|
Who do you wish to win the Democratic primaries? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Biden, the Klansman |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Bernie Sanders, the Hand Flailer |
|
578 | 65.76% |
| Elizabeth Warren, the Plan Maker |
|
185 | 21.05% |
| Kamala Harris, the Cop Lord |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Cory Booker, the Super Hero Wannabe |
|
0 | 0% |
| Julian Castro, the Twin |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Kirsten Gillibrand, the Franken Killer |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Pete Buttigieg, the Troop Sociopath |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Robert Francis O'Rourke, the Fake Latino |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jay Inslee, the Climate Alarmist |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Marianne Williamson, the Crystal Queen |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Andrew Yang, the $1000 Fool |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Tulsi Gabbard, the Muslim Hater |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Amy Klobuchar, the Comb Enthusiast |
|
1 | 0.11% |
| Just like in real life, nobody voted for Hickenlooper |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jeffrey Epstein, the MCC Most Hated |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| KKKillary KKKlinton |
|
16 | 1.82% |
| Some other idiot not in this list |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Total: | 879 votes | ||
|
https://twitter.com/jesawyer/status/1166783987999633410
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 20:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 20:32 |
|
|
goethe.cx posted:Helpful to consider: State horse race polls aren't much better either. Again, outside of Vermont (where it was impossible to outperform polls), Bernie outperformed polls by at least 9 points in every state he won in 2016. Polls tell you who is viable, and a little bit about the demographics of the supporters. Not much beyond that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 20:46
|
|
|
DNC Primary: You are totally correct, Three Pinocchios
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 20:57
|
|
|
literally everything we make fun of trump for
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:Jesus. The slurring, the misidentifying what decades something occurred, and now word recall problems? I'd say he's simply old but Bernie is actually older and I've never seen a single one of these problems from him. That sort of thing is not a natural symptom of getting old (or at least certainly not just in your 70s) unless you have dementia or something. My maternal grandmother is 92 and didn't stop being 100% sharp until developing dementia at ~90. The Glumslinger posted:https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1166779528888377344 "Laying sweet owns on Republicans/right-wingers" is the sort of thing that is only really good when it's part of a broader left-wing ideology. A lot of liberals get tricked into thinking that someone who makes fun of Republicans must share their values, when that often isn't the case.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm not scared of Biden anymore. Some other centrist hack, sure, but I think Diamond Joe is dead on arrival, just like he was in every precious primary run back when he was more coherent.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:00
|
|
|
sean10mm posted:Yeah, I'm not scared of Biden anymore. Some other centrist hack, sure, but I think Diamond Joe is dead on arrival, just like he was in every precious primary run back when he was more coherent. Is everyone on loving crazy pills?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:01
|
|
|
Ytlaya posted:"Laying sweet owns on Republicans/right-wingers" is the sort of thing that is only really good when it's part of a broader left-wing ideology. A lot of liberals get tricked into thinking that someone who makes fun of Republicans must share their values, when that often isn't the case. The bad part of this is that it looks to be specific to that one event. It should be a touch more generalized as a reason to throw Breitbart out by their bowties or lapels as the case may be from all events.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:03
|
|
|
JazzFlight posted:Which is why I'm still so pissed off that just 20 minutes ago on CNN/MSNBC (it was on in the other room) the host said Biden's "wheel out my dead family to say how M4A is bad" ad was one of the best she's seen in her whole career. Liberal pundits talked about being moved to tears by the Hillary dem convention mini-biopic. So, yes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:04
|
|
|
Pander posted:Nobody was making that case though. They were making the case that Beto Did a Good Thing. Beto laid out a very comprehensive breakdown on why omitting Breitbart from a press event was the responsible decision to make, in a way that even the most decorum-y of campaigns can adopt and use themselves. Oh, I didn't meant to imply that the guy I was replying to was saying Beto was good overall, but a lot of liberals (including the younger version of myself) assume that if someone is making accurate attacks against Republicans that they probably have a broader coherent left-wing ideology. But it turns out that it's entirely possible for many Democrats to attack Republicans for right-wing stuff while ignoring or supporting other Democrats doing right-wing stuff. It's a big reason why so many people have positive impressions of folks like Jon Stewart. There's (pretty understandable) tendency to assume that someone attacking your enemy must be your friend.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:21
|
|
|
You, flinching, terrified and small: People were forced to clap for Stalin! In Korea you have to stand and salute the portrait of Dear Leader! These people have no freedom Me, wise and ascendant liberal with tears in my eyes: The greatest moment in my professional career was seeing Joe Biden knowingly lie about his son's medical care and denying such opportunity to the rest of the nation proves he's serious about leading us. These words I'm speaking are non-ideological but if you disagree with me then that is very, very ideological.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:21
|
|
|
They also cried when Trump bombed an empty airfield
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:29
|
|
|
Gillibrand is out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:35
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Gillibrand is out. Yep. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1166826135923167234?s=20
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:36
|
|
|
 oh well not surprised, she's still a v good senator
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:41
|
|
|
I guess people just weren't that interested in women's causes.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:41
|
|
|
How are u posted:I guess people just weren't that interested in women's causes. Yeah. She went after a more powerful and popular male Democrat for abusing women and it cost her dearly.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:48
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:
no she's loving not -sincerely, someone from the congressional district she represented as the bluest blue dog in all of congress
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:49
|
|
|
I'm happy she's gone and never want her in power but I am a little sad for her that so much of the hate she got was about her one good thing of taking Al down and not the multiple regressive policies she loved.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:50
|
|
|
DEEP STATE PLOT posted:no she's loving not Yeah, she's not a good senator, but I would have rather seen her rewarded by voters for taking a stand on Frankin. It seems like that will be her legacy. The question is how does she fare in the next primary. But hey if it means we can get a real progressive in that safe blue seat then it's a win win.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 22:58
|
|
|
DEEP STATE PLOT posted:no she's loving not I'm not sure how much of GreyjoyBastard's fondness for Gillibrand is ironic and how much is genuine. Or maybe it started as irony and gradually became genuine, like those 4chan people who say a bunch of racial slurs "ironically" and end up becoming explicit nazis.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:17
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Yeah, she's not a good senator, but I would have rather seen her rewarded by voters for taking a stand on Frankin. It seems like that will be her legacy. The question is how does she fare in the next primary. TBH, she's the least bad of our two Senators. gently caress Chuck, I wanna see him go.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:22
|
|
|
To this day I won't understand why Gillenbrand gets held in any regard or is given excuses or seen as a symbol when she had her own abuses in her campaign and tried to hide or suppress it rather than deal with it. She tried to jump on MeToo and didn't take it seriously other than a campaign run tactic. If you give Gillenbrand a pass, it means you don't give a crap about women's causes or justice. And why give her a pass for going to Wall Street to be bought and funded when no one gives it to anyone else? There's some serious blinders on Gillenbrand and at this point it's probably misandry or sexism at root.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:23
|
|
|
How are u posted:I guess people just weren't that interested in women's causes. It's not that, it's just not a particularly remarkable stance to take in a crowded Dem field. It's like trying to market yourself as the pro-gun Republican in a GOP primary. People shrug their shoulders, go "okay, what else are you bringing to the table". She's shifted her own position within the overton window a lot in the last 10 years, so she doesn't really have her own base of supporters to lean on. She shouldn't have run for president without figuring out a path to victory, something that describes about 2/3 of the 2020 field.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:27
|
|
|
Now we just have to wait for De Blasio, Delaney, Bennett, Sestak, Bullock, Castro, Booker, Messam, Yang, Gabbard, Biden, and Ryan to drop out so we can finally have a proper primary.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:36
|
|
|
JazzFlight posted:Which is why I'm still so pissed off that just 20 minutes ago on CNN/MSNBC (it was on in the other room) the host said Biden's "wheel out my dead family to say how M4A is bad" ad was one of the best she's seen in her whole career. bernie's "i know where i came from" is legit one of the best campaign ads ever and i don't remember it getting that treatment.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:49
|
|
|
clearly not playing with a full deck 
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:52
|
|
|
Gillibrand's problem is that she somehow managed to get smacked down by dementia Biden at the last debate when she went after him.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2019 23:56
|
|
|
Yeah pollsters like Nate are colluding and this guy admits it. https://twitter.com/JohnAnzo/status/1166729666268454912?s=20
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:09
|
|
|
sexpig by night posted:I'm happy she's gone and never want her in power but I am a little sad for her that so much of the hate she got was about her one good thing of taking Al down and not the multiple regressive policies she loved. Reporters will absolutely ask Franken for comment on her collapse, so his fans can celebrate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:12
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Yeah pollsters like Nate are colluding and this guy admits it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Yeah pollsters like Nate are colluding and this guy admits it. Yeah it is pretty incredible that he'd admit to something so unethical and fundamentally biasing in public like that. Of course the reason he would is because it is common practice.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:22
|
|
|
Pander posted:Nate's not a pollster, dumbass. Sorry about your dad Nate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:23
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Yeah it is pretty incredible that he'd admit to something so unethical and fundamentally biasing in public like that. Of course the reason he would is because it is common practice. No it’s not lmao
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:24
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Sorry about your dad Nate. You don't even understand that you're paying Nate a compliment by insisting he himself is capable of commissioning polls, rather than gathering the work others do and coming up with his own pundit-y conclusions, do you?
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:24
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:No it’s not lmao How many polling organizations have explicitly said they do not throw out data like that? Afaik only Monmouth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
He is a pollster dumbass however
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
Luckyellow posted:Now we just have to wait for De Blasio, Delaney, Bennett, Sestak, Bullock, Castro, Booker, Messam, Yang, Gabbard, Biden, and Ryan to drop out so we can finally have a proper primary.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:26
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:How many polling organizations have explicitly said they do not throw out data like that? Polling firms that did that would be discredited quickly. It's not something they should explicitly need to say. Have any said that they definitely DO do that? Besides the hack.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 20:32 |
|
|
Pander posted:Polling firms that did that would be discredited quickly. It's not something they should explicitly need to say. How would we know? This is a pollster for Obama, the DSCC, DGA, DCCC with glowing media reviews admitting to basically cooking his numbers. quote:John Anzalone has twenty-five years of polling experience helping candidates, associations, and corporations with message development and strategic planning. John has built a firm that helped elect President Barack Obama twice, U.S. Senators and dozens of Congressmen, as well as big city Mayors all over the country. In the last decade, John has helped beat more incumbent Republicans and take back more Republican seats than any other polling firm in the nation. John works regularly with the DSCC, DGA, and DCCC, and the Washington Post called him one of the “hottest” pollsters in the nation. When he doesn't lose any status over this, we should assume it is most common than we think. edit: yeah this polling firm just won pollster of the year https://twitter.com/JohnAnzo/status/1114158042709463041 Trabisnikof fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Aug 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2019 00:34
|
|