Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
saintonan
Dec 7, 2009

Fields of glory shine eternal

SchrodingersCat posted:

Congress isn't going to let Trump effectively murder 2 million people, right?

Right?


It's the same idea that's been going on for three years now. Who's going to stop him?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


SchrodingersCat posted:

Congress isn't going to let Trump effectively murder 2 million people, right?

Right?

I mean, Harding and Coolidge were terrible and their presidencies are just footnotes in the history books. This is the kind of thing that will get Trump cursed in the same breath as some of the worst monsters in history.

Since the 1950s Congress has pretty much given all war powers and military command to the Executive because they were too scared to do a politics themselves, so they probably will let him do this.

Also, by the time the Senate voted against this withdrawal (and even if it did), those protective US troops will have long departed and the Turks will have done their Thing before the US is back. If it ever is.

There Bias Two
Jan 13, 2009
I'm not a good person

SchrodingersCat posted:

Congress isn't going to let Trump effectively murder 2 million people, right?

Right?

I mean, Harding and Coolidge were terrible and their presidencies are just footnotes in the history books. This is the kind of thing that will get Trump cursed in the same breath as some of the worst monsters in history.

We already have death camps within our own borders. What makes you think Congress would do anything about this either?

Arist
Feb 13, 2012

who, me?


https://twitter.com/cliffordlevy/status/1181191724133163008

The tax returns feel so quaint at this point.

canepazzo
May 29, 2006



https://twitter.com/eorden/status/1181192512775610368

e;fb

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

SchrodingersCat posted:

I mean, Harding and Coolidge were terrible and their presidencies are just footnotes in the history books.

people forget but harding and coolidge and hoover and wilson and partly FDR all presided over the us invading and controlling haiti for 20 years

quote:

On July 28, 1915, American President Woodrow Wilson ordered 330 U.S. Marines to occupy Port-au-Prince. Secretary of the Navy instructed the invasion commander, Admiral William Deville Bundy, to "protect American and foreign" interests. Wilson also wanted to rewrite the Haitian constitution, which banned foreign ownership of land, and replace it with one that guaranteed American financial control. To avoid public criticism, Wilson claimed the occupation was a mission to "re-establish peace and order ... [and] has nothing to do with any diplomatic negotiations of the past or the future," as disclosed by Rear Admiral Caperton. Only one Haitian soldier, Pierre Sully, tried to resist the invasion, and he was shot dead by the Marines

i am harry
Oct 14, 2003


"Ask"? gently caress you.

CHEF!!!
Feb 22, 2001

NYTimes
Trump Ordered to Turn Over 8 Years of Tax Returns to the Manhattan D.A.

quote:

A judge rejected the president’s argument that he was immune from criminal investigations.

William K. RashbaumBenjamin Weiser
By William K. Rashbaum and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 7, 2019, 8:56 a.m. ET

A federal judge on Monday rejected a bold argument from President Trump that sitting presidents are immune from criminal investigations, allowing the Manhattan district attorney’s office to subpoena eight years of the president’s personal and corporate tax returns.

Lawyers for Mr. Trump were expected to appeal the ruling from Judge Victor Marrero of Manhattan federal court.

The judge’s decision came a little more than a month after the Manhattan district attorney subpoenaed Mr. Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, for his personal and corporate returns dating to 2011. The demand touched off a legal showdown that raised new constitutional questions and drew in the Justice Department, which supported the president’s request to delay enforcement of the subpoena.

The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., has been investigating whether any New York State laws were broken when Mr. Trump and his company reimbursed the president’s former lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, for payments he made in the run-up to the 2016 election to the pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels, who had said she had an affair with Mr. Trump.

Sign up for the New York Today Newsletter
Each morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and more.

SIGN UP
Mr. Trump has denied having an affair with Ms. Daniels.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers sued last month to block the subpoena, arguing that the Constitution effectively makes sitting presidents immune from all criminal inquiries until they leave the White House. The lawyers acknowledged that their argument had not been tested in courts, but said the release of the president’s tax returns would cause him “irreparable harm.”

Mr. Vance’s office asked Judge Marrero to dismiss Mr. Trump’s suit, saying a grand jury had a right to “pursue its investigation free from interference and litigious delay” and rejecting his claim to blanket immunity. The judge was appointed by President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers have called the investigation by Mr. Vance, a Democrat, politically motivated. Mr. Vance has accused the president and his team of trying to run out the clock on the investigation.

Last week, lawyers with Mr. Trump’s Justice Department jumped into the fray, asking the judge to temporarily block the subpoena while the court takes time to consider the “significant constitutional issues” in the case.

The Justice Department, led by Attorney General William P. Barr, did not say whether it agreed with Mr. Trump’s position that presidents cannot be investigated. But, citing the constitutional questions, the department said it wanted to provide its views.

Editors’ Picks

What Does Having a Boyfriend Have to Do With Sleep?

This Is the Moment Rachel Maddow Has Been Waiting For

How to Set Your Google Data to Self-Destruct
The Constitution does not explicitly say whether presidents can be charged with a crime while in office, and the Supreme Court has not answered the question.

Federal prosecutors are barred from charging a sitting president with a crime because the Justice Department has decided that presidents have temporary immunity while they are in office.

But in the past, that position has not precluded investigating a president. Presidents, including Mr. Trump, have been subjects of federal criminal investigations while in office. Local prosecutors, such as Mr. Vance, are also not bound by the Justice Department’s position.

As part of a temporary deal reached last month, Mr. Vance’s office agreed not to enforce the subpoena until two days after Judge Marrero issued a ruling, which would give Mr. Trump a chance to appeal if he lost. But that agreement was to expire at 1 p.m. on Monday.

Writing to the judge late on Friday, William S. Consovoy, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, all but demanded that judge rule early on Monday in order that there be time to appeal before the afternoon deadline.

“After 9 a.m.,” Mr. Trump’s lawyer wrote, “the president will not have enough time to seek relief from the Second Circuit before Mazars discloses his confidential information.”

Mr. Consovoy said that if no ruling came by 9 a.m. on Monday, the president would interpret the judge’s inaction as a denial of his request to block the subpoena, and he would appeal without waiting for a court decision.


I cannot wait for the inevitable Twitter hissy-fits.

Edit: drat, I'm slow.

Dreissi
Feb 14, 2007

:dukedog:
College Slice

VitalSigns posted:


Some more humanitarian bombings and it would be a success story like Libya.


People make this comparison all the time, and it frankly confuses me. I’d much rather be stuck in Libya than Syria today. It is by no means a success story, but when people compared Libya’s civil wars to the carnal house that Syria has been - well, its different. Go look at the numbers of dead and displaced, even when adjusted for population, Syria has been much worse.

To be clear, I am a socialist and I don’t think it makes me imperialistic to be fine with 1000 soldiers doing nothing acting as the trip wire preventing an ethnic cleansing.

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



eke out posted:

marco is focused on things that matter this morning, like blaming NBA players for what their executives are making them do

https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1181177725693943808

I really loving hate Marco Rubio. he needs to, and I can't stress this enough, go gently caress himself for eternity

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
It's going to be a day.

Bottom Liner
Feb 15, 2006


a specific vein of lasagna

Koalas March posted:

I really loving hate Marco Rubio. he needs to, and I can't stress this enough, go gently caress himself for eternity

Ted Cruz is tweeting this bullshit too. Funny how these GOP asshats didn’t give a poo poo about Hong Kong until it gave them a reason to criticize the NBA :thunk:

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

ewiley posted:

I can't imagine that this move in Syria is even a distraction from impeachment more than just a snap decision while talking to Erdogan, considering how off-putting this is to his staunchest allies in the Senate. While I fully support Trump getting hosed-over for this, it sucks that it comes at the cost of Kurdish lives.

I doubt we will pull out. It sounds like trump is just saying poo poo again and the pentagon and others didn’t know poo poo. The house and the senate will force defense of Kurds and sdf on him.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Koalas March posted:

I really loving hate Marco Rubio. he needs to, and I can't stress this enough, go gently caress himself for eternity

oh no I'm sure Marco really cares about the current Hong Kong situation, that's why he's moved to take such solid steps beyond just crying and bitching on twitter like

Spiffster
Oct 7, 2009

I'm good... I Haven't slept for a solid 83 hours, but yeah... I'm good...


Lipstick Apathy
Graham is so drat pathetic it’s not even funny dear lord

Slowpoke!
Feb 12, 2008

ANIME IS FOR ADULTS

Calaveron posted:

It's going to be a day.

It feels that way

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Spiffster posted:

Graham is so drat pathetic it’s not even funny dear lord

Hey, licking poo poo off boots is an honorable position.

Meatball
Mar 2, 2003

That's a Spicy Meatball

Pillbug

Arist posted:

https://twitter.com/cliffordlevy/status/1181191724133163008

The tax returns feel so quaint at this point.

So what happens when he does nothing? Can he appeal to the supreme court so they can get him off the hook?

ThanosWasRight
May 12, 2019

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
Does this mean the end of Rojava?

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Arist posted:

https://twitter.com/cliffordlevy/status/1181191724133163008

The tax returns feel so quaint at this point.

This is gonna be a hell of a day.

SchrodingersCat
Aug 23, 2011

Meatball posted:

So what happens when he does nothing? Can he appeal to the supreme court so they can get him off the hook?

I imagine it will involve the Democratic party asking the Republicans to use lube this time before they get bent over the table.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

ThanosWasRight posted:

Does this mean the end of Rojava?

Rojava will likely exist

Just, ya know, without the current demographic

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


I can’t wait for the gop to still do absolutely nothing and/or twist themselves into believing it’s good and just. Ghouls, all of them.

Retro42
Jun 27, 2011


I'm tapping out for a while. I woke up this morning to:

Genocide in Syria
Tax Return BS
Another Whistleblower
Rudy grifting hard(er)


It's only 9:30, I'm not gonna survive the day without some self-care.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Pollyanna posted:

I can’t wait for the gop to still do absolutely nothing and/or twist themselves into believing it’s good and just. Ghouls, all of them.

we have obtained a firm handshake and wink from the Turkish government promising they won't slaughter 2,000,000 people, so what are the libs crying about???

alpha_destroy
Mar 23, 2010

Billy Butler: Fat Guy by Day, Doubles Machine by Night

Party Plane Jones posted:

people forget but harding and coolidge and hoover and wilson and partly FDR all presided over the us invading and controlling haiti for 20 years

The Americans even reinstated forced labor because of course we did.

There is a great line from Edwidge Danticat's memoir of her uncle and father, Brother, I'm Dying. Her father says it after her uncle dies in ICE custody and is buried in America: "If our country were ever allowed to be a country like any other none of us would live or die here."

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
also remember a ton of Kurdish militias are communists, like literal communists, so I genuinely expect the GOP to stop giving a poo poo about them as soon as someone calls the YPG a communist plot against heroic Turks or whatever

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Meatball posted:

So what happens when he does nothing? Can he appeal to the supreme court so they can get him off the hook?

he's already appealing to the second circuit. the argument that "the president, his business, and anyone who has ever worked with him is completely immune from all criminal law including investigative functions of a grand jury" is going to fail just as spectacularly at those levels as it did at this one

"just doing nothing" is not actually an option, by the way, when faced with grand jury subpoenas from a prosecutor's office.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



The Orange Piss Baby will be extra Not Mad this morning

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?

i am harry posted:

"Ask"? gently caress you.

Can the Senate do more than this?

I'm not being snarky, I'm asking a legitimate question. This isn't a declaration of war, so doesn't this fall under the president's authority to direct military operations? I would think that the most the Senate can do is more strongly word that letter so it's a demand rather an request, but it doesn't seem like they'd have power to back that up with anything other than threatening removal.

SchrodingersCat
Aug 23, 2011

Paradoxish posted:

Can the Senate do more than this?

I'm not being snarky, I'm asking a legitimate question. This isn't a declaration of war, so doesn't this fall under the president's authority to direct military operations? I would think that the most the Senate can do is more strongly word that letter so it's a demand rather an request, but it doesn't seem like they'd have power to back that up with anything other than threatening removal.

I imagine Mitch McConnell could stroll into Trump's office and tell him they are going to fast track an impeachment trial and have him out by Friday unless Trump walks this back, but Mitch McConnell has no soul.

CornHolio
May 20, 2001

Toilet Rascal
This Syria thing is to distract everybody from the impeachment proceedings, isn't it?

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


eke out posted:

he's already appealing to the second circuit. the argument that "the president, his business, and anyone who has ever worked with him is completely immune from all criminal law including investigative functions of a grand jury" is going to fail just as spectacularly at those levels as it did at this one

"just doing nothing" is not actually an option, by the way, when faced with grand jury subpoenas from a prosecutor's office.

"I've divested myself of all Trump properties to guard myself from conflicts of interest and bribes"
Alright we're investigating that business
"No you can't do that because I own it and I'm the president"

Spiffster
Oct 7, 2009

I'm good... I Haven't slept for a solid 83 hours, but yeah... I'm good...


Lipstick Apathy

Arist posted:

https://twitter.com/cliffordlevy/status/1181191724133163008

The tax returns feel so quaint at this point.

Trump: :happened:

Everyone: ... so now what?

Unless they actually do something about it and enforce it, he will do whatever he drat well pleases

Edit: tax time

https://twitter.com/bodegacats_/status/1179909112508882944?s=21

Edit 2: huh it loaded weird on my phone making it look like I was a new page (no options for previous posts)...

Paid it forward on the tax then

Spiffster fucked around with this message at 14:35 on Oct 7, 2019

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
yea the senate can exert their own political power, threaten to hold up a bill or stop covering for him or something, but this is unfortunately a Commander in Chief choice and Mitch is a huge coward so all that'll happen will be they likely pass a generic 'pls stop the genocide' resolution and Trump goes 'nah'

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

https://mobile.twitter.com/NikkiHaley/status/1181191973367160834

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

CornHolio posted:

This Syria thing is to distract everybody from the impeachment proceedings, isn't it?

He tweeted it with no notice to the Pentagon and no likely conference with anyone outside his very tiny circle so I'd wager that the decision to do this is somehow uniquely self serving and nothing else.

Like, it's more likely that Erdogan promised trump a real good rate on a lease extension for his lovely hotel in Turkey in exchange for this then it is that he's cooked up some sort of elaborate plan to distract us from his never-ending crime spree.

CHEF!!!
Feb 22, 2001

Meatball posted:

So what happens when he does nothing? Can he appeal to the supreme court so they can get him off the hook?

Trump's lawyer already said they would react to a lack of a ruling by 9 am today as a denial and they would appeal, so they're going to appeal. I just hope and pray that it's shot down just as quickly at every step of the way.

poo poo like this makes me wonder about what to do if the DOJ, conveniently enough, refuses to enforce a SCOTUS ruling when they hopefully uphold the decision and tell Trump to hand over his tax returns. If Trump just ignores them, well, that just further shits all over the checks-and-balances of our federal government, and something tells me giving the US federal courts their own law enforcement branch that answers only to them that they can call in when poo poo hits the fan would both create even more problems and be extraordinarily hard to implement. Or maybe that accounting firm throws up their hands and goes "gently caress this, we're done with this shitshow" and releases them. Just thinking out loud here.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


Can't wait for that NYC tax ruling to be overturned by Brett Kavanaugh's majority opinion.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply