Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Groovelord Neato posted:

we already have the same problem that weimar germany had - capital allied with the fascists. IG farben was one of the largest conglomerates on earth at the time and became intertwined with the nazis.

it's seriously bonkers they tried to go for some 'lol fall of weimar germany much' slam but wound up straight up parroting nazi talking points with 'mayhaps the masses had too many options...'

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Groovelord Neato posted:

obama is very stupid if he thought garland had any chance of getting through. then again he did seem delusional for a lot of his presidency in regards to bipartisanship and assorted bullshit.

In other words, it doesn’t matter who Obama would have nominated and this is just your chance to poo poo on the best president in modern history.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

Rent-A-Cop posted:

Parliamentary systems have the problem of overrepresenting fringe nutters like UKIP and the DUP.

UKIP have never held a parliamentary seat, and certainly never will - the odds of the Brexit Party gaining one, even with their current popularity, is slim. Literally one half of the USA's two-party system is nothing but fringe nutters.

Mahoning posted:

Yeah the UK parliament sure seems like it is......functioning?

It's doing pretty well curtailing the government, yeah.

Remember that all the UK's current madness is the result of a referendum. The government promised it, the government ran it.

The UK's political system is a basket case for all kinds of reasons, but the parliamentary system isn't it

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


yronic heroism posted:

In other words, it doesn’t matter who Obama would have nominated and this is just your chance to poo poo on the best president in modern history.

while true he is being graded on the mother of all curves.

goethe.cx
Apr 23, 2014


yronic heroism posted:

In other words, it doesn’t matter who Obama would have nominated and this is just your chance to poo poo on the best president in modern history.

he probably is the best president in the last 50 years but that mostly illustrates how poo poo-tastic the rest were

Rabble
Dec 3, 2005

Pillbug
Trump is a symptom of a system that started breaking long ago. I feel like we’re at the rubicon of the decline of American power abroad. Any illusions of legitimacy of our foreign policy is going to be wiped away by a political party that’s more than happy to hang allies out to dry in order to further their own internal political goals.

Further the American electorate itself is as split as it’s ever been, and I personally don’t see a path forward for our current system of government.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

yronic heroism posted:

the best president in modern history.

this is one of those statements that I can't factually disagree with but also feel like it's calling something the world's fastest slug

Mahoning
Feb 3, 2007

Delthalaz posted:

Right, but do you know if there was an "inquiry vote"? I saw some number on Fox yesterday they were using to show bipartisan approval.

I believe the reason there wasn’t in Clinton’s case is because of the Starr Report. It would be like if the Mueller Report uncovered this Ukraine stuff and Dems basically skipped the inquiry stage and pointed to the Mueller Report as the justification for impeachment.

Tatsuta Age
Apr 21, 2005

so good at being in trouble


Rigel posted:

Romney isn't one of those guys like Sasse or Flake who made sad noises about being concerned and then voted in favor of the thing he was sad about, Romney tends to vote where his mouth is. The reason why he usually votes for evil Republican policies is because he's an evil Republican, he's not going to vote against GOP policies just because Trump is president.

ewiley posted:

Oh right

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
lol, yea, basically.

https://twitter.com/jaredpolis/status/1179987708598349825

Pellisworth
Jun 20, 2005
could states abolish FPTP and do list voting or something, since they run their own elections?

I don't see that actually happening because it would probably cost the dominant party more votes, e.g. California and New York Democrats would likely lose seats to soc dems and Greens

Angry_Ed
Mar 30, 2010




Grimey Drawer

sexpig by night posted:

it's seriously bonkers they tried to go for some 'lol fall of weimar germany much' slam but wound up straight up parroting nazi talking points with 'mayhaps the masses had too many options...'

You're right, parliamentary systems cannot possibly fail, they can only be failed. The Nazis gained, and then seized, power precisely because of the failure of the Weimar-era parties on a massive scale on all fronts.

And what I was quoting precisely described such a situation if, in theory, American Fascists held a plurality in a theoretical American Parlimentary System. Parlimentary systems do not magically prevent complete nutters from gaining seats or power.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

yronic heroism posted:

the best president in modern history.

I thought negging was against the rules....

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass
Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America. The cold war never ended... the battlefield changed and we didn't realize it. Spreading influence by gaming and taking over social media with bots and influence networks helped Russia amplify and divide folks on both sides. Their explicit goal was to confuse and weaken the country by having folks fight against each other. This isn't a hypothetical or clancychat--the senate just confirmed the entire NRA was compromised by Russia, huge Facebook and Twitter networks to amplify and sow hate in law enforcement, etc. were just shut down last week. Hemming and hawing and debating about how much we changed is worthless. We've been under a direct assault for years and the weapons are likes, retweets, and posts instead of smart bombs and cruise missiles.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Angry_Ed posted:

You're right, parliamentary systems cannot possibly fail, they can only be failed. The Nazis gained, and then seized, power precisely because of the failure of the Weimar-era parties on a massive scale on all fronts.

And what I was quoting precisely described such a situation if, in theory, American Fascists held a plurality in a theoretical American Parlimentary System. Parlimentary systems do not magically prevent complete nutters from gaining seats or power.

yea dude no system is fascist proof, you're blaming the concept of a parliamentary system for individual parties failing to take the threat of nationalist authoritarianism seriously.

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012
To be perfectly clear here, the following topics are directly US Politics but have been relegated to their own threads for various reasons:
---The democratic presidential primaries
-------Topics for this thread: the candidates themselves when they appear in the news in contexts outside of the horse race & debate and discussion of policies that may or may not be endorsed by various candidates
-------Topics for the primary thread: horserace topics (polling, markets, punditry) & campaigning for a particular candidate

---The ethics of protest voting and electorialism
------Topics for this thread: why the democrats are bad & why the democrats are good
------Topics for the protest voting thread: why you should or should not vote for democrats that are bad

This isn't always easy to seperate but this is what we're trying to work with.

ewiley
Jul 9, 2003

More trash for the trash fire

That's a pretty self-aware fascist.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

mod sassinator posted:

Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America. The cold war never ended... the battlefield changed and we didn't realize it. Spreading influence by gaming and taking over social media with bots and influence networks helped Russia amplify and divide folks on both sides. Their explicit goal was to confuse and weaken the country by having folks fight against each other. This isn't a hypothetical or clancychat--the senate just confirmed the entire NRA was compromised by Russia, huge Facebook and Twitter networks to amplify and sow hate in law enforcement, etc. were just shut down last week. Hemming and hawing and debating about how much we changed is worthless. We've been under a direct assault for years and the weapons are likes, retweets, and posts instead of smart bombs and cruise missiles.
"Russia made cops racist" is a take.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

mod sassinator posted:

Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America. The cold war never ended... the battlefield changed and we didn't realize it. Spreading influence by gaming and taking over social media with bots and influence networks helped Russia amplify and divide folks on both sides. Their explicit goal was to confuse and weaken the country by having folks fight against each other. This isn't a hypothetical or clancychat--the senate just confirmed the entire NRA was compromised by Russia, huge Facebook and Twitter networks to amplify and sow hate in law enforcement, etc. were just shut down last week. Hemming and hawing and debating about how much we changed is worthless. We've been under a direct assault for years and the weapons are likes, retweets, and posts instead of smart bombs and cruise missiles.

I kind of feel like you're leaving out a lot of U.S. fuckery in Russia's own political and economic systems throughout the 90's and into the present day...

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


mod sassinator posted:

Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America.

russia - if it actually had an actual effect on the election - was only able to do this due to self-inflicted wounds. there was and is an entire media ecosystem dedicated to hollowing out tens of millions of people.

TheOneAndOnlyT
Dec 18, 2005

Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

OAquinas posted:

https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1180097943141048320

So uh, did Cornyn let slip there's a DoJ investigation into Biden?
I was thinking last night about what would happen if you asked a chud "how would you feel if Obama had plotted with a foreign government to discredit Trump in 2016?" And then I realized that it would be pointless to ask, because they already believe it happened.

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Rent-A-Cop posted:

"Russia made cops racist" is a take.

Yes, it is. Here are facts: https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-popular-information-kosovo-police-lives-matter-1462297 You're free to post facts too or stupid quips.

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

Pellisworth posted:

could states abolish FPTP and do list voting or something, since they run their own elections?

They absolutely can with state and local elections, assuming their state constitution allows it.

It is not yet settled whether or not a state can do this (list or ranked voting) with a Federal election. The courts have blessed a top-2 runoff a few weeks later (Louisiana does this), but we're not sure if the supreme court will sign off on any system where the guy with a simple plurality is not declared the winner. (because #2 gets put over the top with everyone's 2nd and 3rd choice preferences)

Dammerung
Oct 17, 2008

"Dang, that's hot."


ewiley posted:

That's a pretty self-aware fascist.

We saw it earlier with the protestor yelling "party over country, always." Facets such as the health of democracy and a vision for America are comparatively unimportant - they have their team, their team must prevail, whatever it takes, by any means necessary. Anything contrary is a distraction at best.

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

mod sassinator posted:

Yes, it is. Here are facts: https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-popular-information-kosovo-police-lives-matter-1462297 You're free to post facts too or stupid quips.
All cops being bastards predates the existence of the Russian state.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

ewiley posted:

That's a pretty self-aware fascist.

It's not too far a step beyond the CHANGE MY MIND guy.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

mod sassinator posted:

Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America. The cold war never ended... the battlefield changed and we didn't realize it. Spreading influence by gaming and taking over social media with bots and influence networks helped Russia amplify and divide folks on both sides. This isn't a hypothetical or clancychat--the senate just confirmed the entire NRA was compromised by Russia, huge Facebook and Twitter networks to amplify and sow hate in law enforcement, etc. were just shut down last week. Hemming and hawing and debating about how much we changed is worthless. We've been under a direct assault for years and the weapons are likes, retweets, and posts instead of smart bombs and cruise missiles.


All Russia has done is pour fuel on the fire that America built. Russia didn't cause these problems, we did. All Russia's teally done here is exploit and inflame our internal tensions for the benefit of their own agenda.

Russia didn't cause this situation, they intelligently exploited it. If you really want something to blame then start with the Southern Strategy. If you want a person to blame then Barry Goldwater is the father of modern (completely insane) conservativism.

Prester Jane fucked around with this message at 18:35 on Oct 4, 2019

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


mod sassinator posted:

Yes, it is. Here are facts: https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-popular-information-kosovo-police-lives-matter-1462297 You're free to post facts too or stupid quips.

this only works in a society where part of the population already agrees with this stuff.

Mahoning
Feb 3, 2007

mod sassinator posted:

Folks are missing the point (left and right). America didn't become 'divided' or its power start declining because of things internally. Stuff like the tea party certainly didn't help, but the big thing that we're just now starting to uncover is an enormous, concentrated effort by Russia to undermine and weaken democracy in America. The cold war never ended... the battlefield changed and we didn't realize it. Spreading influence by gaming and taking over social media with bots and influence networks helped Russia amplify and divide folks on both sides. Their explicit goal was to confuse and weaken the country by having folks fight against each other. This isn't a hypothetical or clancychat--the senate just confirmed the entire NRA was compromised by Russia, huge Facebook and Twitter networks to amplify and sow hate in law enforcement, etc. were just shut down last week. Hemming and hawing and debating about how much we changed is worthless. We've been under a direct assault for years and the weapons are likes, retweets, and posts instead of smart bombs and cruise missiles.

:shuckyes:

Yes, Russia is making everyone be racist and hate immigrants and socialism. It’s not ingrained in who we are or what our country was founded on.

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1180168193937002496

Tatsuta Age
Apr 21, 2005

so good at being in trouble


haveblue posted:

It's not too far a step beyond the CHANGE MY MIND guy.

Wasn't that Crowder?

syntaxrigger
Jul 7, 2011

Actually you owe me 6! But who's countin?

mod sassinator posted:

Yes, it is. Here are facts: https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-popular-information-kosovo-police-lives-matter-1462297 You're free to post facts too or stupid quips.

Turns out facebook has been around since before the internet and cops harassing minorities was due to Russia's influence the entire time.

Skex
Feb 22, 2012

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

your terror of "what if the republicans say something mean to me" is not useful, Skex. i assure you: they are going to be mean to you regardless. can you recall a compromise made with the right that worked.

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension or is it that you only have arguments that work against strawmen. I'm not talking about being concerned about Republicans saying mean things I'm talking about getting a message past a hostile media's manipulation. You seem to think that if they'd just done what they're doing now and said, "Yes I'm a socialist and I'm just talking about the democratic socialism of Norwegian countries not command and control state capitalism of the Soviet Union or China" and thus be able to counter the narrative but all the public would ever hear is "yes I'm a socialist" followed by an endless stream of right wing talking points and maybe some mild push back from the token liberal like Colmes who's job was literally to be a foil for Hannity to beat up on. Oh and that ignores the money issue, thanks to Reagan and the sustained attacks undermining Unions the Democrats lost access to a solid source or money and activists. They started taking more business friendly stances in order to counter that disadvantage and unfortunately that meant making compromises but the alternative was literally ceding the field to the opposition and letting the Republicans have their way unimpeded.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Rigel posted:

They absolutely can with state and local elections, assuming their state constitution allows it.

It is not yet settled whether or not a state can do this (list or ranked voting) with a Federal election. The courts have blessed a top-2 runoff a few weeks later (Louisiana does this), but we're not sure if the supreme court will sign off on any system where the guy with a simple plurality is not declared the winner. (because #2 gets put over the top with everyone's 2nd and 3rd choice preferences)

ranked choice for both the primaries and the general got passed in Maine a few weeks ago, so we'll see soon

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

mod sassinator posted:

Yes, it is. Here are facts: https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-popular-information-kosovo-police-lives-matter-1462297 You're free to post facts too or stupid quips.

you get this scam only works if they know a large amount of the voting population already agrees with that, right?

mod sassinator
Dec 13, 2006
I came here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubblegum,
and I'm All out of Ass

Groovelord Neato posted:

russia - if it actually had an actual effect on the election - was only able to do this due to self-inflicted wounds. there was and is an entire media ecosystem dedicated to hollowing out tens of millions of people.

It's bizarre that so many people want to bury their head in the sands about this. Russia and Putin have not even been shy about their intentions and we've known for a long time they've been trying to create chaos and undermine democracy: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...a_lot_like.html

marshmonkey
Dec 5, 2003

I was sick of looking
at your stupid avatar
so
have a cool cat instead.

:v:
Switchblade Switcharoo
*edit* too slow

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012

Prester Jane posted:

All Russia has done is pour fuel on the fire that America built. Russia didn't cause these problems, we did. All Russia's done is exploit and inflamed are internal tensions for the benefit of their own agenda.

Russia didn't cause this situation, they intelligently exploited it. If you really want something to blame then start with the Southern Strategy. If you want a person to blame then Barry Goldwater is the father of modern (completely insane) conservativism.

Yeah it's this. Pretending that our own cultural failings are the result of outsider propaganda is actively detrimental to making efforts to fix them, and reinforces toxic American exceptionalism and imperialism.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





fool_of_sound posted:

To be perfectly clear here, the following topics are directly US Politics but have been relegated to their own threads for various reasons:
---The democratic presidential primaries
-------Topics for this thread: the candidates themselves when they appear in the news in contexts outside of the horse race & debate and discussion of policies that may or may not be endorsed by various candidates
-------Topics for the primary thread: horserace topics (polling, markets, punditry) & campaigning for a particular candidate

---The ethics of protest voting and electorialism
------Topics for this thread: why the democrats are bad & why the democrats are good
------Topics for the protest voting thread: why you should or should not vote for democrats that are bad

This isn't always easy to seperate but this is what we're trying to work with.
This is all fair enough and I don't have a lot of skin in this anyway but: when the discussion wanders from on-topic for this thread to off, it's really not reasonable to expect posters to just "take it to another thread." It sounds like it should be, but in reality it almost never happens. So all that's really happening is to just kill the discussion outright - which is probably fine - but just bear in mind that like 90% of the time the discussion isn't just going to pack it up and move to another thread. It'll just stop.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016


Yeah, I think I'd have to say the "he was just joking" defense is the best you got if you can't go along with "its perfectly fine to ask other countries to dig up dirt on your opponents" defense.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply