|
Oceanbound posted:Is that Hakurei Reimu 
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 19:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:11 |
|
|
long-rear end nips Diane posted:I'm going to enjoy watching someone play the G/B food deck on youtube or twitch but I don't think I'll be playing it myself. it's important to not play with your food
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 19:53
|
|
|
If there's not a pigeon-rat possibility I'm going to be upset.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 19:55
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:I think outside of Brainstorm (so literally only Legacy) Irencrag Pyromancer is very close to 2R 0/4 with T: deal 3 to any target. Is that busted? Not really, but it's a very good value card. That said it's not really the kind of card control decks or aggro decks really want, so it's hard to say if it'll fit into anything. Wouldn’t that card be nuts?
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:06
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:That faerie is a clear power-level mythic. It's straight busted and will be a format staple until it rotates. Also utterly stupid in draft I think this faerie and the wish one may have had their rarities swapped when they realized how oppressive bounce+creature is compared to a 1/4 blocker in limited.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:15
|
|
|
Bounce flash farie is going to steal a shitload of games and there will be a ton of situations where you could hold on and stabilize, unless the have a way to bounce my thing and play a threat....
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:23
|
|
|
Why is there a random creature dressed like a miko in the European set anyway
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
fadam posted:Wouldn’t that card be nuts? Sampatrick posted:That would indeed be extremely good lmao Would it? Here are the most similar cards:       + 2 more variants of the Artillery card. Every one of these cards are WILDLY unplayable in constructed except for Dynavolt Tower, though admittedly outside of Dynavolt they cost more and have restrictions/do less in the case of the Artillery.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:34
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:Would it? Here are the most similar cards: None of these cards are remotely comparable lol. A 3 mana repeatable free bolt per turn would be absolutely insane, especially since it doesn’t die to itself.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:37
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:+ 2 more variants of the Artillery card. Every one of these cards are WILDLY unplayable in constructed except for Dynavolt Tower, though admittedly outside of Dynavolt they cost more and have restrictions/do less in the case of the Artillery. All of those have a hugely higher set up cost than "draw an extra card, somehow" something that is in general good to be doing for its own sake. I just realized lighning strike is out of standard as of rotation. Granted I've only been back nce IXN but that feels weird.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:37
|
|
|
All of those are substantially worse than a 2R 0/4 that taps to bolt any target. Think about how many times you have to level up that shaman to get a worse version of that effect.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:38
|
|
|
Lone Goat posted:Riftwing Cloudskate was uncommon and this comparative to that. This card is so, so much better than Cloudskate, it's not even close. This strikes me as possibly the best card spoiled so far for standard and an easy modern playable. As always, contextual, etc etc but this card is obscene
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:39
|
|
|
1. costs literally twice as much, dies to disfigure, shock, mask of immolation and a million other cards in the format 2. requires two mana and two other creatures to tap and dies to shock and disfigure 3. does something completely different and is standard playable anyways 4. costs more, requires you to sacrifice a specific typed creature to cast it at all, lower toughness 5. costs five times as much to bring online 6. deals less damage AND deals damage to you AND has lower toughness these are terrible comparisons
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:41
|
|
|
Yeah I don’t know how you can post five examples of more expensive cards that have a shittier version of the effect and not change your mind. 2R tap to draw a lightning bolt every turn on a bolt-proof body would see play in a lot of decks I think. That’s obviously not what the spoiled card is, but that is the card you came up with in your example.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:42
|
|
|
Oh gently caress off WotC that isn't a mythic. Tainen posted:It Mythic because they know you have extra Mythic wildcards since rare ones are in more demand. Thanks WOTC! actually yeah you're right
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:44
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:This card is so, so much better than Cloudskate, it's not even close. we have reached peak set evaluation hysteria
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:45
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:we have reached peak set evaluation hysteria Idk about modern but this will be a standard staple.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:49
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:we have reached peak set evaluation hysteria
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:49
|
|
|
i think the card is going to be good if a mono u deck exists and will be good in simic flash, i do not think it will be particularly impressive outside of those decks it is almost certainly not modern playable
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:52
|
|
|
Sampatrick posted:i think the card is going to be good if a mono u deck exists and will be good in simic flash, i do not think it will be particularly impressive outside of those decks It might slot into faeries for some flexibility. Very few matchups where you just wouldn't want this to be vclique. Nearly unplayable.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:54
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:Oh gently caress off WotC that isn't a mythic. its just as mythic as the green castle is rare
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:57
|
|
|
Also if everything is getting stupidly evaluated against “Gets bounced by Teferi” we should also acknowledge that Flash is a much worse mechanic in a meta with Teferi.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 20:58
|
|
|
i'm angry that people consider the most popular card in the format during evaluations. (adventures are actually decent against teferi.) No Wave fucked around with this message at 21:03 on Sep 18, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:00
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:This card is so, so much better than Cloudskate, it's not even close. It's better than Cloudskate but it's more like a rare than mythic. Do you really think this is better than the knight that casts Not Heroic Downfall? Modern playable lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:02
|
|
|
No Wave posted:i'm angry that people consider the most popular card in the format during evaluations. It also has to do with people incorrectly considering Teferi during card evaluations. Bounce is not the same as destroy, and Teferi cannot bounce every turn, so the threat of some tempo loss doesn’t make these cards unplayable.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:06
|
|
|
The best use of Teferi is to bounce your own stuff. This is why Esper has been so good - Oath of Kaya, kill your thing, Teferi your Oath of Kaya is extremely difficult to beat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:08
|
|
|
If I gave you an over/under of 50 for the number of times the word Teferi shows up in No Wave’s last 100 posts, which would you pick?
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:11
|
|
|
Some galaxy brain poo poo from my boy Sam. https://twitter.com/SamuelHBlack/status/1174400141882810370
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
I mean I'm not gonna go to the mat over speculative card evaluation but it's a pretty clear format staple imo and calling that a hysterical take is kinda silly
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
I don't think I've seen a teferi get a 2nd bounce off more than once every 20 games. If a teferi comes down, bounces something, ticks up for 2-3 turns, and bounces something again, you either lost that game because you can't meaningfully interact with planeswalkers or you don't care that they're drawing cards for free because you're doing the same thing and neither of you have any targets.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:23
|
|
|
moush posted:Some galaxy brain poo poo from my boy Sam. So Samoa Joe, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning at Sacrifice. See Joe, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
"How can it equal one? If one times one equals one that means that two is of no value because one times itself has no effect. One times one equals two because the square root of four is two, so what's the square root of two? Should be one, but we're told it's two, and that cannot be."
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:32
|
|
|
    
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
sensing a theme here too bad it dies to narset
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
found the new bitterblossom obviously
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
It's specifically only the 2nd card, right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
Tibalt posted:It's specifically only the 2nd card, right? Yes
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
Elyv posted:found the new bitterblossom obviously More like Shitterblossom, amirite
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
Improbable Alliance is really good!
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 21:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 10:11 |
|
|
Yeah Improbable Alliance will almost certainly be my first new-season standard brew
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2019 22:06
|
|