|
what the gently caress is he wearing
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
eke out posted:what the gently caress is he wearing Yeah, I want to know what that button is.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:55
|
|
|
Steube looks like he should be hosting Monday Night Football
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:56
|
|
|
my man Greg wearing a three piece purple suit like the joker
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:57
|
|
|
... Did Steube just say "democrots" e: yes, yes he did lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:58
|
|
|
eke out posted:what the gently caress is he wearing When did an npc from red dead 2 get elected to Congress?
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2019 23:58
|
|
|
lol nadler is such a poo poo chairman edit: also lol at all the congresspeople who are loving 100% clueless about how actual congress and committees work
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:00
|
|
|
Look man, all we want to do is just taaaaaaaalk to the whistleblower.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:01
|
|
|
lol deutch asking what Steube meant by "New York lawyer"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:01
|
|
|
idiotsavant posted:lol nadler is such a poo poo chairman I now know less about what "point of order" means in context of this type of hearing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:02
|
|
|
What was the point of grilling Goldman over the cross referencing of phone numbers? Wouldn’t you always dig into who a criminal conspirator is talking to? I mean other than grandstanding about it. Goldman obviously didn’t want to answer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:03
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:What was the point of grilling Goldman over the cross referencing of phone numbers? Wouldn’t you always dig into who a criminal conspirator is talking to? I mean other than grandstanding about it. Goldman obviously didn’t want to answer. Attacking the process to create the idea that the Democrats broke the law because something-something witch hunt ignore the actual crimes exposed here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:05
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:What was the point of grilling Goldman over the cross referencing of phone numbers? Wouldn’t you always dig into who a criminal conspirator is talking to? I mean other than grandstanding about it. Goldman obviously didn’t want to answer. because they're incredibly butthurt that Devin Nunes got caught? and, apparently, they think that someone "gave an order" to figure out who was associated with what phone number, which is absolutely baffling
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
LtStorm posted:I now know less about what "point of order" means in context of this type of hearing. Point of order/call to question/parlimentary inquiry are all part of the various mechanics used to run and manage formal meetings like these. Recognizing speakers, yielding time, it's all nuts and bolts stuff. It's hilarious because a point of order is generally going to be something relatively limited - afaik it's for when something is mechanically out of line, and is definitely not for "I think the chairman is a big meany". These are some basic loving details that all these congresspeople should mostly know if they weren't dumb as rocks. lollllllllllll "can I just have 5 seconds" goddamn these people are so STUPID
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:13
|
|
|
I love the multimedia aspect of using a big TV to play a second long clip of Cheeto Benito saying, "We're fighting all of the subpoenas!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:13
|
|
|
There is something comforting in hearing Goldman explicitly, by using factual statements, shoot down republican talking points. Even if it doesn't matter, it's still nice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:14
|
|
|
eke out posted:because they're incredibly butthurt that Devin Nunes got caught? and, apparently, they think that someone "gave an order" to figure out who was associated with what phone number, which is absolutely baffling That's because in the Conservative mind think someone has to order to do things like this, because in their world none of them do anything like this without orders. It's like any organization that has questionable morals or inner workings. You are encouraged to not dig into anything and to mind your own business. Also one would think they want to give some payback for taking out one of theirs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:14
|
|
|
Castor running out of steam pretty quickly here. Kind of weird though that he's apparently allowed to making a statement when he is supposed to be a witness...? I... is he using the fact that Ukrainians were apparently uncomfortable with publicly announcing what Trump wanted them to as evidence that we have no idea what Zelensky would say, which... means... what, exactly? 
E-flat fucked around with this message at 00:25 on Dec 10, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Oops. Looks like giving Castor free time to reply might not have been the best choice. He's just rambling.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:22
|
|
|
brae posted:Oops. Looks like giving Castor free time to reply might not have been the best choice. He's just rambling. And bringing up unprompted the CNN interview that was a key part of the quid quo pro. Yep.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:23
|
|
|
E-flat posted:Castor running out of steam pretty quickly here. Each congressmember gets 5 minutes to mostly use however they want, including to let Castor mumble on about who-loving-knows for most of it
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:23
|
|
|
Holy poo poo, is this still going? I thought it would end at 5 or 6.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
iirc this committee has like 70 members or some poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:26
|
|
|
ummel posted:Holy poo poo, is this still going? I thought it would end at 5 or 6. It goes until everyone is out of questions or bloviations.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:27
|
|
|
"I would say to Mr Reschenthaler [sp], if Democrats are just concerned that Trump will win, if that's the case, why does he need to cheat?" (that's Goldman, the majority witness)
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:28
|
|
|
LtStorm posted:bloviations My new favorite word. If nothing else, at least all this will have resulted in me learning a new word. e: Collins if you can't speak quickly articulately, then slow down to a speed at which you can. E-flat fucked around with this message at 00:43 on Dec 10, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 00:30
|
|
|
brae posted:Oops. Looks like giving Castor free time to reply might not have been the best choice. He's just rambling. It’s the actions of an attorney who deep down KNOWS he had a poo poo day in court and is slapping a bandaid on it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 01:05
|
|
|
eke out posted:what the gently caress is he wearing the young navy guy who seemed like he was about to veer into blaming Soros was wearing this pin too
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 01:44
|
|
|
Articles of Impeachment to be introduced at 9 am est tomorrow, per CNN. https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1204204321325359104?s=19
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 02:29
|
|
|
*ron paul it's happening dot gif*
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
I loving hate this reporter, it's well known that his "some members of congress" is the same 1-2 shithead conservative Dems, but here's the talking point: Dems are secretly scared of impeachment because voters will be mad! https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1204201739718713344?s=20
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 02:38
|
|
|
oxsnard posted:I loving hate this reporter, it's well known that his "some members of congress" is the same 1-2 shithead conservative Dems, but here's the talking point: Dems are secretly scared of impeachment because voters will be mad! "I solemnly swear to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States as long as it's not an inconvenience."
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 02:50
|
|
|
Make no mistake, most of those new congressmen from red to blue districts are aware that they're in that role because middle class whites and especially women are sick of trump.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 02:55
|
|
|
oxsnard posted:Make no mistake, most of those new congressmen from red to blue districts are aware that they're in that role because middle class whites and especially women are sick of trump. this, its not for the right or even progressive reasons, but a ton of people hate trump and that will probably help alot in 2020 espcially if the senate makes it into a giant farce.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:01
|
|
|
Well this is odd, predictit odds for.only 2 articles of impeachment passed skyrocketed this evening. Could be market liquidity issue or there's some inside knowledge, usually on a market that this busy it's the latter https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/5913/How-many-articles-of-impeachment-of-Trump-will-the-House-pass-by-3-31
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:02
|
|
|
Well there it is, someone got their hands on news early. WaPo says 2 articles https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...eaking-news-bar
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1204217814212644864 efb
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:04
|
|
|
I thought there would have been at least 3.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:37
|
|
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:I thought there would have been at least 3. Same; worried that they're rushing it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
Not bribery?
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2019 03:53
|
|
