|
SatansOnion posted:I can’t tell whether “consuser” is a misspelling of “consumer” or if he’s trying to coin an entirely new word, and either way I could use a hug, a chair, and an iced tea about now Consumer-user (please don't let me be right. i don't want to be right about this) Edit: gently caress, I'm right.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 00:58 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 06:55 |
|
SatansOnion posted:I cant tell whether consuser is a misspelling of consumer or if hes trying to coin an entirely new word, and either way I could use a hug, a chair, and an iced tea about now It is a portmanteu of "consumer" and "[app] user" e:fb
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 01:20 |
|
Clockwork Sputnik posted:Consumer-user Hey, we can't be wrong all the time.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 02:02 |
|
Akratic Method posted:It is a portmanteu of "consumer" and "[app] user" which is odd, because in america, app consume you!
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 02:16 |
|
Currently unable to handle the consumer user portmanteau
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 02:48 |
|
abigserve posted:If you had Dad Oil money and wanted to start a tech company, why not just start a tech company? I don't really understand any of this but there's something really charming about the garfetish in my mind.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 03:13 |
|
"consuser" was a good surprise in that article, but I also loved how he used "entergage" 5 times before explaining what it meant
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 03:18 |
|
gently caress SNEEP posted:"consuser" was a good surprise in that article, but I also loved how he used "entergage" 5 times before explaining what it meant I cannot get enough of this man and his ideas.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 03:29 |
|
i'm pretty consused right now my consusion is occurring at an accelerating paste. maybe i need some god food
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 03:53 |
|
Akratic Method posted:I am excited to be able to finally, numerically calculate how entergaged I am! actually that means your entergagement is INFINITE
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 04:00 |
|
https://twitter.com/scudworthy/status/1208173075960942592
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 04:36 |
|
Come entergage with us, Nathen
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 07:22 |
|
SatansOnion posted:I can’t tell whether “consuser” is a misspelling of “consumer” or if he’s trying to coin an entirely new word, and either way I could use a hug, a chair, and an iced tea about now How about a nice Garfuccino?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 08:50 |
|
Love me Feed me Dont leave me
|
# ? Dec 21, 2019 19:45 |
|
I kind of think Jim Davis might be hard up for cash... https://www.clickorlando.com/entert...k&ICID=ref_fark
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 08:42 |
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:I kind of think Jim Davis might be hard up for cash... no he just literally gave power of attorney to a robot that signs anything you put under it sight unseen.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 09:35 |
|
Motherfucker posted:no he just literally gave power of attorney to a robot that signs anything you put under it sight unseen. So what you're saying is I can make the Garfield porno I've always dreamed of?
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 14:20 |
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:So what you're saying is I can make the Garfield porno I've always dreamed of? Look above, the Portuguese beat you to it.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 16:07 |
|
Mordja posted:Look above, the Portuguese beat you to it. That was burlesque. I'm talking the grossest, sweatiest, most ball slappingest porn. The kind of stuff you can smell through the screen.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 16:13 |
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:I kind of think Jim Davis might be hard up for cash... quote:Jim announced that he's going to put on weekly auctions all hand-painted Garfield comics made from 1978 to 2011. As Davis explained, he started drawing comics digitally using a graphics tablet in 2011. Older comics, still, were sealed in a climate-controlled safe and Davis had to figure out what to do with them. 1. Wine Cave 2. Garf Cave
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 18:44 |
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:I kind of think Jim Davis might be hard up for cash... I think it's more like he contacted museums and stuff and nobody gives a poo poo about Garfield strips, so he's hoping the free market will solve his problem of storing his historic "art" so that future generations can "enjoy" it.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 19:02 |
|
SweetWillyRollbar posted:That was burlesque. I'm talking the grossest, sweatiest, most ball slappingest porn. The kind of stuff you can smell through the screen. I posted a lovingly handcrafted oil painting of Jon making sweet love to Garfield in the cursed images thread (tagged NWS) and got probed for it. It is one of the greatest injustices of our times.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 19:10 |
|
I'm really excited to see what the pipe comic sells for. Millions, surely.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 20:06 |
|
This man is easily dumber and worse at business than Doobie.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 20:43 |
|
He sure is rich as hell for a dumb at business guy who drew a bland comic.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 22:42 |
|
Mimesweeper posted:He sure is rich as hell for a dumb at business guy who drew a bland comic. That's the thing, he's very smart at business which is why the comic is so bland. GarfieldEats is a failure, but its very existence reminds everyone that Garfield exists and here we are, talking about a bland comic strip mascot through no effort from Jim Davis. It's not like he's the one sinking money into this insanity, after all.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 22:46 |
|
Mimesweeper posted:He sure is rich as hell for a dumb at business guy who drew a bland comic. Actually, Nathan does not draw the comic, he just gives Jim Davis a lot of money to use the Garfield brand
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 23:50 |
|
This drawing of Garfield groping a lady is at $7 so far. https://comics.ha.com/itm/animation.../121952-19219.s
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 23:58 |
|
When did they get a deep fryer? I don't remember seeing one when I was there. Also lol, why is there always only one person working there?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:22 |
|
bvj191jgl7bBsqF5m posted:Actually, Nathan does not draw the comic, he just gives Jim Davis a lot of money to use the Garfield brand Oh, that guy. Oops.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:56 |
|
I'm gonna be contrarian here but garfield isn't actually that bland within the realm of newspaper comics imo
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 02:25 |
|
Korthal posted:When did they get a deep fryer? I don't remember seeing one when I was there. theres a 0% chance they actually have a deep fryer so my guess is its baked theres only one person working there because they get no business nathen, still available for consultation. $120k for 10 hours of consultation + 10 hours of strategy.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 03:38 |
|
GolfHole posted:theres a 0% chance they actually have a deep fryer so my guess is its baked Hmmm. But do you consult on increasing the entergagement levels of consusers??? Or just some dumb bullshit like selling products people want at reasonable prices?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 04:52 |
|
bvj191jgl7bBsqF5m posted:Actually, Nathan does not draw the comic, he just gives Jim Davis a lot of money to use the Garfield brand TBF Jim Davis doesn't draw Garfield either.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 04:59 |
|
abigserve posted:I'm gonna be contrarian here but garfield isn't actually that bland within the realm of newspaper comics imo Its true. Theres way worse than Garfield but who really feels like making GBS threads on the lockhorns or gasoline alley?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:03 |
|
Garfield does that thing where it's the same gag for a week or more at a time. Like Garfield smashing spiders, Garfield kicking Odie off the table, Garfield needs coffee, etc.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:06 |
|
Snowy posted:Its true. Theres way worse than Garfield but who really feels like making GBS threads on the lockhorns or gasoline alley? The Lockhorns is actually funny, screw you.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:28 |
|
Sailor Cat posted:The Lockhorns is actually funny, screw you. No gently caress you bad taste haver
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:31 |
|
Comics fight! Comics fight! Comics fight!
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:31 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 06:55 |
|
Yo mama likes Funky Winkerbean
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 05:34 |