|
Chilichimp posted:I mean... you can support a politicians policy proposals without supporting their candidacy for president. Yes, people can be very dumb. As evidenced by her previous tweets where she "claimed a hood" or some other cringeworthy poo poo from a white woman.
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2019 23:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:34 |
|
|
 https://twitter.com/WillVanguard/status/1175500323911294978 https://twitter.com/donnabrazile/status/1174758610565554177  We have to win or whole lotta people gonna die. Nonsense fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Sep 21, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2019 23:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1175524590359105536
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2019 23:37
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:I'm not certain there is enough wealth to sustain that indefinitely. Doesn't mean we shouldn't try. If we're wrong, oh well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2019 23:42
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:I'm not certain there is enough wealth to sustain that indefinitely. doesn't really need to be, the transition is the only hard part once we're switched over from the horrible private insurance system it'll almost certainly cost less overall than we're spending now and we can work the kinks out (although I'll grant that building funding into a program is something I support for "it's harder for the reactionaries to destroy it") reasons also blah blah MMT blah blah "how do we pay for it" is the wrong question blah blah
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2019 23:52
|
|
|
Tulsi had to delete a Tweet of her supporting Modi again (the linked tweet was active for an hour or so but is gone now) https://twitter.com/EoinHiggins_/status/1175515784040390657
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:04
|
|
|
I asked Tulsi Gabbard today if she would nominate an atheist to the supreme court and if she believes that religion is a good thing in government. She said absolutely to the atheist and called using Christian values as a basis for government "Antithetical to American democracy." She's like my bottom 3 candidates out of the pack, but that was a good answer I thought  Thats my Tulsa Oklahoma story. Edit: This was at the steak fry, not at a rally or anything.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
Glasses Optional posted:I asked Tulsi Gabbard today if she would nominate an atheist to the supreme court and if she believes that religion is a good thing in government. She said absolutely to the atheist and called using Christian values as a basis for government "Antithetical to American democracy." next ask if she'd appoint a muslim justice
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:32
|
|
|
the funniest thing of the campaign so far was tulsi posting a thirst trap tweet on i think monday.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:49
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/banditelli/status/1175542936542433280
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:53
|
|
|
imagine trying to force Warren to become Bernie instead of just supporting Bernie jfc
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 00:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/PotatoesOGrady/status/1175432939225657344?s=19 Yikes. I initially thought Warren would be just as good as Bernie but now I don't even think I'd want her to have a spot in his cabinet. That being said, I can completely understand why many people really want to see a woman in the White House and brushing them off with a sarcastic "We 👏 need 👏 more 👏 female 👏 billionaires" or whatever is lovely. I hope Bernie chooses a great woman who shares his values as VP and that she can succeed him. From what I've read Nina Turner seems to be the name that pops up most frequently.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:07
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://twitter.com/PotatoesOGrady/status/1175432939225657344?s=19 Nina seems pretty awesome (someone please give me the rundown if she's not) and I would like her to be his second because it would also let me put aside concerns about his age.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:17
|
|
|
What can we do stop Warren's "Centrist-roading" of the progressive movement? Or do you guys think this is just liberals trying to control the narrative and stop us from having faith in good and cool leftist candidates? https://twitter.com/brianneDMR/status/1175560652812763136 
Typo fucked around with this message at 01:25 on Sep 22, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:21
|
|
|
RuanGacho posted:Nina seems pretty awesome (someone please give me the rundown if she's not) and I would like her to be his second because it would also let me put aside concerns about his age. Nina Turner is a delightful human being and I will fight tooth and nail to make her VP and probably President after that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:21
|
|
|
Lol remember when Warren got cheers for dunking on Delaney by asking him why he was running for president if all he had to say was to tell us we couldn't do things?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:21
|
|
|
lol identity politics voters are literally going to destroy the planet so a few minorities can be billionaires
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:27
|
|
|
The worst thing for warren to do is actually talk about her policies and beliefs because they clash very hard with the progressive brand she's made for herself can't have people figuring out she's a fraud until after the primary
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:29
|
|
|
Typo posted:What can we do stop Warren's "Centrist-roading" of the progressive movement? Or do you guys think this is just liberals trying to control the narrative and stop us from having faith in good and cool leftist candidates?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:31
|
|
|
Phi230 posted:The worst thing for warren to do is actually talk about her policies and beliefs because they clash very hard with the progressive brand she's made for herself if warren wins I'm just giving up, at least if biden wins AoC can win 2024
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:33
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://twitter.com/PotatoesOGrady/status/1175432939225657344?s=19 gently caress coddling this garbage.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:33
|
|
|
Typo posted:if warren wins I'm just giving up, at least if biden wins AoC can win 2024 Idk I would like to see her be a senatorial thorn in the side for a while. Not because she needs to be, or something, just because it would be great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 01:46
|
|
|
Typo posted:What can we do stop Warren's "Centrist-roading" of the progressive movement? Or do you guys think this is just liberals trying to control the narrative and stop us from having faith in good and cool leftist candidates? To a person who thinks Warren's proposal's are backed by deliberate thought because they are more wonkish? Nothing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:17
|
|
|
Judakel posted:To a person who thinks Warren's proposal's are backed by deliberate thought because they are more wonkish? Nothing. the poll seems off to me, if even in DnD which is dominated by white liberal number fuckerstain types Bernie is the candidate of choice, it's transparent his support would be higher in real life with working class and minority voters
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:23
|
|
|
Typo posted:the poll seems off to me, if even in DnD which is dominated by white liberal number fuckerstain types Bernie is the candidate of choice, it's transparent his support would be higher in real life with working class and minority voters Could be low-info voters getting wind of media coverage of Warren as the "plans" candidate and liking the sound of that without looking into it much. I'm still not putting any stock in polls prior to 2020 and, honestly, not even after that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:29
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:gently caress coddling this garbage. What garbage? There's a key difference between "it's time for [any woman] to be President" just for the sake of it being a woman and "if there's a truly progressive woman who fits the requirements for VP, it's not a bad idea to choose them over equally progressive men". It's no different than any affirmative action policy that takes into account historical and continuing structural roadblocks that screw over and limit women. Like, for example, politicians that refuse to hold private meetings with women because that makes God angry. Unrelated, https://twitter.com/BernieUpstateNY/status/1175547452289638401?s=19 They're so unbelievably blatant with this poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:30
|
|
|
Honestly it's going to be fun watching the media do everything they can to get Warren the nomination over Sanders and then immediately do a complete 180 and attack her non-stop until election day should she secure it since the actual goal is to stop Bernie.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:42
|
|
|
Typo posted:the poll seems off to me, if even in DnD which is dominated by white liberal number fuckerstain types Bernie is the candidate of choice, it's transparent his support would be higher in real life with working class and minority voters DnD doesn't mean anything anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:47
|
|
|
did the voters and media folks miss the memo that bernie sanders is the compromise candidate?
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:49
|
|
|
KingNastidon posted:did the voters and media folks miss the memo that bernie sanders is the compromise candidate? Jesus christ man.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 02:53
|
|
|
bowser posted:https://twitter.com/PotatoesOGrady/status/1175432939225657344?s=19 after a skim i'm not actually unusually worried about this Josh Delaney guy, despite a Jacobin hit paragraph one year as teacher for TFA (fine whatever), one year as a fresh young face on their policy board (the worst thing on his resume, seems to have been focused on community engagement stuff), then into Harvard for his masters in ed policy, then more-or-less-directly into Warren's senatorial 'cabinet', where he's spent the last five years I don't think a year in TFA policy stuff causing him to go "ooh, this stuff is interesting" is in itself that much of a problem; Harvard's education program is probably more important as an influence. If you want to look at his mindset and products, you should look at Warren's education votes and thoughts as a Senator and a presidential candidate, which... you should be doing anyway? Goatse James Bond fucked around with this message at 03:10 on Sep 22, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:07
|
|
|
TrixR4kids posted:If you live in Iowa (or anywhere really) you should be volunteering for Bernie yesterday. Pete pete pete
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:08
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:after a skim i'm not actually unusually worried about this Josh Delaney guy The same Warren who says she supports M4A one minute and then doesn't the next? I am not going to bet on her future decisions based on her voting record in congress.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:09
|
|
|
edit nm
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:12
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:edit nm Spit it out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:14
|
|
|
Judakel posted:Spit it out. Judakel posted:The same Warren who says she supports M4A one minute and then doesn't the next? I am not going to bet on her future decisions based on her voting record in congress. i disagree with your position but it's less dumb than the Jacobin attack there you go, it wasn't an interesting post
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:23
|
|
|
That would be pretty shocking. How would the race's dynamics change if they were done to four candidates in a month?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:29
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:there you go, it wasn't an interesting post You're half right, at least.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:29
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:i disagree with your position but it's less dumb than the Jacobin attack The Jacobin attack must've been good, considering you're saying it was dumb.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:34 |
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:after a skim i'm not actually unusually worried about this Josh Delaney guy, despite a Jacobin hit paragraph Warren is pro-charter as gently caress, as has been brought up numerous times, she will absolutely not be rejecting TFA shitheads.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2019 03:31
|
|