|
More gribblies!
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:07 |
|
|
R0ckfish posted:More gribblies! Those are exceptionally good gribblies! The swarms are especially adorable 10/10
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 04:21
|
|
|
I played a game with this guy today, he's a ton of fun. I'm so close to done painting him, just got to finish the gun arms, the feet, the rim of the base, and get transfers. Deployment + the rest of the army: 
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 04:25
|
|
|
Kitchner posted:I ordered a venerable dreadnought to supplement my Grey Knight army as I put a bunch in my list with Lascannons and Missile Launchers only to realise there's no missile launcher in the venerable dreadnought kit, only in the dreadnought kit. I have several of these, PM me an address and I can send you like 3.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 04:37
|
|
|
If I wanted to make 10 company veterans with storm bolters and storm shields, what models to I need? It doesn’t seem immediately clear
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 04:56
|
|
|
JIZZ DENOUEMENT posted:Those are exceptionally good gribblies! Thanks! I gotta say that Nids have some of the most aesthetic troops, in my opinion
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 05:06
|
|
|
Good Citizen posted:If I wanted to make 10 company veterans with storm bolters and storm shields, what models to I need? It doesn’t seem immediately clear You need to spend time on ebay. A vanguard veteran box has 5 storm shields, and a sternguard box has 2 storm bolters. I don't think there's a better source for power armor storm bolters. Various custom ones on shapeways too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 05:33
|
|
|
R0ckfish posted:More gribblies!
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 05:41
|
|
|
After sitting on the shelf for a year, I spent most of my time off the past week finishing this cute little fella     
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 05:49
|
|
|
A masterpiece.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 06:11
|
|
|
OhDearGodNo posted:After sitting on the shelf for a year, I spent most of my time off the past week finishing this cute little fella Super cool. Reminds me I bought a ton of AoS bitz last year to build a ship for my freebooterz but never did it. I'm finally finishing painting them though, so maybe I'll assemble my battleship next...
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 08:01
|
|
|
Pretty much done with my grav captain. Now I just need to base and seal him.  It was my first time painting a power sword. Not as nice as I would have liked, but it'll do for my first go, I think.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 10:29
|
|
|
JackMann posted:Pretty much done with my grav captain. Now I just need to base and seal him. FIRST TIME!? WHAT. That’s a really silky great power sword and was my literal first standout thing to compliment. The cloak is also buttery and fantastic as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 10:36
|
|
|
ANAmal.net posted:I have several of these, PM me an address and I can send you like 3. Sweet, you're a legend. I'll give you the cash for posting or if you want any Astra Militarum bits I have loads of those so might be able to exchange.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 11:09
|
|
|
dexefiend posted:You can always just not buy it. lol, good one, Dex
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 12:43
|
|
|
TheBigAristotle posted:lol, good one, Dex Hahaha. I am glad you picked up on my comment. Buying is the hobby.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 15:22
|
|
|
Here are my final projects for 2019. First up are the second-hand bugs I picked up very cheaply a while ago but have been sitting unassembled for months. PA3 was a great reason to build both units, as well as trying out Contrast paints on Tyranids for the first time. With no more bugs left to paint but still wanting to play around with Contrast some more, I remembered that during the big Apocalypse game in the summer I didn't have enough magnetised arms to cover a lot of my big creatures. That resulted in nearly a dozen armless Carnifexes stomping around. Raiding the bits box produced ten new pairs of weapons...  The top set were painted gradually over the last 10 years using regular layer paints & shades. The bottom set were done in around an hour (excluding drying time) using 3 Contrast colours.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 15:24
|
|
|
Some good Nids on this page.  I really need to get around to rehabbing the Carnifices I have in my drawer so I can play around with proper Nidzilla. I suppose I mostly do now but the Flyers just don’t have the staying power of T7 3+ with -1 to hit in shooting. Why don’t you allow Toxicrenes to take Spore Cysts, GW!? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 16:59
|
|
|
Finally looking through Psychic Awakening 3, and... why is it still impossible to make chapter masters for Blood Angels Successors? You can take Seth if you play Flesh Tearers, and Dante if you play the original chapter, but there's still no equivalent of the vanilla marine stratagem to upgrade a captain to chapter master. i just want my dumb little homebrew chapter to be allowed to function like any vanilla astartes successor e: and drat, the relics list took a hard downgrade. The BA relic jump pack used to give reroll charges and ignore overwatch, now it's...+1 to charges, and charge on a turn the model fell back? hammer of baal's gone completely? yeesh 1994 Toyota Celica fucked around with this message at 17:24 on Dec 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
1994 Toyota Celica posted:Finally looking through Psychic Awakening 3, and... They don't replace the old relics, you get those in addition to the new ones
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
Well there's that at least
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 18:10
|
|
|
Weird question, but do Adapetus Mechanicus have to have their backpacks attached for gameplay reasons, or can you leave those off your figures if you don't like them for whatever reason?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
1994 Toyota Celica posted:Finally looking through Psychic Awakening 3, and... It is also extremely easy and common to just say a model you created uses Dante’s rules. There’s really no reason not to just use the BA rules for a successor that is not Flesh Tearers if you want to run one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:Weird question, but do Adapetus Mechanicus have to have their backpacks attached for gameplay reasons, or can you leave those off your figures if you don't like them for whatever reason? Honestly I was just thinking about asking how people would feel about marines without backpacks. Its non canon, but I can't imagine it making any rules difference. Won't affect LOS... Maybe if you went to a GW official tournament someone could call you out? But you'd still be using GW plastic so I doubt it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 18:54
|
|
|
Pendent posted:It is also extremely easy and common to just say a model you created uses Dante’s rules. There’s really no reason not to just use the BA rules for a successor that is not Flesh Tearers if you want to run one. The point is that I don't want to use Dante, I want to be able to play a fully fleshed-out, original BA successor the way Vanilla marine players can play fully fleshed out successors. I don't understand why the option isn't included when other elements of that option, like the special-issue wargear rules, were. all it would've taken was copy-pasting the SM strat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 19:04
|
|
|
1994 Toyota Celica posted:The point is that I don't want to use Dante, I want to be able to play a fully fleshed-out, original BA successor the way Vanilla marine players can play fully fleshed out successors. I don't understand why the option isn't included when other elements of that option, like the special-issue wargear rules, were. all it would've taken was copy-pasting the SM strat. Do any of the other non-codex marines have a chapter master strat for successors? I can't check right now but I don't think so? It's lovely and bad though, yeah
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 19:08
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:Weird question, but do Adapetus Mechanicus have to have their backpacks attached for gameplay reasons, or can you leave those off your figures if you don't like them for whatever reason? Go for it, the data tether and omnispex are hand held items, the backpacks don't represent anything with a points value. Why you'd want to do that though? They look rad. But who am I to judge, I put hoods on all my vanguards because I like the look of them better. Lizard Combatant fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Dec 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 19:10
|
|
|
1994 Toyota Celica posted:The point is that I don't want to use Dante, I want to be able to play a fully fleshed-out, original BA successor the way Vanilla marine players can play fully fleshed out successors. I don't understand why the option isn't included when other elements of that option, like the special-issue wargear rules, were. all it would've taken was copy-pasting the SM strat. Which existing strat would you like to lose?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 19:28
|
|
|
Booley posted:Which existing strat would you like to lose? Hunter-Slayer Missile, easy
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 20:28
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:Weird question, but do Adapetus Mechanicus have to have their backpacks attached for gameplay reasons, or can you leave those off your figures if you don't like them for whatever reason? This is tech heresy. Enjoye life as a dung servitor.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 23:24
|
|
|
Are Havocs seeing action in competitive chaos marine lists? I ask because everyone loves the Gatling cannon fella when they were first previewed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 00:12
|
|
|
I don't pay much attention beyond casual looks at tournament lists but i have not seen havocs much less the chain gunners. They are really good at infantry killing where chaos already does that well. I have used them in a few games an they will really hold a point to back lines deep strike infantry. Edit: fat finger typo edit
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 00:25
|
|
|
What does one do if they want to turn a squad of csms into chaos chosen with combibolters? Is non-GW the only cost-efficient method?
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 02:58
|
|
|
JIZZ DENOUEMENT posted:Are Havocs seeing action in competitive chaos marine lists? Sadly, no. The Reaper Chaincannons are too short-ranged and aren't good enough at killing primaris marines and vehicles, and Lascannons are too high variance to really get there. The optimal play is probably 4x autocannons, but you're generally going to be better off taking obliterators instead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:09
|
|
|
Quick note to the goonhammer guys: love all the content and I check every day hoping today is the day an Orks start competing article goes up
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:19
|
|
|
Good Citizen posted:Quick note to the goonhammer guys: love all the content and I check every day hoping today is the day an Orks start competing article goes up Uh do you mean this one? https://www.goonhammer.com/start-competing-orks-tactics/
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:23
|
|
|
Good Citizen posted:Quick note to the goonhammer guys: love all the content and I check every day hoping today is the day an Orks start competing article goes up it went up two weeks ago
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:24
|
|
|
On the plus side, we just made that guy's day!
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:38
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:Sadly, no. The Reaper Chaincannons are too short-ranged and aren't good enough at killing primaris marines and vehicles, and Lascannons are too high variance to really get there. The optimal play is probably 4x autocannons, but you're generally going to be better off taking obliterators instead. I'm a fan of Iron Warriors Missile Launcher Havocs for that Faith and Fury strat to reroll either damage or number of shots. That seems insanely flexible against just about any matchup.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:07 |
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:it went up two weeks ago Orcember.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2019 04:13
|
|
