|
I feel like I've been cheated out of a story about turnip subsidies now.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 22:07 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 10:22 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:Yeah a ton of stuff for the military is made with prison labour. Uniforms and so on. My second thought was the fact that one time I talked about a racist terrorist bomber who was targeting black people in Austin on Facebook and my mom, a proud democrat, popped up to lecture me about how my generation "makes everything about race," carrying water for a literal terrorist bomber because saying anything has a racial component to it makes white boomers bend over backwards to excuse the actions of even literal, actual murderous terrorists the moment they're made to think about race even a little bit and I remembered that I was nearing middle age when I accepted this fact and was thus part of the problem.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2019 03:11 |
|
i imagine that in order to keep John and the writers from killing themselves after dealing with so many depressing stories, you have to do a goofy one to keep it light and oh man was this goofy I really did not expect the last 5 minutes to completely body the Guinness Book of World Records, but i bet their PR people are going to have a very bad week defending their work with autocrats
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 05:25 |
|
Yeah ... that horse is dead now. It's definitely not alive and well.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 12:13 |
|
Fire 🔥 One of the best episodes this year I think, when it's just such an odd topic without serious ramifications for Americans they can just get way more creative than usual. And in a poorly-thought-out response, Guinness is of course .. doubling down: https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2019/8/guinness-world-records-on-last-week-tonight-with-john-oliver-586398/
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 12:59 |
|
webmeister posted:And in a poorly-thought-out response, Guinness is of course .. doubling down: quote:We were disappointed to see the false and unfair allegations about Guinness World Records in Sunday’s episode of ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.’
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 13:21 |
|
I know for a fact that they definitely charge for records. My company was in talks with them about a record during a promotion we ran and one of our sister properties went fully in on one. It was $20k for the record and another $20k every two years to maintain it.
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 16:44 |
mcbexx posted:Yeah ... that horse is dead now. It's definitely not alive and well. Then how could it be doing donuts besides a fiery crater?
|
|
# ? Aug 12, 2019 16:56 |
|
Tiggum posted:Interesting that they don't say which allegations were false. Which part of what was said could they even plausibly deny? They didn't say specifically which allegations were false because obviously none of it is false. And yes, paying for certification has been their business model for at least 20 years, really since the dawn of the internet meant that their books weren't lucrative anymore. So now we get records like: Most Recent Test of a Nuclear Bomb, awarded to ... well, North Korea, obviously. It's kind of sad and also loving hilarious that among all those self-important N Korean military folk watching their latest bomb test, there's probably an official certifier from Guinness WR wondering how their life ended up like this.
|
# ? Aug 13, 2019 00:48 |
Makes total sense when you think about the huge loving tools that break Guinness records.
|
|
# ? Aug 13, 2019 02:15 |
|
It's one of those things where if you've got all the money and power of a small country in your hands, of course you're going to spend it on worthlessly frivolous things, especially if you think it makes you look cool and solidifies your public image. Which is also the same reason why Wayne LaPierre wastes NRA money. The NRA is just supposed to make money off of an industry of blood and frivolous spending is the main purpose for accumulating all that money. And I feel like it's worth mentioning whenever the NRA and gun control come up that the current interpretation of the second amendment was literally fabricated out of thin air. It didn't mean any of what it does now back before the 90s.
|
# ? Aug 13, 2019 03:41 |
|
Invalid Validation posted:Makes total sense when you think about the huge loving tools that break Guinness records. Would you say they were... the world's biggest tools??
|
# ? Aug 13, 2019 03:42 |
|
I appreciated the Belle and Sebastian nod.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2019 04:45 |
|
The Behind The Bastards two hander on Turkmenbashi is fantastic and an eye opener if you think the current guy is a loon.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2019 13:27 |
|
This might interest those who watched the prison episode a bit back, Bernie's plans to actually do something. https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/cs1wyx/sanders_unveils_plan_to_end_cash_bail_ban_private/ quote:End Profiteering in Our Criminal Justice System Ra Ra Rasputin fucked around with this message at 03:47 on Aug 19, 2019 |
# ? Aug 19, 2019 03:44 |
|
Excellent episode tonight. You'd really hope that the medical field would be the one place in the world where racial and gender biases don't permeate but nope! The joke at the end about bringing a white guy is something I've literally seen happening in real-time where a woman's pain wasn't being taken seriously until her husband restated it verbatim to the practitioner.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 06:19 |
|
honestly they could have done an entire 20 minutes on America's atrocious mortality rates during childbirth, especially for non-white mothers. Propublica has done some really excellent work in this area, the numbers are horrible and even when you adjust for money black women in particular are dying at much higher rates than others who are giving birth, due to a lot of the same factors John talked about in this episode. Put another way: literally one of the most famous black women in the whole entire world had serious, potentially fatal complications during childbirth and if Serena loving Williams is still subject to the inherent bias of the medical profession, imagine how much harder it is for a woman who doesn't have her access to literally the best technology.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 06:38 |
|
Ra Ra Rasputin posted:This might interest those who watched the prison episode a bit back, Bernie's plans to actually do something. If you watch this show and aren't voting Bernie I don't even know what to tell you.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 10:44 |
|
Well it's not as if this show ever acknowledges his existence
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 11:12 |
Hakkesshu posted:Well it's not as if this show ever acknowledges his existence Hey John went out of his way to let us know it was mathematically impossible for Bernie to beat Hillary in 2016.
|
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 11:31 |
|
Orange Devil posted:If you watch this show and aren't voting Bernie I don't even know what to tell you. Right now, I see Bernie promising everything to everybody and almost for free (well, we just won't notice the cost, so kind-of for free). That doesn't impress me. He and a couple others are coming off like they'll say anything, no matter how crazy, just to get elected. I know that's always been the case in politics, but now it doesn't even seem slightly realistic. They're doing what Trump did, except with real problems instead of imagined ones. But it's still "elect me and I'll make all the bad go away, it's so simple!", and how anyone is falling for it is beyond me. And also, well, maybe Hillary wasn't the right woman for the job. But does that mean we seriously need to consider only super-old white guys? Can we seriously not get some diversity here?
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 15:49 |
|
Orange Devil posted:If you watch this show and aren't voting Bernie I don't even know what to tell you. Or there’s Liz Warren who seems to make the most sense. But to be honest, I’ll vote for any Dem who becomes the candidate. I suggest you do, too.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 15:53 |
|
tarlibone posted:Right now, I see Bernie promising everything to everybody and almost for free MAGIC MONEY TREE He'll tax the rich, it's not rocket science CaveGrinch posted:But to be honest, I’ll vote for any Dem who becomes the candidate. I suggest you do, too. And this is why the Dems keep nominating a bunch of lovely neolibs Rarity fucked around with this message at 16:30 on Aug 19, 2019 |
# ? Aug 19, 2019 16:27 |
|
CaveGrinch posted:Or there’s Liz Warren who seems to make the most sense. literally every one of liz's plans is 'what if bernie, but worse', from her medical plan with an absurdly high cap for what patients pay to her weird 'no child left behind, but hospitals too' reform idea, to her tax plan. She has no actual better ideas.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 16:33 |
|
Rarity posted:MAGIC MONEY TREE It actually is as complicated as rocket science, and your statement is why people who actually are informed about some of the issues don't get how people can hear Bernie speak and not get even a tiny bit skeptical about his plans' feasibility. Paying for the plan isn't the only thing to consider, and I don't get how his fans don't see this. (And that assumes that his plan for paying for it would suffice.) ((And that assumes that taxing the rich is something the President would be able to push through the House and Senate.)) Additionally, the unintended consequences of just, say, Medicare For All could easily be disastrous to the economy if done in the hamfisted way that Bernie is suggesting. I happen to have quite a lot of inside knowledge about Medicare, the CMS, and private health insurance. Medicare only works at all right now because it is the primary payer for a small (but growing) portion of the population. It was designed to work within a profit-based system to keep a small minority of people from being devastated by the high cost of hospital bills. As such, it's largely non-managed (you don't need a PCP), and it exists to pay the bills, whatever they are. Asterisk. HUGE ASTERISK on that one. But I'm not going to get into it because I'm not sure if you'd believe me if I told you how much Medicare paid on things. It's one of the reasons why there are a lot of doctors who totally opt-out of accepting Medicare as a payer. Bernie is offering ultra-simple solutions to extremely complicated problems, and he even presents the problems as really simple. And, his solutions have little hope of getting through Congress, and probably passing some judicial reviews. And mind you, he is fully aware of all of this. It's intellectually dishonest and blatantly so; if you choose to believe it, be my guest. I'll only vote for him if he's the guy running against Trump.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 18:41 |
|
tarlibone posted:Better Things Aren't Possible Doctors can afford to opt out of Medicare when they have enough patients with non-Medicare insurance/enough cash to pay them the rates they desire. When the vast majority of potential patients are MfA and the options are getting paid the Medicare amount and getting paid $0 by not treating that patient, guess which one they'll pick? tarlibone posted:I'll only vote for him if he's the guy running against Trump.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 19:10 |
Skippy McPants posted:Excellent episode tonight. You'd really hope that the medical field would be the one place in the world where racial and gender biases don't permeate but nope! The joke at the end about bringing a white guy is something I've literally seen happening in real-time where a woman's pain wasn't being taken seriously until her husband restated it verbatim to the practitioner. It's just loving horrifying that medicine in some areas hasn't evolved since antiquity.
|
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 20:22 |
|
Rarity posted:And this is why the Dems keep nominating a bunch of lovely neolibs You don't put Trump in the white house for spite because you didn't fall in love with a centrist.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 20:59 |
LividLiquid posted:You don't put Trump in the white house for spite because you didn't fall in love with a centrist. Yeah when's that ever happened.
|
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:13 |
|
I mean... that's exactly my point?
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:18 |
|
you mean the time Sanders voters went with Hillary in way better numbers than hers did with Obama?
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:46 |
"Vote Blue No Matter Who" completely ignores the political reality of most people, including moderates. It's the losing strategy the dems have kept trying since 2000. It wasn't Bernie Bros or misogyny or the electoral college that lost 2016, it was Hillary thinking she was the default choice.
|
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:50 |
|
tarlibone posted:Right now, I see Bernie promising everything to everybody and almost for free (well, we just won't notice the cost, so kind-of for free). That doesn't impress me. He and a couple others are coming off like they'll say anything, no matter how crazy, just to get elected. I know that's always been the case in politics, but now it doesn't even seem slightly realistic. They're doing what Trump did, except with real problems instead of imagined ones. But it's still "elect me and I'll make all the bad go away, it's so simple!", and how anyone is falling for it is beyond me. Hahahahahahhhahahahhahahhahahahahahahahaahhaahahahhahahahahahahahahhah Source your quotes.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:53 |
|
'I don't get it, we ran someone who was as disliked as trump, who refused to go to loving wisconson as part of some crazy mind game, who spent most of the campaign preaching to the choir that trump was a meanie and that better things can't happen, and felt so entitled to a win she spent more time trying to rack up the score in California or thinking Texas will turn blue in her massive wake than she spent in the 'blue wall'...and she lost?' 'fuckin bernie bros am I right guys?'
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 21:55 |
|
Also remember that there was a concerted Russian effort to affect votes in the swing states that won the election for Trump. You can't chalk it up to some electoral masterstroke when the election was won by 40,000 votes in ~12 rural districts when even the government now admits that the Russians had the ability to alter votes in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign shared their voter data and strategy with the Russians who had house-by-house detail on voters from Cambridge Analytica/Facebook.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 22:06 |
|
tarlibone posted:And also, well, maybe Hillary wasn't the right woman for the job. But does that mean we seriously need to consider only super-old white guys? Can we seriously not get some diversity here? Haha, I just spotted this bit. Electing a woman/BAME/LGBTQ+ candidate doesn't mean poo poo if they're just going to reinforce the systemic prejudices that discriminate against minorities throughout society.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 22:16 |
|
tarlibone posted:I'm a gigantic stupid loving rear end in a top hat!
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 22:34 |
|
'Doing good things would never pass through Congress' *somehow the person suggesting the good things is bad for not making his solutions complicated enough*
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 22:39 |
|
Toxic Fart Syndrome posted:Also remember that there was a concerted Russian effort to affect votes in the swing states that won the election for Trump. You can't chalk it up to some electoral masterstroke when the election was won by 40,000 votes in ~12 rural districts when even the government now admits that the Russians had the ability to alter votes in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign shared their voter data and strategy with the Russians who had house-by-house detail on voters from Cambridge Analytica/Facebook. I mean, at the end of the day the Russian effort was dumb facebook poo poo that was actually kinda small potatoes, there were no votes changed. We have that happen a lot in elections, most candidates are good enough to handle that but Hillary's campaign was so anemic that yea some dipshits in Russia spamming "HILLARY MURDERS BALD EAGLE FOR SEXUAL PLEASURE?????" stories hurt her.
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 22:45 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 10:22 |
|
tarlibone posted:But it's still "elect me and I'll make all the bad go away, it's so simple!", and how anyone is falling for it is beyond me. Maybe you missed the part where Bernie said electing him is not enough. I can understand if you hear Bernie talking about real solutions to real problems and your brain shuts off because you are accustomed to shitlib rhetoric. What do you think he could do to keep your attention better such that he may actually reach people like you?
|
# ? Aug 19, 2019 23:56 |