Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Moey posted:

Disable the windows update service. Problem solved.

Please patch.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tapedump
Aug 31, 2007
College Slice
... nah. Security as informed by populism.

Cause we aaaaaallll know, populism is where it's at, right?

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





Tapedump posted:

... nah. Security as informed by populism.

Cause we aaaaaallll know, populism is where it's at, right?

... what?

Moey
Oct 22, 2010

I LIKE TO MOVE IT

mllaneza posted:

We didn't so much disable it as have WSUS and SCCM 2003 just loving die on our legacy infrastructure. Since we have a couple thousand machines in that domain, any one of which could cure the common cold tomorrow, we've spent almost a year using my Powershell to deploy the stuff (Dell KACE) that can actually push Microsoft patches to lab machines.

Dear lord, this entire block of text hurts my insides.


CommieGIR posted:

Please patch.

Competing to host the largest botnet currently.

Tapedump
Aug 31, 2007
College Slice
Really?

"I'll turn Updates off because I/we/the unwashed masses know far better than thousands of industry engineers" is strikingly like populist notions.

(I know Moey didn't mean it.)

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Moey posted:

Dear lord, this entire block of text hurts my insides.

I'm actively terrified on at least a weekly basis, but this is great resume fodder.

Revalis Enai
Apr 21, 2003
<img src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-revalis_enai.gif"><br>Wait, what's my phone number again?
Fun Shoe
We got a motorola AP6532 for our wifi AP and it's a pain to work with. What would be a good replacement?

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


Revalis Enai posted:

We got a motorola AP6532 for our wifi AP and it's a pain to work with. What would be a good replacement?

I really like Unifi AC APs for small sites. The pros can handle a few dozen devices easily, the lite is perfect for phone use only, or 2-4 laptops depending on what you are doing if it's low bandwidth you can get more but don't think people wont start streaming music.

It's really easy to add multiple access points as well and have them work as a single network. I use lites at home and pros at work.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Unifi is definitely easy to manage, but there have been a variety of quality issues with their AP's.

I'm not saying don't use them, but if you do keep that and mind and overbuild your network so that if you do have issues the impact is minimized.

MF_James
May 8, 2008
I CANNOT HANDLE BEING CALLED OUT ON MY DUMBASS OPINIONS ABOUT ANTI-VIRUS AND SECURITY. I REALLY LIKE TO THINK THAT I KNOW THINGS HERE

INSTEAD I AM GOING TO WHINE ABOUT IT IN OTHER THREADS SO MY OPINION CAN FEEL VALIDATED IN AN ECHO CHAMBER I LIKE

The Fool posted:

Unifi is definitely easy to manage, but there have been a variety of quality issues with their AP's.

I'm not saying don't use them, but if you do keep that and mind and overbuild your network so that if you do have issues the impact is minimized.

The quality issues were from a run a few years ago, as long as you don't buy used, you should be fine.

Obviously there could be a new bad run I haven't heard of...

Revalis Enai
Apr 21, 2003
<img src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-revalis_enai.gif"><br>Wait, what's my phone number again?
Fun Shoe
I took a quick look at it and it seems to be pretty easy to setup and it's cheap enough I can get it without my manager bitching.

Thanks Ants
May 21, 2004

#essereFerrari


Also look at Aruba Instant On. It's a version of Aruba Instant for really small deployments, with free online management. The APs are really cheap, and the mounting brackets are significantly better than on Ubiquiti's APs.

Digital_Jesus
Feb 10, 2011

Aruba has been my standard for both SMB and enterprise for years.

If youre doing a small office deployment the IAP models run a built in virtual controller and the smaller APs are pretty cost effective.

Moey
Oct 22, 2010

I LIKE TO MOVE IT

Tapedump posted:

(I know Moey didn't mean it.)

I'm actually pretty up to date on patching all across my environment. Sometimes I impress myself.

Methanar
Sep 26, 2013

by the sex ghost
What does everyone think of crowdstrike

MustardFacial
Jun 20, 2011
George Russel's
Official Something Awful Account
Lifelong Tory Voter
I like the Meraki AP's. Cloud managed, no controller needed, once you build the network you can deploy new ones in seconds, and if you watch one of their videos they'll send you a test one for free*. However, if the license lapses they stop working entirely.

*For 3 years.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Yeah, the Meraki AP's are super nice. My environment is 100% Meraki and while there are some things that I butt heads with occasionallynon-meraki site-site vpns are a disaster, they are super easy to manage. Expanding to another floor this summer was just a matter of registering the new switch and AP's.

They are not cheap though

Revalis Enai
Apr 21, 2003
<img src="https://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-revalis_enai.gif"><br>Wait, what's my phone number again?
Fun Shoe
I got the Unifi AC AP PRO today and it was really easy to setup. I have it placed facing upwards on top of our walk-in cooler, and it covers about 85% of our floor.
I see they have the Unifi Mesh that supposedly expands the AP, is it worth getting?

Dans Macabre
Apr 24, 2004


Methanar posted:

What does everyone think of crowdstrike

I want to know what everyone thinks about endpoint security in general. currently using webroot. I feel like windows defender + cisco umbrella should be good enough though and don't need another thing.

Rick
Feb 23, 2004
When I was 17, my father was so stupid, I didn't want to be seen with him in public. When I was 24, I was amazed at how much the old man had learned in just 7 years.
I guess should've asked this thread before deciding between Unifi and Tp-link APs, although I've had zero complaints about the tp-links at the other place I deployed them when budget was more of an issue, and they also were easy to set up.

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:

I want to know what everyone thinks about endpoint security in general. currently using webroot. I feel like windows defender + cisco umbrella should be good enough though and don't need another thing.

I'd agree with defender + umbrella being good. Anything else would be app whitelisting, patching, and doing other stuff to reduce vulnerablity.

Dans Macabre
Apr 24, 2004


Internet Explorer posted:

I'd agree with defender + umbrella being good. Anything else would be app whitelisting, patching, and doing other stuff to reduce vulnerablity.

Do you manage w/ InTune?

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:

Do you manage w/ InTune?

We don't today, still SCCM. I put Umbrella in at my last place and was very happy with it. Been happy with my interactions with Defender. I think they just added tamper protection, which is a necessity, but I think you have to manage in InTune. Trying to get my current place to jump on board with that and hybrid domain join.

Umbrella was a huge help. Good spam filtering (Mimecast) was a huge help. Like I said, the rest to me is just being good about updates, not having local admins, endpoint and server firewalls, then doing SIEM stuff to have some visibility into any issues.

[Edit: regarding Crowdstrike, I think the concept of this stuff being super interconnected is good, but I don't see the point, especially for an SMB, of doing that over Umbrella / Defender ATP / mail filter that is doing the same. All of these services are 'global services with lots of data that looks at global trends and reacts quickly'.]

Internet Explorer fucked around with this message at 15:25 on Sep 12, 2019

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe
Ok got a reallll dumb/novice level question here. This is my first time ever fooling with a VPN. And our company has no IT guy/service.

We have a QNAP NAS in the office. We also just opened up a remote office on the coast. So they need to be able to access our client files from there.

VPN!

QNAP has a built in QVPN service. I've installed that and setup the L2TP/IPsec server. Took just a couple of clicks.

So, now I go into the native Windows 10 "Add a VPN connection" setup. Everything makes sense except for "server name or address"

What goes there? For every other server setup type in the QVPN app (QBelt, OpenVPN, etc) they have port/ip information. But not for L2TP/IPsec. I'm guessing because the server name is just the WAN for the whole business? But then I would need some port information it would seem, correct?

Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!
Wow. O365 kicked my rear end with how easily it handled everything. I thought I had to do way more but nope, it handled everything on its own basically.

Thank you for the guidance!

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





BonoMan posted:

Ok got a reallll dumb/novice level question here. This is my first time ever fooling with a VPN. And our company has no IT guy/service.

We have a QNAP NAS in the office. We also just opened up a remote office on the coast. So they need to be able to access our client files from there.

VPN!

QNAP has a built in QVPN service. I've installed that and setup the L2TP/IPsec server. Took just a couple of clicks.

So, now I go into the native Windows 10 "Add a VPN connection" setup. Everything makes sense except for "server name or address"

What goes there? For every other server setup type in the QVPN app (QBelt, OpenVPN, etc) they have port/ip information. But not for L2TP/IPsec. I'm guessing because the server name is just the WAN for the whole business? But then I would need some port information it would seem, correct?

VPNs suck, especially client to site VPNs, and you should find a better solution.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Internet Explorer posted:

VPNs suck, especially client to site VPNs, and you should find a better solution.

I'm up for anything! Essentially we're an ad agency that has about 6 tb of assets that need to be accessed via both locations. Ultimately I'd love to have physical servers at both locations that are file synced every hour or so. But there's likely not money for that yet, so right now just an easy "fast" way for the coast office to access our creatives files.

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


BonoMan posted:

I'm up for anything! Essentially we're an ad agency that has about 6 tb of assets that need to be accessed via both locations. Ultimately I'd love to have physical servers at both locations that are file synced every hour or so. But there's likely not money for that yet, so right now just an easy "fast" way for the coast office to access our creatives files.

You want site to site VPN so both are on the same network, you do this with your firewall / router you may require additional licensing depending on what you are using.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


BonoMan posted:

I'm up for anything! Essentially we're an ad agency that has about 6 tb of assets that need to be accessed via both locations. Ultimately I'd love to have physical servers at both locations that are file synced every hour or so. But there's likely not money for that yet, so right now just an easy "fast" way for the coast office to access our creatives files.

Holy poo poo.

Your QNAP's VPN is not the solution.

You need edge devices doing a site-to-site VPN.

What is your current router/firewall/edge appliance at both locations?

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





Can you just put all that in the cloud? How big are the files, how fast is your internet, how many users, etc?

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


Internet Explorer posted:

Can you just put all that in the cloud? How big are the files, how fast is your internet, how many users, etc?

Yeah, these are all super important concerns.

Your 'remote' office will have a very poor experience if your internet connection can't handle the number of users and the size of the files.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

The Fool posted:

Holy poo poo.

Your QNAP's VPN is not the solution.

You need edge devices doing a site-to-site VPN.

What is your current router/firewall/edge appliance at both locations?

I'm at home for the second so I'll get this all when I get back to the office but I should note that the ONLY thing they need access to is the files served on the very QNAP that is running the VPN. And that they won't "work" from it. Only pull files from time to time when they need a logo or reference to something we've done in the past. They don't need access to anything else on our network. Just the QNAP. Is the QVPN still a bad solution for that?

Basically "hey I need the Illustrator project for this" "oh it's on the client drive in their folder."

That kinda thing.

The Fool posted:

Yeah, these are all super important concerns.

Your 'remote' office will have a very poor experience if your internet connection can't handle the number of users and the size of the files.


See above. It's generally just for file grabs when they need some work we've done in the past.

I'm inquiring about the internet at the new office (it's literally in the process of being setup) and here we have AT&T fiber at 50/50.

There will be 2 or 3 users that will need to access everything.

edit: OH hey a pertinent piece of information I posted in the other thread but not here:

quote:

I've been pestering them for years to please dear god please hire a sys admin before everything goes totally south.

We have a pretty robust machine room configured by a sysadmin (as a favor to a colleague who no longer works here). But now it's left to me to just poke around and figure things out (i'm a CG artist, not a sysadmin) when they need something new. Lord.

I have an old credential sheet with the logins and a terrible description of what all of the servers do (there's proxmox, freenas, ubiquiti controllers, EdgeSwitches, PFSense and lots of other poo poo). I've poked around enough to determine that it looks like PFSense is handling the port forwarding so I'm going to do it in that.

BonoMan fucked around with this message at 20:06 on Sep 12, 2019

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


BonoMan posted:

Is the QVPN still a bad solution for that?

Yes.

quote:

edit: OH hey a pertinent piece of information I posted in the other thread but not here:

You may not need a fulltime sysadmin, it might be worthwhile to find a decent MSP to handle these kinds of issues for you.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

The Fool posted:

Yes.


You may not need a fulltime sysadmin, it might be worthwhile to find a decent MSP to handle these kinds of issues for you.

They won't spend the money for that. Womp womp.

The Fool
Oct 16, 2003


BonoMan posted:

They won't spend the money for that. Womp womp.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

The Fool posted:

Holy poo poo.

Your QNAP's VPN is not the solution.

You need edge devices doing a site-to-site VPN.

What is your current router/firewall/edge appliance at both locations?

Ok coming back to this. So, knowing I'm not a sysadmin, when you say edge devices. Are you referring to EdgeRouter? Same brand as our EdgeSwitch?

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

And actually, now that we have a new office, and there will need to be actual equipment and professional setups done... they might finally splurge for it. I probably wont' have as much leverage in the future as I do now to get this poo poo off mah drat back.

Actuarial Fables
Jul 29, 2014

Taco Defender

BonoMan posted:

Ok coming back to this. So, knowing I'm not a sysadmin, when you say edge devices. Are you referring to EdgeRouter? Same brand as our EdgeSwitch?

Your edge devices are the network devices on the "edge" of your network - the first devices incoming traffic hits before continuing on further into your network, and the last device outgoing traffic goes through that you control. For small businesses it's often a firewall/router combo, and from the list of network items you provided it's probably your PFSense box.

Another way to ask the question - what device that you control is connected to the AT&T provided equipment?

Actuarial Fables fucked around with this message at 20:47 on Sep 12, 2019

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Actuarial Fables posted:

Your edge devices are the network devices on the "edge" of your network - the first devices incoming traffic hits before continuing on further into your network, and the last device outgoing traffic goes through that you control. For small businesses it's often a firewall/router combo, and from the list of network items you provided it's probably your PFSense box.

Another way to ask the question - what device that you control is connected to the AT&T provided equipment?

Gotcha, that's sort of what I thought as well (inre: edge devices).

As far as the AT&T equipment. Looks like it plugs into one of our three Supermicro servers (each one is a Proxmox node). It's got a PFsense VM on it. I can log into that and see all my VPN settings.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Actuarial Fables
Jul 29, 2014

Taco Defender
That pfSense VM is your edge device for the main office. You'll also need to know what the remote office's edge device is.

BonoMan posted:

And actually, now that we have a new office, and there will need to be actual equipment and professional setups done... they might finally splurge for it. I probably wont' have as much leverage in the future as I do now to get this poo poo off mah drat back.

This is probably the best option. I assume you're not being paid extra to do IT work in addition to your regular work, right?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply