl advising on that? Funny thing, he apparently wrote You Only Live Twice.

doomrider7
Nov 29, 2018

Ghost Leviathan posted:

Did they have Roald Dahl advising on that? Funny thing, he apparently wrote You Only Live Twice.

The screenplay I believe. He worked on whichever Bond flick had the volcano lair in it.

doomrider7
Nov 29, 2018

Kart Barfunkel posted:

Yeah all the underwater stuff essentially replaced a similar sequence in the book where they’re dealing with a group of cloud people instead. I think the change works.

Yeah I loved that pirate fight and the skeleton cameos.

Andorra
Dec 12, 2012

doomrider7 posted:

The screenplay I believe. He worked on whichever Bond flick had the volcano lair in it.

An unfortunate thing about the screenplay for You Only Live Twice is that the producers didn't allow him much freedom to write. It had to follow a formula. I wonder what he would have done otherwise.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
And on the other hand, Ian Fleming wrote Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Andorra posted:

An unfortunate thing about the screenplay for You Only Live Twice is that the producers didn't allow him much freedom to write. It had to follow a formula. I wonder what he would have done otherwise.

That makes you wander what the point of having him on board was.

James and the Giant Peach was loving terrifying and makes New York sound incredible.

nankeen
Mar 20, 2019

by Cyrano4747
e: mod removed by poster request

Somebody fucked around with this message at 02:29 on Aug 14, 2021

Inspector Gesicht
Oct 26, 2012

500 Zeus a body.


Bond movies have never been bastions of cultural sensitivity but still, I have to wonder whose idea it was for Bond to disguise himself as a Japanese man.

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




Inspector Gesicht posted:

I have to wonder whose idea it was for Bond to disguise himself as a Japanese man.

Ian Fleming.

Robindaybird
Aug 21, 2007

Neat. Sweet. Petite.

Alhazred posted:

Ian Fleming.

yeah Fleming is... really dire. I actually read Casino Royale as at the time there was no legit adaptation (loose as they tend to be - there was only that "comedy" trainwreck) of it, and lord.

There was a line in it about how homosexuals can't whistle (????).

Looper
Mar 1, 2012
bond the book makes bond the movie look downright progressive

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
Bond has always been basically middle class white guy wish fulfilment, with all the misogynistic, reactionary and generally bigoted overtones that implies. (And while I say white guy, the Bond formula has been translated to different cultures and is otherwise intact)

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

Ghost Leviathan posted:

(And while I say white guy, the Bond formula has been translated to different cultures and is otherwise intact)

That's kind of surprising, since nostalgia for imperialism- the idea of still being able to use the world as your playground- really seems like a key component of the the fantasy.

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

General Dog posted:

That's kind of surprising, since nostalgia for imperialism- the idea of still being able to use the world as your playground- really seems like a key component of the the fantasy.

There are colonizers and then there are temporarily inconvenienced colonizers.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
The I wanna say second or third Bond book is like, insanely racist. Like holy poo poo racist

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

doomrider7
Nov 29, 2018

Looper posted:

bond the book makes bond the movie look downright progressive

Wasn't there a part in Goldfinger book where he cured a womans lesbianism by basically raping her?


Ghost Leviathan posted:

Bond has always been basically middle class white guy wish fulfilment, with all the misogynistic, reactionary and generally bigoted overtones that implies. (And while I say white guy, the Bond formula has been translated to different cultures and is otherwise intact)

I remember someone saying similar stuff about Taken and 24.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply