|
I've hosed my vocal cords up from cheering, then booing, West Ham tonight and frankly whatever happens on Thursday can't be as loving abject as what I've just seen. This is the nearest I get to optimism, deal with it. Also thanks for the answers on the mailshots, did anyone answer the question about EU citizens counting towards constituency sizes? e: 140 is the number of players West Ham would have needed on the pitch to not completely gently caress up
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:57 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 14:55 |
|
This kid on the floor photo and the Tories heartless reaction is really kicking off. I had four people bring it up unprompted on the doors tonight.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:57 |
|
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:59 |
|
Apraxin posted:https://twitter.com/allisonpearson/status/1204170286289084417 Alison Pearson is genuinely a loving moron.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:59 |
|
The Perfect Element posted:Hello, great UKMT hive mind. I was having an argument with a friend of mind about labour antisemitism ; she thinks it's very real and very serious, I think it's overblown and whatever there is has been massively weaponised. Besides the other facts linked, the article is more like a narrative. Most of it discusses the concept of antisemitism, with the authors own experience, antisemitic tropes and the issue of antisemitism on a societal level. It conflates the issue of being opposed to the action of Israel against Palestine as being antisemitic. And then it pin-points coincidence between Corbyn and the rhetoric set up in the first 1000 or so words. Some ideas are complex, but having to use so many words to explain Corbyn is antisemitic due to a sequence of events makes it less meaningful compared to the actions of others. We all can see how MP's voted, hear the words they use and the way they treat people. And if Corbyn did get in and begin any kind of harm against Jewish people, or any others, his voters would be the first to call him to account. This particular article is structured in such a way as to set a scene and build up towards a climax. It isn't a report or a personal story but tries to be both. Things like "Is Jeremy Corbyn personally antisemitic? Yes. No. I don’t know. Does it matter?" is more telling of the author's approach than owt else. e: sheesh, responded to a lot otherwise and better than me. But its not written well either. Tesseraction posted:A rattled snake. Snake? justcola fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:59 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:I've hosed my vocal cords up from cheering, then booing, West Ham tonight and frankly whatever happens on Thursday can't be as loving abject as what I've just seen. This is the nearest I get to optimism, deal with it. totally unrelated, but you wouldn't happen to have part 4 of your council housing posts somewhere btw?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 00:59 |
|
This has really got the feeling of being something that'll be looked back on as changing public opinion against the Tories, hopefully I'm not just being overly optimistic. Even the BBC went with it at News at Ten
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:01 |
|
Weird how the Tories and media have stopped pushing the anti terrorist angle ever since that poor lad's dad went on the offensive. e: Looool Sky News just said the hospital photo is the first big news of an otherwise uneventful campaign.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:01 |
|
TACD posted:“ok boomer” 'Man City were in League 1 20 years ago, you'd be loving stupid to suggest they're a bad football team now because of that. What's important is who is running the service, and Labour's national services will be better funded and will have more motivated staff than 40 years ago.' Edit: this was meant to be in reply to the poster who was wondering what their answer should be to questions from older relatives about the 70s! I'm phone-posting so can't edit my post properly. an_mutt fucked around with this message at 01:06 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:02 |
|
Tomberforce posted:Has anyone got any better strategies for dealing with patronising Tory family members telling me that I don't remember the 70s and the 3 day week and that I should never vote Labour as a consequence? The 3 day week was under the Conservatives. The Winter of Discontent was under Callaghan, a Labour right-winger. Neither would have happened under Corbyn!
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:02 |
|
I have less hair than that. Jaeluni Asjil posted:Was that Universal Credit Panorama shown tonight? Or did Johnson's threats over the tv licence get it pulled again? It was shown. Interesting enough I guess, but it didn't really hammer home just how bad it's got in my opinion. Have a Spectator cartoon to send you off to sleep with a warm current of incoherent rage https://twitter.com/Spectator_LIFE/status/1203056519769518080 E: justcola posted:Snake? SNaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake RockyB fucked around with this message at 01:05 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:03 |
|
The tories are scum, just look in their dead, glazed eyes and you'll see a rapacious neoliberal beast willing to sell the future of their own children for a quick buck to spend on their houses or prosecco
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:04 |
|
The Perfect Element posted:She has linked me to this article : https://medium.com/@sararoseofficial/everything-i-never-wanted-to-have-to-know-about-labour-and-antisemitism-649b5bc1e576 The rest is a huge list of things which are antisemitic but unrelated to Labour, and other accusations which are only true if you start from the assumption that Corbyn is antisemitic. Also the author you linked used GnasherJew as a source, who... You've only got to look at their twitter to see what a disingenuous gently caress they are. The one mildly valid point in that whole loving mess is when Corbyn argued over the IHRA definition, and 'posters went up around the country saying "Israel is a racist endeavour." Anyone could have put those up, and most likely the fash responsible only did it because the media and twitter disingenuously framed it as Corbyn refusing to accept the IHRA definition - they probably wouldn't have heard about it otherwise, the pig ignorant fucks. And you can't enshrine a definition which refuses to acknowledge that one of the sides did wrong - yet Corbyn eventually did. He just made sure he entered his protest against a definition which whitewashes a conflict with errors and atrocities on both sides. None of this matters though because the explanation takes longer than the initial lie. What they've done here is taken the seed of a problem and grown a loving giant redwood. I don't know, take this post back to them, but they'll probably ignore it because they are already approaching it from a viewpoint of the left being antisemitic, but don't have the mental training to avoid the rhetorical traps the article sets up. I mean I could write a step by step breakdown of it, but would probably end up having one myself with frustration. We're tired of being called antisemites for daring to say Israel isn't perfect. Oh, also: Tomberforce posted:Has anyone got any better strategies for dealing with patronising Tory family members telling me that I don't remember the 70s and the 3 day week and that I should never vote Labour as a consequence? And as was said before: Doctor_Fruitbat posted:"I've heard all the horror stories about the 70s, and I'd still take it in a heartbeat over what we have now." Bobby Deluxe fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:07 |
|
forkboy84 posted:Alison Pearson is genuinely a loving moron. She just hadn't been given the line to take yet, hence the standard excuse of 'don't politicise this'. Half an hour later, coincidentally when all those sock-puppet accounts started pumping out the exact same message about the photo being fake, she has '100% proof' the photo is fake. Once you realise 90% of journalists, all Tory politicians and thousands of bot accounts just one big team it becomes painfully obvious what instructions they've been given and when they got them Edit: 7.8 million views.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:08 |
|
jabby posted:She just hadn't been given the line to take yet, hence the standard excuse of 'don't politicise this'. wait https://twitter.com/demarionunn/status/1204190151041269765
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:12 |
|
moostaffa posted:totally unrelated, but you wouldn't happen to have part 4 of your council housing posts somewhere btw? It got folded into part 3 because I pretty much run out of words. I thought I'd actually mentioned that but it's entirely possible I forgot, sorry. The salient points of most of it (the redevelopment or replacement of the old stock) are all in there, just not in as much detail as I was planning. When things (hopefully) get a bit more boring around here I might knock something out addressing the points I was meaning to have in part 4 about the future, because mass-produced housing is pretty much the only way of addressing the massive need for housing, as well as the massive wastefulness of current house building.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:18 |
|
I almost want them to publish it just so they can get eviscerated by everyone else on twitter.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:18 |
|
Ah, so THAT is the solution to the extra 40 thousand nurses
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/BoJosCatamite/status/1204191690766065665
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:22 |
|
Tomberforce posted:Has anyone got any better strategies for dealing with patronising Tory family members telling me that I don't remember the 70s and the 3 day week and that I should never vote Labour as a consequence? I bet they carefully explain to you as well that Nazis were socialists because it says socialist in their name. Others have dealt with the tory 3-day week bit as well. The bins though, they were labour, and were pretty awful if you lived in a city.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:23 |
|
Could one of the thread doctors explain the a&e nurse tweets are those facts legit?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:24 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Little did you know that boris johnson's 50 thousand quantum nurses are all working at the mysterious leeds extradimensional hospital. God help us all if they meet, that will be Big Bang 2 - Return of the end/beginning of the Universe.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:26 |
|
Crankit posted:Could one of the thread doctors explain the a&e nurse tweets are those facts legit? No because those 'facts' are being pushed by Twitter bots. The story was already verified by both the local paper it was first reported to and by the hospital. edit: Good photo xtothez fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:26 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:It got folded into part 3 because I pretty much run out of words. I thought I'd actually mentioned that but it's entirely possible I forgot, sorry. The salient points of most of it (the redevelopment or replacement of the old stock) are all in there, just not in as much detail as I was planning. alright, that's cool. I enjoyed the posts, thanks!
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:29 |
|
Okay, I understand the idea that historically persecuted groups should have politically autonomous areas where their rights are absolutely guaranteed. Perhaps the fact that Israel has become a genocidal apartheid state implies this shouldn't come about in the form of a nation-state which derives its legitimacy from an ethnic/religious identity?
unwantedplatypus fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:32 |
|
Crankit posted:Could one of the thread doctors explain the a&e nurse tweets are those facts legit? The mask in front of the kid is a non-rebreather mask, usually used for delivering high-flow O2. The tweet is correct that if he needed to wear one he'd be very sick and probably have a bed in resus or even ITU. However, he isn't wearing it. It's just placed near his face. Which is a pretty common way of providing a small amount of O2 to kids or anyone else who won't tolerate wearing a tight-fitting oxygen mask constantly. Instead of making them wear a low-flow mask, you put a high-flow mask a few inches away so they get some of the benefit. You don't get a well-controlled percentage of oxygen that way, but you get some extra and the kid isn't constantly trying to rip the mask off. So a kernel of truth, but either not looking at the picture properly or just lying.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:32 |
|
I hope when it comes to house building consecutive Labour governments do actually take us back to the 60s: new towns and tower blocks.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:34 |
|
So what time do I need to tune in Thursday to find out the results?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:35 |
|
oh my god lol https://twitter.com/askforcawmbyok/status/1204181923289022464?s=20 Pershing posted:So what time do I need to tune in Thursday to find out the results? exit poll is released when polls close at 10pm, it's usually relatively accurate. After that the results come in through the night with the majority coming in a flurry between 1am and 3am. By 3/4 you basically know which way it's gone but the final couple of seats don't usually declare till late friday morning. ThomasPaine fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:35 |
|
I'd personally suggest that the idea of autonomous areas is pretty bad generally compared to...like... getting rid of the persecution in the rest of society? Because that's basically arguing for segregation, even ignoring all the problems that refusing to address the discrimination will result in down the line? Of course people will argue that's why it has to be a nation state with its own guns and tanks and nuclear weapons, but of course that encourages the creation of ethnostates in general and that's not going to help you unless you're the biggest ethnostate. The whole thing is realy a right wing idea that everyone just needs to keep to their "own country" and they'll get along fine. Counterpoint, of course, being recorded history. Pershing posted:So what time do I need to tune in Thursday to find out the results? Friday morning. Exit poll will come out I think in the wee hours of the morning but gently caress knows how that's gonna equate to seats in this election.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:36 |
|
I want to go back to the 70s for british wrestling, the best wrestling.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:37 |
|
Pershing posted:So what time do I need to tune in Thursday to find out the results? Exit poll normally comes out within a few minutes of the end BUT it could be wrong. Results will probably start around midnight. I think it's Sunderland that tries to be first? Did someone in this thread say they employ something like 2000 counters for a couple of hours to make sure they do? I know our constituency will probably be around 3am as we have to wait for 85 polling stations (and I think 150+ actual ballot boxes) to come in. Highlands of Scotland are normally last (bearing in mind some of their ballot boxes are coming in from the isles and probably by helicopter or light aircraft so if the weather's bad... ) and the result is usually known before they come in.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:38 |
|
ThomasPaine posted:oh my god lol wow extreme violence on display here, is she a secret labour operative?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:39 |
|
minema posted:https://twitter.com/pengraiggoch/status/1204130509065842688?s=20 Funny story, a former colleague of mine thought he was being a badass by taking home a cannula and a bag of fluids to rehydrate himself after a night out. He propped the bag on the windowsill by his bed and went to sleep. At some point in the night it fell onto the floor. Below the level of his arm. He woke up feeling pretty crappy, with the bag now containing quite a large amount of his own blood.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:40 |
|
Pershing posted:So what time do I need to tune in Thursday to find out the results? The exit polls usually reveal the moment the polls close as the clock strikes 10PM local (GMT). The exit poll normally gets a handful of constituencies wrong but for the general parliament result (whether there's a hung parliament, or a majority and who the majority is for) has been close enough to true to call the general result since the last cock up in 1992. However if it was the be all and end all then we wouldn't need a vote! The actual results of the ballots continue rolling in for hours, and takes us into the morning. The result will be somewhere in the small hours of the morning on the 13th. The ritual for most people here is that they go to bed on Thursday night and by the time they wake up for work on Friday the result is fresh on the news. Azza Bamboo fucked around with this message at 01:47 on Dec 10, 2019 |
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:41 |
|
ThomasPaine posted:exit poll is released when polls close at 10pm, it's usually relatively accurate. After that the results come in through the night with the majority coming in a flurry between 1am and 3am. By 3/4 you basically know which way it's gone but the final couple of seats don't usually declare till late friday morning. I'm gonna be bricking it at work - I'm on my night shift later this week, with limited internet access.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:41 |
|
jabby posted:Funny story, a former colleague of mine thought he was being a badass by taking home a cannula and a bag of fluids to rehydrate himself after a night out.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:42 |
|
jabby posted:Funny story, a former colleague of mine thought he was being a badass by taking home a cannula and a bag of fluids to rehydrate himself after a night out. oh gently caress that made me throw up in my mouth. accidently siponed your own arm.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:44 |
|
Pesky Splinter posted:I'm gonna be bricking it at work - I'm on my night shift later this week, with limited internet access. LBC are doing it live until 6am. Have you got radio on your phone or elsewhere?
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:45 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 14:55 |
|
jabby posted:Funny story, a former colleague of mine thought he was being a badass by taking home a cannula and a bag of fluids to rehydrate himself after a night out. Did he cannulate himself when he got back drunk?! That would be impressive.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2019 01:47 |