|
It's the day they're supposed to work everything out, so we should know soon if anything else need to be handed down by the judge.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 19:34 |
|
|
If they work things out, if not the judge does at which case he'll have to pay up much worse.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2019 22:02
|
|
|
It's a good day in Dallas to sweep big court news under the rug, what with the ex-police officer getting 10 years. I'm genuinely curious to see if Vic admits defeat here, though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2019 22:59
|
|
|
Can't wait for Vic to also get a bible reading from the judge and a promise of a study bible for prison.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:21
|
|
|
Nobody is going to prison, he's just gonna be out of a bunch of money at some point e: unsurprisingly https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1179585361439318016?s=21 Ignis fucked around with this message at 03:39 on Oct 3, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:30
|
|
|
Expected. Friday the Judge will put the smackdown on them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:44
|
|
|
Yeah, there was no way either party was going to budge an inch there. The Defendants because of how strong their case is, and the Plaintiffs because they're dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
their one ticket out of this, can't wait to see that ruling. how long before the confidentiality of the details of mediation falls apart?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
The Spider's Thread IRL.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 03:59
|
|
|
Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:their one ticket out of this, can't wait to see that ruling. how long before the confidentiality of the details of mediation falls apart? I give it Monday at the latest, because one of them will want to rant about how they totally owned those stupid accusers by refusing to mediate and will win this handily on their own terms if they could only get enough money, hint-hint.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:02
|
|
|
Ignis posted:Nobody is going to prison, he's just gonna be out of a bunch of money at some point 
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:04
|
|
|
I'm shocked that they're willing to risk it all on this awful case instead of settling and grifting their base some more. Vic's gotta be the one who won't take no for an answer right? Ty's folded in front of the judge every time but Vic's been so totally removed from the process that he probably only knows as much as his lawyers tell him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:04
|
|
|
TheHan posted:I'm shocked that they're willing to risk it all on this awful case instead of settling and grifting their base some more. Vic's gotta be the one who won't take no for an answer right? Ty's folded in front of the judge every time but Vic's been so totally removed from the process that he probably only knows as much as his lawyers tell him. You got to remember two things. 1. They're that inept. 2. They likely actually believe they're winning due to being so inept.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:08
|
|
|
Would a lawyer letting their client reject mediation without warning him he's going to waste his money get them in trouble with the bar? Or would the consequences be limited to a malpractice suit by the client?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:35
|
|
|
the mediator should have made all of that very clear. vic finding out his money is on the line was the major chance of a change in tactics, but alas
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 04:58
|
|
|
Keltar posted:You got to remember two things. A live performance of Dunning-Kruger in court!
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 05:14
|
|
|
God bless america
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 06:03
|
|
|
This isn’t at all like Phoenix Wright ace attorney!
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 06:19
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:This isn’t at all like Phoenix Wright ace attorney! Well, the defense is clearly going to win, that's one similarity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 07:03
|
|
|
Ignis posted:Nobody is going to prison, he's just gonna be out of a bunch of money at some point This could go on for over two more years? Sounds expensive.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 09:35
|
|
|
bessantj posted:This could go on for over two more years? Sounds expensive. I think most of that time is just, like...waiting. The courts are already packed full of poo poo that needs taking care of.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 10:13
|
|
|
It could go on for two years if Vic appeals.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 12:02
|
|
|
Slick Vic! Can't lose!
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 12:45
|
|
|
So I'm a little murky on the details; this is bad for Vic, right? Summary of my understanding: Vic accused of sexual assault publicly Vic tries to prosecute his detractors Lawyers (Screech??) Try to make case on batshit claims Judge dismisses most charges, indicating most of the claims were inadmissable on their face Judge urges Vic and Co to reconsider working this out *HINT* Vic and Co refuse to budge ... But 2 years from now, we'll find out how badly Vic and Co hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 13:42
|
|
|
we'll find out tomorrow that all claims are dismissed and ty will push an appeal not caring that he's just setting more of his client's money on fire or comedy option a single claim makes it past tcpa adding more time to the process raking up more billable hours as an appeal can't get lodged until the rest of the case is settled as far as the appeal ty can't add facts to his case and can only work off of what's been submitted to the court. so uh, good luck
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 14:00
|
|
|
You missed my favorite part where Vic's lawyers forgot to do the bare minimum basic legal legwork in obtaining affidavits that would bolster Vic's claims of losing work over the #metoo claims. And that the inevitable appeal cannot include new information such as those missing affidavits so many of his claims are now malformed and poorly supported. Plus there was some possible notary public fraud in there for the affidavits they did have, which could possibly come up in an appeal.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 14:06
|
|
|
Merrill Grinch posted:You missed my favorite part where Vic's lawyers forgot to do the bare minimum basic legal legwork in obtaining affidavits that would bolster Vic's claims of losing work over the #metoo claims. And that the inevitable appeal cannot include new information such as those missing affidavits so many of his claims are now malformed and poorly supported. Oh I'm just focusing on the anime rapist not the dipshits representing him. Can someone so a quick dossier of who his lawyers are and their thread nicknames?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 14:23
|
|
|
Nick is mad as hell on Twitter right now. Calling people cucks and whatnot
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:Can someone so a quick dossier of who his lawyers are and their thread nicknames? Mignogna's actual lawyer is named Ty Beard. I can understand why you'd mistake that for a nickname. Beard is an estate lawyer, and he's quite out of his depth here. He got this lawyer on the recommendation of Nick Rekieta, a "free speech" lawyer and right-wing Youtube grifter. There's also Greg Doucette, who is a lawyer but isn't involved in this at all except as someone who's been making fun of Rekieta/Mignogna/Beard on Twitter.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 17:17
|
|
|
Shame Greg isn’t on the other side. Be easy to make fun of his name. All we have is ty neckbeard and nick wrecktieta
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 17:27
|
|
|
Cease to Hope posted:Mignogna's actual lawyer is named Ty Beard. I can understand why you'd mistake that for a nickname. Beard is an estate lawyer, and he's quite out of his depth here. Who's Screech then??
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:08
|
|
|
Wasabi the J posted:Who's Screech then?? Screech is Nick Rikieta. Ty is also known as Blackface Lawyer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:10
|
|
|
If he were any more a Gimmick lawyer he’d run into court in blackface going “is this the black ty event?!?”
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:12
|
|
|
Adnor posted:Screech is Nick Rikieta. No, Rekieta is Blackface Lawyer because he wore blackface
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
RubberLuffy posted:Nick is mad as hell on Twitter right now. Calling people cucks and whatnot I mean that is pretty much how he normally conducts himself on Twitter Piell posted:No, Rekieta is Blackface Lawyer because he wore blackface Ty’s nickname is “Percy” but that is not so much a ‘nickname’ as it is ‘his actual name’
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:47
|
|
|
Piell posted:No, Rekieta is Blackface Lawyer because he wore blackface Oh I got confused then, thanks for the correction.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 18:50
|
|
|
TheHan posted:...Vic's gotta be the one who won't take no for an answer right? Well....yeah that's how this whole thing really started.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 19:52
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:If he were any more a Gimmick lawyer he’d run into court in blackface going “is this the black ty event?!?” lmao codenameFANGIO posted:I mean that is pretty much how he normally conducts himself on Twitter He's definitely more agitated since everyone found out that Ty is is sugar daddy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 20:18
|
|
|
....so when is this happening today?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 20:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 19:34 |
|
|
dwarf74 posted:....so when is this happening today? The judge will give the dismissals tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2019 20:38
|
|
