|
https://twitter.com/CraigCaplan/status/1188913328330067970
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:28 |
|
|
theflyingorc posted:Yeah, but do you think the process goes FASTER or SLOWER when a judge has to make a ruling on specific issues? Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is the tactic here now that you've laid it out like that. Yes, the argument is getting smacked down by courts but there's still the process of appeals that everything has to go through, so maybe there's values in cutting off the already-flimsy legal arguments. This is only an issue if we think that there's some strategy behind Republicans' call for a vote. The only angle I can see is them getting the actual party-line vote to decry it as partisan. I don't think that will work well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
CuddleCryptid posted:Honestly, if you are 35+ and still are the kind of insecure that the alt-right is almost entirely made up of then you need professional, not social, therapy. There is a path out but it has to be something done with someone who really knows what they are doing there is a good podcast that talks about the alt right called "i dont speak german" and having listened to it. you get the sense that alot of "big figures" alt right are either grifters and or dumb insecure rear end in a top hat who just bitch to each other and hope someone else solves the problems. that and the community constantly fractures from infighting over money and them doxing each other or making each other targets.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
Ate My Balls Redux posted:I apologize in advance for the forthcoming vapors you will catch, but "hard left" is an assumption in and of itself. But no, it seems pretty clear we were talking about CHUDs, not you. edit: To be clear, a shitload of people who voted for Trump are irredeemable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
TulliusCicero posted:This is loving sick, and she should sue the poo poo out of her ex husband and Sevaadra Their phones and emails should be subpoena'd and charged with crimes for disseminating revenge porn, then subpoena the same if every person they sent it to and see if they also disseminated it, and hey going down the chain. Charge them all with revenge porn
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
VH4Ever posted:The complete lack of involved parenting in that article is infuriating. In this day and age letting a kid that age have unfettered Internet access is just stupid. Like back before we knew what was going on was one thing. Now you're just sending them out to get radicalized, you have to know that at this point. Yeah, that was something i was left feeling as well. Knowing what your kid is doing is kinda parenting 101, and the article never mentions the dad once, which is a little  theflyingorc posted:Yeah, but my point is only that it's really, really weird to act like, from a vantage point of being a stranger on the internet, that you should be telling somebody else to never, EVER try and that it's always a waste of time. I was just trying to explain why people get frustrated when they see "allies" wasting time on people that are not allies themselves. I don't necessarily agree with it, but there's legitimacy there. It's not much different that the MLK take on white centrists. PerniciousKnid posted:Sure, supposed leftists are arguing that it's impossible to reform antisocial behavior, might as well throw some ageism into the mix. swing and a miss. reading comprehension isn't your strong suit it it? Heck Yes! Loam! fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Oct 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
AlBorlantern Corps posted:Their phones and emails should be subpoena'd and charged with crimes for disseminating revenge porn, then subpoena the same if every person they sent it to and see if they also disseminated it, and hey going down the chain. Charge them all with revenge porn there may not be a crime there, revenge porn is often not illegal but it is, likely, copyright infringement. sue em for statutory damages. the max, $150k per picture, seems somewhat fair.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
The state of California has revenge porn laws I believe
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I was just trying to explain why people get frustrated when they see "allies" wasting time on people that are not allies themselves. I don't necessarily agree with it, but there's legitimacy there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:34
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:there may not be a crime there, revenge porn is often not illegal Doesn't she actually have to, erm, copyright the pictures first? or is there some inherent copyright law that she can use? Party Plane Jones posted:The state of California has revenge porn laws I believe They do indeed! quote:In California, distributing revenge porn is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by six months in prison and $1,000 in fines. Individuals who are convicted for the distribution of revenge porn a second time can face up to one year in jail for their actions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:34
|
|
|
There’s no  big enough, considering Mitch and a bunch of other GOP leaders held a meeting on the day Obama was elected to plan the same thing
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
What about DC
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
Doctor Butts posted:I have a relative who can't be saved. They're a full on culture warrior who thinks everyone else is dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:36
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Doesn't she actually have to, erm, copyright the pictures first? or is there some inherent copyright law that she can use? copyright attaches automatically upon creation of a work, there is no requirement to register. by the time you see this post, it is officially a copyrighted work. you may need to register to collect statutory damages, however, which would be a tiny issue with that plan (i can't recall if you need to or not)
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Statutory damages for copyright infringement require that the documents be registered with the copyright office. Otherwise you just get some multiple of actual damages.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Yeah, that was something i was left feeling as well. Knowing what your kid is doing is kinda parenting 101, and the article never mentions the dad once, which is a little Agreed. The kid was on the internet all day and night to the point where he was a walking, irritable zombie every day for a year or more. That's bad loving parenting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:copyright attaches automatically upon creation of a work, there is no requirement to register. by the time you see this post, it is officially a copyrighted work. Isn't the copyright with the photographer and not the subject?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:There’s no i mean he is a sociopath so i am not shock. i do expect mitch to try to force the GOP to acquit him and they probably will, but i suspect it will be like 10 or less votes making the decision.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Doesn't she actually have to, erm, copyright the pictures first? or is there some inherent copyright law that she can use?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:I didn't say me. The unironic argument was that every person who voted for Trump is irredeemable. It's not true. gently caress you, they voted to take away my rights, and a lot of other people's rights. They knew what they voted for, don't defend them. gently caress them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:Photographer owns the rights by default. Her statements suggested her ex took the pictures though? Or did I misunderstand?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:41
|
|
|
booseek posted:My main fund is a whole stock market index fund. I realize that neither the S&P nor DJIA mirror the stock market in general, but clearly it's used as a stand in for the broader market in general, so don't be silly. I have no clue how the poster's account is structured or what they do with dividends, so that's why I mentioned it. When did the Dow go from 27k to 22.5k?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:gently caress you, they voted to take away my rights, and a lot of other people's rights. They knew what they voted for, don't defend them. gently caress them. Nope, a lot of people are extremely loving stupid. Their vote is inexcusable, but I don't think that's the same thing as irredeemable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
Midgetskydiver posted:Trump could do the identical thing Dukakis did and his cult would laud him for how tough and brave and perfect he is. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
OddObserver posted:Isn't the copyright with the photographer and not the subject? ahh yeah welp will have to mull on this some more
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
beejay posted:When did the Dow go from 27k to 22.5k? Around September-January of last year.  Not quite 27k but it was around a 5k point drop in a couple months which then somehow turned around weirdly. Push El Burrito fucked around with this message at 21:49 on Oct 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
She's a CA rep. CA has revenge porn laws. Pretty sure she has a solid case all things considered
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:45
|
|
|
Retro42 posted:She's a CA rep. CA has revenge porn laws. Pretty sure she has a solid case all things considered I'm guessing not great.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:46
|
|
|
OJ MIST 2 THE DICK posted:shes running the Super PAC that Giuliani's Ukrainian buddies were using to direct illegal campaign donations That's loving beautiful. That gets an italian chef kissing his fingers gesture from this guy. Rent-A-Cop posted:Photographer owns the rights by default. Unless they really went out of their way to transfer the ownership. But there's a good possibility that some combination of her public stature as a Rep and the offenders taking the photos down upon request will be enough under prevailing interpretations of the copyright/statute DMCA. (Not a lawyer, definitely never been in this position professionally, but I've listened to a lot of webinars.) I also don't believe Porter is entitled to statutory damages (like the $26,000 per Metallica song of old) because she didn't register her nudes with the Library of Congress. This is just a potpourri of the reasons it's so important to have a separate revenge porn statute.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:46
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:That every person who has flirted with anything other than hard leftism is a Nazi This is a good post. I think most people on the left would agree that it's beneficial to look into social and economic factors that feed groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, and further that painting "at risk" groups with a broad brush simply ends up pushing them in that direction. I don't see why the same approach is somehow useless when it comes to Trumpists.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:God dammit, don't let the people under investigation dictate the terms of the investigation you loving spineless jellyfish. I guarantee their next argument will be nothing done before now counts because the impeachment inquiry qas invalid. Idiots or controlled opposition. Take your pick.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:Nope, a lot of people are extremely loving stupid. Their vote is inexcusable, but I don't think that's the same thing as irredeemable. nah, i'm going to spend more time getting people out to vote who were apathetic and didn't vote over wasting time trying to get that magical unicorn that will suddenly switch away from Trump
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:Nope, a lot of people are extremely loving stupid. Their vote is inexcusable, but I don't think that's the same thing as irredeemable. Ignorance is not a loving excuse. Trump wasn't out of office on Jan 22nd because "oops the people didn't know what they were voting for".
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:48
|
|
|
AhhYes posted:One thing I saw included was authorizations to release transcripts, have open hearings, and even process rights for the White House, obviously to counter the "secret process" narrative the GOP has been trying to build. I would hope this means they're just moving into another phase where they just bring all the witnesses back for some public victory lap but it's dems so I imagine it's so they can capitulate with every republican demand.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:48
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:I'm...fairly certain that we think that "being trans" is developmental in utero, so it doesn't seem that insane that one of two identical twins would be trans, because the DNA isn't currently thought to be the source. There's that one actress who's trans and has an identical twin brother. The one that was in the court case some years back.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1188918425462198272?s=20 kudos to the goon who called it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
Good work, Nancy!
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:50
|
|
|
CascadeBeta posted:Ignorance is not a loving excuse. Trump wasn't out of office on Jan 22nd because "oops the people didn't know what they were voting for". I just called it inexcusable. Redemption, does, in fact, start with the assumption that they did a bad, wrong thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:50
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Good work, Nancy!
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:28 |
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Good work, Nancy! They would do this no matter what nancy did. I don't think bringing the investigation public at this point is bad. If all the republicans can do is slam on the table, they aren't winning.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2019 21:51
|
|