Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Normy
Jul 1, 2004

Do I Krushchev?


What's dumb about the Covington thing is that one kid is the focus of it all. His relative inaction obfuscates the racist hollering and gesticulating of all the kids surrounding him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

bij
Feb 24, 2007

Triskelli posted:

I’m fuzzily aware of how we’ve come to this point, but a breakdown of how anti-communist propaganda has lost its teeth since the 90s would be a fascinating read. I personally was pelted by a lot of the usual stuff in the mid-00s - I read Anthem and The Giver, my middle school history teacher gave the “why is it fair for everyone to share grades” lecture. But between watching the recession and picking up a little Marx through casual history study I’ve wound up a staunch anti-capitalist and it seems that’s happened to a lot of folks. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union make people drop their guard or has the status quo become that much more untenable in the last 30 years that we’re looking harder for alternatives?

Rage Against The Machine has some fuckin dope rear end riffs and Command & Conquer Soviet campaigns own.

Pigbuster
Sep 12, 2010

Fun Shoe

Unoriginal Name posted:

how about the part where she voted against sanctions

I didn't know enough about her voting record on sanctions to judge that. Looking into it now, it's more mixed than I was expecting; there was the thing with BDS, and she signed the resolution that disapproved Trump's sanctions of Russia cronies. If the banks were really the dealbreaker in these otherwise-targeted sanctions she should really make that clear because dang it looks bad otherwise.

squirrelzipper
Nov 2, 2011

Triskelli posted:

I’m fuzzily aware of how we’ve come to this point, but a breakdown of how anti-communist propaganda has lost its teeth since the 90s would be a fascinating read. I personally was pelted by a lot of the usual stuff in the mid-00s - I read Anthem and The Giver, my middle school history teacher gave the “why is it fair for everyone to share grades” lecture. But between watching the recession and picking up a little Marx through casual history study I’ve wound up a staunch anti-capitalist and it seems that’s happened to a lot of folks. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union make people drop their guard or has the status quo become that much more untenable in the last 30 years that we’re looking harder for alternatives?

I think it’s some of A and some of B. There’s no regime of communist evil to point at since the Soviet fell, even the Chinese have kind of stopped pretending to be communists, and the last 40 years have really seen capitalism roar into late-stage possibly existential threat territory. I’m old enough to remember the Cold War but even then the cracks were showing, I’m not at all surprised that Socialism is not a dirty word now and that people are unironically talking about Marx.

Eschenique
Jul 19, 2019

Potential BFF posted:

Rage Against The Machine has some fuckin dope rear end riffs and Command & Conquer Soviet campaigns own.

The allied campaign was surprisingly lame in contrast. Red Alert made many a tankies.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Normy posted:

What's dumb about the Covington thing is that one kid is the focus of it all. His relative inaction obfuscates the racist hollering and gesticulating of all the kids surrounding him.

I'm also not sure any news organization actually made anything up about him

The story would have been gone in like 4 days



ALSO pretty sure his friends war whooped and tomahawk chopped at a native which is racist as all hell

Stereotype
Apr 24, 2010

College Slice

Normy posted:

What's dumb about the Covington thing is that one kid is the focus of it all. His relative inaction obfuscates the racist hollering and gesticulating of all the kids surrounding him.

There was also a long video of the whole confrontation. The kids were essentially unescorted and were acting like an rear end in a top hat high school football team wandering the streets before an away game and got baited hard by some other protesters. They then did a bunch of aggressive football chants and chimpanzee like dominance displays, massively escalating the situation to the point where stuff might have gotten violent. That’s when drum guy shows up and just does rhythmic chants between the two sides which confuses and deescalates the whole thing. The kids were sort of dicks to him at first though, mocking him and getting up in his face (the famous picture), but then they got bored and distracted and wandered off woooping and hollering.

They were dumb as poo poo and people defending them are even dumber.

Normy
Jul 1, 2004

Do I Krushchev?


theflyingorc posted:


ALSO pretty sure his friends war whooped and tomahawk chopped at a native which is racist as all hell

Yeah that's what I'm taking about. One kid absorbed all the attention.

Wilbur Swain
Sep 13, 2007

These are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

Normy posted:

What's dumb about the Covington thing is that one kid is the focus of it all. His relative inaction obfuscates the racist hollering and gesticulating of all the kids surrounding him.

Confrontational stillness is not inaction. His behavior was more symbolic of white supremacy than all the hooting and hollering.

Normy
Jul 1, 2004

Do I Krushchev?


Wilbur Swain posted:

Confrontational stillness is not inaction. His behavior was more symbolic of white supremacy than all the hooting and hollering.

Sure but it's a tougher sell.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Normy posted:

Sure but it's a tougher sell.

But also, still want to know what exactly the news falsified???

Eschenique
Jul 19, 2019

Just some inaction. Nothing to see here.

Normy
Jul 1, 2004

Do I Krushchev?


I'm not defending him. People are buying that the kid did just stood there and the others are ignored because people are easily gas lighted. I have no trouble pointing out the truth that all these kids are poo poo heads when it ever comes up. I said relative inaction, perhaps should have said perceived inaction.

Der Waffle Mous
Nov 27, 2009

In the grim future, there is only commerce.
"clearly mentally ill minority"

Go gently caress yourself.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Elviscat posted:

I agree.

If he's in some sort of hell-dimension school that is travelling to DC to protest abortion, I doubt he's really been given a chance to form any of his own opinions, or allowed to even interact with the bogeyman from the right, basically raised in a cult-like setting worshipping the right and denigrating minorities. Yet when confronted with a clearly mentally ill minority, he managed to at least choose a decent path, when he had many hateful options available to him, which isn't at all worthy of praise, but it's at least not worthy of the vilification he's recieving here, with comments like "send him to the Gulag" which is gross. There are literally millions of Chuds who are full-blown adults, with plenty of time in their lives to be responsible for their own unconscionable opinions to go after in this country.

What's really, really gross though is "gently caress him, he's our enemy, so who cares if the press made poo poo up about him, he's poo poo anyways." because thats the logic that gets used to defend loving Breitbart, and I don't want a loving Left-wing Breitbart, because if all the news outlets reported 100% the facts, as close as reasonably possible, they'd be on our side 99% of the time, we don't NEED lovely propaganda tags to prop up humanist and socialist values.



RE: Drumpf; holy poo poo, they all thought the transcript was super-exhonerating because they redacted all the explicit crimes, and only left the implicit crimes.

A perfect phone call indeed.

Literally the most bigoted poo poo I have read on these forums in a long time, seriously get the gently caress out of here with this bullshit

Eschenique posted:

Just some inaction. Nothing to see here.



thin blue whine
Feb 21, 2004
PLEASE SEE POLICY


Soiled Meat
i'm not really paying attention are people still defending the kid who is signalling support for a guy that is so racist hate crimes jump by a triple digit percentile in areas he evangelizes in

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



Bucky Fullminster posted:

Can I ask about all the hate this kid gets? Cos here's my understanding.

There's a big long video showing the whole interaction, right?

Their school group went to Washington for a field trip and an anti-abortion protest thing.

The Native American guy was there doing his thing.

Some other douchebags were there being weird and somewhat aggressive, possibly wound the Native guy up.

The school kids were at the scene, but not involved with the interaction. Douchebags leave.

The Native guy then comes up to them drumming and singing at them.

This kid does literally nothing - he doesn't engage, he doesn't provoke, he doesn't move. He just stands there while this veteran is up in his face.

Some of the other kids may have been making sounds, but it wasn't really very clear, and it wasn't him.

It gets reported that the school group was mocking this guy.

The media jumps on it.

This kid releases a statement saying "yo, I honestly didn't do anything, there was this strange confluence of 3 parties, a weird guy wound up this native american veteran, who then came over and started drumming in my face, it was pretty intense but I tried not to escalate the situation."

His name (and face) were dragged through the mud, and judging from posts here, they still are.

I haven't really kept up with the legal proceedings since then, and I'm more interested in the general perception.

Am I missing something, or is this an example of a misfire?

His school may be a hot bed for fuckwits. Fuckwit parents may send their children there to become fuckwits. He may even be a fuckwit himself. But nothing in the video really showed him being a fuckwit? Given the circumstances, he actually maybe did kind of well? Aside from wearing a MAGA obviously. They were at an anti-abortion rally, sure, but like the hat, that seems like more of a product of their upbringing - if they were born somewhere else to different parents it would likely be a different story. There is an interesting discussion to be had there about free-will versus cultural determinism, and the moral responsibility of youth and all that, but it seems like the world is just hating on a kid who stayed still while an adult drummed in their face.


edit - sorry to interrupt Sanction Chat

how do you feel when someone gets inches from your face smiling at you? He is a little bully and should be treated as such until he learns a valuable lesson about not intimidating people. He had many choices that day and he chose to try to impress a bunch of chuds by intimidating someone. Was the native drummer completely in the right? No, but he did not deserve to have his space invaded in such a blatant manner. Personally, I was hoping that the dragging he received would be enough to teach him that lesson but obviously he is going to do what rich people do and spend money until they get the outcome they desire which is another terrible life lesson. They were all wrong that day but only one person is trying to sue.

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 5 days!)

Strange Poon posted:

i'm not really paying attention are people still defending the kid who is signalling support for a guy that is so racist hate crimes jump by a triple digit percentile in areas he evangelizes in

I skipped over it but even if you're a POS (and wearing that hat makes him one in my book), nobody's got a right to libel you.

There's exceptions about "you're so unpopular nothing anyone can say about you can be considered libel" but I doubt it applies here.

Other than that, yeah. move on.

TyroneGoldstein
Mar 30, 2005

Triskelli posted:

I’m fuzzily aware of how we’ve come to this point, but a breakdown of how anti-communist propaganda has lost its teeth since the 90s would be a fascinating read. I personally was pelted by a lot of the usual stuff in the mid-00s - I read Anthem and The Giver, my middle school history teacher gave the “why is it fair for everyone to share grades” lecture. But between watching the recession and picking up a little Marx through casual history study I’ve wound up a staunch anti-capitalist and it seems that’s happened to a lot of folks. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union make people drop their guard or has the status quo become that much more untenable in the last 30 years that we’re looking harder for alternatives?

It's not that people 'dropped their guard,' it's that the whole concept behind having the guard up is basically a sham now. It's hard to explain to people under around 40 years old just how much the curated lore of the United States was accepted as fact back then. I would say that the people who came of age in the 1990's...e.g...you were at least a world-aware late teen by the time the end of the decade rolled in...are the last group of people that understand keenly how much utter bullshit was just accepted as fact and not argued for the vast, vast majority of Americans. This lore was almost bulletproof unless you put in work to get the deeper details behind everything.

The Lore stated that the Soviet Union, like Communism, was bad. Period. They were bad and us and our system of capitalism was good and that was that. This was virtually unassailable because it took work to get more information. Work that most people simply did not put in.

Like, trending on twitter now because of Watchmen is what happened in the Greenwood District in Tulsa. Thousands of posts of people being utterly surprised about what happened there, how horrific it all was an how it was essentially memory holed from existence for almost 100 years. Well it wasn't actually memory holed. The info was out there. Academics had written extensive papers putting it in the greater context of lynching and the African American experience. When I was in HS (92-96), I actually cited this incident in a prep paper I got assigned for AP American History. I had to go to the main Branch of the Orlando Public Library to cite things for that paper because that was the only place that had a robust enough archive to get information on the subject matter. I distinctly remember that I was prepared to go to the University of Central Florida's library if I had to if Orlando didn't have the info I needed.

That poo poo is one click away now. And this isn't just about the horrific acts of violence that stand out...Now, one click away, you can get the unabridged history of just how loving horrible so many different points in this Country's history really were and, more importantly, how much of a ripple effect through time these incidents had. How it all gets us to the now.

What I'm saying is it was inevitable, with the Internet being a thing, that a succeeding generation would eventually call bullshit on older GenX'ers and the entirety of the slob section of the Boomer cohort calling every good thing in the commons 'socialism' as an epithet. It was only a matter of time.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

The Glumslinger posted:

Turns out he asked Ukraine about this tape where hookers pissed on Joe Biden

Hunter's a coke fiend isn't he? Doesn't seem out of the question there could be video of him with escorts.

TyroneGoldstein
Mar 30, 2005

Charlz Guybon posted:

Hunter's a coke fiend isn't he? Doesn't seem out of the question there could be video of him with escorts.

With the amount of money spent on trying to find any dirt on the last Administration, if that tape existed, you would have already heard about it. They just drummed a member of congress who was ostensibly in a poly relationship OUT OF CONGRESS after she was revenge porn'd by her husband.

She's the victim and she ended up resigning.

If that poo poo existed, you would have seen it already.

SimonCat
Aug 12, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice

TyroneGoldstein posted:

With the amount of money spent on trying to find any dirt on the last Administration, if that tape existed, you would have already heard about it. They just drummed a member of congress who was ostensibly in a poly relationship OUT OF CONGRESS after she was revenge porn'd by her husband.

She's the victim and she ended up resigning.

If that poo poo existed, you would have seen it already.

She got caught screwing one of her subordinates, the fact that the way she got caught was scummy does not make her a victim.

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?

Lead out in cuffs posted:

All true.

And it's not just the cold war -- there's also no longer a big scary stalinist dystopia to point at, and a lot of Russians are nearly as badly-off under Putin/hypercapitalism.

And the fact that Millenials are the most economically screwed generation since WWII, except maybe the next one.

Oh yeah, there's also tons of outright dystopian poo poo happening in the USA right now that can easily be linked to capitalism, from lovely jobs at Walmart/McDonalds where they encourage workers to apply for food stamps, to medical bankruptcies, to private utilities loving poo poo up in the name of profit.

think you can't discount the polarizing tendencies of the internet and social media in particular. the more you become sympathetic to a point of view, the more you get exposed to it. but social media supercharges that process through sharing systems like likes and retweets, and ai algorithms. some of that will be based on information, some based on disinformation*, but the effect is the same, mass political realignment.

(*i see a lot of poorly researched soviet apologia on twitter. to put it politely.)

Rinkles fucked around with this message at 11:14 on Oct 30, 2019

Vichan
Oct 1, 2014

I'LL PUNISH YOU ACCORDING TO YOUR CRIME

ManBoyChef posted:

how do you feel when someone gets inches from your face smiling at you?

Granted it's been a very long time since I saw the video but didn't the Native American approach him?

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

Lead out in cuffs posted:

All true.

And it's not just the cold war -- there's also no longer a big scary stalinist dystopia to point at, and a lot of Russians are nearly as badly-off under Putin/hypercapitalism.

A lot of Russians are worse off under hypercapitalism. IIRC life expectancy nosedived after the Berlin Wall fell, and people essentially stopped having kids due to all the chaos, so they wound up with basically a lost generation

SimonCat
Aug 12, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice

Vichan posted:

Granted it's been a very long time since I saw the video but didn't the Native American approach him?

He did after some black Israelites said some really vile poo poo to everybody around them for an hour beforehand.

What's more offensive doing a tomahawk chop to some Native Americans or telling them that the reason they lost their country is they worship the wrong God?

Trazz
Jun 11, 2008

Rust Martialis posted:

I skipped over it but even if you're a POS (and wearing that hat makes him one in my book), nobody's got a right to libel you.

There's exceptions about "you're so unpopular nothing anyone can say about you can be considered libel" but I doubt it applies here.

Other than that, yeah. move on.

Truth is an absolute defense against libel

Therefore, this kid is a racist, the MAGA hat is the modern-day Swastika armband, and gently caress this kid and the parents who no doubt enabled his racist rear end

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer
Covington kid is one of my least liked kind of political events because to anyone who actually follows politics and doesn’t have brain worms, it should be obvious why he’s bad and his friends are bad and why his family are trying to use this dumb poo poo to push their reactionary agenda, but it’s also basically impossible to explain to normal people who aren’t into politics because most of them do have brain worms and concepts like political iconography as political statement just don’t register for them.

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

More RE Katie Hill

https://twitter.com/fawfulfan/statu...ingawful.com%2F

loving disgusting

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

TyroneGoldstein posted:

With the amount of money spent on trying to find any dirt on the last Administration, if that tape existed, you would have already heard about it. They just drummed a member of congress who was ostensibly in a poly relationship OUT OF CONGRESS after she was revenge porn'd by her husband.

She's the victim and she ended up resigning.

If that poo poo existed, you would have seen it already.

She’s a victim in the sense of being a victim of revenge porn.

That fact is completely separate from her being unethical and loving a subordinate, which is what she is in trouble for/resigned over.

There are two separate things here why is it so hard to understand? Regardless of whether or not the revenge porn aspect ever came to light she still did an unethical and bad thing and should most definitely resign over it.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Boris Galerkin posted:

She’s a victim in the sense of being a victim of revenge porn.

That fact is completely separate from her being unethical and loving a subordinate, which is what she is in trouble for/resigned over.

There are two separate things here why is it so hard to understand? Regardless of whether or not the revenge porn aspect ever came to light she still did an unethical and bad thing and should most definitely resign over it.

I don't think you can separate one from the other nor do I think you can say she only resigned for one.

Truthfully I didn't know who Hill was before this debacle and I would say that yes, she should resign, but also this is an actual example of a Republican hit job on a Democratic politician, regardless of how good/not good that politician may have been. That context is relevant even if the outcome of her resigning is still the correct decision.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

Lightning Knight posted:

I don't think you can separate one from the other nor do I think you can say she only resigned for one.

Truthfully I didn't know who Hill was before this debacle and I would say that yes, she should resign, but also this is an actual example of a Republican hit job on a Democratic politician, regardless of how good/not good that politician may have been. That context is relevant even if the outcome of her resigning is still the correct decision.

I agree that the context does matter, and I didn’t mean that they should be treated as two entirely different things but that there are two things here:

1) Hill loving a subordinate, which is unethical,

2) Hill’s ex (I presume) selling revenge porn, which is illegal.

Regardless of 2, she should have resigned for 1. It may be true that if 2 didn’t happen then she would have never needed to resign for 1, but that doesn’t make 1 okay nor does/should it give her a pass.

This is like people apologizing for something “if it was offensive.” You don’t apologize on a condition, you apologize unconditionally. Otherwise you’re only apologizing because you got caught. How they got caught doesn’t really factor into whether or not they should apologize for doing a bad thing.

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

https://mobile.twitter.com/girlsreallyrule/status/1189486955320545283

Vichan
Oct 1, 2014

I'LL PUNISH YOU ACCORDING TO YOUR CRIME

SimonCat posted:

He did after some black Israelites said some really vile poo poo to everybody around them for an hour beforehand.

What's more offensive doing a tomahawk chop to some Native Americans or telling them that the reason they lost their country is they worship the wrong God?

I should note that I'm not trying to defend the MAGA kids at all, gently caress them. I was honestly asking if I was misremembering who approached who.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1189499372557479937

I have trouble squaring "mentioned Biden by name, covered it up, lied about it" and "not actually that big of a deal"

Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy

eke out posted:

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1189499372557479937

I have trouble squaring "mentioned Biden by name, covered it up, lied about it" and "not actually that big of a deal"

I think it means they won’t focus on the editing of the transcript as an issue, but rather continue to focus on the content of the conversation and surrounding actions.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Jealous Cow posted:

I think it means they won’t focus on the editing of the transcript as an issue, but rather continue to focus on the content of the conversation and surrounding actions.

if this is what it means, it makes sense - that they don't think the editing was a conspiracy to hide it. but the substance of the edited out portion is very significant

ewiley
Jul 9, 2003

More trash for the trash fire
I was looking for the original release of the phone call record and the first Google result struck me as hilarious:



:thunk:

Ither
Jan 30, 2010

Otteration posted:

Completely unrelated but necessary tax:

https://i.imgur.com/1p8094k.mp4

What animal is this?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


From a few pages ago:


I'm not familiar with the California law on revenge porn - but is seems to only cover a person who the victim knew had the photos and was ok with having them and not anyone who knowingly distributed them.

Basically I'm not seeing how anyone but her ex faces any jail time for this.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply