|
Oof https://twitter.com/TomTaylorMade/status/1168415330957316096?s=19
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2019 16:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
did tom taylor get sent kings comps of vision and just never tell anyone
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2019 16:59
|
|
|
A Strange Aeon posted:http://www.multiversitycomics.com/annotations/hellboy-reading-order-2019/ I've just finished Library book 4, and it's got most of it. I did have to buy one store out of Library format, and it doesn't have BRPD. Here's the read guide I'm using: http://www.multiversitycomics.com/annotations/hellboy-reading-order-2019/ I have Year 1 in my pile to read (I never read DC stuff otherwise), so what's the catch here? IUG fucked around with this message at 19:45 on Sep 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2019 19:41
|
|
|
IUG posted:
Previews keeps marking stuff he has written as Tom King.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2019 20:25
|
|
|
A Strange Aeon posted:http://www.multiversitycomics.com/annotations/hellboy-reading-order-2019/ That diagram there is too convoluted. Just read the omnibus editions in their numerical order and the two short story collections whenever. The whole point of the omnibi (omnibuses?) is to make it simple to read. Those six books compile all the Hellboy material from the beginning all the way through Hellboy in Hell. I have no idea what the Library Editions contain though. I only read all that after the omnibuses (?) were released because I didn't want to buy fifty of those little trades they use to have. The price point on the omnibi (?) is really good too. Getting bogged down in which of the spinoffs you should read when seems like an exercise in tedium. I can tell you from reading just Hellboy I wasn't lost because I didn't read Lobster Johnson volume one and then BPRD volume two or whatever the gently caress in between each book.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
If you're not getting Chip Zdarsky's newsletter, well, you should probably change that. https://zdarsky.substack.com/
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2019 14:01
|
|
|
CPL593H posted:That diagram there is too convoluted. Just read the omnibus editions in their numerical order and the two short story collections whenever. The whole point of the omnibi (omnibuses?) is to make it simple to read. Those six books compile all the Hellboy material from the beginning all the way through Hellboy in Hell. I have no idea what the Library Editions contain though. I only read all that after the omnibuses (?) were released because I didn't want to buy fifty of those little trades they use to have. The price point on the omnibi (?) is really good too. Getting bogged down in which of the spinoffs you should read when seems like an exercise in tedium. I can tell you from reading just Hellboy I wasn't lost because I didn't read Lobster Johnson volume one and then BPRD volume two or whatever the gently caress in between each book. I think the Library Editions are just compilations of two trades, hardbound, with bonus sketches and that kind of thing, but I'm not sure. If I didn't already have volumes 1 and 3 that I found for a good price, I probably would just start over with the omnibuses. Maybe I should anyway, honestly, the sketches and stuff don't do much for me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2019 20:07
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:If you're not getting Chip Zdarsky's newsletter, well, you should probably change that. This is amazing, thank you.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2019 20:54
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:If you're not getting Chip Zdarsky's newsletter, well, you should probably change that. I feel like I've been given a gift and it's not even my birthday.
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2019 21:05
|
|
|
Somebody, please talk me out of trying to buy a page of original art from the Clone Saga. Yes, it has both Pete and Ben in costume on it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:27
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:Somebody, please talk me out of trying to buy a page of original art from the Clone Saga. Yes, it has both Pete and Ben in costume on it. Who drew it?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:35
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:Somebody, please talk me out of trying to buy a page of original art from the Clone Saga. Yes, it has both Pete and Ben in costume on it. I think you should buy it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:38
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:Who drew it? Sal Buscema with Sienkiewicz. It's from the issue where Peter hits Mary Jane. But obviously not that page since I wouldn't even want that one for its nadir of Marvel Comics value.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
That issue is ugly in such an interesting way, I used to be fascinated and horrified by it as a kid. That would be a rad thing to have up on your wall.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:49
|
|
|
Archyduchess posted:That issue is ugly in such an interesting way, I used to be fascinated and horrified by it as a kid. That would be a rad thing to have up on your wall. When I was reading the clone saga earlier this year, the Buscema issues looked terrible. Then Sienkiewicz took over the inking and it was like he was redrawing half the page. It still looked wrong for Spider-Man, but it became about a stylistic mismatch instead of just sketchy and flat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 01:53
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:Sal Buscema with Sienkiewicz. If you have the opportunity and the money sure. They are both classic artists.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 03:28
|
|
|
Is it something you want to see every day?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 10:01
|
|
|
man the final issue of WicDiv was great, huh
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2019 00:57
|
|
|
I had a galaxy-brain insight on Watchmen which seemed to fit here better than anywhere else: Rorschach's vision is, quite literally, filtered through the Kitty Genovese murder. Well that's my story.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I had a galaxy-brain insight on Watchmen which seemed to fit here better than anywhere else: Now in Geno-veson™
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2019 13:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kennybloggins/status/1169246729545363457?s=19
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2019 21:34
|
|
|
Wanna hear Kang do an ad read for stamps.com
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2019 22:57
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:man the final issue of WicDiv was great, huh Did that just not ship or something? I can't find it anywhere, it's also on my pull list and I didn't get it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 00:03
|
|
|
has anybody using firefox come across this problem with the forums where tweets are showing up as text but not like, actual embedded tweets. just started happening yesterday, im not sure whats up. tried disabling ublock, firefox builtin content blocking is already disabled for SA because that disabled tweets from showing up in the first place
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 01:29
|
|
|
site posted:has anybody using firefox come across this problem with the forums where tweets are showing up as text but not like, actual embedded tweets. just started happening yesterday, im not sure whats up. tried disabling ublock, firefox builtin content blocking is already disabled for SA because that disabled tweets from showing up in the first place it does that on chrome, but it's usually just a loading thing and reformats into a tweet within a second
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 01:33
|
|
|
I think it's just Twitter's API loving up/hanging at some step. I'll see it in Awful app embeds sometimes as well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 01:44
|
|
site posted:has anybody using firefox come across this problem with the forums where tweets are showing up as text but not like, actual embedded tweets. just started happening yesterday, im not sure whats up. tried disabling ublock, firefox builtin content blocking is already disabled for SA because that disabled tweets from showing up in the first place That happened to me last week and it turns out clearing my cache and cookies solved it.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 08:04
|
|
|
hey, clearing the cache worked. thanks!
|
|
#
?
Sep 6, 2019 15:36
|
|
|
 lmao a burn on nice guys and guys gardner
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 00:52
|
|
|
Nice Guy Gardner.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 02:16
|
|
|
what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 07:13
|
|
I don't think of myself as a Clark Kent, but I am a Peter Parker.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 08:09
|
|
|
I am SHOOK
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 08:10
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:I don't think of myself as a Clark Kent, but I am a Peter Parker. That's some real school shooter talk coming out of Peter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 08:11
|
|
|
Ditko-era Peter was amazingly bitter, it was great.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 08:14
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Ditko-era Peter was amazingly bitter, it was great. New York was really lucky Uncle Ben got shot the moment Peter used his powers for personal gain, otherwise he'd have basically been another Doc Ock or Green Goblin, only there wouldn't be a Spider-Man to stop him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 08:17
|
|
|
I assume there has to be a "What If... Spider-Man remained a selfish dipshit", right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 11:39
|
|
|
Angry Salami posted:I assume there has to be a "What If... Spider-Man remained a selfish dipshit", right? Multiple ones, IIRC.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 13:03
|
|
Angry Salami posted:I assume there has to be a "What If... Spider-Man remained a selfish dipshit", right? Yeah, the one where Uncle Ben doesn't get shot has him turn into an annoying self-obsessed celebrity who drives the Daily Bugle to ruin because he thinks it's funny. Kind of a mundane dick more than a supervillain, which makes sense.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 13:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
It kind of sucks that they are implying the only reason Peter became a hero is because of a tragedy, instead of some kind of being just raised right. That is more of a failing on May and Ben's behalf if the only way for Peter to be a decent guy was for one of them to be killed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 15:41
|
|
