|
 that's a real good fuckin' card name
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 07:18 |
|
|
Mechanics article https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/feature/throne-eldraine-mechanics-2019-09-04
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:Finally you can eat changelings it's an artifact subtype rather than creature subtype so i dont think it will apply to changelings
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:13
|
|
|
Jen X posted:Teferi is the best, though?  Looking forward to that one guy that can't count to 4 screaming and crying about more Teferi
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:15
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:it's an artifact subtype rather than creature subtype so i dont think it will apply to changelings The gingerbread man isnt an artifact creature ?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:21
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:The gingerbread man isnt an artifact creature ? Pastry golem
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
Adventure cards don't have their second type while in any other zone. If you cast the adventure half, you put the card in exile and then can cast the creature half at a later time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:24
|
|
|
Warlock is the stupidest type because they already have enough stupid magician types they don't support enough.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:27
|
|
|
These have got to be the laziest set mechanics wotc has ever done
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:30
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Warlock is the stupidest type because they already have enough stupid magician types they don't support enough. Mystic spellshaper warlock
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
These storybook cards just became an utterly loving miserable rules and memory issue. Whatever your idea of someone being dumber than a box of rocks is; always assume Magic players are even dumber than that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:These have got to be the laziest set mechanics wotc has ever done what were the set mechanics in Born of the Gods?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:These have got to be the laziest set mechanics wotc has ever done Devoid ?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:31
|
|
|
Ya adventure seems hosed for rules stuff
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:32
|
|
|
I'm so excited for more zendikar aesthetic. Give me more angular geometric basic lands
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:33
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:Mystic spellshaper warlock Shaman Druid Cleric Monk Warlock.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Im interested in the monster world
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Looking forward to fetches in the next Zendikar set, right on schedule for the shocks to rotate
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:34
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:what were the set mechanics in Born of the Gods? The same as the ones from Theros but also Inspired and the other one
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:35
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:These have got to be the laziest set mechanics wotc has ever done Tell us more about your threshold for "hard working" mechanics in Magic
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:35
|
|
|
I didn't see the trailer for Eldraine get posted yet so here you go. It's much better than the last one we got.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:37
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:Tell us more about your threshold for "hard working" mechanics in Magic idk when its not literally investigate but worse or slightly different devotion or kicker with memory and gameplay issues
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
Extremely looking forward to the MTGA auto tapper loving up adamant, constantly
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:Tell us more about your threshold for "hard working" mechanics in Magic bootstraps -
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
Mikujin posted:I didn't see the trailer for Eldraine get posted yet so here you go. It's much better than the last one we got. I was skeptical of the chosen soundtrack at first, but it pays off by the end
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:Tell us more about your threshold for "hard working" mechanics in Magic like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:Extremely looking forward to the MTGA auto tapper loving up adamant, constantly Are there any in the precon Brawl decks? I bet they use the same interface as split cards/spectacle, at the very least.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af? They work mandatory weekends and 12 hour days, ok.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
Mikujin posted:I didn't see the trailer for Eldraine get posted yet so here you go. It's much better than the last one we got. Garruk is a dick
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af? Food rules you nerd
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
The worst set to go on a diet
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af? because we've played multiple magic the gathering sets with poo poo like Amass or Addendum or Afterlife?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:43
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:The gingerbread man isnt an artifact creature ? i assume it will be. but food is still an artifact subtype not creature type. dunno if they'll have it artifact - food creature or "counts as a Food" in the text box
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
Adventure is fine. You cast it and if it resolves you exile it and put a counter on it to remind yourself you can cast it, easy enough., not sure what the memory issues here are supposed to be? Adamant is a generic limited mechanic, sure whatever. Food is good. It's exceptionally mediocre on its own, but they've already shown a bunch of cards that interact with it so I'm sure that'll be good.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:46
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af? Uh Adventure is something they haven't done before, and Food is tweaking an already existing mechanic that worked well, which is a tried and true formula for the game. Delve, Manifest, and Energy were all brand new "non-lazy" mechanics and they all sucked poo poo. It turns out that the amount of "effort" put into a mechanic has no relation to how good or fun it is. You know what the least lazy mechanics of all time were? Banding and Rampage. poo poo, maybe I need to rethink my views about complex mechanics being "good" Ate My Balls Redux fucked around with this message at 18:50 on Sep 4, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:47
|
|
|
Sampatrick has bad opinions? Oh, mercy me!
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:49
|
|
|
There always seemed to be a rule of thumb in the past where every block got at least one major "innovation" mechanic (equipment, sagas, Tribal, etc), and a few supplemental mechanics, not to mention mechanics got carried over between sets in the block. As this is the first set fully developed under the "3+1 rule" I wonder if we're seeing them wanting to ration mechanics between sets that are so creatively different.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:54
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:like literally how can you look at these mechanics and not think they're lazy af? What does lazy even mean in this context? Uncomplicated? Leading to boring play? "Easy to have come up with"? Like, if the set drafts well who cares?
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:56
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:i assume it will be. but food is still an artifact subtype not creature type. dunno if they'll have it artifact - food creature or "counts as a Food" in the text box IIRC subtypes are always presented in the same order as types; Dryad Arbor is a Land Creature - Forest Dryad, for instance. So Gingerbrute will be an Artifact Creature - Food Golem.
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 18:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 07:18 |
|
|
I found an old box in my house and it had some artwork I did when I was around 8 years old.  
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2019 19:04
|
|
