Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tollymain
Jul 9, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

420 Gank Mid posted:

Finally an interventionist willing to come to a reasonable compromise

im down

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Pacho posted:

I think we have different concepts of "pressure". What I meant is pressuring the Maduro goverment into giving up, call elections or just plain abandoning Venezuela and having regional and global groups observe new fairer elections and the reconstruction of the country, because the opposition in Venezuela is too weak. I believe other countries in the region have the power to enact pressure this way because they are neighbours and peers Venezuela has to deal with for trade, diplomacy, assistance, etc. I don't believe US sanctions and the spectre of military intervention help in this regard because they just pressure Maduro and the military heads into being more entrenched, as they see no way out

I guess they should have been a little more persuasive, right? They let the situation get real ugly.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

BigFactory posted:

International pressure is stronger than US pressure, especially since he’s been negotiating with UN member states who signed on to proposed resolutions.

Do you oppose free and fair elections in Venezuela?

No. I just don't see how soft political measure from a governing body that has never actually had leverage to do anything would change things on the ground. China and Russia aren't what's keeping Maduro in place.

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

No. I just don't see how soft political measure from a governing body that has never actually had leverage to do anything would change things on the ground. China and Russia aren't what's keeping Maduro in place.

But they are actively preventing the UN from stepping in.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

BigFactory posted:

But they are actively preventing the UN from stepping in.

Ah, so the China and Russia are standing in the way of the UN authorizing international intervention, not in the way of the Venezuelan people.

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Ah, so the China and Russia are standing in the way of the UN authorizing international intervention, not in the way of the Venezuelan people.

Maduro is standing in the way of the Venezuelan people. Well, when he’s not having them murdered.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Ah, so the China and Russia are standing in the way of the UN authorizing international intervention, not in the way of the Venezuelan people.

lol it took 5 or so pages to get him to post his sincere opinion and even then he's doing it in the most oblique way possible
useless shitposting of the highest order

upgunned shitpost
Jan 21, 2015

what happens if maduro and the psuv win the next election? or are they not allowed to run?

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

jfood posted:

what happens if maduro and the psuv win the next election? or are they not allowed to run?

psuv & maduro being disqualified appear to be the only conditions team guaido would acknowledge as "free and fair"; they never mention the previously barred candidates were convicted of assassination attempts and armed insurrection, or that fielding no presidential candidate would signal to the national elections department that their party is not active and would require some groundwork to reactivate

fnox
May 19, 2013



Corky Romanovsky posted:

psuv & maduro being disqualified appear to be the only conditions team guaido would acknowledge as "free and fair"; they never mention the previously barred candidates were convicted of assassination attempts and armed insurrection, or that fielding no presidential candidate would signal to the national elections department that their party is not active and would require some groundwork to reactivate

You mean how Leopoldo Lopez was charged over a complete fabrication, one so bad that even the prosecutor who convicted him said was illegal and the result of state coercion after he defected? Or how the CNE changed the terms for the recall referendum twice during procedures? Or how the largest coalition party, the MUD, was forbidden from running due to some bizarre interpretation of the rules over “double militancy” that would also apply to the PSUV? Historical revisionism through omission, a Marxist classic.

In any case, the answer to this is, the PSUV, yes, Maduro, no. The reason why Maduro can’t run is that he’s been tried and charged with a crime already, of corruption from the Odebrecht case, thus disqualifying him from running. The PSUV wouldn’t field him if they wanted to actually win anyway. This is of course contemplating the possibility that he’ll be able to run, when his best case scenario is that he’s exiled to Turkey after leaving the presidency.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010
That seems like the best case scenario to me too. I don’t see any possibility of Maduro leaving Venezuela nor stepping down before his current term is over, and I also don’t believe it’s possible that anyone except a PSUV candidate will win next time. We can only hope it is someone less criminally stupid, although undoubtedly corrupt. At least someone clever and corrupt will probably at least try to keep the lights on and people fed, though. Then maybe gradually in a generation things can get better. I mean, it’s happened to countries like Panama and Lebanon, so maybe Venezuela will be okay in 20 years too. I no longer think there’s any other chance though for something faster that is also good; that chance was lost back when the AN was declared invalid.

Tollymain
Jul 9, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
you guys sure are investing a lot of energy and words to try make genocide sound easier

fnox
May 19, 2013



Tollymain posted:

you guys sure are investing a lot of energy and words to try make genocide sound easier

The thousands murdered by Maduro don’t count?

Tollymain
Jul 9, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
lmao

Tollymain
Jul 9, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
the primary source of violence and lack of food in venezuela is the bougie bitches chavez failed to execute

Tollymain
Jul 9, 2010

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
so probably like, your dad or something

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
I guess fnox is fine with sanctions and embargos starving Venezuelans since it's international pressure

fnox
May 19, 2013



Jose posted:

I guess fnox is fine with sanctions and embargos starving Venezuelans since it's international pressure

You’re fine with Maduro literally killing, torturing, arresting thousands, displacing and starving millions. You don’t have the moral high ground dude. You don’t give two fucks about starving Venezuelans, much like you didn’t give a gently caress about the people starving before 2017.

Zidrooner
Jul 20, 2006

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

fnox posted:

You’re fine with Maduro literally killing, torturing, arresting thousands, displacing and starving millions. You don’t have the moral high ground dude. You don’t give two fucks about starving Venezuelans, much like you didn’t give a gently caress about the people starving before 2017.

Every single time you deflect with this poo poo. Oh you're against the embargo? Guess that means you are fine with Maduro killing thousands. It's the same poo poo we saw with Iraq. Oh you're against the invasion? Guess that means you're fine with Saddam killing thousands. Maybe people are simply against making things worse fnox

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Zidrooner posted:

Every single time you deflect with this poo poo. Oh you're against the embargo? Guess that means you are fine with Maduro killing thousands. It's the same poo poo we saw with Iraq. Oh you're against the invasion? Guess that means you're fine with Saddam killing thousands. Maybe people are simply against making things worse fnox

Fnox is against the embargo.

fnox
May 19, 2013



BigFactory posted:

The US sanctions convinced Maduro to stop turning away humanitarian aid at the border.

This is a heavily understated part of that entire fiasco. The only reason there was controversy over the aid trucks is that Maduro very literally closed the border with Colombia to prevent them from getting in. The man was mobilizing police to prevent aid from entering a country under starvation. The first time he allowed Red Cross aid to enter the country was 2 months after that. The Red Cross previously could only operate in the missions they had in the country before the crisis, or at the Colombian border attending refugees.

Elias_Maluco posted:

You appears to be under the impression that we can actually do anything about it

With that attitude you sure as gently caress can’t. Start small? Find a Venezuelan you can help, ask them about their situation and what you can do to help them. It may be too small to make a big difference but at the very least you won’t be hopelessly standing aside.

fnox fucked around with this message at 12:26 on Aug 16, 2019

Elias_Maluco
Aug 23, 2007
I need to sleep
You appears to be under the impression that we can actually do anything about it

Zidrooner
Jul 20, 2006

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
I would be happy to support an action that puts a stop to Maduro's crimes that doesn't end up hurting the Venezuelan people more. I don't know what that would look like but you admit you don't either. There are however actions being taken right now by the US though that ARE inflicting additional harm on Venezuelans and I think it's useful to voice opposition against such things. Bad action is in fact worse than inaction

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Zidrooner posted:

I would be happy to support an action that puts a stop to Maduro's crimes that doesn't end up hurting the Venezuelan people more. I don't know what that would look like but you admit you don't either. There are however actions being taken right now by the US though that ARE inflicting additional harm on Venezuelans and I think it's useful to voice opposition against such things. Bad action is in fact worse than inaction

The US sanctions convinced Maduro to stop turning away humanitarian aid at the border.

Zidrooner
Jul 20, 2006

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

BigFactory posted:

The US sanctions convinced Maduro to stop turning away humanitarian aid at the border.

Unless that aid provides more benefit than the deprivation brought on by the sanctions then that's a net negative

fnox
May 19, 2013



Zidrooner posted:

Unless that aid provides more benefit than the deprivation brought on by the sanctions then that's a net negative

No food + US food = negative food?

Why was Maduro blocking aid from the Red Cross until only 2 months after the truck fiasco? Why were they forced for years to only operate in the Colombian border attending refugees? Does that sound correct to you? If the country is starving why is he blocking international aid?

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Zidrooner posted:

Unless that aid provides more benefit than the deprivation brought on by the sanctions then that's a net negative

Yup it probably does.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

fnox posted:

With that attitude you sure as gently caress can’t. Start small? Find a Venezuelan you can help, ask them about their situation and what you can do to help them. It may be too small to make a big difference but at the very least you won’t be hopelessly standing aside.
An insane position.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

fnox posted:

No food + US food = negative food?

Why was Maduro blocking aid from the Red Cross until only 2 months after the truck fiasco? Why were they forced for years to only operate in the Colombian border attending refugees? Does that sound correct to you? If the country is starving why is he blocking international aid?

Perhaps he suspected that the trucks may have been carrying arms for para militaries. Like the US has organized, many times before. Perhaps if the US had not established itself as completely untrustworthy for 40 years their involvement wouldn't immediately put a regime into a siege mentality. Perhaps if they stopped organizing assassination attempts that would also help.

Why did the Columbian forces set fire to the trucks, pray tell? Just out of frustration with Maduro not letting them in?

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

BigFactory posted:

Yup it probably does.

Sure buddy

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Perhaps he suspected that the trucks may have been carrying arms for para militaries. Like the US has organized, many times before. Perhaps if the US had not established itself as completely untrustworthy for 40 years their involvement wouldn't immediately put a regime into a siege mentality. Perhaps if they stopped organizing assassination attempts that would also help.


So you’re saying maduro is paranoid because he’s been starving and murdering Venezuelans for half a decade and fears retribution?

fnox
May 19, 2013



Ron Paul Atreides posted:

An insane position.

Yup complete insanity. Couldn’t possibly work. It’s not like that’s how I left the country.

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Perhaps he suspected that the trucks may have been carrying arms for para militaries. Like the US has organized, many times before. Perhaps if the US had not established itself as completely untrustworthy for 40 years their involvement wouldn't immediately put a regime into a siege mentality. Perhaps if they stopped organizing assassination attempts that would also help.

Why did the Columbian forces set fire to the trucks, pray tell? Just out of frustration with Maduro not letting them in?

Now it’s Colombian forces who burned the trucks? That’s some telephone game going on. If there were weapons in the trucks why the gently caress would they burn them?

Also, how hard can it possibly be to, you know, unload just the food from the trucks, and then turn the trucks back if the concern is that they’re gonna sneak in weapons? This whole idea of the trucks having anything but food is contradicted by the trucks that DID make it through, and had, who would’ve guess, food aid in them!

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

BigFactory posted:

So you’re saying maduro is paranoid because he’s been starving and murdering Venezuelans for half a decade and fears retribution?

I'm saying they've been paranoid since multiples attempts at assassination dating back to Chavez. I'm saying that the way to fix this was the US not being a belligerent rear end in a top hat since Reagan. I'm saying sometimes there is nothing that can be done to help by outside forces that would not immediately worsen things.

Honestly though I don't have time right now to go into exactly how I think I would hope things proceed to resolve this, but the main point is that it cannot be resolved with an F35 flyover. Any direct military involvement from any other state will create a civil war that will kill hundreds of thousands more and leave the country in ruins, likely not to recover for generations

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

fnox posted:

Yup complete insanity. Couldn’t possibly work. It’s not like that’s how I left the country.


Now it’s Colombian forces who burned the trucks? That’s some telephone game going on. If there were weapons in the trucks why the gently caress would they burn them?

Also, how hard can it possibly be to, you know, unload just the food from the trucks, and then turn the trucks back if the concern is that they’re gonna sneak in weapons? This whole idea of the trucks having anything but food is contradicted by the trucks that DID make it through, and had, who would’ve guess, food aid in them!

The reports I've seen are that it was not Maduro forces that burned the trucks, rather it was an attempt to justify the US intervention that was imminent at the time before the insanity that is the Trump admin decided to not bother.

I'm also skeptical that any foreign aide being offered is being okay'd to be distributed by the government forces, rather that there is insistence on bringing it in with NGO personnel, but I'll admit I don't know if that's the case. It's certainly been true in other circumstances.

Ron Paul Atreides fucked around with this message at 13:47 on Aug 16, 2019

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


BigFactory posted:

Fnox is against the embargo.

right he wants "international pressure" but rejects any actual proposed or enacted measure that can be shown to have concrete negative effects, that way he gets to shout about how The Left is keeping Venezuela down while also low-key advocating for increased pain

fnox
May 19, 2013



brugroffil posted:

right he wants "international pressure" but rejects any actual proposed or enacted measure that can be shown to have concrete negative effects, that way he gets to shout about how The Left is keeping Venezuela down while also low-key advocating for increased pain

Such as?

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

The reports I've seen are that it was not Maduro forces that burned the trucks, rather it was an attempt to justify the US intervention that was imminent at the time before the insanity that is the Trump admin decided to not bother.

I'm also skeptical that any foreign aide being offered is being okay'd to be distributed by the government forces, rather that there is insistence on bringing it in with NGO personnel, but I'll admit I don't know if that's the case. It's certainly been true in other circumstances.

It is ridiculous to assume that an US intervention was imminent even if you believe the trucks were intentionally burned. The reason why it was a lose/lose for Maduro is because he was stubbornly blocking aid and until then denying there was any sort of humanitarian crisis. It’s after that whole thing that he was forced to accept aid because of how ridiculous of a concept it is to send the loving military to block a truck with food when your country is starving.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

fnox posted:

Such as?


It is ridiculous to assume that an US intervention was imminent even if you believe the trucks were intentionally burned. The reason why it was a lose/lose for Maduro is because he was stubbornly blocking aid and until then denying there was any sort of humanitarian crisis. It’s after that whole thing that he was forced to accept aid because of how ridiculous of a concept it is to send the loving military to block a truck with food when your country is starving.

US intervention was imminent. Bolton had plans to deploy troops. They are not behaving rationally and that is contributing to the insanity of the situation.

Elias_Maluco
Aug 23, 2007
I need to sleep

fnox posted:

With that attitude you sure as gently caress can’t. Start small? Find a Venezuelan you can help, ask them about their situation and what you can do to help them. It may be too small to make a big difference but at the very least you won’t be hopelessly standing aside.


Well Im not doing so well myself to be able to help with money, nor I live anywhere near where refugees are living, so I dunno what I could offer. Also helping venezuelans is cool and good, but that alone wont do anything to bring down Maduro

Im prepared to protest on the streets if my fascist prez Bolsonaro decides to intervene along with Trump (like they threatened to do), or if they decide to expel the refugees from Brazil, other than that I dont know how could I have any influence

I get your frustration and I know the situation is dire, but I dont think we (I mean, we the regular people) can really do anything to expel Maduro from power

Noshtane
Nov 22, 2007

The fish itself incites to deeds of hunger

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

US intervention was imminent. Bolton had plans to deploy troops. They are not behaving rationally and that is contributing to the insanity of the situation.

You mean the “5000 troops” scribble that was very much intentionally flashed before the cameras?
Yeah no, there has never been any imminent danger of US attacks on Venezuela. No troop movements, no carriers in the area, no nothing. You could maybe argue that “advisors” where being prepared for an upcoming civil war but since that failed to happen, Trump lost interest in Venezuela other than tightening sanctions to show that he’s sticking it to the commies.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BigFactory
Sep 17, 2002

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Honestly though I don't have time right now to go into exactly how I think I would hope things proceed to resolve this, but the main point is that it cannot be resolved with an F35 flyover. Any direct military involvement from any other state will create a civil war that will kill hundreds of thousands more and leave the country in ruins, likely not to recover for generations

So you probably approve of exhausting non-military options before you get to that completely undesired outcome, right? Like cutting off the ability for top Venezuelan government and military officials to profiteer off the country? Sort of like sanctions?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply