|
We have an update on the transcript release: apparently the call audio is being audited by the IRS for the indefinite future
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 08:02 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:As I understand it, until they actually vote to impeach and send it to the Senate for a trial, they can continue to add more articles of impeachment. Yeah, the House should be able to add charges during the course of their investigations as they dig up more dirt, before sending it to the Senate for trial. Pretty sure they have to stop investigations and produce a final case to the Senate for consideration though.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:43 |
|
It's kind of hard to put the tooth paste back in the tube, even if the Ukrainian phone call turns out to be innocent.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:45 |
|
Mummy Xzibit posted:That tweet says the White House will release the entire complaint, not just a transcript. I think anyone who believes this is true hasn't been paying attention
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/1176658774372712450quote:Trump’s closest advisers, including acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who was ordered by Trump to suspend the aid to Ukraine, are also increasingly targets of internal finger-pointing. Mulvaney has agitated for foreign aid to be cut universally but has also stayed away from meetings with Giuliani and Trump, officials said. But the person who appears to have been more directly involved at nearly every stage of the entanglement with Ukraine is Giuliani. quote:Several officials traced their initial concerns about the path of U.S.-Ukrainian relations to news reports and interviews granted by Giuliani in which he began to espouse views and concerns that did not appear connected to U.S. priorities or policy. Reading between the lines, seems like Bolton is bringing out the knives for Guiliani The Glumslinger fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Sep 25, 2019 |
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:47 |
|
The DNI uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing: https://twitter.com/shaneharris/status/1176647188916686849?s=19
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:47 |
|
Trump swore an oath, too. It says nothing to us.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:50 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Which has me worried and hoping that Trump is just too stupid to realize how bad it makes him look. There's so many layers of dumb it's hard to tell which is the actually prevailing one. However, most likely he thinks that this whole thing is just about the whistle blower thing. They forced his hand, so here's your dumb report. History has been that nothing will happen to him, so he doesn't actually think anything will happen. He thinks that now this whole thing will go away, or at the very least result in just another The thing is that, while this particular thing is what finally caused the cowards in the leadership to pull the trigger, it's hardly the only or even the most egregious impeachable thing Donny's done. Now that the inquiry is on, the best possible outcome is that Pelosi slow walks this thing past the point of reason and it becomes month 11 of Impeachment. Which is actually slightly less likely than the House throwing together a list of crimes on a mustard stained napkin and voting to impeach in 5 minutes.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:51 |
|
Tibalt posted:It's kind of hard to put the tooth paste back in the tube, even if the Ukrainian phone call turns out to be innocent. The ONLY reason (of course) that the administration proposing to releasing a "transcript" is that they think that will stop the whole process and crimes can continue. "Hey Nancy let's make a deal," is only one of infinite reasons why the whole process enormously should not.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:51 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:So do you think the House Dems will do a take-backsies after they get the whistleblower complaint? Doubtful. They’re too invested now and too many public statements made.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:52 |
|
well looks like i got egg on my face. pelosi is going through with it afterall
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:52 |
|
AhhYes posted:The DNI uses a lot of words to say absolutely nothing: he's saying he's not going down with the ship
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:53 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/1176658774372712450 This seems significant and damning.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:53 |
|
ahahahaha man someone got really loving mad at getting unmasked as a rudy guliani fan
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:53 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:This seems significant and damning. quote:The perception of a parallel, hidden agenda intensified in the summer as officials at the NSC, Pentagon and State Department began reacting to rumors that hundreds of millions of dollars of military and intelligence aid to Ukraine was being mysteriously impeded. quote:On July 24, former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III testified before Congress on the outcome of the Russia investigation, a probe that had threatened Trump for much of his presidency and was focused on whether he had conspired with Moscow to influence the U.S. election. The Glumslinger fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Sep 25, 2019 |
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:54 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:https://twitter.com/mattdpearce/status/1176658774372712450 Rudy was also instrumental in bringing down Hillary for Trump in 2016. Remember his bragging in front of live television about bombshells fed to him by members of the FBI New York office days before Comey's announcement? Rudy needs to go to jail for a long, long, long time. ThanosWasRight fucked around with this message at 01:59 on Sep 25, 2019 |
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:54 |
|
What if John Bolton is the whistle blower
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/silviakillings/status/1176659293803819010Shimrra Jamaane posted:What if John Bolton is the whistle blower
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:55 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:[quote]The perception of a parallel, hidden agenda intensified in the summer as officials at the NSC, Pentagon and State Department began reacting to rumors that hundreds of millions of dollars of military and intelligence aid to Ukraine was being mysteriously impeded. part of me thinks nothing will happen But the other parts can't wait to see this dumb fat bitch FRY
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:56 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:We know the whistleblower is still a member of the government how so?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:56 |
|
Pelosi still sucks but can we suspend the "this will be wet fart nothing matters" bullshit for a few days while this plays out? I hope to gently caress this is the dam breaking. Pos vibes only for my neg rear end in a top hat please, I wanna get real hype on the concept of Russia electing Trump, and then Ukraine getting him impeached and indicted.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:59 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:well looks like i got egg on my face. pelosi is going through with it afterall That's ok egg is nice.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 01:59 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:well looks like i got egg on my face. pelosi is going through with it afterall Tbf, she did have to be dragged kicking and screaming in the most undignified manner possible. I honestly can't think of a way she could have dragged her feet more blatantly and obnoxiously.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:00 |
|
evilweasel posted:how so? I was fairly sure I had read it in several places, but I seem to be unable to find any of them
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:01 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:I was fairly sure I had read it in several places, but I seem to be unable to find any of them well if you find them i'd be interested considering there's persistent rumors it was Coats or his fired deputy i also suspect the name hasn't been widely shared enough or trump would have tweeted it out
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:04 |
|
Here's some red meat for the thread. Let's say Pelosi's plan was holding off on supporting impeachment until the best possibly moment, under the assumption that Trump would inevitably stick his dick in a beehive. Now that his circus peanut is covered in stings, they can drag out the official inquiry for a few months and then dump the vote in the Senates lap shortly before the election. Was it actually a bad plan?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:04 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:well looks like i got egg on my face. pelosi is going through with it afterall Well you seem a bit confused but maybe... Well I've got you pegged
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:04 |
|
ascii genitals posted:a few days while this plays out Yes, that's the speed of government all right
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:04 |
|
7c Nickel posted:Here's some red meat for the thread. She never had a plan and if she did it was bad
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:05 |
|
7c Nickel posted:Here's some red meat for the thread. i mean if you assume the plan was a good plan, which is your starting assumption, then yes you reach the conclusion it is not a bad plan but the answer is simple: what was out there before wasn't enough to get most of her caucus behind impeachment as a political matter and she did not believe that what was out there before was enough for impeachment as a political matter. this, however, was enough to change the calculus on both. there's not anything more to it.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:07 |
|
7c Nickel posted:Here's some red meat for the thread. Yeah because you can throw any 12D chess justification at it but impeachment was still morally correct months ago, kids in concentration camps have been suffering while she enacts her master plan, and people are supposed to do the right thing, not the thing that guarantees their desired result
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:08 |
|
7c Nickel posted:Here's some red meat for the thread. This was the self-impeachment all along.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:08 |
|
7c Nickel posted:Here's some red meat for the thread. Yes. She could have moved forward with impeachment on day one of being made HML and been perfectly justified. Waiting as long as she did just further normalized Trump's lawlessness and raised the bar ever higher to a standard that as far as she knew would never be sufficiently met.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:09 |
|
What's the point of technically being able to remove presidents if nobody bothers to try until their term is almost up anyways no matter how egregious the crimes
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:09 |
|
evilweasel posted:i mean if you assume the plan was a good plan, which is your starting assumption, then no it is not a bad plan I mean it would fall apart if Trump didn't do something stupid that would make his chances worse which was a real dang-- hahahah ahhaahahahahah. cheetah7071 posted:What's the point of technically being able to remove presidents if nobody bothers to try until their term is almost up anyways no matter how egregious the crimes I guess the other assumption is that the Senate would never convict, a fairly solid one in my mind, so the only question was how to best use it to damage Trump and the other Republicans.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1176658973547814912
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:10 |
|
She also could have expressed anything but pure antipathy towards the idea, which was incredibly demoralizing to the entire non-chud population.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:11 |
|
tangentionally related question: is anybody aware of any historical times where political norms get horribly broken and then things later return to normal (and remain a democracy), without intervening violence?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:12 |
|
evilweasel posted:well if you find them i'd be interested considering there's persistent rumors it was Coats or his fired deputy That would make shockingly little sense for either of them to be the whistleblower
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 08:02 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:What's the point of technically being able to remove presidents if nobody bothers to try until their term is almost up anyways no matter how egregious the crimes politicans are supposed to care about the good of the country more than party politics and their own careers. obviously this is a bad and unworkable assumption but that's how it is intended to go even if trump doesn't get removed from office there is still some merit in him being damaged by impeachment stuff going into an election
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 02:13 |