Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
jeeves
May 27, 2001

Deranged Psychopathic
Butler Extraordinaire

CainFortea posted:

There was no series of stopable events to create that disaster tho. It was literally just "we'll save money by doing this wrong gently caress everyone" and that was it.

- Flint
- Bopal
- Literally everything done outside of Soviet sphere of influence
- Oh wait this was done at Chernobyl too as they were literally saving money on this flawed reactor design. It was just more about because the Soviet Union was going broke and less about making shareholders even richer at the expense of everyone else.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


jeeves posted:

- Flint
- Bopal
- Literally everything done outside of Soviet sphere of influence
- Oh wait this was done at Chernobyl too as they were literally saving money on this flawed reactor design. It was just more about because the Soviet Union was going broke and less about making shareholders even richer at the expense of everyone else.

If you think THE ONLY preventable step in chernobyl was "cost savings" you need to rewatch it and pay attention.

Dalael
Oct 14, 2014
Hello. Yep, I still think Atlantis is Bolivia, yep, I'm still a giant idiot, yep, I'm still a huge racist. Some things never change!

CainFortea posted:

If you think THE ONLY preventable step in chernobyl was "cost savings" you need to rewatch it and pay attention.

From what I understood, yes there was a whole series of idiot decisions which led to the catastrophe but, had the USSR not cheapened out on those rods, the panic button would have worked.

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Kemper Boyd posted:

That really wasn't a major fear in the Soviet Union of the eighties. More of a Stalin era thing.
Americans will literally never ever care to comprehend that.

And it's not like the show wasn't trading on those very same stereotypes. The whole cow episode makes absolutely no sense unless the viewer is expected to honestly believe the soldier is about to shoot the old woman.

(Or the made up soldier escorting Sitnikov to view the reactor core at gunpoint).

Stairmaster
Jun 8, 2012

the rods weren't designed that way to save money but to give them greater control over the reaction rate. The real problem was its design as a dual use reactor.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Dalael posted:

From what I understood, yes there was a whole series of idiot decisions which led to the catastrophe but, had the USSR not cheapened out on those rods, the panic button would have worked.

And if Dyatlov had followed safety protocols it also wouldn't have happened. Almost as if, now follow closely here, there were multiple preventable steps.

Trevor Hale
Dec 8, 2008

What have I become, my Swedish friend?

Dalael posted:

I think that people are reading too much into it. It doesn't need to be about anything more than what it is, a docu-drama about a disaster.

What next, Titanic was really about how climate change puts more iceberg in the path of Leonardo Dicaprio's rise to stardom?

Correct. Art is never ever political. Guernica is just some weird picture. Why think more about it?

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
It's possible for the artist to actually just intend a surface-level analysis but for the viewer to take more away from that, too.

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to
Wasn't it mentioned if the reactor had a containment vessel it wouldn't of been as much of a disaster?

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

twistedmentat posted:

Wasn't it mentioned if the reactor had a containment vessel it wouldn't of been as much of a disaster?

It would definitely have been better are easier to get control of. Graphite wouldn't have been flung everywhere and putting out the initial fire would have been easier.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Xander77 posted:

Americans will literally never ever care to comprehend that.

And it's not like the show wasn't trading on those very same stereotypes. The whole cow episode makes absolutely no sense unless the viewer is expected to honestly believe the soldier is about to shoot the old woman.

(Or the made up soldier escorting Sitnikov to view the reactor core at gunpoint).

I just watched Stranger Things season 3 and holy god it's trading in the same comically evil Soviet stereotypes from the 80s, which I know is the show's schtick, but it was like, even worse than I remembered. Square-jawed wrinkly scarred old Soviet general choking out a guy who dares to give him bad news, holding him up off the ground and strangling him and then telling the next guy "You have one year". Darth Vader eat your heart out.

Torture rooms, truth drugs, trading quips about capitalism and marxism, man it was painful and not in a good way.

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro

twistedmentat posted:

Wasn't it mentioned if the reactor had a containment vessel it wouldn't of been as much of a disaster?

Yeah. Chernobyl-like events have happened multiple times in the US, but it never affected anyone who didn’t work in the plants because they had containment vessels.

Also, the lack of containment in Soviet designs was one of many cost-savings measures.

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

Toxic Fart Syndrome posted:

Yeah. Chernobyl-like events have happened multiple times in the US, but it never affected anyone who didn’t work in the plants because they had containment vessels.

Also, the lack of containment in Soviet designs was one of many cost-savings measures.

To be fair, America never had a reactor straight up explode. Did anyone ever assess whether a vessel would have contained the entire explosion?

CeeJee
Dec 4, 2001
Oven Wrangler

Pook Good Mook posted:

To be fair, America never had a reactor straight up explode. Did anyone ever assess whether a vessel would have contained the entire explosion?

The size of an RBMK reactor makes it practically impossible to make a containment vessel strong enough.

Trevor Hale
Dec 8, 2008

What have I become, my Swedish friend?

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

It's possible for the artist to actually just intend a surface-level analysis but for the viewer to take more away from that, too.

He absolutely did not.

NowonSA
Jul 19, 2013

I am the sexiest poster in the world!
The cost saving stupidity involved in Flint really pisses me off, try to pinch some pennies and then you have to spend exponentially more money fixing the mess you made and you get to poison loads of residents as a bonus.

There's just no excuse for that poo poo happening.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Data Graham posted:

I just watched Stranger Things season 3 and holy god it's trading in the same comically evil Soviet stereotypes from the 80s, which I know is the show's schtick, but it was like, even worse than I remembered. Square-jawed wrinkly scarred old Soviet general choking out a guy who dares to give him bad news, holding him up off the ground and strangling him and then telling the next guy "You have one year". Darth Vader eat your heart out.

Torture rooms, truth drugs, trading quips about capitalism and marxism, man it was painful and not in a good way.

I’ve barely watched S2 let alone 3 but the American facility had all those horrible things in S1?

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


NowonSA posted:

The cost saving stupidity involved in Flint really pisses me off, try to pinch some pennies and then you have to spend exponentially more money fixing the mess you made and you get to poison loads of residents as a bonus.

There's just no excuse for that poo poo happening.

Evidence suggests they don't have to pay anything to fix it by just not fixing it.

NowonSA
Jul 19, 2013

I am the sexiest poster in the world!

CainFortea posted:

Evidence suggests they don't have to pay anything to fix it by just not fixing it.

Ugh, there's that side to the whole mess too, yeah. Can't really trust that it's all getting done right. Hard to trust the government that just let you down so significantly. I'm about an hour and change from Flint, but it's still a heck of a blemish on the whole state, from my perspective.

kaesarsosei
Nov 7, 2012

Data Graham posted:

I just watched Stranger Things season 3 and holy god it's trading in the same comically evil Soviet stereotypes from the 80s, which I know is the show's schtick, but it was like, even worse than I remembered. Square-jawed wrinkly scarred old Soviet general choking out a guy who dares to give him bad news, holding him up off the ground and strangling him and then telling the next guy "You have one year". Darth Vader eat your heart out.

Torture rooms, truth drugs, trading quips about capitalism and marxism, man it was painful and not in a good way.

I'm not the biggest ST fanboi, but there's a decent chance this is intentional right.

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.
It's 100% intentional. They've switched from "creepy mystery that happens to take place in the 80's" and are now full on "remember this from the 80's?!?!" So evil Russians and Magnum PI had to sneak in there somewhere.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



And whereas S1 was ET and S2 was Jurassic Park, S3 had a straight-up Terminator

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Data Graham posted:

And whereas S1 was ET and S2 was Jurassic Park, S3 had a straight-up Terminator

I liked how they made him look simultaneously like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Robert Patrick.

But yeah, they started with stereotypical 80s media evil secret American mad science agency and then did a stereotypical 80s media evil secret Soviet mad science agency and it suddenly draws out all the :ussr:

twerking on the railroad
Jun 23, 2007

Get on my level

Toxic Fart Syndrome posted:

Yeah. Chernobyl-like events have happened multiple times in the US

https://mobile.twitter.com/simpsonsqotd/status/481780827597324288

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






https://twitter.com/Mach1ne_4423/status/1162574773970358272?s=09

MarcusSA
Sep 23, 2007


IDGIT

CeeJee
Dec 4, 2001
Oven Wrangler

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core

quote:

On the day of the accident, Slotin's screwdriver slipped outward a fraction of an inch while he was lowering the top reflector, allowing the reflector to fall into place around the core. Instantly there was a flash of blue light and a wave of heat across Slotin's skin; the core had become supercritical, releasing an intense burst of neutron radiation estimated to have lasted about a half second.

ElBrak
Aug 24, 2004

"Muerte, buen compinche. Muerte."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZIjbX1gj88 I think this explains it pretty well.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

twistedmentat posted:

Wasn't it mentioned if the reactor had a containment vessel it wouldn't of been as much of a disaster?

Yes. And depends. Current papers support the idea that the initial explosion was a nuclear fizzle rather than a steam explosion which probably occurred a few seconds later., so basically a nuclear explosion that largely failed, but still provided enough energy to lift the containment lid off it.

Containment would've helped keep the mess in, but most BWR containment systems are designed around massive steam explosions, not encountering a nuclear fizzle (which can't shouldn't happen in a BWR like a RBMK).

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/chernobyl-disaster-mystery-solved/3008327.article

CommieGIR fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Aug 18, 2019

KoRMaK
Jul 31, 2012




i gotta watch the movie cuz i still dont understand why he was using a screw driver and what his loving goal was if not to join the two sides

Bobbin Threadbare
Jan 2, 2009

I'm looking for a flock of urbanmechs.

KoRMaK posted:

i gotta watch the movie cuz i still dont understand why he was using a screw driver and what his loving goal was if not to join the two sides

Well, it sounds like the goal was to bring the core as close to supercritical as possible to test how pure the metals were, and he used a screwdriver because he was a lazy idiot.

hailthefish
Oct 24, 2010

Wikipedia posted:

As the reflectors were manually moved closer and farther away from each other, scintillation counters measured the relative activity from the core. The experimenter needed to maintain a slight separation between the reflector halves in order to stay below criticality. The standard protocol was to use shims between the halves, as allowing them to close completely could result in the instantaneous formation of a critical mass and a lethal power excursion. Under Slotin's own unapproved protocol, the shims were not used and the only thing preventing the closure was the blade of a standard straight screwdriver manipulated in Slotin's other hand. Slotin, who was given to bravado, became the local expert, performing the test on almost a dozen occasions, often in his trademark blue jeans and cowboy boots, in front of a roomful of observers. Enrico Fermi reportedly told Slotin and others they would be "dead within a year" if they continued performing the test in that manner.

Literally he was just lazy and arrogant.

Rip Testes
Jan 29, 2004

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception.
Reminds me of another accident where one of the Los Alamos crew accidentally ingested plutonium.

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/w/welsome-plutonium.html

quote:


 On the day of this particular accident—which would be the most serious of any thus far—it was not the lost plutonium that would be the problem. It was the plutonium in Mastick's vial.

A purplish-color liquid that gave off an eerie, animallike warmth when concentrated in larger amounts, the plutonium in the vial had undergone an unanticipated transformation overnight. Some of the liquid had been converted into gas and was pushing against the walls of the bottle. Other molecules were tunneling into the sides of the glass itself.

Unaware of the small bomb he was holding, Mastick snapped the slender neck of the vial. It made a small, popping sound in the quiet laboratory. Instantly the material spewed out of the bottle and onto the wall in front of him. Some of the solution ricocheted back into his mouth, flooding his lips and tongue with a metallic taste.

Not overly alarmed, Mastick replaced the vial in its wooden container. Then he trotted across the hard-packed ground of the technical area to knock on the door of Dr. Hempelmann's first-aid station. He had just swallowed a significant amount of the world's supply of plutonium. "I could taste the acid so I knew perfectly well I had a little bit of plutonium in my mouth," he said in an interview in 1995.

.....

After the accident, Mastick's breath was so hot that he could stand six feet away and blow the needles on the radiation monitors off scale. His urine contained detectable plutonium for many years. In one of several interviews Mastick said that he was undoubtedly still excreting "a few atoms" of plutonium but had suffered no ill effects.

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to

Rip Testes posted:

Reminds me of another accident where one of the Los Alamos crew accidentally ingested plutonium.

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/w/welsome-plutonium.html

Why did I feel like that story was going to go "and he saw the weird liquid and decided to try drinking it". Like with that Egyptian Sarcophagus and that red liquid.

Chairman Capone
Dec 17, 2008

If you're interested in stories like those (both of which are covered in the book) I would recommend reading The Plutonium Files by Eileen Welsome. Some really hosed-up stories in there, especially when it comes to the government secretly administering plutonium and other radioactive substances to civilians (many either black or mentally-handicapped) without their knowledge in order to see what would happen.

The book also notes how as a result of the 1940s/50s nuclear testing, cancer rates across the entire Midwest dramatically went up, and how the government worked to sweep that under the rug.

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Both the Slotin incident and the Mastick incident are shown in the movie "Fat man and Little Boy", which if not entirely historically accurate, is worth a watch.

Here's the Slotin scene:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh89h8FxNhQ

E: or actually the Mastick incident is not in the movie, I misremembered. Both are in the Manhattan TV show, iirc.

spankmeister fucked around with this message at 06:51 on Aug 19, 2019

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to

spankmeister posted:

Both the Slotin incident and the Mastick incident are shown in the movie "Fat man and Little Boy", which if not entirely historically accurate, is worth a watch.

Here's the Slotin scene:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh89h8FxNhQ

E: or actually the Mastick incident is not in the movie, I misremembered. Both are in the Manhattan TV show, iirc.

Man I love how janky all nuclear stuff was in the early days. Man an HBO show about the Atom and hydrogen bomb development would be cool. It's pure visual but if you can track it down, Trinity and beyond The Atomic Bomb movie is awesome to see the test footage and the lengths they'd go to test out the bombs. You even have Edmund "Oppenhiemer was a Communist because he didn't approve of my giant rear end bombs" Teller as a very old man.


Chairman Capone posted:

The book also notes how as a result of the 1940s/50s nuclear testing, cancer rates across the entire Midwest dramatically went up, and how the government worked to sweep that under the rug.

This is often used as an counter to "smoking causes cancer" because they love to point out the Conquerer was shot on radioactive sand and that's what gave John Wayne lung cancer, not his 40 cigarettes a day.

Trevor Hale
Dec 8, 2008

What have I become, my Swedish friend?

spankmeister posted:

Both the Slotin incident and the Mastick incident are shown in the movie "Fat man and Little Boy", which if not entirely historically accurate, is worth a watch.

Here's the Slotin scene:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh89h8FxNhQ

E: or actually the Mastick incident is not in the movie, I misremembered. Both are in the Manhattan TV show, iirc.

Manhattan was such a great show

mst4k
Apr 18, 2003

budlitemolaram

I watched this entire thing yesterday thinking "meh yeah I remember that I'll see if its any good before bed" and i wound up staying up until 3am so I could watch the entire thing.

There were a few scenes I just could not do but holy poo poo it was good.

How real was the radiation poisoning poo poo?

I did not know it could've been a lot worse than it was..... loving crazy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




karma_coma posted:


How real was the radiation poisoning poo poo?


That really seems to depend on who you ask.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply