|
OMG!  https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1189903072039821315
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:34 |
|
|
Lol, I can't remember ever hearing a literal round of applause for someone saying something. Whoever the dude was that quoted Madison saying 'the House should be a stern adversary of the Executive' rules.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:03
|
|
|
Jim Jordan seems very very angry that the vote he’s been clamoring for for 4 weeks is now finally happening.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:04
|
|
|
eke out posted:i'm still shocked they haven't got rid of this dude yet "You mean the poo poo we wanted to use against Obama is now being used against US?" 'UNFAIR!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LibyaLiberty/status/1189878322878013441 https://twitter.com/funder/status/1189706447015305218 Buckle up bitches https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1189895765654679552
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:06
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:How cheap and dumb can this dumbass be? Choosing his investments https://twitter.com/brianschatz/status/1189900733770092545?s=20
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:07
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:How cheap and dumb can this dumbass be? I read an article several years ago (like eons ago basically since it was before Trump even descended the escalator) that attempted to take a look at his money and, surprise, in terms of net value when all of his unpaid debts and lawsuits and massive failures and so on were taken into account it seemed like he might possibly be the single most worthless human being on the planet.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
skylined! posted:Choosing his investments
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1189905420678320128
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
LOL What's with the flag prop?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:10
|
|
|
Hey Donny, just call up Schiff and ask, maybe you can "work something out"
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:11
|
|
|
I missed the link, somebody post it again
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:12
|
|
|
"I mean, my wife can't wait for me to die. Is that not normal?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:12
|
|
|
ewiley posted:I'm not exactly trolling, but there's an awful lot of just jumping on the ACAB bandwagon, instead of, hey maybe there's more to it than that. I immediately get jumped on by people not reading the article and expressing the worst about a situation that didn't happen (that the kid was in the house and the police started firing immediately) Why do you believe that the police aren't financially responsible for damage that they cause in the course of their duties? Even if the police were justified in their actions, it's unclear to me why you believe that they shouldn't have to pay for damage that they caused to someone else's property.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:12
|
|
|
To be fair it’s very likely true that if Trump were shot his wife wouldn’t shed a tear
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:I missed the link, somebody post it again Just search on YouTube, most of the news networks are streaming the feed from the house commentary-free. I'm watching NBC's, but there are others.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1189906458797903875?s=20 lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JenniferWexton/status/1189899421795917825 gently caress you NYT. The sheer amount of Islamophobia the VAGOP is pushing against candidates is just staggering and they support big daddy all the way. gently caress. You.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
Solkanar512 posted:LOL What's with the flag prop? they love american more, duh
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:14
|
|
|
https://www.c-span.org/video/?465765-1/us-house-debates-impeachment-inquiry-resolution Live coverage
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:14
|
|
|
Look at the SEO brain genious over here
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:15
|
|
|
I am extremely curious on how Tulsi is going to vote.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:15
|
|
|
Dammit, Nancy, stop using that loving Franklin 'If you can keep it" quote. We get it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:15
|
|
|
"so many people have died for this flag" Pelosi says pointing at a $5 kinkos print-out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/strangeanimais/status/1188852675124834304?s=21
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:16
|
|
|
Ethics attorney on Trump's NSC? Must be the most ignored and unappreciated man in Washington. https://twitter.com/DavidCornDC/status/1189742686565228546
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:16
|
|
|
Nancy Pelosi is in that weird zone of House parliamentary procedure where the minute she gets lasts as long as she wants it to, isn't she? They cut off Chudley Chudderson (R-TX) mid-sentence right before she came up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:18
|
|
|
Really? https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1189731226762039296
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
haveblue posted:To be fair it’s very likely true that if Trump were shot his wife wouldn’t shed a tear true, but the fact that trump literally can't process that someone else might have a different perspective on anything is very telling. He's an idiot on top of being a sociopath so of course these accusations and broad hatred of him would drive him (more) insane
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
That doesn't sound like a very effective defense  https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1189900335734829056
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:22
|
|
|
lol "They say they want transparency, but they still have a week of closed door hearings!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:24
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Ethics attorney on Trump's NSC? Must be the most ignored and unappreciated man in Washington. Especially if he keeps getting mistaken for his identical twin, the guy who keeps getting brought along on grifting trips to Ukraine ... How much would THIS explain
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:24
|
|
|
 For a country that loves its flag so much, that’s a pretty lovely cutout “Eight white stripes, seven red stripes and a hell of a lot of stars!”
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:25
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:lol God, I can taste the impotent rage dripping off of this. It's delicious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:25
|
|
|
I can’t stop loving laughing, the Canadian scientist stated (paraphrasing) “it has a hosed up toupee looking thing and a tiny dick for the genus, so we named it after your president to call attention to the fact that he needs to take the environment seriously”. Dear God that’s hilarious. Edit: if God exists, s(he) must be sick of Trump’s poo poo by giving the Nats a pennant win after their fans booed Trump and also making this weird-poo poo moth to mock him. funeral home DJ fucked around with this message at 15:28 on Oct 31, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:26
|
|
|
friendbot2000 posted:cops blow up a innocent families house in pursuit of a suspect. family receives nothing in compensation I may regret this, but, as a homeowner's insurance adjuster, I'll attempt to contribute & clarify: There are two parts to this. 1) What the cops did was egregious and indefensible, and another example of runaway police 'powers' that have remained unchecked for far too long. 2) The actions of civil authorities to keep the peace and protect lives and property* are typically held to be immune from civil suits under sovereign immunity laws (Title 59 rules in NJ). In Philadelphia, for example, the police & fire departments used to be extremely, uh, proactive in gaining entry to a fire house (no knock, axe first, bye-bye all windows). They're getting better about it, but that would invariably be part of the scope of my estimate for fire damage ("fire department activity") since, of course, fire suppression water damage is also covered. Most insurance policies exclude damage that ensues following an order or decision by a civil authority. In my experience, we rarely invoke this exclusion. Technically, the homeowner's insurer could have denied the structure claim. It was wise of them that they did not. After 9/11, we had meetings to discuss corporate's decision whether or not to deny ensuing claims in the WTC complex and the surrounding affected neighborhoods because the Bush administration immediately declared the occurrence an act of war; damage ensuing from acts of war are excluded. They correctly ruled that this was a one-time thing despite the declaration, and waived the exclusion (Can you imagine the shitstorm if they had not?). In the MOVE bombing, the city found it to be, ah, in their best interests to cover the rebuilding of Osage Avenue. In both of the above instances, the insurers and the municipal government elected to do the right thing because of the wide-spread scope of the damage, with hundreds/thousands of affected individuals, not to mention the publicity. In the end, however it's a political decision. In this instance, the insurer paid to rebuild the structure. It has no right of recovery in subrogation against the municipal government; while they'll send an initial demand letter, their recovery efforts will proceed no further once they get the denial letter back. Nobody cares if the insurer gets their money back. The municipal government offered to cover the deductible. This is a common offer, I've had it happen on numerous claims of mine, both involving police & fire dept activity as well as motor vehicle collisions. They will typically offer no more. Since this involved a single home and family, they made the political calculus to stop there. I'll don my extreme cynic/rear end in a top hat hat to say, though, had someone died, the municipality would likely have jumped right in on this. With respect to the municipality criticising what the homeowner did as far as rebuilding: Bad move, assholes. If you'd done the right thing at the outset and paid the rebuild costs, you'd have no complaint about how the home was rebuilt. With respect to the suit: The premise of taking may not have been the best legal strategy, although (as noted in the article) there are a fair number of precedent cases to bolster the argument. However, none of these appear to be in Colorado (which is probably why they filed this in federal court rather than the local/state venue) I'm guessing that there are even more with the opposite decision. Maybe this was the strongest legal argument they could make rather than asserting liability due to non-proportional use of force. Finally: It sucks that they are not compensating the tenant. All I can say to that is: get an HO4 if you're renting. Most tenants don't. Get it, It's cheap. *I'm not going there. See 1) PainterofCrap fucked around with this message at 23:02 on Oct 31, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:26
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:That doesn't sound like a very effective defense It’s going to amazing watching Nunes try to question witnesses in the public hearings.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:26
|
|
|
Horse tax https://twitter.com/emzanotti/status/1189732951967309824
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:29
|
|
|
Bwahaha. Scalise is invoking the Red Scare. What a disingenuous poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:34 |
|
|
Scalise putting up a picture of the Kremlin and calling this "Soviet-style impeachment" is pure-strain 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2019 15:30
|
|