|
Is your MSP a CSP? My CSP has just as many privileges as my GA account. In fact, probably far too many.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 19:18 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 08:01 |
|
snackcakes posted:I'm not sure how I'd make that work, care to elaborate? (I'm not being sassy, just stupid) You would use 'Show one-time code in app', then store the generated token somewhere secure to share with your colleagues. They could configure this in their own apps. Or have a bot spit it out upon request (probably a better solution if you want to keep tracking who's requesting tokens when).
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 19:19 |
|
snackcakes posted:...the former. I don't think I can convince my company to make individual admin accounts for every technical member of my company for each of our many clients If you're a Microsoft partner your delegated admin accounts could have global admin. I don't recommend giving everyone global admin, but there should be no weird restrictions.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 19:31 |
|
The Fool posted:If it's bluescreening during the PE stage and not after imaging/first restarts, you could try using a real computer or virtualbox instead of Hyper-V for your testing. Or you may just need to maintain two different PE images. Yeah, it's bluescreening immediately upon trying to boot to WinPE (System thread exception not handled, AppleSSD.sys; no specific stop code given). On the bright side, injecting drivers is the only significant customization I'm doing to WinPE, so the driverless image should work fine for Hyper-v as long as I don't have to edit bootstrap.ini or something.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 20:06 |
|
If you're an MSP then you should be using your own Office 365 accounts with delegated admin permissions to admin the tenants, you get seats of EM+S E3 licensing free with a Silver partner status and you can use that to configure conditional MFA. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/partnercenter/multi-factor-auth?view=partnercenterps-2.0
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 20:08 |
|
Speaking of Office 365, anyone have this fun overlay breaking admin center? Seems to not be machine/browser/tenant specific, I can't zap it to switch back to classic mode either, only seems to be new folks in "new" admin center mode
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:02 |
|
We just sold half our company to another company. What's the best way to migrate mailboxes from our Office 365 to their Exchange 2013? Am I to export the mailboxes to PST files? Please tell me there is a more elegant way?
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:46 |
|
kiwid posted:We just sold half our company to another company. Hahahahahahahaha. No.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:47 |
|
https://help.bittitan.com/hc/en-us/articles/115008107267-Office-365-to-On-Premises-Exchange-version-2007-and-later-Migration-Guide
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:48 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:https://help.bittitan.com/hc/en-us/articles/115008107267-Office-365-to-On-Premises-Exchange-version-2007-and-later-Migration-Guide ooo I didn't look very closely. I thought migrationwiz just went the one direction. Thanks.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:49 |
|
It's a really good product, it's cheap, the support is great. You don't need anything more than the basic mail migration licenses if you're just moving mail and you have an AD at the other side to set the accounts up for you automatically. You'll presumably have to forward messages out of your domain across to the other company for a while, but you can just throw a load of contacts into your Office 365 tenant and create DLs to achieve that.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 21:54 |
|
Adding another vote for Bittitan, over the last year we’ve been migrating 1400 employees from the acquisition we made almost exactly a year ago. Once we set up the proper service account with the divesting company it’s been super easy to use.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2019 22:07 |
|
The answer is always BitTitan.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 18:35 |
|
Yea we decided to use BitTitan. Just hoping the recipient company accepts this method. Unrelated though, does anyone still use Server 2016? If so, why does it take like 8 loving hours to do the initial Windows updates?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:19 |
|
kiwid posted:Yea we decided to use BitTitan. Just hoping the recipient company accepts this method. Has windows update ever been fast?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:30 |
|
Sickening posted:Has windows update ever been fast? Server 2016 is the absolutely worst with updates. It takes loving forever. 2019 is way way way better in my experience.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:31 |
|
GreenNight posted:Server 2016 is the absolutely worst with updates. It takes loving forever. 2019 is way way way better in my experience. Yeah I'm regretting not renewing our SA now.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 19:51 |
|
kiwid posted:Yea we decided to use BitTitan. Just hoping the recipient company accepts this method. It's the lovely way they built the servicing stack. Thanks Ants posted:https://help.bittitan.com/hc/en-us/articles/115008107267-Office-365-to-On-Premises-Exchange-version-2007-and-later-Migration-Guide Nth'ing this. There are other solutions as well, but this works well. Migrating to 2013 on prem.... whoof.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 20:39 |
|
kiwid posted:Yeah I'm regretting not renewing our SA now. Wouldn't you just get 2019 licenses when you update your SA?
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 21:02 |
|
skipdogg posted:It's the lovely way they built the servicing stack. Yeah it seems like the better way to do this would be to go Office 365 as a hybrid deployment, migrate the new company direct to that and then slowly move all your accounts there as well.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 21:06 |
|
Sickening posted:Wouldn't you just get 2019 licenses when you update your SA? What do you mean? I'm installing a new 2016 server because I don't have 2019 licenses
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 21:25 |
|
kiwid posted:What do you mean? I'm installing a new 2016 server because I don't have 2019 licenses Your SA for a server license should cover anything of equal status. 2016 standard vs 2019 standard. Datacenter for datacenter, etc. Just call your VAR.
|
# ? Sep 25, 2019 22:07 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:If you're an MSP then you should be using your own Office 365 accounts with delegated admin permissions to admin the tenants, you get seats of EM+S E3 licensing free with a Silver partner status and you can use that to configure conditional MFA. Hey, this looks cool. I'm going to do check this out more in-depth after I get some caffeine in me. Thanks!
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 13:18 |
|
Lol so the other company doesn't want to use MigrationWiz (even if we're paying) so PST files it is.quote:I’m thinking we could get an external drive and load it up with PST files and then upload it Ugh.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 17:28 |
|
kiwid posted:Lol so the other company doesn't want to use MigrationWiz (even if we're paying) so PST files it is. Your company gives this company it owns too much voting power. How can someone not want to use migration wiz? Like on what grounds? Those leaders are the types that usually find themselves fired after an acquisition.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 17:34 |
|
Create an account for someone at the new company to use, give it access to the mailboxes of all the staff who are moving over, tell them to go hog wild
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 18:03 |
|
Sickening posted:Your company gives this company it owns too much voting power. How can someone not want to use migration wiz? Like on what grounds? Those leaders are the types that usually find themselves fired after an acquisition. Their reasoning was that they don't want to dump the mail into the Exchange mailboxes due to sizing limitations, etc. They want to put the PSTs on an archival server or some poo poo. I suppose that's not terrible reasoning... I don't know. Also, we don't own them. We sold part of our company to them, so they own the mailboxes technically.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 18:30 |
|
I take it all the technical talent is staying with the old company. Let em drown in a sea of PSTs I say as you wave and shut the door slowly.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 21:30 |
|
incoherent posted:I take it all the technical talent is staying with the old company. Let em drown in a sea of PSTs I say as you wave and shut the door slowly. Yeah not my problem. If they want PSTs they can have their PSTs. I see MigrationWiz can also dump mailboxes to PST files on Microsoft Azure so that's what I'm going to do. I still get to use BitTitan and they still get their PSTs. Win-Win I guess?
|
# ? Sep 26, 2019 22:08 |
|
Imagine someone wanting to deal with PST files
|
# ? Sep 28, 2019 08:17 |
|
I've converted all our MFDs to use Office 365 SMTP relay using SSL on port 587. Why then when I block port 25 on the firewall, do these stop working?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 15:04 |
|
kiwid posted:I've converted all our MFDs to use Office 365 SMTP relay using SSL on port 587. Why then when I block port 25 on the firewall, do these stop working? As described, someone's being stupid. Either you forgot to open up outbound 587 for those devices or they're still trying 25 for some dumb reason. Packet captures will tell you everything you need to know.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 15:41 |
|
Is 587 not for TLS? If it is, I thought it goes through 25 first, runs STARTTLS command then upgrades the connection to port 587 That aside, Is anyone using REFS in a CSV on dedicated SAN storage for Hyper V Clusters? Any pros/cons at this point. Lots of google searches say stay away in but it is from 2016. lol internet. fucked around with this message at 16:31 on Oct 1, 2019 |
# ? Oct 1, 2019 15:54 |
|
wolrah posted:As described, someone's being stupid. Either you forgot to open up outbound 587 for those devices or they're still trying 25 for some dumb reason. That could be. Now that I remember, I think the Canon printers need to change the port in the maintenance settings somewhere. lol internet. posted:Is 587 not for TLS? If it is, I thought it goes through 25 first, runs STARTTLS command then upgrades the connection to port 587 Ah that's probably it. Yes, I'm using STARTTLS (which is still SSL right?) but I didn't know it needed port 25 then upgrades it.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 16:39 |
|
lol internet. posted:Is 587 not for TLS? If it is, I thought it goes through 25 first, runs STARTTLS command then upgrades the connection to port 587 No, STARTTLS upgrades within the same connection. If it started on 25 it stays on 25, if it started on 587 it stays on 587. 465 is implied TLS, so the negotiation happens before the first SMTP verb is transmitted. The main purpose of moving clients to submitting messages on 587 is to get them off of 25 so that ISPs and network operators can block outbound 25 by default, only opening it up for their actual mail servers. This basically eliminates the problem of botted end-user PCs sending spam and gives you an easily detected red flag for something being wrong. If it still required starting on port 25 that'd defeat the purpose. In an ideal world the only systems that can connect out to the internet on port 25 would be those that are defined in your SPF records. All clients should be using 465 or 587.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 17:10 |
|
wolrah posted:No, STARTTLS upgrades within the same connection. If it started on 25 it stays on 25, if it started on 587 it stays on 587. 465 is implied TLS, so the negotiation happens before the first SMTP verb is transmitted. Yeah my goal was to prevent bots sending spam so thanks for the info. I'll work on getting these changed.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 17:44 |
|
I used this to get a Canon device sending outbound email using Office 365 https://techbytes.co/2016/05/09/connecting-a-canon-mfp-to-office-365/ Could never get SMTP relay to work though, ended up having to license an account for them. Didn't have time to do a Wireshark trace to see what was going on.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2019 19:14 |
|
Who is a good cloud provider that provides on demand per hour windows instances? This will just be for testing stuff, I use digitalOcean for linux but need to play with windows from time to time. Should I just use azure?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 19:33 |
|
Azure, AWS, Google, all offer Windows
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 19:41 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 08:01 |
|
I've spun up Windows server instances on Google cloud super easily and quick before to do some transfers with no issues. Fastest way to move files from cloud to cloud when you have lovely DSL sometimes.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 20:42 |