|
Bailiffs wear santa hats to get into the spirit of the season. Edit: 3 8 1 and became 4 Braggart fucked around with this message at 12:17 on Dec 23, 2019 |
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 07:59 |
|
|
They're really not hanging around https://twitter.com/JennThorburn_/status/1209064433621835777?s=19
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:15
|
|
|
Daddy Chrimbo yessmate
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:15
|
|
|
Give me my present Daddy Chrimbo, I’ve been oh-so-good this year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:24
|
|
|
ronya posted:He's right that the end of ambiguity would have sucked either way. My sense is that leaning more Remain would have reduced losses but it's certainly arguable. I don't think it would have been credibly possible to lean more remain, other than full revoke A50. The way I see it, the next steps from Labour's position would have been: - As it was, but promise to campaign for remain in the 2nd ref (either as a party, or Corbyn personally). This would have been a disaster, as you are now promising to negotiate a new deal, only to immediately campaign against it. - No renegotiation, just promising a 2nd ref between the existing deal and remain, and promise to campaign for remain. For this to be credible, Labour would also have to promise to honour the existing deal if Leave won again. Not credible because the deal was terrible. - Immediate 2nd ref, campaign for remain, but if Leave won a 2nd ref, renegotiate a new deal and carry it out. Possible but not exactly a clear and simple message to campaign on which was already something Labour was being attacked on. And it would be clear that Labour would be negotiating a deal they didn't want. I can't think of anything beyond that wouldn't be a straight up revoke A50 position.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:25
|
|
|
ronya posted:the timing in Mills' narrative is off somewhere because the Commons passed the early general election on Oct 31st, shortly after the 3 month extension to 31st Jan was granted. So whatever Labour decides in November can't undo the GE I think in that post we see a reaching for a grander meaning, a way we could not have been completely obliterated. I don't think there's much to it. The way facebook's algorithm now works against us because you can still buy viral content, but only for post-truth viewers, and only with absurd amounts of unregistered spending, is one of the few interesting things I've seen since probably the 15th, directly contradicting Mills praise of Corbyn's social media team. Congrats at winning twitter, turns out that twitter is loving irrelevant. Facebook is still really important though, and we did loving terribly there. Great work. As for "We should have hid from an election and played no-deal brinksmanship", it's not just about it not being something the party had technical control over, it's just not a credible position in any scenario - the labour party has an obligation to not play chicken with a bunch of loving vampires who entirely want the crash and ensuing body count. I did laugh at Mills description of good leadership because it felt, in light of what I saw, incredibly pointed. I cannot stress how much I hated pretty much everyone who got to call shots, and how loving terrible they were at it. The sole moment of consideration for the views of others I actually saw in the campaign was when Corbyn moved his coat so I could sit down and watch yet another dumb loving argument that involved regional denying reality, this time about how you don't need to contact or canvass anyone that was canvassed in loving january. Last time I posted someone asked me if it was true people stormed out and I don't even know which loving clp they meant. Did I post the thing about the coffee? I'm only just sobering up from the loss and my brain isn't functioning properly yet
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:37
|
|
|
Labours position was pretty much stealth remain with a rigged second referendum that would 100% end up as remain because Tory leave voters would be very hesitant to vote for a Labour brexit deal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:39
|
|
|
Katt posted:Labours position was pretty much stealth remain with a rigged second referendum that would 100% end up as remain because Tory leave voters would be very hesitant to vote for a Labour brexit deal. This, but it wasn't in any way stealthy so it didn't work
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:41
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:This, but it wasn't in any way stealthy so it didn't work Well I mean it was trying to be stealthy 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WarmongerHodges/status/1208845004019523584?s=20 https://twitter.com/Geoelte_Spinne/status/1208522165265616898?s=20 Katt fucked around with this message at 12:51 on Dec 23, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:46
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:This, but it wasn't in any way stealthy so it didn't work Unless you were a Lib Dem voter in which case CORBYN VOTED LEAVE IN NANDO'S 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:48
|
|
|
quote:you harm not just me but our movement. yes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:48
|
|
|
Phillips and Weetman were grown in the same lab experiment on the limits of Twitter-based narcissism, prove me wrong
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:54
|
|
|
What's Tweetman been up to in the past year? Fill me in on our favorite pundit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 12:57
|
|
|
Katt posted:What's Tweetman been up to in the past year? Fill me in on our favorite pundit. Tweeting
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:00
|
|
|
Katt posted:What's Tweetman been up to in the past year? Fill me in on our favorite pundit. That.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:03
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Tweeting There was also that one night she gave up Tweeting forever. She came back in the morning to resume tweeting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:04
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:"Jesus Christ was Jewish, so I'm pretty sure he'd have been standing with the Jewish community in protesting Corbyn's Labour" Amazing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:05
|
|
|
I mean Jesus famously hated poor people and thought being rich was excellent of course
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:06
|
|
|
Corbyn was probably a bit soft on money lenders for Jesus taste.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:07
|
|
|
Are the Corbynite Continuum and Johnson's Johnsons new factions in the upcoming star trek Picard series?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rbrooks45/status/1209077801783111680?s=20
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:14
|
|
|
corbynite continuum sounds cool as heck, like a sci-fi guerrilla movement
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:21
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:Are the Corbynite Continuum and Johnson's Johnsons new factions in the upcoming star trek Picard series? having watched TNG for the first time recently i was surprised at how many essentially god like beings they encounter
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:22
|
|
|
Pretty sure you can commit deicide by just fiddling with the knobs on the deflector dish. Honestly it's really daft that they only fit space ships with one of those, I'd put like half a dozen on and solve every problem.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:23
|
|
|
Spangly A posted:Last time I posted someone asked me if it was true people stormed out and I don't even know which loving clp they meant. Did I post the thing about the coffee? Think it was probably me asking but I was more curious about why Jen Forbes would have been a terrible MP (I'm in St Austell & Newquay, have nothing to do with Truro except lending occasional hand at elections). I don't remember you saying anything about coffee.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:24
|
|
|
Jose posted:having watched TNG for the first time recently i was surprised at how many essentially god like beings they encounter Then you get to DS9, where Sisko both punches a god in the face and upsets him, then becomes a demi-god himself. Kinda owns
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Then you get to DS9, where Sisko both punches a god in the face and upsets him, then becomes a demi-god himself. Kinda owns You hit me!  Picard never hit me!I'm...not...Picard  DS9 Trek best Trek
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:50
|
|
|
Dabir posted:https://twitter.com/sean_antrim/status/1208454202495766529 Pages ago but lmao no one with that bio is ever going to have a good opinion on anything
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:23
|
|
|
Coohoolin posted:Pages ago but lmao no one with that bio is ever going to have a good opinion on anything Bio is superfluous once you see av and username
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:26
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Bio is superfluous once you see av and username 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:30
|
|
|
LOL 1871
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:31
|
|
|
 1871
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:31
|
|
|
Actually just looked at that dudes tweets and he might lead the most boring/depressing life in NI, quite an achievement
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Actually just looked at that dudes tweets and he might lead the most boring/depressing life in NI, quite an achievement *walks past a bunch of car bombs only for his lovely boringness to cause their mechanisms to fail and not go off*
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:37
|
|
|
LOL 1922, motherfuckers
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:37
|
|
|
I'm picturing a Sweeney Todd scenario
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:45
|
|
|
I do note that they say "Eliminate Rough Sleeping" and not "Eliminate Homelessness". Bodies are going to pile up somewhere, just not in sight.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:56
|
|
|
"vows to stop people sleeping on the streets" sure has an air of menace to it
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 07:59 |
|
|
Each homeless person will be accompanied by a minder who will poke them with a stick every time they start to nod off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 14:59
|
|