|
Phil Moscowitz posted:We was just wrassling your honor The Rt. Hon. Shaggy 2 Dope finds the defendant Totally Sick.
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 12:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 02:06 |
|
|
Turtlicious posted:This is some legal advice: what if you're a professional wrassler
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 14:53
|
|
|
A_Account posted:So far everybody I've spoken to about this has been fair and level headed, especially once they have read my statement. And I mean fair and level headed, not biased in my favour. The university guild have been very helpful, GBS less so. Everyone else has already chipped in here but seriously shut up. You don't know enough to be confident. If you are confident , you are wrong. You are dunning-kreuger personified right now: you don't even know enough to realize how ignorant you are. Only a lawyer, licensed in your area, who has reviewed your case could possibly speak on it with confidence. Go talk to one. Stop talking here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 15:28
|
|
|
No, please, post your exact actions that will obviously exonerate you, Rowdy Roddy RA. The lawyers in this thread are just trying to protect their championship belts, but I think a heel winning it will really galvanize the ratings
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 15:50
|
|
|
Seeing as A_Account hasn't asked - would you lot recommend lawyering before he hears the specifics of the complaint, or should he hold off till then? Like, for all he knows it could be "A_Account didn't pass me when he should have, waa" and the uni is obliged to go through the motions. (E: I mean, it's not gonna be, but it could be, right?) Also, what if it's a gold-fringed wrasslin belt? lofi fucked around with this message at 16:01 on Dec 7, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 15:58
|
|
|
lofi posted:Seeing as A_Account hasn't asked - would you lot recommend lawyering before he hears the specifics of the complaint, or should he hold off till then? Like, for all he knows it could be "A_Account didn't pass me when he should have, waa" and the uni is obliged to go through the motions. (E: I mean, it's not gonna be, but it could be, right?) If you need a lawyer you needed the lawyer yesterday. You're already making mistakes or you probably wouldn't be looking for a lawyer in the first place. The longer you wait to lawyer up the more opportunities you're giving yourself to gently caress up further. You can't listen to a lawyer you don't have.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 16:15
|
|
|
Outrail, I was unable to read the details before you deleted them (and it's good you deleted them), but it is very possible your boss knows exactly what they are doing, and is making sure you are the person who is going to be held responsible.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 16:45
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Outrail, I was unable to read the details before you deleted them (and it's good you deleted them), but it is very possible your boss knows exactly what they are doing, and is making sure you are the person who is going to be held responsible. Yeah, this makes sense to me also. Your best choice of action is probably quitting and getting a job somewhere else ASAP. Without having read the original post, just from context comments it's crystal clear this situation is going to get worse and you don't want to be the last one out before the musical chairs stop.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 16:50
|
|
|
owlhawk911 posted:actually that is a question i have now. is that actually a defense? like if this guy went ahead and cranked out some falsified invoices for his charity could he just say "my boss told me it was cool" and be off the hook? The Nuremberg defense is not actually a defense the majority of the time. You can argue mens rea and intent, if you didn’t actually know what you were doing was wrong. But you’d be hard press to claim ignorance on falsifying invoices.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 16:58
|
|
|
Really the number one rule when it comes to subjective defense pleading (aka too dumb to crime) is that it needs to actually be reasonable. If nobody is usually that loving stupid, well then you have a problem. Also, it needs to concern fact, not law. Factual ignorance may get you off the hook (mislead, conned, defrauded etc. and your conduct was reasonable in that context) but ignorance of the law (didn't know it was illegal, honest) is a straight waste of time almost every time everywhere.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:03
|
|
|
It makes me sad you guys dunked on that dude so hard he’s probably never coming back to finish his tale of wrasslin’-inspired woe 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 19:38
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Outrail, I was unable to read the details before you deleted them (and it's good you deleted them), but it is very possible your boss knows exactly what they are doing, and is making sure you are the person who is going to be held responsible. .... I hadn't thought of that, but given what I know about the parties involved this is extremely unlikely. In any case even if I deliberately did some extremely illegal poo poo he would also be legally liable for anything I did as a worker for the organization. Hieronymous Alloy posted:Yeah, this makes sense to me also. Yeah, we're approaching this point. If we leave the org will likely fold and it does a lot of good work. I've had a string of lovely working environments and I'm just so loving tired of dealing with poo poo like this when I should be hammering out actual work. Finding work around here in my field is very difficult, and the situation is potentially salvageable if we can convince the two problem people to just back off and let us do our jobs. You can start pissing down the well now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:06
|
|
|
Challenge your boss to a cage match, A_Account could be hiding under the ring to throw the match in your favor.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:43
|
|
|
gently caress. Violence really is the answer to all our problems.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 20:54
|
|
|
sephiRoth IRA posted:It makes me sad you guys dunked on that dude so hard he’s probably never coming back to finish his tale of wrasslin’-inspired woe
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 21:24
|
|
|
Outrail posted:gently caress-violence really is the answer to all our problems.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 21:25
|
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Really the number one rule when it comes to subjective defense pleading (aka too dumb to crime) is that it needs to actually be reasonable. If nobody is usually that loving stupid, well then you have a problem. "2 dumb 4 crime" as a face tat seems like a powerful piece of evidence. i'll have to think about this, thanks. maybe just practice saying "oh gosh, ah geez. those tricksters" real embarrassed-like for now
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 21:36
|
|
|
We are mutually wrestling! [I slide my hand over your rear end and fall into unemployment, it's not clear what kind of move I was trying to do]
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Is it a written order? Try to get it in writing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2019 22:06
|
|
|
That was amazing. That guy was the stupidest, most tone deaf motherfucker and deserved every last dunk from both threadsFrozenVent posted:“CAN YOU SMEL-L-L-L-L! WHAT THE RA! IS! COOKING!” 
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 05:05
|
|
|
I’ve never asked legal advice from something awful, llc. But is this a lot of traffic itt vs normal?
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 05:51
|
|
|
"oblivious person who doesn't yet realize how deep the poo poo they're in" and "oblivious person who doesn't realize fraud is a crime" are recurring cast members, getting two in a row like that has things a little lively but that's it
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 06:04
|
|
|
Javid posted:"oblivious person who doesn't yet realize how deep the poo poo they're in" and "oblivious person who doesn't realize fraud is a crime" are recurring cast members, getting two in a row like that has things a little lively but that's it It’s pretty entertaining, so win I guess.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 06:11
|
|
|
It was a good couple pages
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 06:21
|
|
|
We just need tree law to complete the sequence.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 10:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 14:24
|
|
|
So I'm not on speaking terms with my neighbor, and there is a eucalyptus tree on our property that is partly overhanging their driveway. How do I legally replant the tree on their driveway without anyone noticing? Fake edit: I'm not on speaking terms with them because I only moved in this year and haven't seen them yet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
Burt Sexual posted:I’ve never asked legal advice from something awful, llc. But is this a lot of traffic itt vs normal?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 00:40
|
|
|
Eminent Domain posted:We just need tree law to complete the sequence.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
FilthyImp posted:My neighbor's papaya tree overhangs on our backyard and drops rotten fruit and dead limbs into our patio. Am I within my rights to prune everything that overhangs with no warning? That's what my dad does to his neighbors trees and it's fine. Go ahead. IANATL
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:20
|
|
|
My neighbour’s tree fell and crashed through my guest bedroom and my garage, damaging my car and injuring my friend who was staying over on a business trip. On the way down the tree also took down the communication cables for the block. The tree might have fallen because my landlord - who also own the neighboring property - was doing some landscaping work to shore up the fence on the property line with his neighbour. Who do I sue and for what?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:24
|
|
|
CongoJack posted:IANATL In the future I hope tree law branches off from law like how optometry or dentistry doesn't go through medical school. You can just go to tree law school. Maybe a six year combined program with an agricultural degree.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:32
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:My neighbour’s tree fell and crashed through my guest bedroom and my garage, damaging my car and injuring my friend who was staying over on a business trip. So the landlord owns your property, the neighbour's property and the tree? Who else is there to sue? Yourself? Throw the landlord into a woodchipper and you're now owned by the tree.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:32
|
|
|
make a bone broth out of your manager/supervisor and eat him in front of their family.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:40
|
|
|
Turtlicious posted:make a bone broth out of your manager/supervisor and eat him in front of their family. That’s your answer to everything.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 01:45
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:My neighbour’s tree fell and crashed through my guest bedroom and my garage, damaging my car and injuring my friend who was staying over on a business trip. Do you have renters insurance
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:08
|
|
|
EwokEntourage posted:Do you have renters insurance Yes, through the landlord’s family-owned-and-operated insurance company They’re denying the claim, is that relevant?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:11
|
|
|
Divorce law question, sort of. I'm in the process of looking for a divorce lawyer, and my dad is convinced that the best thing for me to do is to write out what happened, so that I can hand over a typed-out transcript of events to the lawyer. This will, he's sure, save time and money. Is this actually necessary and/or helpful, or should I just focus on finding the lawyer and skip the transcript entirely?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:35
|
|
|
That sounds like an extremely great idea honestly. Don't just send it unsolicited but if they're like "yeah tell me about the situation" it's just ready to read from or email or whatever IMO this isn't even lawyer advice so much as "dealing with pros you pay by the hour, in general" advice, but having as much information you can about whatever you want them to do for you already prepared (before you start a dialog with them) is always helpful I cannot speak for others but when I'm working on that sort of client-job basis, the people who know what they need and don't make me wring the key data I need out of them get more of my priority attention; in your case, a good solid essay on the period of time in question will probably cover a lot of the key bits the guy needs to start filing whatever things need filing finding a solid lawyer you trust can/should take non-zero calendar days, so definitely get on both tasks imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 02:06 |
|
|
The lawyer still has to read and interpret the document and ask you follow up questions Not really seeing a time or money savings It’s not like free for a lawyer to read something
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 02:50
|
|
