|
He's still going!
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
E-flat posted:"Is there a question for Dr. Hill?" laughter in the gallery too
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
Before was Holmes with the "WTF" look. Hill has the look of a women used to hearing this kind of bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
eke out posted:you're right, she's bad because of her imaginary politics which are irrelevant to this proceeding Take a deep breath and calm down. She’s a great witness but suggesting she belongs in a democratic administration because she had integrity in the hearing is a step too far.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
They don't get a chance to reply to Turner?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
Cactrot posted:Turner is a coward, but he is right to be afraid because Dr.Hill would make him look like a fool. Carson should have just been like - "do you have any response to the previous gentlemen's statements?"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
Cactrot posted:Turner is a coward, but he is right to be afraid because Dr.Hill would make him look like a fool. You could tell she was revved up to rip him a new one. The look on her face when she realized that she wouldnt be allowed to speak at all...
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:They don't get a chance to reply to Turner? He didn't technically ask them anything, so nope! The rules are stupid.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
"How dare you use crude, embarrassing language like the word 'rear end'?!?" --A Trumpist, 2019
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
Uncleanly Cleric posted:Hey, those are elected officials!  Shammypants posted:There’s a near 100% chance Hill was a Tory and is a Reagan republican so let’s not go crazy here people. Right, and Sondland got his ambassadorship because he paid a million dollars to Trump, nobody's saying "these are pure souls, untainted by the world," except apparently Dr. Hill in reference to Lt. Col. Vindman. It's more noteworthy that they're not #resistance types and still appalled by Trump's trumpish trumpery.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
ShutteredIn posted:He didn't technically ask them anything, so nope! The rules are stupid. He did ask "do you want to be a laughingstock?" 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:They don't get a chance to reply to Turner? He didn't ask a question efb
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
Shammypants posted:Take a deep breath and calm down. don't be a dick
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
Angry_Ed posted:He did ask "do you want to be a laughingstock?" That was directed at the dems
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:29
|
|
|
ShutteredIn posted:He didn't technically ask them anything, so nope! The rules are stupid. in that regard, Turner is much smarter than his colleagues
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
hello I hear you can get a snazzy I WANT NOTHING gang tag by asking in this thread to commemorate the historic event of the President of the United States being a big wet-brained pissbaby who wants nothing
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
Spun Dog posted:That was directed at the dems Could've fooled me but fair enough. EDIT: Damnit Dr. Hill don't acknowledge Stefanik's crocodile tears.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
aparmenideanmonad posted:Carson should have just been like - "do you have any response to the previous gentlemen's statements?" Agreed. Because that would have been glorious.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:30
|
|
|
Companion Cube posted:hello I hear you can get a snazzy I WANT NOTHING gang tag by asking in this thread to commemorate the historic event of the President of the United States being a big wet-brained pissbaby who wants nothing That's hearsay. We don't tolerate that around these parts. (also, you missed out, but there'll be an opportunity later in the year)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
Companion Cube posted:hello I hear you can get a snazzy I WANT NOTHING gang tag by asking in this thread to commemorate the historic event of the President of the United States being a big wet-brained pissbaby who wants nothing Deadline's passed, other opportunities may emerge.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
wenstrup gets to jack off to his service again
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
Good lord look at Jabba the Hutt back there edit: I have been alerted to the fact that this individual has been present at the earlier hearings, but I have missed those (or at least the shots in which he appeared), and apologise for any redundancy and/or offence. In all fairness, and also in light of the fact that my post has already been quoted, however, I shall refrain from redacting my comment and eat the probe that it appears will come to me very soon now so that others may learn from my mistake. Thank you. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
Schiff is having to do fact checks after every single Republican speaks
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Who... who attacked america in 98?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Strange Poon posted:wenstrup gets to jack off to his service again  refleks posted:Who... who attacked america in 98? Some guy named Bin...Lauden? EDIT: Also gently caress off Wenstrup your oath is to THE CONSTITUTION
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Strange Poon posted:wenstrup gets to jack off to his service again he voluntarily joined.. the reserves.. in 1998.. because we were under attack?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Strange Poon posted:wenstrup gets to jack off to his service again  right out of the gate too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:Good lord look at Jabba the Hutt back there Here we go
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:Good lord look at Jabba the Hutt back there He has a very nice tie today, don't you think?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
legitimate elections lmbo
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
Wow a true "winning hearts and minds" believer
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
refleks posted:Who... who attacked america in 98? Limp Bizkit
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
Wenstrup: We did a report I swear. No you can't see it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
If it is debunked that the Ukraine interfered in our elections then why do I insist they did?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
Clintons! Drink!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
Wenstrup: I want to hear from MY...AI AI AI AI WHOO. M-M-M-MY CHALUPA.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
CHALUPA. GIVE US THE CHALUPA.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:34
|
|
|
Hahahahaha to prevent them from looking stupid is the new strat to just not ask questions?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:34
|
|
|
So is every R just gonna make a speech instead of asking questions?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Strange Poon posted:wenstrup gets to jack off to his service again Note that Wenstrup refuses to support an admendment that would support military widows and spouses https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr553/summary
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 20:34
|
|