|
At this point I kinda want the whistleblower to just out themselves. It doesn't loving matter at this point. Everyone in power probably already knows. And that's all the republicans have, which is nothing.
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 06:56 |
|
|
Lol @ "If you told us that there'd be a vote at the end we wouldn't have bailed out on an impeachment hearing because we don't care about anything that is being said".
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:10
|
|
|
zonohedron posted:Soon to be was, he's not seeking reelection, which is why I had such high hopes for him. Ha ha ha ha Trying to nail someone from profiting over their last name is probably the last thing Trump should have been trying to do. Even without the extortion, this would have been a really silly thing to bring up if Biden were the nominee.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
1glitch0 posted:At this point I kinda want the whistleblower to just out themselves. It doesn't loving matter at this point. Everyone in power probably already knows. And that's all the republicans have, which is nothing. I think if Republicans knew they'd have leaked it. They'd want the name leaked because they want revenge on him or her.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:Trying to nail someone from profiting over their last name is probably the last thing Trump should have been trying to do. Even without the extortion, this would have been a really silly thing to bring up if Biden were the nominee. And (without getting too much into primary chat) Biden probably won't be the nominee so it's even dumber.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
Castro: mysteriously, Giuliani and Mulvaney have declined to appear, even though Mulvaney's previously been totally okay with announcing crimes, and Giuliani can't get enough of talking about his crimes
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:12
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:I think if Republicans knew they'd have leaked it. They'd want the name leaked because they want revenge on him or her. they have leaked a name, they just have no confirmation its right Angry_Ed posted:And (without getting too much into primary chat) Biden probably won't be the nominee so it's even dumber. given the timing i think part of the thinking was ensuring biden was not the nominee, because the trump campaign considers him the strongest dem opponent. note: to avoid primarychat, it is not necessary the trump campaign be right to agree that was their thinking
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
Sanskrit Scat posted:Will Hurd, while still posturing, is one of the only Republicans who has any dignity left Absolutely loving false. He was a world class dickhead during Benghazi and only doesn’t care now because he will lose his seat and retired from government.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
TyrantWD posted:Trying to nail someone from profiting over their last name is probably the last thing Trump should have been trying to do. Even without the extortion, this would have been a really silly thing to bring up if Biden were the nominee. You're talking as a normal functioning adult. The whole Trump Admin is doing all the bad stuff they accused the Democrats of doing for years and acting like it's fine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1197608660912001030
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
Anybody got a link to a clip of when Holmes was talking about the Sondland/Trump call in the restaurant? This part specifically Sondland:”We’re in Kyiv” Trump:”ARE YOU IN UKRAINE?”
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
1glitch0 posted:At this point I kinda want the whistleblower to just out themselves. It doesn't loving matter at this point. Everyone in power probably already knows. And that's all the republicans have, which is nothing. Radical people will still need to rely on mainstream media outlets to give enough details on the person to do anything. If they out themselves, a lot more than just a name will be exposed. Right now I only know of a name and that it might not be the right person, so I assume that is as far as most people would get too if they dug. Let’s keep it that way. But of course Trump knows at this point. I believe the New York Times outed him by narrowing his job to probably only a handful of people.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:I think if Republicans knew they'd have leaked it. They'd want the name leaked because they want revenge on him or her. Maybe. I just think there are so few limited possibilities that if you're in the loop and know the people who it could possibly be it can't be that long of a list. I think no one just wants to be the one to leak or say the name first.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
Reminder than Mike Conaway's son is a HUGE liberal socialist and has to have Thanksgiving with him next week.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
"You see this impeachment is a good thing...FOR PUTIN!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
"resounding" EC victory
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
only just getting caught up enough to watch, I need some fuckin clipssssssssssssssss
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
lmao holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:16
|
|
|
Oh my God, fracking? loving really?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
"FRACKING IS GOOD BECAUSE RT SAID IT'S BAD"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
Holy poo poo...fracking. Nice.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
I'm sorry but I was dealing with a delivery at work, why is this Texan Rep talking about fracking to Ms. Hill?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
She said American loving
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
Jiro posted:I'm sorry but I was dealing with a delivery at work, why is this Texan Rep talking about fracking to Ms. Hill? BECAUSE RUSSIA TODAY
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
what in the poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
what the gently caress is he talking about
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Jiro posted:I'm sorry but I was dealing with a delivery at work, why is this Texan Rep talking about fracking to Ms. Hill? He seems to have caught on not to mess with Fiona Hill.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
"see Russia Today is propaganda, not like that paragon of journalism, Fox News" (not actually said but I feel like this is going to be implied)
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Is this guy on speed?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
This gently caress trying to use the witness to push fracking on America is pissing me off. Russian propaganda is bad. Fracking is also bad.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
You're a very bad boy!
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
There Bias Two posted:This gently caress trying to use the witness to push fracking on America is pissing me off. Russian propaganda is bad. Fracking is also bad. Wonder how much money he has in Fracking.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Wow What an rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
There Bias Two posted:This gently caress trying to use the witness to push fracking on America is pissing me off. Russian propaganda is bad. Fracking is also bad. Capitalism is bad.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Why did you talk about something you found concerning with others when it makes OUR PRESIDENT look bad if you are a man of discretion 
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Yeah this is all just a swerving winding way of wasting more time from Rep Conaway.
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
Is this dude just going with “you’re a narc?”
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
ok boomer Did I do it right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 06:56 |
|
|
Arrgytehpirate posted:Is this dude just going with “you’re a narc?” "Mr. Holmes are you aware that Snitches get Stitches?"
|
|
#
?
Nov 21, 2019 21:20
|
|