Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Beelzebufo
Mar 5, 2015

Frog puns are toadally awesome


Love this threat of "imminent attacks" that somehow would all fall apart without the idea guy at the head. Why would Soleimani's death even slow them down, if they're that far into planning? Was he literally the only commander Iran had?


gently caress CNN

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Flayer
Sep 13, 2003

by Fluffdaddy
Buglord

Stringent posted:

AllI know is I can't wait to see what they do.
Realistically Iran will wait until some minor opportunity shows up and use it for internal propaganda. This assassination will have done nothing more than harden Iran on it's path to being the regional powerhouse and any move that triggers an all out war with the USA likely hurts that objective. Long term the assassination of Soleimani will likely prove counter-productive as it will provide great impetus to Iranian adventurism but short term nothing of significance will change much.

Beelzebufo
Mar 5, 2015

Frog puns are toadally awesome


Flayer posted:

Realistically Iran will wait until some minor opportunity shows up and use it for internal propaganda. This assassination will have done nothing more than harden Iran on it's path to being the regional powerhouse and any move that triggers an all out war with the USA likely hurts that objective. Long term the assassination of Soleimani will likely prove counter-productive as it will provide great impetus to Iranian adventurism but short term nothing of significance will change much.

Except the US alienating essentially everyone and violating international law, possibly moving into an illegal occupation of foreign territory, and generally proving to even it's closest allies that it shouldn't be trusted (as of they needed more proof).

I really do think the blowback from not telling the UK will be felt. It's so beyond the acceptable for a military partner.

Stringent
Dec 22, 2004


image text goes here

Flayer posted:

Realistically Iran will wait until some minor opportunity shows up and use it for internal propaganda. This assassination will have done nothing more than harden Iran on it's path to being the regional powerhouse and any move that triggers an all out war with the USA likely hurts that objective. Long term the assassination of Soleimani will likely prove counter-productive as it will provide great impetus to Iranian adventurism but short term nothing of significance will change much.

I'd put money on this being wrong.

Flayer
Sep 13, 2003

by Fluffdaddy
Buglord

Stringent posted:

I'd put money on this being wrong.
I honestly hope I am wrong because the USA getting away with things like this only emboldens more of the same activities.

Hope I'm wrong but judging by the last few decades of history I'm not confident that the USA is vulnerable in any real way to outside attack.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

The Little Death posted:

Except the US alienating essentially everyone and violating international law, possibly moving into an illegal occupation of foreign territory, and generally proving to even it's closest allies that it shouldn't be trusted (as of they needed more proof).

I really do think the blowback from not telling the UK will be felt. It's so beyond the acceptable for a military partner.

lol boris won't give a poo poo

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

i think iran is being pretty consistent and clear about what their new aims are over the last day or so:

https://twitter.com/IranWonk/status/1214163546424139778

edit: https://twitter.com/DavidADaoud/status/1214160305036648448

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle

The Little Death posted:

Except the US alienating essentially everyone and violating international law, possibly moving into an illegal occupation of foreign territory, and generally proving to even it's closest allies that it shouldn't be trusted (as of they needed more proof).

I really do think the blowback from not telling the UK will be felt. It's so beyond the acceptable for a military partner.

the entirety of Bojo's brexit strategy relies on getting along with the US for the dealz so BoJo is going to STFU and take it

the world is far, far dumber than you think

Rated PG-34
Jul 1, 2004




lol laws

My Crab is Fight
Mar 13, 2007
ironically bojo has actually attempted to be the voice of reason

https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1214148318307205121

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Flayer posted:

I honestly hope I am wrong because the USA getting away with things like this only emboldens more of the same activities.

Hope I'm wrong but judging by the last few decades of history I'm not confident that the USA is vulnerable in any real way to outside attack.

The US as in the USA proper/mainland certainly isn't vulnerable, US interests and allies absolutely are extremely vulnerable and in ways that would be felt at home very strongly, just look at how much people freak out at small fluctuations in prices.

Truthfully I think there's some chance you're right, but also the reality is that a lot of people on both sides have some real interest in there being a conflict. The only thing really holding a conflict back on the Iranian side is that if they can stall for another year or two until they have a proper nuclear capability, their position wrt potential american aggression is a thousand times stronger.

Crusader posted:

i think iran is being pretty consistent and clear about what their new aims are over the last day or so:

https://twitter.com/IranWonk/status/1214163546424139778

There's a thing in Iranian jurisprudence where if you cause a death the family of the deceased can choose to accept a payment from you that will absolve the killer of responsibility. That's what this blood money talk is, also of note, that this is likely a continued response to backchannel american offers to please not escalate

Herstory Begins Now has issued a correction as of 14:22 on Jan 6, 2020

fanfic insert
Nov 4, 2009

BurningCourage posted:

ironically bojo has actually attempted to be the voice of reason

https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1214148318307205121

lol, don't the US have a law on the books where it pretty much just states that the US reserves the right to invade the Netherlands if the Hague were ever to try an American citizen for war crimes or the like? Kind of makes mentioning any convention, signed or not, pointless.

edit; quick search gave me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

RajCooper posted:

lol, don't the US have a law on the books where it pretty much just states that the US reserves the right to invade the Netherlands if the Hague were ever to try an American citizen for war crimes or the like? Kind of makes mentioning any convention, signed or not, pointless.

yes

RealityWarCriminal
Aug 10, 2016

:o:
easily one of the worst laws ever passed (44 dem senators voted yes)

Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

One does not need to imagine very exotic escalations really. Iraq has requested the US to leave, Trump has already attached himself to not leaving, and Iran will be perfectly happy to (with the support of Iraq) make the continued existence of US troops in the region unpleasant and bloody. The US loses and Iran wins on both a material and PR level.

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

Cybernetic Vermin posted:

One does not need to imagine very exotic escalations really. Iraq has requested the US to leave, Trump has already attached himself to not leaving, and Iran will be perfectly happy to (with the support of Iraq) make the continued existence of US troops in the region unpleasant and bloody. The US loses and Iran wins on both a material and PR level.

i agree that’s how iran wants things to go, but the wild card is donald “exotic escalations” trump

meanwhile


https://twitter.com/nprkelly/status/1214168551612985344

20 Blunts
Jan 21, 2017
i hope people chant death 2 america at my funeral

George Rouncewell
Jul 20, 2007

You think that's illegal? Heh, watch this.
Any action from Iran, Iraq or any vaguely brown person in the world will be considered ww3 terrorist islam holocaust that will be used as a justification for any escalation up to and including nukes.

Nonaction will be used as proof that killing soleimani was a necessary action as it stopped islamic ww3 holocaust hezbollahz

Good times, america #1

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

BurningCourage posted:

ironically bojo has actually attempted to be the voice of reason

https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1214148318307205121

Imagine being in the position where you can be lectured on cultural sensitivity by a guy who sings imperial war songs while being hosted by their former subjects

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1213846628311977989?s=20
Did this get posted because lmao

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
yes but its still good to post it again

BattleMaster
Aug 14, 2000

given that Israel having nuclear weapons is the most open secret in history, I bet it was some sort of vaguely-deniable flex more than a mistake

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold
bibi confirming what everyone has known since 1979 and previously confirmed when apartheid fell

cda
Jan 2, 2010

by Hand Knit

Crusader posted:

i agree that’s how iran wants things to go, but the wild card is donald “exotic escalations” trump

"Exotic escalations" is a great name for a company that makes one of a kind staircases and escalators

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

https://twitter.com/RudawEnglish/status/1214170432603086853?s=20

Frijolero
Jan 24, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo

Lets gooooooooo

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

lol now nato says they're going to have to review their presence in iraq

CODChimera
Jan 29, 2009

BattleMaster posted:

given that Israel having nuclear weapons is the most open secret in history, I bet it was some sort of vaguely-deniable flex more than a mistake

yeah especially when now is really not the time to appear weak

Suplex Liberace
Jan 18, 2012



Crusader posted:

lol now nato says they're going to have to review their presence in iraq

Please die nato

Lawman 0
Aug 17, 2010

https://twitter.com/lummideast/status/1214210043308118016?s=20

Toplowtech
Aug 31, 2004

Just in time.

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

big brain TURMP

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

fuckin lmao @ "charge them sanctions"

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

lmao

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

very ungrateful!

https://twitter.com/W7VOA/status/1214225692445102080

Kurtofan
Feb 16, 2011

hon hon hon
LIKE A DOG

Man Musk
Jan 13, 2010

http://twitter.com/borzou/status/1213995482667728896

Comrade Koba
Jul 2, 2007

Having the Youtube auto-generated English captions activated when watching the live stream of a Soleimani memorial service sure was...something.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Atomic Man-Boy
Jul 23, 2007

Lol at anyone in here thinking that Trump will in any way honor Iraqi sovereignty and acquiesce to their demands that we leave the country.

At least not after Sean Hannity gets on TV tonight and calls him a pussy if he leaves.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply