Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Pile Of Garbage
May 28, 2007



Yeah I said IF they did. Obviously I guess they don't, those feckless assholes!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

teacup
Dec 20, 2006

= M I L K E R S =

I mean I didn’t know what I expected but loving hell

Is that Leunig thing legit? After his last scandal how is that not being reported?

Purk
Aug 9, 2017
Albanese is throwing his support behind the coal industry saying we should keep selling our coal because the demand will remain even if we stop.

"So it would not reduce emissions - which has to be the objective. I don't see a contradiction between that and having a stong climate change policy."

hambeet
Sep 13, 2002

:coal:

The Before Times
Mar 8, 2014

Once upon a time, I would have thrown you halfway to the moon for a crack like that.

Purk posted:

Albanese is throwing his support behind the coal industry saying we should keep selling our coal because the demand will remain even if we stop.

"So it would not reduce emissions - which has to be the objective. I don't see a contradiction between that and having a stong climate change policy."

except, as Albo should know, Australia exports just over 1/4 (26%) of the world's coal. if we were to stop selling, it would drive prices up, thus reducing demand. it's probably one of the biggest impacts we could make on global emissions.

e: 1/4, not 1/3


source: https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-information-2019

The Before Times fucked around with this message at 22:11 on Dec 8, 2019

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai

Lol hahahaha

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
I can't believe the Australian public has made Scomo the new John Howard.

I can't believe we are starting again.

I mean that while thing about Australia being 10 years behind the rest of the world politically, feels like 30 years now.

Leader after Albanese? A hopeless clod.
Greens forming government before climate change becomes irreversible? Unlikely.

This is hosed. You dream of a better society and all you get is despair. :itwaspoo:

hambeet
Sep 13, 2002

The Before Times posted:

except, as Albo should know, Australia exports just over 1/4 (26%) of the world's coal. if we were to stop selling, it would drive prices up, thus reducing demand. it's probably one of the biggest impacts we could make on global emissions.

e: 1/4, not 1/3


source: https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-information-2019



but others would start mining it. and then their rich friends wouldn't give them cushy jobs or money.

so no, that's a dumb idea.

The Before Times
Mar 8, 2014

Once upon a time, I would have thrown you halfway to the moon for a crack like that.
Now, China is BY FAR the largest producer of coal, so if Australia were to bow out of the market, they might decide to fill that gap. Except they're also the largest consumer of coal so who knows how much they'd actually export.

Another complicating factor is the quality of the coal. Australia's coal exports are 'cleaner' than most and you can burn less of it to get the same amount of energy as 'dirty' coal. If someone else were to come in and fill that market, emissions could actually increase. Depends on whether the US or China decide to export more (but they both use most of their coal domestically iirc).

The Before Times fucked around with this message at 22:30 on Dec 8, 2019

Solemn Sloth
Jul 11, 2015

Baby you can shout at me,
But you can't need my eyes.
Hard to imagine why the Liberals have increased in popularity given the the incredible vision of an alternative government presented by Anthony Albanese

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Help, I need somebody.

Yeast
Dec 25, 2006

$1900 Grande Latte
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/bill-shorten-least-popular-leader-since-1990-election-study-20191208-p53hz3.html

"The study of the May election found that Mr Morrison was the most popular leader since Kevin Rudd led Labor to the 2007 election, using a popularity scale of zero to 10 and drawing on surveys with thousands of voters."

"The study found that Mr Shorten was the least popular leader of any major political party since 1990."

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Lmao how the gently caress did Morrison come anywhere close to Kevin 07 campaign.

What the gently caress is wrong with this place.

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Study found big business has too much power
Study also found climate change to be a major concern.
80 percent of study participants disapproved of the leadership change and felt it undermines democracy.

Study funds Morrison most popular leader since Kevin 07 :suicide:

toggle
Nov 7, 2005

what times to be alive

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
Excuse me hambeet is this brexit?

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai

Anidav posted:

I can't believe the Australian public has made Scomo the new John Howard.

I can't believe we are starting again.

I mean that while thing about Australia being 10 years behind the rest of the world politically, feels like 30 years now.

Leader after Albanese? A hopeless clod.
Greens forming government before climate change becomes irreversible? Unlikely.

This is hosed. You dream of a better society and all you get is despair. :itwaspoo:

I think it’s time to admit that the only reason the left made any progress in the 20th century was the Cold War. Now it’s over we’re going back to robber barons and pinkerons.

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai
What was the last major progressive victory? Medicare I guess.

Lid
Feb 18, 2005

And the mercy seat is awaiting,
And I think my head is burning,
And in a way I'm yearning,
To be done with all this measuring of proof.
An eye for an eye
And a tooth for a tooth,
And anyway I told the truth,
And I'm not afraid to die.

Don Dongington posted:

Also apparently there was a Wall of Death during a Veronica's set at Good Things today and what the poo poo is 2019.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02I6HKyUOkM

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
Morrison is more popular than Abbott, Gillard, Turnbull and *checks notes* Brendan Nelson?

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

Amethyst posted:

What was the last major progressive victory? Medicare I guess.

We just had marriage equality, even if it was just a cynical attempt to wedge the government.

Tree Bucket
Apr 1, 2016

R.I.P.idura leucophrys

Amethyst posted:

I think it’s time to admit that the only reason the left made any progress in the 20th century was the Cold War. Now it’s over we’re going back to robber barons and pinkerons.

Don't you mean job creators and battlers?

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:

We just had marriage equality, even if it was just a cynical attempt to wedge the government.

Fits in snugly with capitalist ideology.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

lol under 35s cast more votes for the Greens than the Libs

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

Anidav posted:

Study found big business has too much power
Study also found climate change to be a major concern.
80 percent of study participants disapproved of the leadership change and felt it undermines democracy.

Study funds Morrison most popular leader since Kevin 07 :suicide:

the electorate is simply too stupid for any progress to be achieved

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again
This study is basically saying Abbott would've won

bell jar
Feb 25, 2009

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-says-australia-should-continue-to-export-coal-20191208-p53hyp.html

Albanese says Australia should continue to export coal

quote:

Labor leader Anthony Albanese has backed the case for Australian coal exports amid a divisive debate on shutting down the trade to act on climate change, arguing it would be wrong to damage the industry and its workers.

Mr Albanese said Australia’s priority should be to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under strong global agreements but that this would not be achieved by stopping coal exports.

The Opposition Leader said other countries would fill the gap left by any halt to Australian coal exports, laying down a key principle amid a climate policy rift between Labor frontbencher Joel Fitzgibbon and Midnight Oil singer Peter Garrett.

“If Australia stopped exporting today there would not be less demand for coal – the coal would come from a different place,” Mr Albanese said in an interview.

“So it would not reduce emissions
– which has to be the objective. I don’t see a contradiction between that and having a strong climate change policy.

“We’ve got to consider what the actual outcome is from any proposal, and the proposal that we immediately stop exporting coal would damage our economy and would not have any environmental benefit.”

The Opposition Leader outlined his approach to The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald ahead of a visit to regional Queensland, where he will speak with workers in coal fields and manufacturing centres.

Labor’s election review found that low-income workers swung against the party at the May election and that it lost support when it could not say whether the Adani coal mine in central Queensland should go ahead.

“Labor’s ambiguous language on Adani, combined with some anti-coal rhetoric, devastated its support in the coal-mining communities of regional Queensland and the Hunter Valley,” the review said.

The Greens want to ban new coal mines and stop thermal coal exports by 2030, while Labor debates the policies and emission targets it will take to the next election.

“Without a plan to phase out coal, you don’t have a plan to address the climate crisis,” Greens MP Adam Bandt said of Labor in October.

Mr Albanese said the demand for coal around the world would not change if Australia stopped its exports, which meant the ban would have no impact on emissions.

“What happens with our exports depends on demand – and our exports do not create demand,” he said.

While the world was transitioning away from coal, he said, the Australian priority should be to reduce emissions under United Nations negotiations such as the Paris agreement.

“They don’t call for countries to stop trading,” he said of those agreements.

“What they call for is a series of domestic emission targets to be implemented.

“Do we need to strengthen those international agreements? Yes. Is Australia in a position to argue that? No, because our emissions are actually rising, not decreasing.”

Mr Garrett, who served as environment minister in the Rudd and Gillard governments, called for “courage and conviction” on climate from Labor “true believers” in a speech on Saturday, but he came under fire on Sunday.

“I don’t know where Peter lives these days but I suspect it’s not Central Queensland, the Hunter or the Illawarra,” Mr Fitzgibbon tweeted.

“I’m sure he’s not worried about where his next mortgage payment will come from. I support ‘true believers’ who want well-paid blue-collar jobs for aspirational Australians.”

Mr Albanese spoke of the link between climate change and the heightened risk of bushfire.

“You can’t link any specific event, but what you can look at is the trends – and the trends are very clear,” he said.

“Bushfire season is getting longer and it’s getting more severe.”

But he said this was not an “academic argument” and should lead to a debate about the most effective way to reduce emissions.

“Climate change is real and is having a real impact on our natural environment. And that’s why we need to look at the actual impact on things as they are rather than as we want them to be,” he said.

Mr Albanese said the environmental “convoy” to Queensland during the election campaign hurt the climate change cause by offending voters, in a lesson about the need to unify those who wanted to act on climate change.

“It just didn’t show any respect for people who were just trying to provide an income for their families and for the community,” he said of the campaign, which was led by former Greens leader Bob Brown.

“You can’t change people's views by screaming at them.

“It’s wrong to not treat people with respect regardless of where they live. And the convoy didn’t treat people with respect.

“Some of the people on the convoy were motivated by their concern about the natural environment and the impact of climate change, so they’re worthy of respect as well.

“It’s a two-way process, but it’s them who were choosing to go into a community.”

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

Anidav posted:

This study is basically saying Abbott would've won

Is that really so hard to believe after seeing Morrison win?

Robodog
Oct 22, 2004

...how does that work?
If only Krudd knifed Bill before the last election…

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

Abbott's only tactical error was overestimating the average punter.

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai
The story there isn’t that Morrison is popular. He scored 5.1 where Gillard scores 4.9

The story is voter cynicism. Since Kevin Rudd got knifed people have zero faith in the political system.

Cynics aren’t going to vote for climate action because they don’t believe it will be implemented. Same with socialist policy. They’ll vote nationalist.

hambeet
Sep 13, 2002

Anidav posted:

Excuse me hambeet is this brexit?

I'm pro quexit

Anidav
Feb 25, 2010

ahhh fuck its the rats again

I mean

He's not exactly wrong here.

Any attempt to shut down coal exports or production here will just be filled by countries with lower standards.

I don't know what the solution is for Australia, the island nation full of resources in the ground.

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai

Anidav posted:

I mean

He's not exactly wrong here.

Any attempt to shut down coal exports or production here will just be filled by countries with lower standards.

I don't know what the solution is for Australia, the island nation full of resources in the ground.

He’s only right if you’re cynical to the core about global efforts to reduce emissions.

If nations like Australia showed leadership and got serious about fossil fuels the demands for enforceable global standards would have teeth.

Mad Katter
Aug 23, 2010

STOP THE BATS

Anidav posted:

I don't know what the solution is for Australia, the island nation full of resources in the ground.

If only we could have spent the last quarter century preparing for this transition.

BBJoey
Oct 31, 2012

Anidav posted:

I mean

He's not exactly wrong here.

Any attempt to shut down coal exports or production here will just be filled by countries with lower standards.

I don't know what the solution is for Australia, the island nation full of resources in the ground.

Why haven’t countries with lower standards already undercut Australia’s offerings? In the global race for the bottom, how is it that Australian mining is still viable and profitable compared to exploiting developing countries?

norp
Jan 20, 2004

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

let's invade New Zealand, they have oil

Mad Katter posted:

If only we could have spent the last quarter century preparing for this transition.

Some sort of price on externalities that could be used to fund the transition?

hambeet
Sep 13, 2002

BBJoey posted:

Why haven’t countries with lower standards already undercut Australia’s offerings? In the global race for the bottom, how is it that Australian mining is still viable and profitable compared to exploiting developing countries?

big coal

Don Dongington
Sep 27, 2005

#ideasboom
College Slice
Channels 9 and 7 won the culture war 20 years ago.

Rudd was just a hiccup caused by Murdoch thinking he had another Tony Blair on his hands, and was easily dispensed when that turned out to be untrue.

Scomo could have lit the fires himself and it wouldn't matter worth a drat.

By the time The Block Watchers are a small enough bloc that we see a Labor/greens majority again, it'll be too late.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Amethyst
Mar 28, 2004

I CANNOT HELP BUT MAKE THE DCSS THREAD A FETID SWAMP OF UNFUN POSTING
plz notice me trunk-senpai

BBJoey posted:

Why haven’t countries with lower standards already undercut Australia’s offerings? In the global race for the bottom, how is it that Australian mining is still viable and profitable compared to exploiting developing countries?

Yeah. Induced demand.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply