|
The only things I'm going to take away from Collin's opening statement is that his voice is annoying and that he hates the chair he's sitting in.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 21:35 |
|
"We didn't have hearings about the Muller report" is some Galaxy brain poo poo lmao
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:23 |
|
Ehud posted:...is this guy actually worse than Nunes? he's way dumber and he lacks Nunes' manic 'DAD SAID THIS WAS OK SO EVERYONE HATES YOU FOR DOING THIS ACTUALLY' cokehead energy so he's gonna be way less funny
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
Collin's sounds like Gym-lite
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
man this guy is just like gym jordan
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
oxsnard posted:"We didn't have hearings about the Muller report" is some Galaxy brain poo poo lmao Next comment from a Democrat better be a subpoena to Muller to come and answer questions
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
Collins sucks but he's clearly a tier above Nunes and Jordan imo
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
Hhhhhwutttt
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:24 |
|
oxsnard posted:Collins sucks but he's clearly a tier above Nunes and Jordan imo they're all the same idiot but he's way less amusing
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:25 |
|
geeko55 posted:How long is today's hearing set to go for? I've got an hour long meeting soon, and I don't want to miss everything. Well, the four testifying have opening statements, Nadler and Foghorn Leghorn each have 45 minutes, and then the 40 other members of the committee each get 5 minutes, so we're gonna be here a while.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:25 |
|
HHHHHWYYYYY
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:26 |
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Well, the four testifying have opening statements, Nadler and Foghorn Leghorn each have 45 minutes, and then the 40 other members of the committee each get 5 minutes, so we're gonna be here a while. Ugh. Well, then I guess I'll go out now rather than sit here and listen to him run out the clock.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:27 |
|
TRUMP DOESN'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR LAW PROFESSORS
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:27 |
|
He acts like he is under time pressure and is barely understandable...
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:28 |
|
BOY, I SAY BOY....
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:28 |
Fair warning: there is basically no reason whatsoever to subject yourself to today's hearing except masochism
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:28 |
|
I'm excited for a republican to ask one of the law professors if they were aware that Alexandra Chalupa met with someone from Ukraine
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:29 |
|
"He told the truth!" AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:29 |
|
eke out posted:Fair warning: there is basically no reason whatsoever to subject yourself to today's hearing except masochism It's cute that you think any of us can feel anymore.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:29 |
|
eke out posted:Fair warning: there is basically no reason whatsoever to subject yourself to today's hearing except masochism Just have a tweetdeck running with emptywheel and southpaw
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:30 |
|
eke out posted:Fair warning: there is basically no reason whatsoever to subject yourself to today's hearing except masochism Curious as to why. Is the witness useless or something?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:30 |
|
eke out posted:Fair warning: there is basically no reason whatsoever to subject yourself to today's hearing except masochism I'll have you know that I've hated myself longer than you've probably been alive, so suck it.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:30 |
|
ummel posted:Curious as to why. Is the witness useless or something? they're just law professors bringing things into context. there will be no new information or anything.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:31 |
|
I'm getting PTSD from years of listening to southern baptist preachers.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:32 |
|
Hahahaha they're forcing a vote hahahaha
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:32 |
ummel posted:Curious as to why. Is the witness useless or something? it's just law profs talking about the nature of impeachment, no fact witnesses
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:32 |
|
Counting the votes here is hypnotic
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:32 |
|
The GOP is a part of babies
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:33 |
|
God is Ratcliff there as well... AND MMCLINTOCK? Thought he was busy with writing speeches for Selina
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:33 |
|
Section 2 part 4 of the parliamentary inquiry says you can lick every single inch of my taint.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:34 |
|
So who else, other than Nunes, do you think is in on the whole crimes-being-impeached-for thing? Surely it wasn't just Nunes.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:34 |
|
are you going to use the rules of evidence the gentleman will susp- are you GOING to use the rules of the gentleman will the RULES of EVIDENCE
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:35 |
|
OMG these idiots think this is a loving jury trial. I so want to see nadler have these idiots thrown out by capitol police.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:35 |
|
I loving hate everyone of those fuckers
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:35 |
|
I seek recognition! PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:35 |
|
GlyphGryph posted:So who else, other than Nunes, do you think is in on the whole crimes-being-impeached-for thing? Surely it wasn't just Nunes. Rohrbacher and McCarthy just going on the old news article about being bukkakied with Russian money...
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:36 |
|
eke out posted:it's just law profs talking about the nature of impeachment, no fact witnesses How did these poor saps get roped into this?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:36 |
|
aaand this is why law profs were brought in today, bc these guys are idiots
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:37 |
|
Only in America can the love child of Boomhauer and Foghorn Leghorn can become a member of Congress.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 21:35 |
ummel posted:How did these poor saps get roped into this? the democratic witnesses are a bunch of excellent legal scholars (especially Pam Karlan, who is a queer lady that just argued the most recent LGBQT discrimination case at the Supreme Court and runs the Yale SCOTUS Clinic) and the one republican witness is a gigantic douchebag
|
|
# ? Dec 4, 2019 16:38 |