|
Who do you wish to win the Democratic primaries? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Biden, the Klansman |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Bernie Sanders, the Hand Flailer |
|
578 | 65.76% |
| Elizabeth Warren, the Plan Maker |
|
185 | 21.05% |
| Kamala Harris, the Cop Lord |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Cory Booker, the Super Hero Wannabe |
|
0 | 0% |
| Julian Castro, the Twin |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Kirsten Gillibrand, the Franken Killer |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Pete Buttigieg, the Troop Sociopath |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Robert Francis O'Rourke, the Fake Latino |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jay Inslee, the Climate Alarmist |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Marianne Williamson, the Crystal Queen |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Andrew Yang, the $1000 Fool |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Tulsi Gabbard, the Muslim Hater |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Amy Klobuchar, the Comb Enthusiast |
|
1 | 0.11% |
| Just like in real life, nobody voted for Hickenlooper |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jeffrey Epstein, the MCC Most Hated |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| KKKillary KKKlinton |
|
16 | 1.82% |
| Some other idiot not in this list |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Total: | 879 votes | ||
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/postopinions/status/1169741682214100992?s=21 As a black man, anytime I hear population control I think this is the intended consequence. It was a terrible answer.
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 22:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 11:18 |
|
|
Office Pig posted:Warren has been making some I just knew this idiot would be back; she's like a bad penny. I swear to god, if Clinton manages to find some way to gently caress up the last chance the dems have to to stop the republicans and the descent into fascist hell.... I'll break my teetotaler oath and drink myself into a stupor for a month and hope the nukes land during that bender.  And I just know that Warren would be fool enough to take advice from her - she Did A Race Science at the behest of fuckmothering PODCAST HOSTS 
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 22:53
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:yeah, in the primary the number of people who would vote for Warren if only she didn't speak to the Clintons There is a small subset of Warren voters who seem to think that she's more or less equivalent in terms of policy/ideology to Sanders and as a result is preferable due to being a woman (plus whatever subjective positive impression they have), and all of these sorts of things combined contribute to disproving this notion (even if each individually might not be enough). gohmak posted:As a black man, anytime I hear population control I think this is the intended consequence. It was a terrible answer. He literally just said he supports increasing access to birth control through funding organizations that help with that sort of thing*, and didn't bring it up in the context of climate change himself (the person asking the question did). The alternative was for him to say "no I don't support providing funding to organizations that help provide access to contraceptives/birth control in other countries." There's no possible answer that wouldn't have been interpreted maliciously. And I seriously doubt anyone in good faith thinks that he has some secret goal of curbing non-white births, lol. * specifically in reference to the Mexico City Policy which Trump reactivated that bans federal funding to organizations that perform abortions Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 23:12 on Sep 7, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:03
|
|
is probably functionally zero
|
kidkissinger posted:What possible reason would anyone have to reach out to Clinton other than to curry favor with a branch of the party that has no actual constituency? Ask her for what she would do in situation and then 100% of the time do the opposite
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:20
|
|
|
And to imagine I was worried about Warren all this time, when she's just another surrogate for the failure machine.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:31
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:And to imagine I was worried about Warren all this time, when she's just another surrogate for the failure machine. If Biden keeps sundowning the establishment will raise her up and when Donald Trump wins the general they will say it was because she was too far left.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:If Biden keeps sundowning the establishment will raise her up and when Donald Trump wins the general they will say it was because she was too far left. Yeah it owns https://twitter.com/papapishu/status/746803108949409793?lang=en
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2019 23:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1170471571041001476
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
I mean, a 15 year old A4 vert is like a $10k car tops, it seems more ironic in that regard than anything
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 00:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1170495024255164416?s=19 What the gently caress is wrong with with Massachusetts
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:35
|
|
|
rscott posted:https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1170495024255164416?s=19 White people. But this is a post for the state/local thread regardless.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TYTPolitics/status/1170446747493117952 If you were wondering whether Warren deviated from the formula and actually answered the question then you can rest easy with the knowledge that no, she did not.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:42
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:White people. Kennedy winning would be a national disaster
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:42
|
|
|
GonadTheBallbarian posted:Kennedy winning would be a national disaster All those memes about poor Republican stock and then they go elect a defective aristocratic inbred.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:49
|
|
|
The Kennedy bloodline is ancient, and powerful. We need their strength
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:51
|
|
|
It is increasingly funny to me that Elizabeth Warren goes off on some dipshit tangent about DOD corruption after signing a blank check over to one of the most corrupt fonts of graft on earth, like she doesn't actually believe in anything left of center and exists for people who value the image of doing something more than taking meaningful action.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 01:55
|
|
|
GonadTheBallbarian posted:Kennedy winning would be a national disaster AvP tagline, etc.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 02:07
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:White people. Warren has endorsed Markey, for what it's worth.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 02:14
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:The Kennedy bloodline is ancient, and powerful. We need their strength There must always be a Kennedy in Washington.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 02:21
|
|
|
Gyges posted:There must always be a Kennedy in Washington. We already have the lovely fake Kennedy in Louisiana
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 02:24
|
|
|
quote:Hi there -- I'm 80% sure this is real.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 03:00
|
|
|
rscott posted:I mean, a 15 year old A4 vert is like a $10k car tops, it seems more ironic in that regard than anything this is some lucielle bluth poo poo right here it’s a 15 year old vag product (a4 platform at that lmao), cmon man
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 03:24
|
|
|
Ytlaya posted:There is a small subset of Warren voters who seem to think that she's more or less equivalent in terms of policy/ideology to Sanders and as a result is preferable due to being a woman (plus whatever subjective positive impression they have), and all of these sorts of things combined contribute to disproving this notion (even if each individually might not be enough). The answer is "No I don't believe in population control"
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 04:29
|
|
|
Luckyellow posted:It's been a while since I read any opinions but how the heck did you went from "abortion is a human right" to "suppressing the world population through abortion is eugenics"? Jennifer Rubin is a straight up fascist who's appalled at Trump for being uncouth about it. WaPo publishes her for the exact and exclusive reason that she's anti-Trump. I wish people would stop sharing her bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 04:43
|
|
|
Uglycat posted:It's all been engineered, using sockpuppets and the cambridge analytica data and fake news. It's a big part of the fascist machine. This is an odd question but what the hell have you seen a connection with the Q crap and racist pornography?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 04:50
|
|
|
gohmak posted:The answer is "No I don't believe in population control" To be clear, you support the policies he discussed just don’t approve of discussing them in response to the question asked?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 04:55
|
|
|
Giving women in poor countries access to birth control is a good thing and shame on you if you buy into the right wing framing that doing so is eugenics
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 05:20
|
|
|
The Pussy Boss posted:Giving women in poor countries access to birth control is a good thing and shame on you if you buy into the right wing framing that doing so is eugenics Never give into right wing framing for anything. They’re just fine with pollution being dumped on minorities and poisoning them and their children. They’re just fine with sterilizing “criminals”. They’re just fine with PoC dying more in childbirth and infancy. They are fundamentally incapable of making any social commentary without disingenuous virtue signaling.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 05:40
|
|
|
gohmak posted:The answer is "No I don't believe in population control" The question was asking if he supports stopping a policy to limit federal funding to organizations that don't give abortions. In his answer he just said he supports that (deactivating the agreement). The only other way he could have answered is to attempt to say "I support allowing organizations that receive federal funding to give abortions but disagree with population control" or something but it's pretty obvious that he just interpreted the question as a question about deactivating the Mexico City Agreement. Basically the reporting on this is putting words in his mouth through the most negative possible interpretation of what was actually said. I mean come on, do you seriously think that Bernie Sanders secretly wants to preserve white supremacy through reducing non-white birthrates? The Pussy Boss posted:Giving women in poor countries access to birth control is a good thing and shame on you if you buy into the right wing framing that doing so is eugenics I mean, I get what gohmak is trying to say here, in that "population control in poor countries" is sometimes used as a talking point translating to "make the proportion of non-white people stop increasing," but in this case Bernie Sanders himself didn't say anything about population control and was just stating that he'd allow federal funding to organizations that prove abortions (reversing an agreement Trump reactivated).
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 05:41
|
|
|
Ague Proof posted:I'm 80% sure this is real. How is it that so many people watched a show about the White House where gays in the military was too much but peace in the middle east was totally doable and said, yes, this is how it really is? I liked the West Wing too, but I sure as gently caress never finished an episode and thought that was totally how poo poo should work. Did these people also enroll in welding classes after watching a few season of The A-Team?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:08
|
|
|
Ague Proof posted:I'm 80% sure this is real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM1Vt6MyKj0
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:34
|
|
|
gohmak posted:The answer is "No I don't believe in population control" You don't think women have the right to control the size of their families? Why not
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 07:53
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:You don't think women have the right to control the size of their families? Because poor women are more likely to choose not out of economic duress? Maybe make childcare is provided is equal measure before worrying about how many children people are having, especially when replacement theory is being spread by white supremacists. They have ~*~access~*~ to reproductive freedom
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 08:53
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:https://twitter.com/TYTPolitics/status/1170446747493117952 Someone with video editing skills needs to make a compilation of all the times Warren has dances around answering direct questions that's easy to share and spread. There was the time Charlamagne Tha God asked her about why she was a Republican and I believe another one relating to her position on Medicare for All that was posted a week or two ago.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 09:22
|
|
|
bowser posted:Someone with video editing skills needs to make a compilation of all the times Warren has dances around answering direct questions that's easy to share and spread. if someone's willing to compile a list of clips/links and times I'm down
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 09:32
|
|
|
bowser posted:Someone with video editing skills needs to make a compilation of all the times Warren has dances around answering direct questions that's easy to share and spread. One of the best examples: https://twitter.com/BethLynch2020/status/1166727858204663810 Immediately veers into housing when asked directly about what she’d do about mass incarceration, drools out Democratic pablum about Republicans repealing Obamacare when asked again, and when asked yet again eventually comes around to “well the 1994 crime bill is bad and we should, like, do some sort of thing about it I’ll have to look into it.”
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 10:22
|
|
|
B-b-but she has a plan
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 10:24
|
|
|
Of course Warren being a liar in support of all the same evils as the rest of the field probably doesn’t matter if her primary base of support is something as boorish and primitive as woman in the white house no matter who or how. https://twitter.com/NH_for_Warren/status/1170295074028212225 It’s the exact same poo poo as Kamala supporters counterprotesting service workers and the sunrise movement, only difference being how ugly you’re willing to get in service of awful people who only want to gently caress everyone over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 10:36
|
|
|
Warren is very Hillary like. Unacceptable sorry.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 14:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 11:18 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/LeftwardSwing/status/1170642510198140928
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2019 14:48
|
|