|
A Moose posted:I feel like not a lot of people notice that you can only use the mana from that land's ability to cast creatures. No Wave fucked around with this message at 21:49 on Sep 17, 2019 |
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 12:17 |
|
|
A Moose posted:I feel like not a lot of people notice that you can only use the mana from that land's ability to cast creatures. I feel like you don't notice that everyone in the thread have finally found a piece of common ground and that it is how wrong you are.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
A Moose posted:I feel like not a lot of people notice that you can only use the mana from that land's ability to cast creatures. No, we understand that the ramp value is narrow and limited. People are okay with that because it's upside on a card that you can just casually drop into any deck with large creatures and a decent number of Forests. For comparison, a Green land that entered the battlefield unconditionally tapped and had no upside would still be better than Temple of the False God, which comes in untapped and then stays that way until it's too late.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
who casts creatures in a green deck?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
A Moose posted:I feel like not a lot of people notice that you can only use the mana from that land's ability to cast creatures. and you seem to have failed to notice you can use the mana from the first ability to cast non-creatures
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
Cards like ilharg are rotating yeah? I just thought about how funny it would be to trap it on the field with a pacifism. I guess they could cast a second one, but it seemed funny for a bit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
ilharg is not rotating, because cards from what is basically ravnica block 3 are not rotating
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
ilmucche posted:Cards like ilharg are rotating yeah? I just thought about how funny it would be to trap it on the field with a pacifism. I guess they could cast a second one, but it seemed funny for a bit. Ilharg is not rotating.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
flatluigi posted:who casts creatures in a green deck? It's true, green is the color of eternal fog.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:59
|
|
|
A Moose posted:I feel like not a lot of people notice that you can only use the mana from that land's ability to cast creatures. That's all you're casting with it anyway so why the hell not get a +1 to them? It has a regular rear end T:G anyway.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 21:59
|
|
|
Toshimo posted:The gently caress is this poo poo?!? Sorry, Toshimo. The time has come for you to finally recognize that Temple of the False God is actually an amazing card, especially in Commander. It's actually good when lands can't be used before turn 5. I know it's hard to admit you were wrong, but it will only get harder as you continue putting it off.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:00
|
|
|
Elyv posted:ilharg is not rotating, because cards from what is basically ravnica block 3 are not rotating Ah, thought it was an amonkhet card.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:07
|
|
|
Goon project: creatureless monogreen deck.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:08
|
|
|
ilmucche posted:Ah, thought it was an amonkhet card. amonkhet is already not in standard though anyway    happy to see white with defensive bounce again, maybe red can get aggressive bounce again too
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:This taps for mana before you can activate its ramp ability. In fact i'm not clear how in any respect it's worse than Temple of the False God except in some weird corner cases with tons of utility lands. Temple is arguably better because non-green decks have access to it and generally are more thirsty for ramp effects. Note that I am not making this argument.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
ilmucche posted:Ah, thought it was an amonkhet card. It's basically the red god-eternal, which they couldn't actually have because Hazoret didn't die in Amonkhet
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
Elyv posted:[timg]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/562452010696310800/623626070985539605/sheperdoftheflock.png[/timg Good, another card for my not all cards theme deck.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:11
|
|
|
Two Shepherd’s of the Flock can theory block a creature forever and I love the idea of one perpetually looping the other back to the hand
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:13
|
|
|
Why is that Shepherd stronger at attacking then a knight? It seems weird to call out that he doesn't have a sword but he can kill an elephant.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:13
|
|
|
neaden posted:Why is that Shepherd stronger at attacking then a knight? It seems weird to call out that he doesn't have a sword but he can kill an elephant. The Shepherd is swole
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:13
|
|
|
uhhh so about that whole "adventure payoffs are only gonna be good in limited" discussion from before
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:13
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Good, another card for my not all cards theme deck. that's a pretty good deck
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:17
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:that's a pretty good deck Not all that bad, at least.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:24
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:uhhh Hmm, this is slow. I don't think my GB Adventure Knights is interested in this. I'll try it though, double downfall seems pretty strong.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:36
|
|
|
Tom Clancy is Dead posted:Hmm, this is slow. I don't think my GB Adventure Knights is interested in this. I'll try it though, double downfall seems pretty strong. Yeah it should coat 1/2 mana
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:37
|
|
|
first of all, mono-green ramp isn't a thing because all the payoffs from ramping are things like mass manipulation, hydroid krasis, electrodominance, explosion, all the finales, Chandra, Lilliana, Ugin,Nissa, and golos. They made a ramp card that is super bad at ramping. What non-krasis creatures are you ramping into with that? Its a forest you can't fetch.
A Moose fucked around with this message at 22:41 on Sep 17, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:39
|
|
|
A Moose posted:first of all, mono-green ramp isn't a thing because all the payoffs from ramping are things like mass manipulation, hydroid krasis, electrodominance, explosion, all the finales, Chandra, Lilliana, Ugin,Nissa, and golos. They made a ramp card that is super bad at ramping. What non-krasis creatures are you ramping into with that? Its a forest you can't fetch. the opportunity cost of playing it in your deck is extremely low if you have a bunch of forests so why not replace 1-2 forests with this
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:52
|
|
|
A Moose posted:first of all, mono-green ramp isn't a thing because all the payoffs from ramping are things like mass manipulation, hydroid krasis, electrodominance, explosion, all the finales, Chandra, Lilliana, Ugin,Nissa, and golos. They made a ramp card that is super bad at ramping. What non-krasis creatures are you ramping into with that? Its a forest you can't fetch. There is something about these new lands that make certain magic players completely broke brained.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 22:55
|
|
|
Tom Clancy is Dead posted:Hmm, this is slow. I don't think my GB Adventure Knights is interested in this. I'll try it though, double downfall seems pretty strong. Yeah it's probably not for every deck but imagine going turn two clover, turn three cast Seasonal Ritual adding GG, Heart's Desire creating two 1/1s, cast Lovestruck Beast. Seems pretty brutal. Or even just going turn three double rampant growth with Beanstalk Giant
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:00
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:Yeah it's probably not for every deck but imagine going turn two clover, turn three cast Seasonal Ritual adding GG, Heart's Desire creating two 1/1s, cast Lovestruck Beast. Seems pretty brutal. Or even just going turn three double rampant growth with Beanstalk Giant there's also a 1/1 for G that draws you a card for every creature who has an adventure that you play, there's potentially enough powerful payoffs to try to build around in constructed
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:05
|
|
|
Elyv posted:there's also a 1/1 for G that draws you a card for every creature who has an adventure that you play, there's potentially enough powerful payoffs to try to build around in constructed Edgewall Inkeeper, that's what my GB knights deck is built around. But I slanted pretty aggressive, with this it might be better to go with a slower grindier build.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:08
|
|
|
Would a land called "woods" that tapped for G be better or worse than a forest?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:14
|
|
|
If you -2 with Chandra, Acolyte of Flame and target an Instant/Sorcery Adventure with it, can you cast the creature side?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:14
|
|
|
Adventure cards are treated as creatures in most cases, so you couldn't target it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:21
|
|
|
resistentialism posted:Adventure cards are treated as creatures in most cases, so you couldn't target it. "most cases" being everywhere other than the stack
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:31
|
|
|
Arivia posted:maybe stop polling middle schoolers on what's cool How do you do fellow kids. There is one person in my group that hates all split and transform cards and refuses to make decks with them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:35
|
|
|
GoutPatrol posted:How do you do fellow kids. Trans- and bi-phobia are common in the gamer community, I'm not surprised.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
A Moose posted:Would a land called "woods" that tapped for G be better or worse than a forest? Worse, doesn't allow your castle to come into play untapped.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
Better because woods is a funnier word.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 12:17 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2019 23:54
|
|