Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
Normal MBGA is being Alf Garnet on Death Til Do Us Part or the other gently caress from Love Thy Neighbour.
But everyone agrees with everything you say

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Soylent Yellow
Nov 5, 2010

yospos

Cerebral Bore posted:

Presumably the food bank knows what they actually need better than some rando so either give money directly or ask what they need. The donation bins have always struck me as more of a way of letting people help on impulse.

My mother volunteers at the local foodbank, and they put a wishlist on the donation bins. This is mainly because otherwise they end up with entire slabs of Tesco Value spaghetti hoops and very little else. Basic toiletries are always a good bet, as is coffee/teamaking supplies.

thespaceinvader
Mar 30, 2011

The slightest touch from a Gol-Shogeg will result in Instant Death!

Soylent Yellow posted:

My mother volunteers at the local foodbank, and they put a wishlist on the donation bins. This is mainly because otherwise they end up with entire slabs of Tesco Value spaghetti hoops and very little else. Basic toiletries are always a good bet, as is coffee/teamaking supplies.

The one I always tried to do back when I felt I could afford it, after watchign I Daniel Blake, was period supplies. Period poverty is real and it loving suuuuuucks.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

God loving dammit

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

https://twitter.com/emilyhewertson/status/1208584372061982720

:thunk:

Apraxin
Feb 22, 2006

General-Admiral

Pound_Coin posted:

dipshit paper goin in hard


btw, while that second one is very much 'i asked young Labour members to DM me for an article, here's the thoughts of the five people who did, which i'm presenting as a serious analysis of the membership as a whole', it's still a good reminder that we shouldn't just laugh off the rightist attempt to seize control as quixotic and doomed; they're going in hard and we're gonna have to loving fight them

quote:

Jonny Lawrence, 25, a PhD student, backed Corbyn in the last two leadership contests but encountered hostility towards him in the general election campaign. “I canvassed loads for Anneliese Dodds in Oxford East and the main issue coming up on the doorstep for us was Corbyn as a leader. It was difficult – I lost faith in him myself, to be honest,” he says.

Lawrence is now leaning towards Nandy, a candidate who has forged an identity and a message entirely separate from Corbyn and his allies.

“I do think she was right on Brexit and how we need to go about rebuilding the party,” he says. “Our focus needs to be, as she has said, on restoring faith in the towns across the UK that Labour can provide a better future for.

“In reality, the manifesto’s flagship policies were out of touch and were much more appealing to me and my demographic than the demographic we needed to win.”

Alice Gent, 21, says she “strongly aligns to the left of [Labour] and its values”. But she too found Corbyn’s unpopularity with voters to be a strong factor in the election and is not in favour of a “continuity Corbyn” leadership. “Long Bailey as leader and Angela Rayner as deputy would just be a bit of a slap in the face for Labour voters who turned away due to Corbyn. Long-Bailey would just be repeating the mistakes of our biggest defeat since 1935,” she says. Gent spent the campaign knocking on doors in London. “Every door I knocked on Corbyn was the issue, and he must have seen how unpopular he was in polling so I don’t understand the decision not to let someone else lead. I do feel it was arrogant.” She too backs Nandy, the MP for Wigan. “I think we’ve had too many north London Liberal elite-esque leaders and [Nandy] would be a welcome change from this”.

Since the beginning of the election campaign, Labour membership has risen by more than 50,000. Georgina Holden, 22, is one of those who has joined up. She left the party in mid-2019 before rejoining shortly after the exit poll was published on election night because she wanted a say over who should take Labour forward. “I wanted to make sure that I get a say in who leads the party out of the abyss. I knew that the membership would most likely vote for the Corbyn continuity candidate, and I wanted to stop that from happening,” she says.

“I’m not going to vote for a candidate seen as Corbyn 2.0. The media gives Labour leaders a hard enough time as it is, and we need to combat that. To elect a continuity candidate would be to tell the electorate we’ve learned nothing.”

Despite this, Holden liked the policies. It was the messenger not the message that was the problem. “[Labour] needs someone who can bring these leftwing policies forward but who appears sensible,” she said.

Phe Hayhurst, a 19-year-old student from Reading, has been a Labour member since 2015. She voted for Corbyn in both leadership elections. But now she’s backing Keir Starmer because, she says, he is “best placed to bring the party back together” and is “not too closely aligned with any faction of the party, and comes across well in public and in the House of Commons”.

Francine Mead, a 22-year old working in public affairs, has also been a Labour member since 2015 and previously backed Yvette Cooper (in 2015) and then Jeremy Corbyn (in 2016).

For her Starmer also looks the best on offer. “There is no point in a main political party existing under first-past-the-post if it cannot win elections. I’ve wanted Starmer to stand as leader for quite some time now.”

“He hasn’t pandered to factions, he doesn’t let himself be defined by individuals – he just does his job with passion and respect.”

Since the summer of 2015, a majority of Labour members have been solidly in favour of project Corbyn.

Now it seems some believe it is time for change, and that the worst reaction to the election result would be just more of the same.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


who are the corbynista candidates and are they any good? RLB and raynor? pidcock is dead

e actually more broadly, are any of the candidates good? like charismatic or smart?

Communist Thoughts fucked around with this message at 18:32 on Dec 22, 2019

winegums
Dec 21, 2012


Rlb is fan favourite. Helped by the fact that her existence drives the melt and the fash rags insane.

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


Communist Thoughts posted:

who are the corbynista candidates and are they any good? RLB and raynor? pidcock is dead

e actually more broadly, are any of the candidates good? like charismatic or smart?

Rayner is standing for deputy, they're pushing it as an RLB/Rayner ticket.


Clive Lewis is problematic with women

Jess Philips is a TERF

Lisa Nandy is backed by Blue Labour

Emily Thornberry said in the middle of the windrush scandal she didn't have a problem with a "hostile environment"

Keir Starmer will inevitably court the centre more than the left and is easily portrayed as out of touch londonista.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

mehall posted:

Keir Starmer will inevitably court the centre more than the left and is easily portrayed as out of touch londonista.
This is bad for Jeremy London.

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
Clive Lewis behaves like an adolescent and Thornberry clearly has a problem with alcohol :/

I don't think we need either of them atm.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

mehall posted:

Jess Philips is a TERF
That's not fair.

She's also casually racist and Islamophobic, pals with Jacob Rees-Mogg, and spends more time agitating against Labour in the poo poo press than the Tories do.

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

mehall posted:

Keir Starmer will inevitably court the centre more than the left and is easily portrayed as out of touch londonista.

no that's RLB and Rayner apparently

Starmer doesn't seem a lot different from Corbs in his media style, he always seems to do a similar quiet, measured, non-confrontational delivery which clearly doesn't work around a chaotic mendacity elemental. He'd probably get an easier ride from the press just because he's The Right Sort, but when accountability is as low as it is now I kinda feel like we need a leader who'll call out the tories themselves

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

This is giving off very powerful 'could actually kill Alasdair' vibes.

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...

Bobby Deluxe posted:

This is giving off very powerful 'could actually kill Alasdair' vibes.

That's most Toby Young articles tbf

joedevola
Sep 11, 2004

worst song, played on ugliest guitar

I'm often perplexed by the insistence on prison abolition as a virtue on the left. Prisons are full of people arrested for drug possession or otherwise harmless crimes against property, and those things can and should be handled differently. But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.

What are we going to do with the maniacs when we close all the prisons?

People in the comments of that tweet point out that referral or whatever it was those kids got would be better for them in the long run but I don't see how brutally attacking two women for nearly ten minutes, then skating on it, would do anything but encourage further violent criminality.

And I don't buy that economic deprivation or cutbacks on social care are mostly or even partially responsible for nurturing that sort of psychotic violence. They closed your youth center so you turned into a droog? gently caress away off.

I've long thought that socialism, aligned with -for the want of a less loaded term- strong law and order policies could be a real vote winner. Nationalise the trains and lock up the maniacs.

Get Group 4 the gently caress out of the process and make sure the (now uncrowded) prisons are drug and violence free and see if two or three years of education and manual labour wouldn't be better for them than going to some community volunteer to talk about their feelings.

I dunno, they say you get more right wing as you get older but I'm somehow getting more extremely left and right wing. I'm like the philosophical opposite of what a centrist is.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
ok boomer

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

baka kaba posted:

no that's RLB and Rayner apparently

Starmer doesn't seem a lot different from Corbs in his media style, he always seems to do a similar quiet, measured, non-confrontational delivery which clearly doesn't work around a chaotic mendacity elemental. He'd probably get an easier ride from the press just because he's The Right Sort, but when accountability is as low as it is now I kinda feel like we need a leader who'll call out the tories themselves

my mam saw him give a speech at a law firm christmas party because he was friends wtih one of the partners and apparently he was really bad at it an uncharismatic but had a lot of hangers on because of who he was at the time

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear

joedevola posted:

I'm often perplexed by the insistence on prison abolition as a virtue on the left. Prisons are full of people arrested for drug possession or otherwise harmless crimes against property, and those things can and should be handled differently. But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.

What are we going to do with the maniacs when we close all the prisons?

People in the comments of that tweet point out that referral or whatever it was those kids got would be better for them in the long run but I don't see how brutally attacking two women for nearly ten minutes, then skating on it, would do anything but encourage further violent criminality.

And I don't buy that economic deprivation or cutbacks on social care are mostly or even partially responsible for nurturing that sort of psychotic violence. They closed your youth center so you turned into a droog? gently caress away off.

I've long thought that socialism, aligned with -for the want of a less loaded term- strong law and order policies could be a real vote winner. Nationalise the trains and lock up the maniacs.

Get Group 4 the gently caress out of the process and make sure the (now uncrowded) prisons are drug and violence free and see if two or three years of education and manual labour wouldn't be better for them than going to some community volunteer to talk about their feelings.

I dunno, they say you get more right wing as you get older but I'm somehow getting more extremely left and right wing. I'm like the philosophical opposite of what a centrist is.

I'd give them a good hiding, OP. An eye for an eye :mad:

I think we should be using VR technology to make people experience their crimes as the victim

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Miftan posted:

That's most Toby Young articles tbf
The powerful combination of Toby Young, Quillette, and Boris Johnson means that the article itself should be considered as some sort of memetic nonce hazard.

joedevola posted:

I'm often perplexed by the insistence on prison abolition as a virtue on the left. Prisons are full of people arrested for drug possession or otherwise harmless crimes against property, and those things can and should be handled differently. But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.
Is this a given? We've seen very different rates of homicide and violent offenses across different kinds of societies. The idea that there's a fixed 1-2% who are 'just bad' seems a large assumption, especially given that you don't seem to believe that this number changes with social or economic factors.

joedevola
Sep 11, 2004

worst song, played on ugliest guitar
Ok that % was pulled out of my arse but even the most well organized society will have people in it who are just wicked bastards.

So if we remove the possibility of incarceration what would we do with them?

crispix posted:

I'd give them a good hiding, OP. An eye for an eye :mad:

I think we should be using VR technology to make people experience their crimes as the victim

Thank you, yes. This is exactly what I was saying. Good man.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It's more "you never had a youth center, or anything else to make your life worthwhile, so you quite rationally grow to believe that society hates you (it does) and will never offer you anything (it won't) and that trying to fit in is pointless (it is) so why not just do whatever you like?"

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

joedevola posted:

I'm often perplexed by the insistence on prison abolition as a virtue on the left. Prisons are full of people arrested for drug possession or otherwise harmless crimes against property, and those things can and should be handled differently. But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.

What are we going to do with the maniacs when we close all the prisons?

People in the comments of that tweet point out that referral or whatever it was those kids got would be better for them in the long run but I don't see how brutally attacking two women for nearly ten minutes, then skating on it, would do anything but encourage further violent criminality.

And I don't buy that economic deprivation or cutbacks on social care are mostly or even partially responsible for nurturing that sort of psychotic violence. They closed your youth center so you turned into a droog? gently caress away off.

I've long thought that socialism, aligned with -for the want of a less loaded term- strong law and order policies could be a real vote winner. Nationalise the trains and lock up the maniacs.

Get Group 4 the gently caress out of the process and make sure the (now uncrowded) prisons are drug and violence free and see if two or three years of education and manual labour wouldn't be better for them than going to some community volunteer to talk about their feelings.

I dunno, they say you get more right wing as you get older but I'm somehow getting more extremely left and right wing. I'm like the philosophical opposite of what a centrist is.

there's some kind of primal desire to see justice done, people punished for bad things, consequences falling on the perpetrators more than the victims etc. and you have to watch out for that, because it starts to push buttons where certain people need to suffer because they deserve it or it's their own fault. next thing you have a daily mail subscription

the boring and difficult truth is that really, you need what works. If a policy makes you feel good but doesn't fix the problem (or even makes it worse) then that's bad. If something's effective then really that's what you want, even if it feels too lenient. That doesn't mean the victims aren't important in all this, but the approach should be more about making them feel safe and making them feel like there's a somewhat positive outcome, rather than just defaulting to maximum punishment

I mean yeah it's not an easy sell even to yourself sometimes but that doesn't mean you should lean into STRING EM UP

btw left + right = centrist that's just how maths (and centrism) works

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
i hate when anyone associated with labour, in this case Pidcock, try to explain why blair's government is part of the reason we're in this mess is responded to by pundits with "he won 3 elections in a row so stfu"

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006

joedevola posted:

But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.

joedevola posted:

People in the comments of that tweet point out that referral or whatever it was those kids got would be better for them in the long run but I don't see how brutally attacking two women for nearly ten minutes, then skating on it, would do anything but encourage further violent criminality.

you can't have it both ways buddy

you can't say "1-2% of the population are just naturally violent" (which, citation loving needed) and then follow it up with "people are violent if they never face consequences"

e: and it's no kind of coincidence that the people who get described as "naturally violent" or "maniacs" or "scum" or whichever phrase the redtops are all using today are almost uniformly working class and/or BAME

Julio Cruz fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Dec 22, 2019

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Jose posted:

i hate when anyone associated with labour, in this case Pidcock, try to explain why blair's government is part of the reason we're in this mess is responded to by pundits with "he won 3 elections in a row so stfu"

That would be part of why it's his fault, yeah.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


are they doing hustings this time around? it kinda sounds like there aren't any really good options but thats not super surprising since that was why we stuck with corbo

its a bit of a shame that RLB and raynor are running a joint ticket, it makes sense not to split the left but it does definitely nail them down as the "associate clearly with our defeat" faction, whereas one of them coulda run against the other and distanced themselves a bit

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

Communist Thoughts posted:

are they doing hustings this time around? it kinda sounds like there aren't any really good options but thats not super surprising since that was why we stuck with corbo

its a bit of a shame that RLB and raynor are running a joint ticket, it makes sense not to split the left but it does definitely nail them down as the "associate clearly with our defeat" faction, whereas one of them coulda run against the other and distanced themselves a bit

everyone has some baggage around them and those that didn't just lost their seat. i was wondering why i hadn't heard anything about dan jarvis this time but i see its because he quit being an MP to be a mayor instead

labour should go for the horny vote

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

Jose posted:

my mam saw him give a speech at a law firm christmas party because he was friends wtih one of the partners and apparently he was really bad at it an uncharismatic but had a lot of hangers on because of who he was at the time

he seems like he'd be a pretty good lawyer, but not a tv lawyer

reminds me of Hillary Benn a bit, they've both somehow ended up with this respect that means parliament generally shuts up while they're talking. It makes them seem like they're powerful convincing speakers when they've just got a cooperative room

Jess Phillips gets it a bit too but at least her performative bit is telling people to stfu

Endjinneer
Aug 17, 2005
Fallen Rib

joedevola posted:

I'm often perplexed by the insistence on prison abolition as a virtue on the left. Prisons are full of people arrested for drug possession or otherwise harmless crimes against property, and those things can and should be handled differently. But like 1-2% of any given population is always going to be loving maniacs.

What are we going to do with the maniacs when we close all the prisons?

People in the comments of that tweet point out that referral or whatever it was those kids got would be better for them in the long run but I don't see how brutally attacking two women for nearly ten minutes, then skating on it, would do anything but encourage further violent criminality.

And I don't buy that economic deprivation or cutbacks on social care are mostly or even partially responsible for nurturing that sort of psychotic violence. They closed your youth center so you turned into a droog? gently caress away off.

I've long thought that socialism, aligned with -for the want of a less loaded term- strong law and order policies could be a real vote winner. Nationalise the trains and lock up the maniacs.

Get Group 4 the gently caress out of the process and make sure the (now uncrowded) prisons are drug and violence free and see if two or three years of education and manual labour wouldn't be better for them than going to some community volunteer to talk about their feelings.

I dunno, they say you get more right wing as you get older but I'm somehow getting more extremely left and right wing. I'm like the philosophical opposite of what a centrist is.

Nobody with any kind of sense is arguing for the abolition of prisons because even in the most benevolent and equal societies, some people are just dicks. A substantial proportion of our prison population could have been better dealt with by means other than incarceration which are kinder and less expensive, and that would spare more resources for dealing with those who are genuinely harmful.
"Lock em all up and throw away the key" is the received wisdom and wins votes though, even if a direct consequence is that our legal system basically rations jail time because it doesn't have enough to allocate.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

baka kaba posted:

he seems like he'd be a pretty good lawyer, but not a tv lawyer

i mean you'd hope so given he was DPP

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

joedevola posted:

So if we remove the possibility of incarceration what would we do with them?
I think it's more of an end-goal rather than something that should be in the next manifesto. When the majority of social issues are solved under socialism, we won't need police or jails.

The idea behind it is that when you look at the causes of violent offences, it tends to be generational* / institutional abuse and lack of opportunity. Properly funded social programmes will get rid of this stuff gradually, until the 1 or 2 percent who have unsolvable antisocial tendencies will be held in secure psychiatric institutes and studied, rather than being shunted into institutions where their malicious tendencies thrive and go unadressed.

As for arresting and investigating them you'll need a wing of the reshaped and adequately funded community care system which functions similar to the police, just without the institutional racism, underfunding and recruiting aimed at boot boys who just want to crack heads. The difference is they'll be the last line of action rather than the first.

* I'm including parents enouraging working class Tories under this.

Bobby Deluxe fucked around with this message at 19:39 on Dec 22, 2019

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

Jose posted:

i mean you'd hope so given he was DPP

I want my state crimes buried by a charismatic Good Wife antagonist

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

joedevola posted:

Ok that % was pulled out of my arse but even the most well organized society will have people in it who are just wicked bastards.

So if we remove the possibility of incarceration what would we do with them?
The prison abolition movement wants the eventual abolition of the prison-industrial complex along with bringing in policy that reduces the percentage of those people to as low as feasibly possible.

"What will you do about people like Peter Sutcliffe in a world with no prisons" doesn't really follow from that, because we'd need a world without people like Peter Sutcliffe first, which is why the abolition movement focuses on abolishing the most egregious parts of the prison-industrial system first, not saying "just close them all and let everyone out". Things that don't work like solitary confinement, things that encourage mass incarceration like for-profit prisons and laws that punish the poor, things that increase recidivism like gang violence and denying prisoners access to books.

It's not just prisons that need reform, it's the concept of the prison that needs reform. People can't decide if it's there to punish, rehabilitate, or segregate, and so it ends up not being very good at either, and just turns into factories that multiply reoffending.

kustomkarkommando
Oct 22, 2012

im naturally a bit cautious about declaring 15 and 16 years olds naturally violent who need a good locking up as there's naught we can do with the wronguns

Trin Tragula
Apr 22, 2005

joedevola posted:

I've long thought that socialism, aligned with -for the want of a less loaded term- strong law and order policies could be a real vote winner. Nationalise the trains and lock up the maniacs.

Norway is showing the way; the vast majority of their prison system is based around rehabilitation and they have a ludicrously superior recidivism rate to us, but it's also flexible enough to keep Anders Breivik locked away where he can't radicalise anyone else, until such time as he decides to engage in good faith with what they can do to help him.

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

Prisons are not the only places, and arrest is not the only reason, that we keep people isolated from society for the assumed benefit of society.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Julio Cruz posted:

e: and it's no kind of coincidence that the people who get described as "naturally violent" or "maniacs" or "scum" or whichever phrase the redtops are all using today are almost uniformly working class and/or BAME

Well, the rich do tend to find other people to do their violence for them.

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear

kustomkarkommando posted:

im naturally a bit cautious about declaring 15 and 16 years olds naturally violent who need a good locking up as there's naught we can do with the wronguns

I think we should have a more proactive approach, I don't understand why school nurses aren't taking measurements of the children's heads for till identify evildoers and ne'erdowells at an early stage :mad:

They could use computers to store the results.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

crispix posted:

They could use computers to store the results.

It's 2019, the results are coming from inside the computer

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply