|
OMFG Hypothesizzle is such a good card name wasted on a bad common
Ate My Balls Redux fucked around with this message at 23:09 on Sep 7, 2019 |
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 13:36 |
|
|
All you gotta say is you can cast Dive Down after declaring how damage is assigned but before damage is dealt. Dive Down cannot be cast in response to damage.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:07
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:OMFG Hypothosizzle is such a good card name wasted on a bad common Hypothesizzle is a good common actually 
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:08
|
|
|
Eej posted:All you gotta say is you can cast Dive Down after declaring how damage is assigned but before damage is dealt. Dive Down cannot be cast in response to damage. No you can't? You can cast Dive Down after blocking order is chosen, but assigning damage happens at the same time it's actually dealt with no room to respond in between.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
fadam posted:Lol are you okay? I thought I kept up with this poo poo but it turns out it's been mostly on limited removal with one decent card, and now I've made a fool of myself in public!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
Elyv posted:Hypothesizzle is a good common actually It's so good that it's in a standard legal set and I has never even heard of it til that post
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
Do you even draft, bro?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:13
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:It's so good that it's in a standard legal set and I has never even heard of it til that post Sounds like someone never drafted grn
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:14
|
|
|
Elyv posted:Sounds like someone never drafted grn That's fair, I drafted RNA like a fiend tho
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:16
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:I thought I kept up with this poo poo but it turns out it's been mostly on limited removal with one decent card, and now I've made a fool of myself in public!! The specific wording/rule was apparently introduced in Amonkhet for the exert cards, which might be why you don't remember it, it's been a while. Also all of the Gotcha cards got errata'd to use it, for some reason? Oh yeah and it's also on Sorin, that's probably the place you would have seen it the most recently. And the card hasn't been officially spoiled, but Maro confirmed that Will and Rowan share a card on the announcement stream the other day. So either it's the best fake ever (with new art and a picture that isn't blurry as hell) whose maker made an improbably good guess or someone just took a picture of a real card.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:23
|
|
|
Tulul posted:The specific wording/rule was apparently introduced in Amonkhet for the exert cards, which might be why you don't remember it, it's been a while. Also all of the Gotcha cards got errata'd to use it, for some reason? Oh yeah and it's also on Sorin, that's probably the place you would have seen it the most recently. They showed The Royal Scions. It's a real card. E: Maybe I'm high, I went through the announcement video and yeah, they just said they share a card.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:27
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:It's so good that it's in a standard legal set and I has never even heard of it til that post It is extremely good in GRN limited, but yeah waste of a card name. Personally I'm still waiting on that Prophetic Bolt reprint.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:41
|
|
|
Jabor posted:No you can't? You can cast Dive Down after blocking order is chosen, but assigning damage happens at the same time it's actually dealt with no room to respond in between. At comp REL you missed the chance to cast dive down when you indicated you were going to damage Casual REL the judge would rewind and explain combat timing
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:44
|
|
|
I honestly think the stranger thing is that the 2nd ability can't happen without a creature on the battlefield...I think.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:11
|
|
|
Is this how it's supposed to happen? I'm bad at the rules: 1) Player A attacks with a 4/4 attacks 2) Player B blocks with 2 2/2s 3) Player A orders the blockers as "I'll hit creature 1, then 2" but doesn't assign damage yet 4) Player B gives +0/+3 to creature 1 5) Player A has to assign lethal damage to creature 1 (4 damage) before they can assign any to creature 2, so both creatures survive? And 1 (declare attackers), 2 (declare blockers) and 5 (damage) are all combat steps which have a round of priority, but 3 (ordering blockers) is a part of the declare blockers step so there's no ability to cast spells between 2 and 3?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:21
|
|
|
GoutPatrol posted:I honestly think the stranger thing is that the 2nd ability can't happen without a creature on the battlefield...I think. Good thing it has another +1 ability to activate instead.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
ilmucche posted:Is this how it's supposed to happen? I'm bad at the rules: this is all correct
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:33
|
|
|
Deleted due to being wrong
PhyrexianLibrarian fucked around with this message at 01:15 on Sep 8, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:33
|
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:There's no priority round in between ordering blockers and assigning damage. So step-by-step: This is wrong. You do not assign damage numbers when you choose the blocking order. You just choose the order. When assigning damage at the start of the combat damage step, you have to respect the order you chose, but you can assign the damage any way you like as long as that order is respected.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:38
|
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:There's no priority round in between ordering blockers and assigning damage. So step-by-step: The ordering of blocking creatures happens a step earlier in 509.3, though. e:f;b
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:39
|
|
|
Deleted
PhyrexianLibrarian fucked around with this message at 01:00 on Sep 8, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:Good point, updated my above comment to distinguish between blocking order and damage assignment. It's still wrong. Your headline statement is inconsistent with your detailed outline, and neither of them are correct! ilmucche's understanding was completely correct. Here it is again, broken out into steps with players getting priority added: -- Declare Attackers step: Player A attacks with a 4/4 Each player gets priority -- Declare Blockers step: Player B blocks with 2 2/2s Player A orders the blockers as "I'll hit creature 1, then 2" but doesn't assign damage yet Each player gets priority. Player B gives +0/+3 to creature 1. -- Combat Damage step: Player A has to assign lethal damage to creature 1 before they can assign any to creature 2, so they assign and deal 4 damage to creature 1 and both defenders survive.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:58
|
|
|
Star Man posted:Good thing it has another +1 ability to activate instead. But what if your hand is all good cards and you don’t want to discard any?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:06
|
|
|
That's why you have to put enough bad cards in your deck.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:20
|
|
|
Lol forever, when did Manamorphose spike? I thought reddit was joking. They were not. A playset is ~a Chalice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:20
|
|
|
Tubgoat posted:Lol forever, when did Manamorphose spike? I thought reddit was joking. They were not. A playset is ~a Chalice. Almost a year ago. https://www.mtggoldfish.com/price/Shadowmoor/Manamorphose#paper I’ve got some for cheap in the buy/sell thread if you are looking for them  .
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:43
|
|
|
With the rise of UR Phoenix?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:53
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Who confirmed it? Where? How? I can say Foegod, Master of Iron was confirmed to be real, but what's the source of that? It hasn’t been officially previewed but in the pre-recorded video WOTC streamed on Wednesday MaRo said that Will and Rowan were going to be the first dual character planeswalker card and even named dropped “The Royal Scions”. The card was posted two or so hours before he stream.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 08:02
|
|
|
What about Wrenn and Six
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 08:03
|
|
|
CharlieFoxtrot posted:What about Wrenn and Six Still just has “Wrenn” in the type line
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 08:16
|
|
|
I don't think Six is a planeswalker. Just like, a tree mecha or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 11:42
|
|
|
Six is a number
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 11:54
|
|
|
What about Wrenn and sex.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 12:10
|
|
|
We've spoken about this before. Do NOT gently caress the tree
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 12:11
|
|
|
So we have around us a dude from legacy play group who started playing Standard with Bant Scapeshift, grinded it in arena to mythic while cursing aggro elemental decks, insists that it is the first time he has been interested in standard since the days of Psychatog, says that Wizards were idiots for banning Marvel and Copycat and that there have not been truly good combo decks in Standard since Urza's Saga. ...are all legacy players like that?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 13:12
|
|
|
No, some are just money laundering.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 13:16
|
|
|
Some still complain about the new card frame
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 13:21
|
|
|
Nostalgia is a helluva drug.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 13:47
|
|
|
fatherboxx posted:So we have around us a dude from legacy play group who started playing Standard with Bant Scapeshift, grinded it in arena to mythic while cursing aggro elemental decks, insists that it is the first time he has been interested in standard since the days of Psychatog, says that Wizards were idiots for banning Marvel and Copycat and that there have not been truly good combo decks in Standard since Urza's Saga. amazingly, some are worse!
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 14:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 13:36 |
|
|
the reason someone like that is infecting your playgroup is that since wrenn and six legacy is now like 90% fair incremental value delver decks with four colors
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 14:37
|
|
