Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Zenithe
Feb 25, 2013

Ask not to whom the Anidavatar belongs; it belongs to thee.
I never really expected any serious action on climate change any time soon, but the fact they won't even scavenge together the funds needed to help the fire services in rural areas is really dire. It's such a no brains slam dunk policy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-11-09/fires-in-nsw-affected-by-india-monsoon-season/11689416?pfmredir=sm

Complex system breaking.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

Xerxes17 posted:

The thread agrees that we're in the hellworld timeline, so having a defense force is kind of a good idea.

I would legitimately appreciate if someone could set out the geopolitical scenario in which Australia ends up in a shooting war with another nation. I assume we have various war plans for conflicts with various opponents; is thought given as to how we could end up in that scenario? Like, what are the steps that the world goes through that Indonesia or China or the Solomon Islands or whatever decides to invade Australia? How does the cost-benefit analysis of going to war with a western nation deeply embedded within the US defence umbrella work out in favour of war?

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

BBJoey posted:

I would legitimately appreciate if someone could set out the geopolitical scenario in which Australia ends up in a shooting war with another nation. I assume we have various war plans for conflicts with various opponents; is thought given as to how we could end up in that scenario? Like, what are the steps that the world goes through that Indonesia or China or the Solomon Islands or whatever decides to invade Australia? How does the cost-benefit analysis of going to war with a western nation deeply embedded within the US defence umbrella work out in favour of war?

lol the us would drop us in a second if there was a real war.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/video/id-5348771529001-6101749367001/Albanese-vows-to-restore--respect-and-trust--in-the-Labor-Party

Murdoch has Albanese's National Press Club address up and without a paywall. FYI.

The Peccadillo
Mar 4, 2013

We Have Important Work To Do

JBP posted:

gently caress three people are already dead.

Yeah, a handful more unaccounted for

The Peccadillo fucked around with this message at 10:07 on Nov 9, 2019

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.

Must have been a real train wreck

Jezza of OZPOS
Mar 21, 2018


GET LOSE❌🗺️, YOUS CAN'T COMPARE😤 WITH ME 💪POWERS🇦🇺

BBJoey posted:

I would legitimately appreciate if someone could set out the geopolitical scenario in which Australia ends up in a shooting war with another nation. I assume we have various war plans for conflicts with various opponents; is thought given as to how we could end up in that scenario? Like, what are the steps that the world goes through that Indonesia or China or the Solomon Islands or whatever decides to invade Australia? How does the cost-benefit analysis of going to war with a western nation deeply embedded within the US defence umbrella work out in favour of war?

This is a good line of thinking beyond my kenning to answer honestly but one thing when I think about this with my tiny drug addled mind is ‘how much of our position within the us defense umbrella is based upon us buying their poo poo planes and weapon systems at a huge immediate financial loss to us?’

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

Solemn Sloth posted:

Must have been a real train wreck

Nah, let me show you a train wreck.



:smug: - The Website

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
Penis lost in an attractive dog.

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

Malcolm Turnbeug posted:

This is a good line of thinking beyond my kenning to answer honestly but one thing when I think about this with my tiny drug addled mind is ‘how much of our position within the us defense umbrella is based upon us buying their poo poo planes and weapon systems at a huge immediate financial loss to us?’

They probably would defend us to keep Pine Gap under their control more than anything else imo

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.

starkebn posted:

They probably would defend us to keep Pine Gap under their control more than anything else imo

Yeah there's some strategic value to keeping the friendly coal dwarves alive to an extent.

Zenithe
Feb 25, 2013

Ask not to whom the Anidavatar belongs; it belongs to thee.
Gammon Bingo.

The Peccadillo
Mar 4, 2013

We Have Important Work To Do

starkebn posted:

They probably would defend us to keep Pine Gap under their control more than anything else imo
Defending the Australian people is not really their MO when it's come to protecting their intelligence infrastructure here

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

The Peccadillo posted:

Defending the Australian people is not really their MO when it's come to protecting their intelligence infrastructure here

I just think they would do it to stop their base being surrounded by an enemy, not for the good of us in principal.

I'm guessing there is also a nuke buried below the base in case they can't save it.

Weird Sandwich
Dec 28, 2011

FIRE FIRE FIRE hehehehe!
Appears as though the real national defence plan is to turn Australia into a burning inhospitable husk as fast as possible, so that no other country will want to invade us.

cohsae
Jun 19, 2015

Jesus those budget cuts to the fire service are stunning.
Albanese should be screaming that every second of the day, blame Gladys for the deaths, go loving scorched earth (no pun intended).
Also Death Stranding is very strange but I love that it's fostering this spirit of donating stuff and sharing which even though it's very abstract feels just nice and wholesome.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

Malcolm Turnbeug posted:

This is a good line of thinking beyond my kenning to answer honestly but one thing when I think about this with my tiny drug addled mind is ‘how much of our position within the us defense umbrella is based upon us buying their poo poo planes and weapon systems at a huge immediate financial loss to us?’

I'm certain a fair amount of it is, but there's more to the US-Aus alliance than just materiel. it'd be interesting to think through the ramifications of calling the US's bluff on the alliance - if you're withdrawing your protection because we're not buying your poo poo, we'll shut down pine gap, revoke your ability to use australian bases etc. australia is useful to the US, including in a geographical sense, beyond just shovelling money into the american MIC and I don't think we've ever tried to exploit that.

this is all theorising regardless as we know both parties are all the way with DJT.

Mr Chips
Jun 27, 2007
Whose arse do I have to blow smoke up to get rid of this baby?

cohsae posted:

Jesus those budget cuts to the fire service are stunning.
Albanese should be screaming that every second of the day, blame Gladys for the deaths, go loving scorched earth (no pun intended).

if he did this he'd get slammed by the media for politicising a tragedy.

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.

cohsae posted:

Jesus those budget cuts to the fire service are stunning.
Albanese should be screaming that every second of the day, blame Gladys for the deaths, go loving scorched earth (no pun intended).
Also Death Stranding is very strange but I love that it's fostering this spirit of donating stuff and sharing which even though it's very abstract feels just nice and wholesome.

Wow how dare you politicise this unavoidable and incomprehensible tragedy #thoughtsandprayers

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

Mr Chips posted:

if he did this he'd get slammed by the media for politicising a tragedy.

Lol, you're so right, they love this one

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
Let them slam you. If you choose the shortest sharpest words and they go in the paper you win.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

Solemn Sloth posted:

Wow how dare you politicise this unavoidable and incomprehensible tragedy #thoughtsandprayers

Awful Albo and his shocking Salvo - The Bundaberg Daily

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.
On the other hand check out an electoral map, thoughts and prayers is exactly what these people overwhelmingly voted for so gently caress em.

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.
Redraw the electorate boundaries in fire and blood

fauna
Dec 6, 2018


Caught between two worlds...
that photo of scomo fondling his coal nugget in parliament while barnaby cackles apoplectically is going to go down in history

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.
There's a fat red faced anime character in some anime poo poo for a fleeting second who is absolutely Barnaby but I can't for the life of me remember what it was in. I'm fairly sure he gets his head exploded too.

fauna
Dec 6, 2018


Caught between two worlds...
https://twitter.com/MadFckingWitch/status/1192904708165267456

Zenithe
Feb 25, 2013

Ask not to whom the Anidavatar belongs; it belongs to thee.
Oh right, part of the pacific highway had to be closed today. That's pretty grim.

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher
Something I learnt why the fires around Pt Mac and Coffs seem to be a lot fiercer than what you usually see - they usually have anything up to a meter of basically damp /wet peat that is now completely dry for the first time in .... well no-one knows as its never been recorded to happen before in some cases and hence there is a metric assload of fuel that cant be put out and is going to burn until a huge rain event finally puts it out. Coffs is supposed to be humid as gently caress and stormy right now but of curse it aint so it's a firestorm just waiting to go off. The Forster fire re-ignited a week after it was thought to be put out, again because the soil has too much dead leaves over god knows how many years that it just cant be put out and hence away it went when the winds picked up.

Compare to the Blue Mountains around Sydney - that might burn loving hard when it gets going (ie Springwood 2013) but it has regularly burnt so thence there isn't the big layer of dead material for a fire to really get hold into mostly. South of the highway tho hasnt burnt in a while so if that gets going that'll be big.....

Welcome to climate change where forests that have never burnt are now tinderboxes. gently caress you LNP, gently caress you climate change deniers.

kirbysuperstar
Nov 11, 2012

Let the fools who stand before us be destroyed by the power you and I possess.

Tongue speaking fundie piece of poo poo

gently caress off Morrison

The Peccadillo
Mar 4, 2013

We Have Important Work To Do

CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:

Something I learnt why the fires around Pt Mac and Coffs seem to be a lot fiercer than what you usually see - they usually have anything up to a meter of basically damp /wet peat that is now completely dry for the first time in .... well no-one knows as its never been recorded to happen before in some cases and hence there is a metric assload of fuel that cant be put out and is going to burn until a huge rain event finally puts it out. Coffs is supposed to be humid as gently caress and stormy right now but of curse it aint so it's a firestorm just waiting to go off. The Forster fire re-ignited a week after it was thought to be put out, again because the soil has too much dead leaves over god knows how many years that it just cant be put out and hence away it went when the winds picked up.

Compare to the Blue Mountains around Sydney - that might burn loving hard when it gets going (ie Springwood 2013) but it has regularly burnt so thence there isn't the big layer of dead material for a fire to really get hold into mostly. South of the highway tho hasnt burnt in a while so if that gets going that'll be big.....

Welcome to climate change where forests that have never burnt are now tinderboxes. gently caress you LNP, gently caress you climate change deniers.

Lol

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"
https://twitter.com/weatherdak/status/1193007468663603202?s=19

lilbeefer
Oct 4, 2004

BBJoey posted:

Please explain

Because we live in a society.

In a country. On this planet

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

The ABC posted:

The failure springs from the Left having not intellectually recovered from the collapse of socialism. When socialism proved itself unviable, its critique of the ways that capitalist economies tend towards exploitation was taken down with it.
The Left didn't go through a process of sorting through the intellectual wreckage and developing a new position.
Instead it embraced its opponents' account of free markets being efficient and meritocratic. It capitulated completely, taking on its opponents' ideas in full.
For 30 years, Labor politicians have been telling the punters that they are not educated enough to understand that their free market policies are for their own good.
The difference between the major parties was reduced to Labor being prepared to tax and spend more to improve welfare services like public health and public education.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012


cool that they let high schoolers write for the ABC

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

BBJoey posted:

cool that they let high schoolers write for the ABC

Apart from this part

quote:

When socialism proved itself unviable

The rest seems valid on a surface level

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Socialism has failed
*ignores, Europe and south america*

FAILED I TELL YOU

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

starkebn posted:

Apart from this part


The rest seems valid on a surface level

it presupposes that "the Left" (with a capital L, no less) and "ALP" are synonymous, when even the most surface-level understanding of australian politics would tell you it is not, as the Greens exists and is further left than the ALP. it is correct that the ALP tacked sharply to the right on economics and embraced neoliberalism, but that is not what the author wrote and it was certainly not a result of "socialism proving itself unviable".

the claim that "The Left didn't go through a process of sorting through the intellectual wreckage and developing a new position." is also completely laughable, as you could spend decades reading analyses of the success and failures of socialism around the world from various leftist perspectives.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"
Yes you're right, my reading standards are probably high school level at best. It came across to me they're talking about Labor of the last 30 years, and it shouldn't lead with "the LEFT"

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply