|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I thought he obsessed over babs bunny rather than the skunk, but it turns out it was the voice actress for both. Also, holy poo poo that might be the most 2003 internet thing ive ever read. What you say !!
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 16:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:26 |
|
|
Burning Beard posted:The full version is on YouTube. The Russian company that owns the rights to all Tarcovskys movies out them all up for free. Perfect, thanks, I’ll check it out!
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 17:18
|
|
|
Stalker is even more of a must see than Solaris. A completely unique film the likes of which we have not and probably will never see again. I own 20 or 30 Criterions but if I had to choose just one it would probably be Stalker.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 17:23
|
|
|
I really enjoyed the naturalistic acting and directing There are a few moments in tarkovksy's films where the actor accidentally drops or fumble with something, that the camera keeps going while it's being sorted really adds to a sense of verisimilitude This whole sequence with the railcar is great (33:00) https://youtu.be/Kgocncu6MBw
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
I'm reminded of a bit in Star Trek DS9 where Kira's demonstrating the differences between Federation and Cardassian phaser rifles and talking about the Federation one being fiddly overengineered and gimmicky, and the battery pack falls out of the prop as she does.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 03:27
|
|
|
In blazing saddles one of my favourite jokes is when Heady brings Bart to the governor and the governor accidentally starts talking to Bart. "Have you gone berserk?! Can't you see that man is a ni- ... Sorry, wrong person!" Then he grabs heady and repeats himself: "Have you gone berserk?! Can't you see that man is a nit?" I just love how he sets up the joke and then subverts it at the last second.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 03:27
|
|
|
Arcsquad12 posted:In blazing saddles one of my favourite jokes is when Heady brings Bart to the governor and the governor accidentally starts talking to Bart. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 03:37
|
|
|
What the hell are you worried about? This is 1874. You'll be able to sue *her*.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 15:00
|
|
|
CzarChasm posted:What the hell are you worried about? This is 1874. You'll be able to sue *her*. He just wants to be called by his correct name. Names are important.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 16:39
|
|
|
CzarChasm posted:What the hell are you worried about? This is 1874. You'll be able to sue *her*. The fact that Hedy Lamarr did sue Brooks, and his settlement included an apology for “almost” using her name, was a subtle legal moment.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2019 02:36
|
|
|
This isn't super subtle. In Catch Me If You Can when Tom Hanks' character is talking to Frank's mom, his FBI partner is nervously trying to get a fork to eat some Sara Lee cheesecake. After several failed attempts, Tom takes a fork without breaking eye contact with Frank's mom and hands it to his partner in a sort of stabbing motion. He gets a little twinge of "Come the gently caress on, dude".
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 07:21
|
|
|
Nth Doctor posted:On Thursday, a friend pointed out that if That 70's Show, which debuted in 1998 and was set in 1976 were to be made today, it would be set in 1997. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 08:38
|
|
|
Arrath posted:Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck me. Also in the same vein, if the Wonder Years were moved to now, I believe it'd be looking back to around 2000-2005. Ugh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 16:49
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Also in the same vein, if the Wonder Years were moved to now, I believe it'd be looking back to around 2000-2005. God dammit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 18:54
|
|
|
2000 doesn't seem so long ago except I bought a 24 inch CRT for about $400 back then and my cell phone had an antenna. So it was like a whole other world.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 19:14
|
|
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Also in the same vein, if the Wonder Years were moved to now, I believe it'd be looking back to around 2000-2005. Not quite that terrible, they were always just set 20 years earlier. So who’s ready for a TV show nostalgic about 2000? Great ready for the shocking twist during the family trip to New York late in season 2! We’re all old. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 19:26
|
|
|
I think it "helped" that whenever Wonder Years came on as a kid, it was reruns. So the show and the time period it portrayed were further apart. Then I would change the channel, as Wonder Years loving sucked.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2020 19:50
|
|
|
In Up, when the dogs in biplanes give their callsigns they're "grey one" etc and when they're spotting red/blue cars at the end Doug says "there's a grey one" because dogs only see in black and white (according to popular belief at least). Can't believe I just noticed that 
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2020 17:18
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that if That 70's Show were to be made today it would probably still be set in the 70s
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 06:10
|
|
|
Because that 90s show already happened
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 07:01
|
|
Cat Army
|
datajugend posted:Because that 90s show already happened I remember commercials for that running about 12 times per Simpsons rerun and my entire impression of That 90s Show is some dork screaming I'M ON A CELLULAR PHONE.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 12:59
|
|
|
Pastry of the Year posted:I remember commercials for that running about 12 times per Simpsons rerun and my entire impression of That 90s Show is some dork screaming I'M ON A CELLULAR PHONE. Pretty sure that was That 80's Show
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 13:07
|
|
|
Len posted:Pretty sure that was That 80's Show oh god drat it
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 13:13
|
|
|
Len posted:Pretty sure that was That 80's Show Ironically given what he was saying, That 90's Show was actually a Simpsons episode. It's one of the most widely loathed Simpsons episodes, the one that shifted the timeline of Homer and Marge's high school days to be in the 90s instead of the 70s.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 13:17
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Ironically given what he was saying, That 90's Show was actually a Simpsons episode. Am I misremembering the ad for That 80s Show that was a guy yelling "ITS NOT A PAY PHONE IT'S A CELLULAR PHONE"?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 13:43
|
|
|
The first commercially available cellphone was in 1983 so probably not.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 14:08
|
|
|
If they remade That 70s Show today it would be That 90s Show: a shot for shot remake of Friends
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 14:24
|
|
|
Sounds good to me(and most of the world)
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 14:29
|
|
|
beanieson posted:If they remade That 70s Show today it would be That 90s Show: a shot for shot remake of Friends Could you be any more correct?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2020 15:14
|
|
|
VideoGames posted:Could you be any more correct? *bumps fists together sideways at you and makes a face*
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 02:11
|
|
|
I remember kind of liking that 80s show, it had some potential. Still glad it was cancelled, because if it was successful we probably would have never gotten It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 02:20
|
|
|
The new Doom movie has a nod to a character dying that I don’t want to spoil (bj blazcowicz). A little detail only real gamers are gonna notice
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 07:15
|
|
|
More like oldtagsless.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 08:15
|
|
|
oldpainless posted:The new Doom movie has a nod to a character dying that I don’t want to spoil (bj blazcowicz). A little detail only real gamers are gonna notice A friend of mine watched that and was kind of amazed at how bafflingly dumb, dull and bad it was while also making obscure references.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 08:49
|
|
|
It's a good DOOM movie, but not a good movie, if that makes any sense. More faithful to the game than the Urban/Rock movie, but... yea not exactly awash in great acting or plot or anything else. Still, neat story. It's on netflix if anyone wants to watch it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 08:58
|
|
|
I'll never see it, just tell me what they do to my man, the immortal Nazi killer with a robot body. Shot in the head by Mars Hitler in the first five minutes?
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 09:45
|
|
|
None of the new Wolfenstein games are the real one. And the new movie was more faithful to the game, but the highest monster type they get to is loving imps. So it's just 1-1 and 1-2.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 12:26
|
|
|
all i remember about that doom movie was that they spent 99% of the budget on the cgi at the end
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 12:35
|
|
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:It's a good DOOM movie, but not a good movie, if that makes any sense. This makes perfect sense. How do you make a movie based on Doom? Simple. How do you make a good movie based on Doom? Ok, wait, now.... After the other Doom movie, I remember thinking 'Why didn't they just make it about demons from hell? How hard would that have been? It's ominous, it's scary, it's completely ridiculous, but at least it's faithful to the source material.' Is the new one about demons from hell? If so, great.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 14:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:26 |
|
|
I kind of find it baffling when they create a movie that is so far removed from the original source material as to be basically its own property in the first place. Those licenses cost money, you might as well farking use it properly otherwise just churn out a bunch of garbage that will make money anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2020 14:28
|
|
