Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

VideoGames posted:

So does that mean I have been mispronouncing Einstein, Frankenstein and beer stein?

Just wait until you hear about how furious Barbara Streesand is right now

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

I'm 😤 not a 🦸🏻‍♂️hero...🧜🏻



I was originally calling Epstein ep-steen, but that's because I never actually looked at the spelling, and as I understand all names with 'ie' are pronounced 'ee' and those with 'ei' are pronounced 'eye'.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

VideoGames posted:

So does that mean I have been mispronouncing Einstein, Frankenstein and beer stein?

No you've been doing it the German way which makes it not British and therefore anti-Semitic somehow.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


http://gallery.mailchimp.com/fe34b42da454f21dccfb6b521/files/01b07d90-06d1-424a-8a4b-803c79cd3be6/Lib_Dem_Manifesto_2019.pdf

Here's the full libdem manifesto. Not a word about squirrels though.

But there is a giant full-page photo of Jo Swinson on page 5, if that's your thing.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Frankenstein's in the public domain, so there's no reason there can't be a version where Frankensteen is the monster and the Doctor is called Who.

VideoGames posted:

So does that mean I have been mispronouncing Einstein, Frankenstein and beer stein?
Bruce Springstein.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
I always felt the point of that book was that Frankenstein was the real monster.

e: :hfive: videogames

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
https://twitter.com/MetroUK/status/1197103243182137345

CCHQ pretends to be a fact checking organisation; twitter thinks about doing something in the future maybe

Royale family star pretends to be CCHQ as a joke; immediate suspension

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

RockyB posted:

As a rational, self interested lolbertatrian I donate blood on the reg because...

- It keeps my undiagnosed haemochromatosis in check
- It's 850 calories a pop, that's almost a pound of fat a year!
- I get the warm, satisfying glow of knowing that I haven't somehow caught hepatitis in the past three months

Also I guess it helps the lives of poor people who can't afford their own butler/blood chattel.

...

I wonder if there's actually any political will around to change the donor regulations from the current 70s setup. Obviously doesn't account for trans people very well at the moment.

Oh and people should really read up on haemochromatosis by the way. It's surprisingly unknown.

It also lowers cholesterol and is the only time that medical staff ever tell insist you eat chocolate and do less exercise.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Samovar posted:

I was originally calling Epstein ep-steen, but that's because I never actually looked at the spelling, and as I understand all names with 'ie' are pronounced 'ee' and those with 'ei' are pronounced 'eye'.
Brian Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's names are spelled the same but they pronounced them differently. Often happens with diasporas.

deletebeepbeepbeep posted:

The antibodies that they test for in your blood do not become detectable until after 3 months (to a reliability of 99.99%) although modern 4th generation testing kits have a 95% or so detection rate after 4 weeks.

If you test negative after 8 weeks it's ridiculously unlikely that you will test positive after 12 but the gold standard is seen as 12.

Most people do not have significant symptoms other than what you may shrug off as a cold and can live that way for multiple years without realizing. It's possible to live a healthy life as HIV positive for several years until serious complications come about but the longer you are not treated the more your quality of life will be compromised.
Sure, but 'gay sex' is not where HIV comes from. If you're both married and monogamous and have HIV tests yourself every national testing week, the three month restriction makes no sense.

Same for the sex work one really. If they're no longer a sex worker, and you're in a monogamous relationship and both get tested every year, it's incredibly unlikely that HIV can vector itself in.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
As someone with stein as part of their name I instinctively say Epstein not the way he said it lol

NinpoEspiritoSanto
Oct 22, 2013




mediaphage posted:

This stuff is honestly blowing my mind. I read much more news than I listen to, and I don't watch any, and I've been pronouncing it all this time like Einstein. I really think he was uncertain because it sounded to me like he stumbled over the pronunciation when he said it.

I called him out for "put extra Jew on that" and I feel a dog pile attempt imminent

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

Doccykins posted:

whoever told you that is wrong, the deadline for applying to vote by post is November 26th

https://www.gov.uk/voting-when-abroad

Love that to get accurate information I can't trust google or the loving council but some socdem on a dead gay forum

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

HorseLord posted:

Love that to get accurate information I can't trust google or the loving council but some socdem on a dead gay forum

Guava please probate this post. no need for that horrible insult

Unkempt
May 24, 2003

...perfect spiral, scientists are still figuring it out...
My surname is anglicised jewish, has an 'ei' and is pronounced 'eye' not 'ee'. Frankly I think it's Jeffrey Epstein who was anti-semitic for not pronouncing his name right.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

namesake posted:

No you've been doing it the German way which makes it not British and therefore anti-Semitic somehow.

You know who else was German?

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Why can't royals just dig their own hole deeper on twitter like everybody else?

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
E: ^^^ post-post combo :goatsecx:


Gonzo McFee posted:

https://twitter.com/MetroUK/status/1197103243182137345

CCHQ pretends to be a fact checking organisation; twitter thinks about doing something in the future maybe

Royale family star pretends to be CCHQ as a joke; immediate suspension

I like the headline as written on their actual website

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Junior G-man posted:

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/fe34b42da454f21dccfb6b521/files/01b07d90-06d1-424a-8a4b-803c79cd3be6/Lib_Dem_Manifesto_2019.pdf

Here's the full libdem manifesto. Not a word about squirrels though.

But there is a giant full-page photo of Jo Swinson on page 5, if that's your thing.

https://twitter.com/Tesseraction/status/1197147185940488193

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Bundy posted:

I called him out for "put extra Jew on that" and I feel a dog pile attempt imminent

I wonder whether they realise they're overcooking this? The 'Corbyn is antisemitic' smear stuck harder than other attempts, and having that just bubbling under the surface did an effective job of undermining his anti-racist credentials (however much it was bullshit). Now they're yelling 'ANTISEMITISM!!!' at every tiny innocuous thing he does to the point of parody, making constant insane reaches, reading meaning into the number of loving buttons he has done up on his shirt to convince themselves he's sending subtle hostile messages to jews, just having the most wilfully dumb takes if it gives them an excuse to point the finger at him. Surely this must now be getting to the point where your average guy on the street has stopped reacting 'oh yes antisemitism is bad, you say he is? That's not good...' in favour of 'what the actual gently caress are you talking about, you weirdo', because the takes are just completely unbelievable now

Kill All Cops
Apr 11, 2007


Pacheco de Chocobo



Hell Gem
https://twitter.com/hk_watch/status/1197141142896332800

Cool policy (Hong Kongers born before 1997 can apply for BNO)

Shame Lib Dems are never gonna actually get into power to implement it

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
I think polls had already showed - even a year ago - that about 50% think the AS claims in the media are bullshit, and labour voters either see through it (good) or actually don't care (less good)

Braggart
Nov 10, 2011

always thank the rock hider

TheRat posted:

Why is Baddiel having a meltdown over someone pronouncing 'Epstein' The way pretty much everyone who's had German in school would do?

Also lol:
https://twitter.com/inthesedeserts/status/1197096685761105921

It was insufficiently respectful towards a highly successful entrepreneur and job creator who we should all admire. He was good friends with the unimpeachable Prince Andrew, for God's sake!

And where was Corbyn's fuckin poppy? :byodood:

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe

ThomasPaine posted:

I wonder whether they realise they're overcooking this? The 'Corbyn is antisemitic' smear stuck harder than other attempts, and having that just bubbling under the surface did an effective job of undermining his anti-racist credentials (however much it was bullshit). Now they're yelling 'ANTISEMITISM!!!' at every tiny innocuous thing he does to the point of parody, making constant insane reaches, reading meaning into the number of loving buttons he has done up on his shirt to convince themselves he's sending subtle hostile messages to jews, just having the most wilfully dumb takes if it gives them an excuse to point the finger at him. Surely this must now be getting to the point where your average guy on the street has stopped reacting 'oh yes antisemitism is bad, you say he is? That's not good...' in favour of 'what the actual gently caress are you talking about, you weirdo', because the takes are just completely unbelievable now

Yeah, they're overreaching hard and it just looks mental at this point.

CyberPingu
Sep 15, 2013


If you're not striving to improve, you'll end up going backwards.

JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

These seem entirely fair to me? How would you have preferred them worded? It's not like Corbyn got "LIAR" while Johnson got "Inaccurate in some respects"

I know the BBC is horribly biased but i think we sometimes see bias where there is none

Their wording is very much more agressive towards Corbyn, saying "Thats just not right" for when Corbyn was off on his numbers, and then saying "Johsons numbers dont quite make up to his promised numbers" is skewing it to one side.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
https://twitter.com/AnnieKNK/status/1197147886296977409?s=20

TACD
Oct 27, 2000

This is brilliant, if the antisemitism stuff has gone this obviously off the deep end it’s going to make more people start asking if the accusations have been this baseless all along.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Shameful of you to not help spread my fake news

yung lambic
Dec 16, 2011

His Divine Shadow posted:

Why can't royals just dig their own hole deeper on twitter like everybody else?

Best of three, chaps?

sinky
Feb 22, 2011



Slippery Tilde
It's pronounced "didn't kill himself"

peanut-
Feb 17, 2004
Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/status/1197151013058367488

Think he just made this up on the spot? It's a massive policy announcement to just trot out in response to a random question.

Suggests they're pretty worried about how last night went at least.

RockyB
Mar 8, 2007


Dog Therapy: Shockingly Good

Barry Foster posted:

You know who else was German?

Einsteen?

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003

peanut- posted:

https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/status/1197151013058367488

Think he just made this up on the spot? It's a massive policy announcement to just trot out in response to a random question.

Suggests they're pretty worried about how last night went at least.

Isn’t that a 40% tax cut?!

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

TACD posted:

This is brilliant, if the antisemitism stuff has gone this obviously off the deep end it’s going to make more people start asking if the accusations have been this baseless all along.
It may also have the side effect of making antisemitism seem like something that is made up or exaggerated or "oh you people think everything is antisemitism" at a time of an ascendant alt-right, which is less good.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

CyberPingu posted:

Their wording is very much more agressive towards Corbyn, saying "Thats just not right" for when Corbyn was off on his numbers, and then saying "Johsons numbers dont quite make up to his promised numbers" is skewing it to one side.

I think you're over blowing it. I had a look at all 7 claims:

Corbyn's claims

1. "That's not right"
2. "It's a bit of an understatement" (which actually works in favour of Corbyn's argument)
3. [no specific wording about the accuracy of the claim, just an explanation of what's true]

Johnson's claims

1. [no specific wording]
2. "It all depends how you define..."
3. [no specific wording]
4. [no specific wording]

Overall, completely tepid. Slightly more direct in corbyns case, but the "that's not right" is not in relation to Corbyn being off on numbers, it's in relation to him saying the deal got through parliament with DUP support - which it absolutely did not. They all voted against it.

Hardly damning evidence of bias. For what it's worth, the comments are all making GBS threads on Johnson.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem

Tesseraction posted:

Shameful of you to not help spread my fake news

tbh it’s kind of like - I guess out of character? if you went more believable ie something like “This clause will not be extended to invasive species, where humane destruction tools such as traps, poison or slingshots will remain legal and encouraged”, or go for really out there you might have something? idk

RockyB
Mar 8, 2007


Dog Therapy: Shockingly Good

peanut- posted:

https://twitter.com/JasonGroves1/status/1197151013058367488

Think he just made this up on the spot? It's a massive policy announcement to just trot out in response to a random question.

Like all increases to tax brackets, this will most help the middle class.

Lmfao that's he saying he's going to try and sell type 26 frigates to the US. As if they've got the vaguest interest in our lovely navy.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Nah it has to be absurd on its face

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...

TheRat posted:

I got a 30 day ban from /r/ukpolitics for saying Israel was a nazi state. Apparently that was extremely anti-Semitic.

Fwiw I have heard from leftist jews that equating Israel with nazis directly as opposed to nay other dictator who killed a lot of people based on race is problematic because if Jews can be nazis clearly the nazis didn't hate Jews and it veers a bit into holocaust denial in that respect. I don't agree with the view point, nor do I think that's what reddit was going for, but it is a view point amongst some leftist jews. Personally I think it only works as an argument if you completely ignore any nuance and people think that what you're saying is "Benjamin Netanyahu is literally a member of the National Socialist Party that hasn't existed since the end of WW2"

Karloff
Mar 21, 2013

Because Corbyn's handling of it was clumsy back when it hit its peak, it's the only piece of scandal they've got on him that really has any traction under scrutiny. So they're going to keep banging that drum even as it gets coalesces into absurdist self-parody.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

Tesseraction posted:

Nah it has to be absurd on its face

Trolling has to be subtle, have you learned nothing from spending years in this thread??

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply