Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jackard
Oct 28, 2007

We Have A Bow And We Wish To Use It

oxsnard posted:

So, let's pretend Democrats win the White House and Senate in 2020. An aggressive push to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states should be a top priority. Republicans have leveraged every single opportunity afforded them to take power, why shouldn't they fight back? It's the easiest way to institute control over the government and once it's in, it would be even harder for republicans to retake the Senate without seriously moving back towards the center. This should be a rallying cry that is repeated endlessly. Republicans have used the courts, and dems should use the other two branches of government to fight back
What would it take for dems to do something? I don't follow this stuff too closely, last I heard the centrists were leading the party and might screw up the primary again.

Jackard fucked around with this message at 15:55 on Dec 23, 2019

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

T. Bombastus
Feb 18, 2013

Petr posted:

A face said it on cnn. I have a job.

Also, doug jones is going to vote to acquit.
This might end up being true, but right now it feels much more like how Jeff Flake talked during the Kavanaugh confirmation. Jones wants to make it clear that he's a principled non-partisan actor before voting on partisan lines.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003
Doug Jones is dead in the water without a huge anti Trump surge at the ballot box in November, and as a result I'd guess he's one of the safest convict votes against Trump in the Senate at the end of the day

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

oxsnard posted:

So, let's pretend Democrats win the White House and Senate in 2020. An aggressive push to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states should be a top priority. Republicans have leveraged every single opportunity afforded them to take power, why shouldn't they fight back? It's the easiest way to institute control over the government and once it's in, it would be even harder for republicans to retake the Senate without seriously moving back towards the center. This should be a rallying cry that is repeated endlessly. Republicans have used the courts, and dems should use the other two branches of government to fight back

The party aren’t serious about wanting to make things better and are ok with losing because they’re rich enough to weather most of whatever will happen.

If more people who care start primarying the old fucks in charge of the party, they should definitely do that, though.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Jackard posted:

What would it take for dems to do something? I don't follow this stuff too closely, last I heard the centrists were leading the party and might screw up the primary again.

honestly, we need to refocus dem voters to believe that pissing off republicans is the most important thing, as it's a great counter to "own the libs" policy that's worked for the right for years now

Jackard
Oct 28, 2007

We Have A Bow And We Wish To Use It

oxsnard posted:

honestly, we need to refocus dem voters to believe that pissing off republicans is the most important thing, as it's a great counter to "own the libs" policy that's worked for the right for years now
Also from what ive heard "other side bad" is not a compelling enough reason on its own for dems to actually vote

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


oxsnard posted:

So, let's pretend Democrats win the White House and Senate in 2020. An aggressive push to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states should be a top priority. Republicans have leveraged every single opportunity afforded them to take power, why shouldn't they fight back? It's the easiest way to institute control over the government and once it's in, it would be even harder for republicans to retake the Senate without seriously moving back towards the center. This should be a rallying cry that is repeated endlessly. Republicans have used the courts, and dems should use the other two branches of government to fight back

Also giving millions of Americans political representation is a good thing.

beejay
Apr 7, 2002

Surely THIS time the Democrats that get power after the insane fascist Republican regime will fix everything and not just pretend we can go back to normal.

UnknownTarget
Sep 5, 2019

oxsnard posted:

So, let's pretend Democrats win the White House and Senate in 2020. An aggressive push to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states should be a top priority. Republicans have leveraged every single opportunity afforded them to take power, why shouldn't they fight back? It's the easiest way to institute control over the government and once it's in, it would be even harder for republicans to retake the Senate without seriously moving back towards the center. This should be a rallying cry that is repeated endlessly. Republicans have used the courts, and dems should use the other two branches of government to fight back

Holy poo poo why do people keep assuming PR will just snap up statehood? It's not the Feds holding them back, PR legit doesn't want it. It requires a lot more responsibility and scrutiny than most of them want to put in. Im ×from× this area and it's so annoying how the American Caribbean is like an alien planet to our mainland brothers and sisters. I know ever since the hurricanes people in the USA finally realized the US Caribbean exists but guys, this stuff has been going on for a lot longer than the last two years.

UnknownTarget fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Dec 23, 2019

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

UnknownTarget posted:

Holy poo poo why do people keep assuming PR will just snap up statehood? It's not the Feds holding them back, PR legit doesn't want it. It requires a lot more responsibility than most of them want to put in. Im ×from× this area and it's so annoying how the American Caribbean is like an alien planet to our mainland brothers and sisters.

well, luckily, they get a chance to vote on it again in 2020. Also, considering the fuckery with funding that occurred after Maria, I wouldn't be surprised to see the idea gain traction so they can't get ignored again

beejay
Apr 7, 2002

It seems that statehood has gained popularity with the voting population over time. If the politicians don't want to put in more responsibility (?) then maybe they should step down.

UnknownTarget
Sep 5, 2019

oxsnard posted:

well, luckily, they get a chance to vote on it again in 2020. Also, considering the fuckery with funding that occurred after Maria, I wouldn't be surprised to see the idea gain traction so they can't get ignored again

×IrmaMaria. I wouldn't hold your breath. The level of apathy and corruption that the mainland is seeing had been in full force for generations down there.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

UnknownTarget posted:

×IrmaMaria. I wouldn't hold your breath. The level of apathy and corruption that the mainland is seeing had been in full force for generations down there.

to be clear, I don't claim to know the first thing about politics in PR, but it seems like a simple Yes/No referendum with full support offered by democrats in congress may help clear it up, perhaps?

Slowpoke!
Feb 12, 2008

ANIME IS FOR ADULTS

UnknownTarget posted:

Holy poo poo why do people keep assuming PR will just snap up statehood? It's not the Feds holding them back, PR legit doesn't want it. It requires a lot more responsibility and scrutiny than most of them want to put in. Im ×from× this area and it's so annoying how the American Caribbean is like an alien planet to our mainland brothers and sisters. I know ever since the hurricanes people in the USA finally realized the US Caribbean exists but guys, this stuff has been going on for a lot longer than the last two years.

I don’t want to call you out since you’re from the area, but didn’t they vote overwhelmingly yes to statehood (albeit with extremely low turnout)?

Is the consensus there that yes to statehood is just a very active and vocal minority or something? Statistically, the turnout was high enough that you shouldn’t expect a huuuuuuge difference if they had higher turnout, right?

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010

Against All Tyrants

Ultra Carp
Also don't forget that the pro-statehood governor had to resign just this year for being a massive shithead.

PR statehood would be nice but it's by no means guaranteed.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003

Slowpoke! posted:

I don’t want to call you out since you’re from the area, but didn’t they vote overwhelmingly yes to statehood (albeit with extremely low turnout)?

Is the consensus there that yes to statehood is just a very active and vocal minority or something? Statistically, the turnout was high enough that you shouldn’t expect a huuuuuuge difference if they had higher turnout, right?

there were almost as many blank ballots as "yes" votes, so that's a bad assumption to make. It seems to be a 50/50 opinion as of 2017

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Slowpoke! posted:

I don’t want to call you out since you’re from the area, but didn’t they vote overwhelmingly yes to statehood (albeit with extremely low turnout)?

Is the consensus there that yes to statehood is just a very active and vocal minority or something? Statistically, the turnout was high enough that you shouldn’t expect a huuuuuuge difference if they had higher turnout, right?

one of the reasons turnout was so low iirc is that many folks were mad about the idea of continual referendums that go nowhere, so no - low turnout was itself a protest vote against the current territorial government, not voter apathy

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

UnknownTarget posted:

Holy poo poo why do people keep assuming PR will just snap up statehood? It's not the Feds holding them back, PR legit doesn't want it. It requires a lot more responsibility and scrutiny than most of them want to put in. Im ×from× this area and it's so annoying how the American Caribbean is like an alien planet to our mainland brothers and sisters. I know ever since the hurricanes people in the USA finally realized the US Caribbean exists but guys, this stuff has been going on for a lot longer than the last two years.

Well, given that the last groupings of votes they had there was a lot of fuckery by the side wanting to remain a territory, I'd wager statehood is gaining ground if not the popular choice

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003
in case anyone believed there was any ambiguity anymore, Mitch McConnell called PR statehood "Full-Bore Socialism." Just the usual: conflating socialism with "scary brown people"

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

https://twitter.com/Olivianuzzi/status/1208858590515224578?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

cool kids inc.
May 27, 2005

I swallowed a bug


What an inflated sense of self importance and narcissism to think that these are comparable events. They don't in good faith believe this to be true, but gotta say the most atrocious poo poo because their base thinks they wouldn't say it if it wasn't some kind of truth to power (the power currently held and wielded by these very people).

Ugh.

Invalid Validation
Jan 13, 2008




I bet that room smells of old people and death.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

cool kids inc. posted:

What an inflated sense of self importance and narcissism to think that these are comparable events. They don't in good faith believe this to be true, but gotta say the most atrocious poo poo because their base thinks they wouldn't say it if it wasn't some kind of truth to power (the power currently held and wielded by these very people).

Ugh.

I'm more curious which side he thinks the Democrats are represented by because he listed victories for both.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything
Pearl Harbor was the Democrats' Pearl Harbor. :tinfoil:

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

haveblue posted:

I'm more curious which side he thinks the Democrats are represented by because he listed victories for both.

I assumed he meant Democrats are Japan in both analogies, and that impeachment is a short-term tactical victory but they'll inevitably lose the war.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

VitalSigns posted:

I assumed he meant Democrats are Japan in both analogies, and that impeachment is a short-term tactical victory but they'll inevitably lose the war.

That's probably what he was going for, yeah, but it's hard to believe his view of either politics or history is that nuanced.

Phil Moscowitz
Feb 19, 2007

If blood be the price of admiralty,
Lord God, we ha' paid in full!

haveblue posted:

That's probably what he was going for, yeah, but it's hard to believe his view of either politics or history is that nuanced.

It’s not nuanced, he’s saying the dirty sneaky cowardly vermin Democrats tried to backstab the great Donald Trump who embodies the badass sleeping majority of the United States, and as a result the subhuman Democrats are going to get slaughtered into submission in the election.

highme
May 25, 2001


I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!


oxsnard posted:

honestly, we need to refocus dem voters to believe that pissing off republicans is the most important thing, as it's a great counter to "own the libs" policy that's worked for the right for years now

$DemCandidate$ 2020 Die Mad About It

UnknownTarget
Sep 5, 2019

Slowpoke! posted:

I don’t want to call you out since you’re from the area, but didn’t they vote overwhelmingly yes to statehood (albeit with extremely low turnout)?

Is the consensus there that yes to statehood is just a very active and vocal minority or something? Statistically, the turnout was high enough that you shouldn’t expect a huuuuuuge difference if they had higher turnout, right?

I went to go look it up because I wasn't sure of the specifics. "Overwhelming" is a stretch since it was only 54% of voters in 2012 wanted to change the current status (with majority voting for statehood). Granted it is a majority but it's not like everyone's rushing to make it happen.

The most recent referendum had a 23% turnout rate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statehood_movement_in_Puerto_Rico

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

oxsnard posted:

So, let's pretend Democrats win the White House and Senate in 2020. An aggressive push to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states should be a top priority. Republicans have leveraged every single opportunity afforded them to take power, why shouldn't they fight back? It's the easiest way to institute control over the government and once it's in, it would be even harder for republicans to retake the Senate without seriously moving back towards the center. This should be a rallying cry that is repeated endlessly. Republicans have used the courts, and dems should use the other two branches of government to fight back

Also, while we are thinking of other structural changes:

*Expand the house to 550 - 600 Members.
*Give native tribes two Senators and like 10 reps.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Mooseontheloose posted:

*Give native tribes two Senators and like 10 reps.

Oh drat yeah I like that.

Ethiser
Dec 31, 2011

Any plan to add seats to the legislature, apart from adding new states or increasing the total House size, would require a constitutional amendment.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Mooseontheloose posted:

Also, while we are thinking of other structural changes:

*Expand the house to 550 - 600 Members.
*Give native tribes two Senators and like 10 reps.

At this point, let's just abolish the Senate and institute a Parliamentary system.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

Cpt_Obvious posted:

At this point, let's just abolish the Senate and institute a Parliamentary system.

Can't. Or at least not directly, its locked in to the constitution in a way that can't be amended.

You CAN amend around it though indirectly. For example you can create a new Upper-Upper House like in Venezeula that IS proportional and require it to approve any bills that pass both the House and the senate by simple majority or just the House by super majority.

You CAN also just strip the Senate of most of its legislative functions and leave it to the House (and leave the senate with approving ambassadors and foreign treaties), but I'd make sure that the House is non-gerrymandable with something like Single Transferable Vote at that point to lock out the fascists.

e: This is because the Constitution requires Equal Representation in the "Senate"; hence your left with stripping them of their powers, or supplanting them by a new super-senate.

Dr. VooDoo
May 4, 2006


Cpt_Obvious posted:

At this point, let's just abolish the Senate and institute a Parliamentary system.

Abolish the Senate and replace it with THUNDERDOME

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Raenir Salazar posted:

Can't. Or at least not directly, its locked in to the constitution in a way that can't be amended.

You CAN amend around it though indirectly. For example you can create a new Upper-Upper House like in Venezeula that IS proportional and require it to approve any bills that pass both the House and the senate by simple majority or just the House by super majority.

You CAN also just strip the Senate of most of its legislative functions and leave it to the House (and leave the senate with approving ambassadors and foreign treaties), but I'd make sure that the House is non-gerrymandable with something like Single Transferable Vote at that point to lock out the fascists.

e: This is because the Constitution requires Equal Representation in the "Senate"; hence your left with stripping them of their powers, or supplanting them by a new super-senate.

How is literally any part of the Constitution unammendable? Isn't that the whole point?

Edit: I realize this question may look facetious, but I am genuinely curious.

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface

Bel Shazar posted:

Oh drat yeah I like that.

I have no idea if they would actually go for it though since it means their would be a lot more changes in how they govern, meaning they would be waaay more tied into the US government system.

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

You could increase the number of senators though - 6 senators per state so that it's more responsive to elections and changes in the constituency.

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003
Start offering statehood to every Indian reservation with a population greater than 10,000. It would be great

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

empty whippet box
Jun 9, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
Dear thread, here's a quick story of american health care. I posted in this thread a while back mentioning my ear has been hosed up all year. A kind goon sent me some money to help me go to the ENT. I found out what the problem was today, finally, at long last.

I go running fairly often. 6 or 7 months ago I went running in the rain with my headphones on. I lost an earpiece. After that I got swimmer's ear. I figured it was from the rain getting pushed into my ear by the earpiece that went missing.

No, I have had a GOD drat FUCKIN PIECE OF PLASTIC IN MY EAR for like 6-7 months. And I didn't figure this out for most of the year because I couldn't afford a simple doctor visit.

I tried like a million over the counter remedies. I feel so god drat stupid. And horrified. WTF. Holy poo poo. Well, glad that's over, anyway

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply