|
Staggering Development  https://i.imgur.com/4zzOgrG.mp4 Quavers fucked around with this message at 23:01 on Nov 1, 2019 |
#
?
Nov 1, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 01:17 |
|
|
Zzr posted:And the no alchool rule is poo poo too. Poor guys. Let's be fair this is for the best.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
So let me guess, there's absolutely no progress on any of the missions in SQ42 still, right? I'm sure they'll get roaring on those as soon as SSOC is done! Yeah, that's what is holding them back! Yeah! Yeah...
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2019 22:47
|
|
|
 Need more suggestions, there are a few that aren't displayed in the above
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2019 23:15
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Land/apartment sales Demo crashes partway through (they have to replay the same thing in the exact same way) Still under water in space, somehow
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 00:07
|
|
|
What about out of control wildfires and rolling power blackouts?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 00:09
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Consoles port announced SQ42 beta is delayed for another year Engine switch to Unreal New stimperor package reveal priced at $40000
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 00:46
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
"Huuuuuh". "Don't show that splash screen". Cringe scripted dialogues during a "100% genuine un-scripted and real time" demo. Uncontrolable laughters from people on Derek Smart's discord during Chris keynote. The Expanse archering. Engine switch. FOIP hilarity. E.L.E. Heat death of the universe. I'm gonna drink-play that bingo. RIP me. Megalobster fucked around with this message at 01:11 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 01:08
|
|
|
If we could have another demo starring the sandworm, that would be fun, too. Oh, and they die/break their leg in-game while trying to walk down some stairs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 01:11
|
|
|
Bofast posted:Good find, new friend hi  I've been into 3d modelling since the commodore Amiga days (early 90's) so I always look to see what software "game devs" are using come to think of it I've probably got more modelling experience than their entire modelling team of 20 year olds
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 01:11
|
|
|
MostlyRandom posted:hi Even Sandi might have more modeling experience than their modeling team by now 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 01:14
|
|
|
Oh weird, The AI that has been delayed by years has been pushed back another six months. Nevermind though, Star Citizen's best and finest believe that the AI is actually good but is being held back by the laggy servers, and that's going to be fixed soon!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
MostlyRandom posted:
Nah, that's a default starengine module.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 02:17
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 02:55
|
|
|
NPC Improvements: Bartender +1% Walk and Talk -4%
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Refactored Idris interior. Talking while walking npcs. (This could fall into the catagory of 'never done before' tbh, so far in SC they've all been stationary while talking) Pusher walking up/through a ramp. Return of the noodle limbed horror commandos. (4th Stimpire shock troops) Chris drunk on stage. Obvious jumpcuts in 'live gameplay'. Looking forward to it this year
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 03:16
|
|
|
 So for SC, all real gameplay content is getting pushed back again for "bug fixing and quality of life improvements" which in a normal game would just be routine post-launch maintenance, but in this pre-alpha bizarro world it means that Chris' crack team of 22 year olds are banging their heads against a mountain of technical debt. SQ42 is looking great too. They're still struggeling with the bare bones of FPS and Flight combat less than one year before the supposed Beta. Keep doing what you're doing CIG! colonelwest fucked around with this message at 03:41 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 03:18
|
|
|
Quavers posted:
Star Citizen: DELAYED.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 03:42
|
|
|
trucutru posted:Nah, that's a default starengine module. It’s probably in a directory called ‘starengine’.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
If they are planning on showing off Microtech at the con they had better get a move on! OTOH, i suppose it doesn't really matter how complete it is, they can always do a promo video of it and backers will lap it up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:16
|
|
|
Mmmm... prison gameplay. Plenty of opporuntities for lurking in dark corners.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:19
|
|
|
lots of game development non-understanders here, sad. the STARENGINE was designed by chris specifically for large scale space MMOs - refactoring it to make a traditional FPS like SQ42 is going to take time. once they finish the conversion from double to single precision (chris is personally working on this) we can expect MUCH faster development.
zebedy fucked around with this message at 04:28 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:24
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Ramps don't work properly/kill during demo Doors don't work properly/kill during demo Bullshit about alien languages during main presentation Large model/prop to sell a new ship Audio issues during presentation
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:30
|
|
|
Viscous Soda posted:Ramps don't work properly/kill during demo Shapcap in Star Marine cosplay.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:37
|
|
|
I wonder if the new features for SQ42 that are going to be announced at Citizensconned are going to be used to justify at least another year delay? “Answer the call 2021 because we increased the scope again!.. Wait, what was the scope before anyway?”
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 04:51
|
|
|
Agony Aunt posted:If they are planning on showing off Microtech at the con they had better get a move on! Made me realize that CI  Am I overthinking it?  Actually, now that I look at it, it's probably the designer of those roadmaps just ommiting repeated info. I didn't notice that person was not an employee of CI Sabreseven fucked around with this message at 05:06 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:02
|
|
|
Blizzard still bad therefore Star Citizen is good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:03
|
|
|
kilus aof posted:Blizzard still bad therefore Star Citizen is good. From an Open University lecture shown on BBC 2 at 3:42am one drizzly night in Great Britain in the year of 1984: "If game that is not not SC = bad, then -1, and therefore SC = Good and +1, ergo SQ42 will therefore inherit the +1 and make another 6 million sales at minimum, the call should be answered thereby on 2016 at most due to the +1, the -1 from the other game can be disregarded and ignored for now." zzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:18
|
|
|
colonelwest posted:70-80% of America's youth are pretty much automatically disqualified from military service. Most can't pass the initial fitness test or the physical exams, and a good portion are borderline illiterate and can't pass the ASVAB. As for the rest, many of them wash out of the initial training with horrible musculoskeletal injuries because they've never consistently exercised before in their entire lives. Don't forget those of us that suffer from mental illnesses and rely on a cocktail of drugs to keep ourselves functional.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:18
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Battle royal mode.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:24
|
|
|
Pilz posted:Don't forget those of us that suffer from mental illnesses and rely on a cocktail of drugs to keep ourselves functional. Got plenty of us serving already.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:26
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:
Prisons ARE gameplay!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:39
|
|
|
Space. Station. Sales. Been calling it for years, now its finally my time to shine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:49
|
|
|
Quavers posted:Roadmap Roundup November 1st 2019 Catastrophically epic. Even worse than expected. I especially can’t believe they’re gonna fast track Tony Z’s prison gameplay over Salvage and Refuel. Insane how much they take the megawhales for granted. But at this point, they deserve it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 05:50
|
|
|
I think it's cool and good that we're close to a decade in and a staggering amount of money wasted and the developers are openly admitting they're still trying to figure out how their game can run online. And that real people read that and think it's normal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 06:22
|
|
|
DarkDobe posted:Got plenty of us serving already. Ah, over here they tend to turn you away at the hint of mental health issues, especially depression.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 06:42
|
|
|
Mendrian posted:And that real idiots read that and think it's normal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 06:47
|
|
|
star citizen development is like a bottleneck strapped to a bottleneck strapped to a bottleneck and so on. it's always a good excuse to say “oh here we have a bottleneck which we are working on“ you can apparently do that for many years as we see. but what do you get when you strap a hundred bottlenecks to each other? a very thin pipeline i guess edit: daium, the comments on the good ol “roadmap roundup“ on spectrum are all negative. this hate-speech needs to be blocked drop the hammer on those traitors BumbleOne fucked around with this message at 08:13 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 07:56
|
|
|
Honest question, as someone who only tangentially knows about SC as an obvious scam, and since the OP doesn't clarify this.. Star Citizen is a bug-addled shitshow; however, if I pay X amount of dollars they're asking for access to this, what exactly is for-real playable? Not just crappy and thrown-together by ding-dongs, but legit playable? Their website sure doesn't tell me "if you pay this many dollars this is what you get." Is the MMO part available for that amount? Is the TDM? Can you walk around in the stations/on planets? Can you fly ships around and, and drive around on planets and moons and then go dogfight other people? Can you run around cities and hire people? Can you have people serve as crew on your ship, or serve on theirs? Is the paid portion single or multiplayer? Even the wikipedia page for this game is confusing. I tried googling this but because this project has been in limbo forever, all I can find is stuff saying "you'll be able to do this in SC soon!" - articles that range from 5 years ago until today, but I still can't figure out what exactly you get if you actually shell out the money for the game. For the sake of argument (for each part of SC, I guess, because I still cannot figure out what parts of the game you get - beyond S42 and "Star Citizen" writ large being two different things) consider Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing to be "totally unplayable" and 7 days to Die to be "playable and actually really fun but holy poo poo it took this long and it looks like rear end?" to be the scale. I know goons have their thumb on said scale, because the product blatantly sucks, but I'm really interested in what you get for your actual payment. And I can't for the love of all that is holy actually figure it out. edit: I really love 7 days to Die but it is butt-ugly and janky. UltraShame fucked around with this message at 08:53 on Nov 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 08:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 01:17 |
|
|
Fidelitious posted:I will set my car on fire if Squadron 42 sells even 100,000 copies beyond what has already been 'sold' upon its official release. I'm also predicting a metacritic of below 50. Metacritic is shite for controlling ratings. If a launch comes to pass (lol)I am pretty sure CIG will have earmarked a significantly portion of its "marketing" budget to get the best reviews possible in there.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2019 09:01
|
|
