|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 02:01 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:31 |
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 19:03 |
|
this was an emotional rollercoaster
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 19:10 |
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 20:38 |
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 20:39 |
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 20:43 |
|
lmao
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 20:46 |
|
I like this one a lot but uhh it should say Danny Devito instead of Frank Reynolds since the original line used Tom Bosley, which is the name of the actor and not the character he played (Howard Cunningham), because Homer thinking Tom Bosley the actor was his dad is the funniest part of the gag
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:12 |
|
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:17 |
|
why are they eating chalk for snacks??
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:19 |
|
drat horror queefs posted:I like this one a lot but uhh it should say Danny Devito instead of Frank Reynolds since the original line used Tom Bosley, which is the name of the actor and not the character he played (Howard Cunningham), because Homer thinking Tom Bosley the actor was his dad is the funniest part of the gag let me ask you a question: why would a man who's av says "why bother" spend all his time posting in a childrens cartoon show thread?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:21 |
|
"It could not be more simple, Shinji. Do you want me to show this to the penguin and have the penguin tell you what it is? 'cause the penguin's going to get it."
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:21 |
|
This is amazing, but I hate it because the rhythm would imply that the author believes meme has two syllables.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:24 |
|
"It's dignity Shinji! DIGNITY! Something that you lack!"
|
# ? Aug 1, 2019 21:28 |
|
PittTheElder posted:This is amazing, but I hate it because the rhythm would imply that the author believes meme has two syllables. It's pronounced meme!
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 04:03 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:It's pronounced meme!
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 04:13 |
|
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 04:24 |
|
lol
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 04:54 |
|
LOVE LOVE SKELETON posted:why are they eating chalk for snacks?? Best not to ask questions like that; the answers will frighten and confuse you. [your signature is being processed. check the notification bar for updates]
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 07:36 |
|
"It's one, Lorraine! Why don't you get it?" Please don't discuss this.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 10:03 |
|
LOVE LOVE SKELETON posted:why are they eating chalk for snacks?? What else are they going to do with all that leftover chalk after switching to a white board?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 12:23 |
|
LOVE LOVE SKELETON posted:why are they eating chalk for snacks?? You baka. You absolute gaijin. I'm not actually sure what those words mean.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 12:26 |
|
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 12:37 |
|
AstroWhale posted:
RDRR?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 12:43 |
|
Dankmus is streaming putting together his next masterpiece right now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dc-9FL1M48
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 14:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/MemesSurreal/status/1157297727933472768ZX Speculum posted:Dankmus is streaming putting together his next masterpiece right now Watching it come together is surprisingly interesting.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 15:46 |
|
AstroWhale posted:
the equation is deliberately written ambiguously and either answer is correct.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:28 |
|
Sagebrush posted:the equation is deliberately written ambiguously and either answer is correct. no it isn't, what the hell ambiguity are you seeing?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:38 |
|
there was no ambiguity in "please don't discuss this" there is also no ambiguity in please don't loving discuss this. please don't loving discuss this.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:41 |
|
RDRR
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:43 |
|
Phantasium posted:there was no ambiguity in "please don't discuss this"
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:50 |
|
Well maybe Astrowhale shouldn't have posted it then
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:52 |
|
bring back old gbs posted:let me ask you a question: why would a man who's av says "why bother" spend all his time posting in a childrens cartoon show thread? I... withdraw my question e: I was actually very close to writing at the end of my last post something to the effect of, "are we to believe this is some sort of magic meme panel" so I'm glad someone brought it back damn horror queefs fucked around with this message at 16:59 on Aug 2, 2019 |
# ? Aug 2, 2019 16:55 |
|
the real answer is the dignity we lost along the way
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:15 |
|
Dabir posted:no it isn't, what the hell ambiguity are you seeing? The ambiguity arises because mathematics doesn't specify an explicit preference to multiplication and division operations, and because they used obelus (÷) notation in a deliberate attempt to make it unclear which portions of the equation are in the numerator and denominator. Added to this is that different areas of the world use conflicting acronyms to teach order of operations, so that people on the 'gram can have lots of boring arguments about which is 'correct'. So the answer is "probably 1, but maybe 16; either way you should get better at writing equations." In conclusion, RDRR is a land of contrasts.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:25 |
|
PittTheElder posted:The ambiguity arises because mathematics doesn't specify an explicit preference to multiplication and division operations, and because they used obelus (÷) notation in a deliberate attempt to make it unclear which portions of the equation are in the numerator and denominator. Added to this is that different areas of the world use conflicting acronyms to teach order of operations, so that people on the 'gram can have lots of boring arguments about which is 'correct'. So the answer is "probably 1, but maybe 16; either way you should get better at writing equations." Well, that wasn't so bad a discussion at all.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:29 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:Well, that wasn't so bad a discussion at all. Yeah, I'm with Boggs now.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:32 |
|
There is no preferential order between multiplication and division. When there is no preferential ordering, you go left to right.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:38 |
|
This has been a real eye opener. I didn't have a question in my mind that the answer was 1. But now, there is room in my heart for both answers, and further-Trabant posted:Yeah, I'm with Boggs now. LORD! PALMERSTON!
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 17:38 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:31 |
|
Most of these I've posted here, but there's at least one new one. https://youtu.be/QmjmOVrol60
|
# ? Aug 2, 2019 22:11 |