|
Guavanaut posted:McVey on some of the new innovations in housing. She made a speech the other day stating that greenfield land (she meant greenbelt land) should only be developed in the most exceptional circumstances which had to be clarified by DCLG immediately after. E: deletebeepbeepbeep fucked around with this message at 17:39 on Oct 2, 2019 |
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:32 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 17:53 |
|
Finally, now I can have the plastic 3D printed home that will melt in summer I’ve always wanted!
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:33 |
|
radmonger posted:When you buy a new pair of boots, you know that eventually the soles will wear out. The relevant word is ‘eventually’; you can get some walking in between now and then. Oh my god just shut the gently caress up you relentless idiot
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:34 |
|
These worn out boots can still give the Torys a good kicking. That's all the analogy I need.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:35 |
|
Preferably steel capped and ganged with spiked chains.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:36 |
|
WhatEvil posted:And some more good comedy:
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:37 |
|
How many miles do I have to walk in my boots to accrue enough Ability Points to level up to Leader of the Opposition?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:39 |
|
I did a thing. I think once my partner and I are over the trauma of the miscarriage we will try again, and I really don’t want our offspring to grow up in a Tory hellscape. Every bit helps right?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:40 |
|
it's not the position you achieve it's the boots you lost along the way
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:41 |
|
Lord Ludikrous posted:I did a thing. You're a good lad, too. And I don't think I said it earlier so I'm so sorry to hear about what happened.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:42 |
|
e: never mind I was beaten pages ago
Scikar fucked around with this message at 18:23 on Oct 2, 2019 |
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:47 |
Lord Ludikrous posted:I did a thing. I wrote in "I support Jeremy Corbyn's socialist agenda" when I joined.
|
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:49 |
|
forkboy84 posted:What other outlets were giving Jeremy Corbyn airtime incidentally? Oh, that's right, before 2015 exactly gently caress all of them. You go where you can to get a platform to put your views out. That's not an excuse. If he'd gladly appeared in The Sun we'd rightly be excoriating him over it. There's no acceptable reason to appear on a propaganda network for a fascist dictatorship except maybe to challenge that regime, which Corbyn wasn't. There were probably quite a few left-wingers who saw Corbyn on there and thought that maybe RT wasn't that bad after all.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:51 |
Comrade Fakename posted:There's no acceptable reason to appear on a propaganda network for a fascist dictatorship So now you're saying that Labour politicians shouldn't appear on the BBC?
|
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:52 |
|
https://twitter.com/Jamie4North/status/1179431655121010688?s=19 https://twitter.com/scottjunglist1/status/1179433920217128960?s=19
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:56 |
|
Wachter posted:How many miles do I have to walk in my boots to accrue enough Ability Points to level up to Leader of the Opposition? 500 miles. And then maybe 500 more.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 17:56 |
|
https://twitter.com/LiamDidsbury/status/1179135812987969537
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:02 |
|
radmonger who did you vote for in 2017
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:03 |
|
Josef bugman posted:However the problem is that, instead of standing around and going "oh dear" there is something you can do. Have an arguement. If you think Corbyn should eventually step down then I wouldn't say I am against it, but have an answer to obvious questions "like whom" and "how does this prevent the right from just taking over Labour again" and the final one "And how do you think this would actually improve things"? And the argument I am making is that when, not if, Corbyn steps down, we should replace him with someone broadly similar. He has done his job; it has worked, more of the same please. The replacement does no really need to be better, to lack some defect he has. We shouldn’t say ‘walking boots have failed, it is time for Crocs’ They just need to not have had their welcome with the public worn out.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:11 |
|
Jose posted:radmonger who did you vote for in 2017 Judging by his posts, the bootlicker party.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:13 |
|
Lord Ludikrous posted:I did a thing Welcome comrade
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:14 |
|
forkboy84 posted:Judging by his posts, the bootlicker party. I wonder if it'll take more or less time until he responds than ronya
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:16 |
|
radmonger posted:And the argument I am making is that when, not if, Corbyn steps down, we should replace him with someone broadly similar. He has done his job; it has worked, more of the same please. What the gently caress are you talking about.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:18 |
|
Jose posted:I wonder if it'll take more or less time until he responds than ronya
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:20 |
|
radmonger posted:And the argument I am making is that when, not if, Corbyn steps down, we should replace him with someone broadly similar. He has done his job; it has worked, more of the same please. In the boot analogy you never mentioned the existence of loads of old cobblers WHICH is ironic given...
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:21 |
|
if you buy a burrito, you end up eating it. corbyn must go, now
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:23 |
|
Guavanaut posted:tbf ronya has that thing going on where if he admits that he voted in the UK then he can by gulag'd by [unspecified ASEAN country] or something so I understand some reluctance there. Wait, what? What country has laws preventing you voting in another country's election?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:23 |
|
Radmonger seems to think politicans have hp and every time someone smears them they lose hp but in reality nobody who liked corbyn in 2017 thinks he's hitler 4.0 now because the papers just keep repeating themselves.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:24 |
|
Parliament to be prorogued next Tuesday, new session 14th October.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:25 |
Gonzo McFee posted:https://twitter.com/Jamie4North/status/1179431655121010688?s=19 Sorry is he saying the clip was edited so that “which is worse, would you say A or B?” “B” is turned into just “would you say A or B”? Re Corbyn and electability: there are three hypotheses and nobody knows which is correct: 1. Corbs is an electoral asset and will win an election for labour despite polling badly (pick your reason: biased polls, lying voters etc) 2. Corbs is an electoral liability but it would be worse to change leaders going into an election 3 Corbs is an electoral liability and we should change him before the next election. Since changing leaders looks weak and the electorate despise weakness more than almost anything else, I think the sensible thing is to stick with him. E: final thought, maybe the path to socialism really is someone who comes across like Blair and then pulls off the mask moments after being confirmed by the Queen as PM and declares a radical agenda, like that Simpsons Russia->USSR scene. (Or more plausibly, implements an ostensibly moderate agenda in the most radical way possible). But it’s still worth trying to do it openly with a proper mandate first. Beefeater1980 fucked around with this message at 18:36 on Oct 2, 2019 |
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:26 |
|
radmonger posted:And the argument I am making is that when, not if, Corbyn steps down, we should replace him with someone broadly similar. He has done his job; it has worked, more of the same please. radmonger, just a couple of pages ago posted:Obviously Labour can’t afford a leadership change now, let alone a contest. But when the opportunity arises, it should be taken. And before the Bell cartoon of all the Tory leaders Corbyn has been in opposition to acquires too many more panels. So when you said Labour should take the opportunity for a leadership change when it arises, you meant that they should hold a ballot when Corbyn steps down? All that waffling about boots boils down to "we should elect a new leader when the current one quits"?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:29 |
|
marktheando posted:Normally true but this next general election will be all about Brexit. What's hilarious is that the papers have locked themselves into a death spiral of single issue brexit, just as Labour have maneuvred themselves into the only realistic brexit position (take no deal off the table then let the people decide between their deal and remain). The only other issue being austerity, on which the Tory party's record is blisteringly toxic. The only problem is that at the moment, a lot of melts are directing that "guess we have to" energy at the lib dems because they are swallowing the Corbyn unelectability garbage hook line and sinker, and those dumb fucks are splitting the vote.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:30 |
|
keep punching joe posted:Parliament to be prorogued next Tuesday, new session 14th October. To be fair a week long prorogation is normal and legal, this time round. It takes about that long normally.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:37 |
|
feedmegin posted:To be fair a week long prorogation is normal and legal, this time round. It takes about that long normally. Feels like more of Boris's bullshit attempts to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:40 |
|
Beefeater1980 posted:Re Corbyn and electability: there are three hypotheses and nobody knows which is correct: actually no we had this whole election in 2017 where corbs got the largest increase in vote share of the labour party since 1945, so we do know
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:41 |
|
feedmegin posted:To be fair a week long prorogation is normal and legal, this time round. It takes about that long normally. And given conference recess would have been in play anyway, it's absolute galaxy brain that they went for an unlawful extended prorogue for the sake of about 5 days in the first place.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:41 |
|
Terry Pratchett's thing about boots is the UKMT equivalent of centrist twitter being obsessed with Harry Potter I guessBobby Deluxe posted:The other thing to bear in mind with polls about leader popularity is the stunning capacity of the average voter to say things like "Well of course I don't want him in power, but we have to because of this single issue that's been hyped up." Corbyn has always polled terribly as best PM, even in 2017 when Labour did well, it's true. So fair enough to ignore that. It's the Labour vote share compared to the tories I'm more worried about. And those numbers only moving a very small amount as Boris does incredibly stupid insane things and pursues no deal brexit.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:43 |
|
If I had something really important to do, I wouldn't take a week off just because. (I totally would, but I'm not in charge of the country)
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:43 |
|
Gort posted:Wait, what? What country has laws preventing you voting in another country's election? Voting in national elections sometimes being considered one of those rights, even though voting in the UK isn't really "rights accorded exclusively to its citizens" because, like, Irish citizens exist.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:45 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 17:53 |
|
marktheando posted:Terry Pratchett's thing about boots is the UKMT equivalent of centrist twitter being obsessed with Harry Potter I guess so if we ignore some of the polling because results have shown that it's not a good predictor of electoral success maybe we should also ignore the rest of the polling because results have shown that it's not a good predictor of electoral success
|
# ? Oct 2, 2019 18:46 |