Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
RockyB
Mar 8, 2007


Dog Therapy: Shockingly Good

You bastard now I'm crying.

I went to find the sad, lonely space probe cartoon but could only find this instead

https://twitter.com/briancartoon/status/1068933737314963462

E: The 25th of January isn't as cool as the 25th of December. This is the 25th page of this thread where the phrase 'skills wallet' is met with howls of derisive laughter.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

thespaceinvader
Mar 30, 2011

The slightest touch from a Gol-Shogeg will result in Instant Death!

goddamnedtwisto posted:

(well I can't think of many recreational uses of bleach but you get the idea)

I mean, it's a specific type of bleach but plenty of people bleach and colour their own hair recreationally, as well as doing similar things to clothes.

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

Guavanaut posted:

There's been a few drink testing straws/papers/nail varnishes etc. but they're all putting the onus on the victim. The dye method sounds good, but that means making it legal so that a dye could be mandated, so there'd have to be a huge attitude change to "out of all of the euphoric hypnotic sedatives, here's one that we thinks safe enough for sale with the dye" because I don't think you're going to get a euphoric hypnotic sedative that doesn't incapacitate people by definition.

Or maybe they could have legalized some of the popular stimulants and cracked down on G instead, I don't know, some people would be happier, some less happy, even in the party scene. There's seemingly no will at all to even look at safer options, though. I think that's one of the things that pissed me off most with the mephedrone debacle; half of London switched from taking cocaine and it was getting to the stage where hardened dealers were turning themselves in because they couldn't pay their suppliers, but nobody seemed to think "hey, this seems better than the crime and coke gangs, maybe we should seriously study its harms for regulated sale."


that please. starting with MDMA.
but when people G is as much fun as it is, and people already take it clubbing as a better alternative to the already legal /safer alcohol, I fear it’s going to be a struggle to get it to go out of fashion

bessantj
Jul 27, 2004


thespaceinvader posted:

Thinking about it, the big things that I appreciate are people being willing not to make physical contact if they think they're ill, and people letting me know if there is illness around so that I can decide whether I want to attend an event or whatever. I'm particularly thinking about the standard coughs and colds and the like, which are the things that most bother me.

And ideally, people being willing to cancel commitments if they are themselves, ill. It takes me quite a lot of mental effort to go to big, close gatherings of people at the best of times but when I've come away from something sniffling it will put me off going out again for a WHILE

Especially, being willing to take the right set of days off work is really important. But at the same time, I recognise that capitalism makes that extremely difficult; ideally we'd all be able to take 2 weeks off work whenever we get a cold but...

That's a good shout, I'll have to remember that.

Yvonmukluk
Oct 10, 2012

Everything is Sinister


Well, our Branch CLP had its AGM, and we were going to wind it down, since most of the exec were stepping down due to other commitments and the fact we'd hardly ever been quorate. But it turns out that today, we were quorate. And that's how I became the new chair.

Now I just need to figure out what to do next.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Cerv posted:

Bleach, knives, balaclavas, opiates, antihistamines, and booze have differing control regimes based (somewhat) on the relative potential harm when misused and the prevalence of misuse vs legitimate use.
It’s worth having the discussion about how G should be regulated without a knee-jerk response.
We already have laws yes, but that’s not up to much when they’re basically unenforceable and pretty poo poo for people who just want to have a fun time.

https://www.kinkly.com/definition/7838/cleaning-fetish
you probably don’t need to click that, the URL says it all

What I'm saying is that decriminalising/legalising GHB doesn't require us to come up with whole new frameworks, we already have a framework in place (although it does illustrate why I've always preferred full legalisation to decriminalisation but that's besides the point I'm making).

Unless you want to take a complete prohibition position on everything that may be used for harm, it ultimately comes down to making sure that the police have sufficient resources (and, crucially, policies, training and discipline) to catch people who cause harm whether with GHB, a knife, or good plain old-fashioned coercion - of course it should go without saying this also includes wider societal changes to support victims and ensure they come forward, and ultimately that people no longer even have the inclination to do harm. Futzing around with dyes or test kits is Centrist Rally territory IMO.

Namtab
Feb 22, 2010

Without ill people i wouldn't have a job so illness is good

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Quelle surprise.

https://twitter.com/nadinebh_/status/1214291350117634048?s=20

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

goddamnedtwisto posted:

What I'm saying is that decriminalising/legalising GHB doesn't require us to come up with whole new frameworks, we already have a framework in place (although it does illustrate why I've always preferred full legalisation to decriminalisation but that's besides the point I'm making).

Unless you want to take a complete prohibition position on everything that may be used for harm, it ultimately comes down to making sure that the police have sufficient resources (and, crucially, policies, training and discipline) to catch people who cause harm whether with GHB, a knife, or good plain old-fashioned coercion - of course it should go without saying this also includes wider societal changes to support victims and ensure they come forward, and ultimately that people no longer even have the inclination to do harm. Futzing around with dyes or test kits is Centrist Rally territory IMO.
I think what made this case such a big deal was that the perpetrator was able to continue for so long and that people (even the survivors) didn't even know what was happening. Drugs that completely interfere with memory will always be in a strange place in a judicial system that relies heavily on testimony (and a human experience that relies heavily on memory), and I guess it was inadvertently very considerate of him to keep mobile videos and stolen photographic ID cards as trophies.

That makes it a bit different to the other things in that it's pretty hard to be stabby guy who goes around stabbing over 100 people with knives for too long in the 21st century, most people get caught after the first couple. Maybe the closest thing is the people that abuse hundreds of children and everybody suspects but blanks it out, but again the solutions are different there.

But using gels or dispensers or capsules to reduce the risk of abuse of medicines is like half of pharmaceutical design (the other half being covering the packaging in red arrows so that people pay 8x as much for the same thing), so I don't think "make GHB legal but mandate that it's sold in a certain form that maximizes fun and minimizes offensive use" is centrism, because it'd first mean accepting that 'fun' is an acceptable use of chemicals other than nicotine and ethanol, so that would be a huge change in how we talk about drugs for starters.

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

goddamnedtwisto posted:

What I'm saying is that decriminalising/legalising GHB doesn't require us to come up with whole new frameworks, we already have a framework in place (although it does illustrate why I've always preferred full legalisation to decriminalisation but that's besides the point I'm making).

Unless you want to take a complete prohibition position on everything that may be used for harm, it ultimately comes down to making sure that the police have sufficient resources (and, crucially, policies, training and discipline) to catch people who cause harm whether with GHB, a knife, or good plain old-fashioned coercion - of course it should go without saying this also includes wider societal changes to support victims and ensure they come forward, and ultimately that people no longer even have the inclination to do harm. Futzing around with dyes or test kits is Centrist Rally territory IMO.

ok, I think where we’re talking at cross purposes is that you see the suggestion as a whole new framework, but I didn't.
for example methylated spirits sold on the high st already has dye and foul flavours added for safety. so it’s not a totally novel concept.

and I totally agree with your last point. dyes, purchase restriction, etc make it harder for someone to set out to cause harm but are no substitute for fixing whatever hosed up poo poo in society makes them want to do it or think they can get away with it in the first place. it shouldn’t be an either/or choice when we can do both.

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT


*prospero beeps its last as a billion elon musk trash satellites rain against it*

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


RLB has formally announced her candidacy for leadership, and this article is fire -

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/01/rebecca-long-bailey-labour-leadership-socialism

Choice quotes -

quote:

For some, there will be a temptation to compromise on our anti-racist and internationalist principles. Let me be clear: as leader I will never throw migrants or BAME communities under the bus. Never again will our party put ‘controls on immigration’ on a mug. It would be a betrayal of our principles, and of our core supporters and activists. We must defeat Johnson and the nationalist right, never pander to them.

quote:

We’ve also, at times, been too close to the establishment we are meant to be taking on – whether cosying up to Rupert Murdoch, joining forces with David Cameron in the Better Together campaign in 2014 or turning our focus inwards on parliamentary manoeuvring for the last year.

KOGAHAZAN!!
Apr 29, 2013

a miserable failure as a person

an incredible success as a magical murder spider

Yvonmukluk posted:

Well, our Branch CLP had its AGM, and we were going to wind it down, since most of the exec were stepping down due to other commitments and the fact we'd hardly ever been quorate. But it turns out that today, we were quorate. And that's how I became the new chair.

Now I just need to figure out what to do next.

Gratz! Or, well, condolences. That’s not an easy job.

(I am now imagining Lottie in charge of a CLP :allears:)

I’d suggest going all in on community outreach, try to embed yourselves into as many local organisations as possible, identify local causes, muster members to pitch in en masse at pinch points.

My take away from this election is that an air strategy just absolutely will not ever work, and neither will any approach where the party comes to the electorate as this outside, alien force looking to barter for votes. I think you need to make the party synonymous with whatever people care about in your neck of the woods.

But if you figure out a better approach, let me know.

KOGAHAZAN!!
Apr 29, 2013

a miserable failure as a person

an incredible success as a magical murder spider

mehall posted:

RLB has formally announced her candidacy for leadership, and this article is fire -

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/01/rebecca-long-bailey-labour-leadership-socialism

Choice quotes -

NOW THAT’S MORE loving LIKE IT

Christ, I’ve been looking at these leadership pitches in despair, thinking we were back to 2010.

njsykora
Jan 23, 2012

Robots confuse squirrels.


Lavery's being smart it seems. The party left might end up actually getting behind a single candidate.
https://twitter.com/benglaze/status/1214317953509969926

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It would certainly be nice to have the left more unified afterwards too, we don't really have enough of them to really throw them away in leadership fights.

Purple Prince
Aug 20, 2011

On drug chat, I've been reading about the opium wars.

The UK got a ton of Chinese people hooked on opium then declared war when the Qing government had the temerity to try to stop us pushing drugs on them.

And now our drug policy is one of the more draconian in the West.

Just... what ?

WhatEvil
Jun 6, 2004

Can't get no luck.


Ha thanks.

Dom Joly is a right loving twat.


Anyway, in other news:

Lavery has just declared he's not running for leader, instead supporting RLB:

https://twitter.com/IanLaveryMP/status/1214322453436088321?s=20

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

baka kaba posted:

*prospero beeps its last as a billion elon musk trash satellites rain against it*

Prospero's safely above all of Musk's bullshit at least, but atmospheric drag, even at that altitude, will eventually do for her.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Purple Prince posted:

On drug chat, I've been reading about the opium wars.

The UK got a ton of Chinese people hooked on opium then declared war when the Qing government had the temerity to try to stop us pushing drugs on them.

And now our drug policy is one of the more draconian in the West.

Just... what ?

It makes perfect sense if you view it through the lens of the UK being an oligarchy and both policies being useful to the rulers at the time.

jaete
Jun 21, 2009


Nap Ghost

mehall posted:

RLB has formally announced her candidacy for leadership, and this article is fire -

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/01/rebecca-long-bailey-labour-leadership-socialism

Darn yeah that's powerfully written

RLB seems proper

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Purple Prince posted:

On drug chat, I've been reading about the opium wars.

The UK got a ton of Chinese people hooked on opium then declared war when the Qing government had the temerity to try to stop us pushing drugs on them.

And now our drug policy is one of the more draconian in the West.

Just... what ?

Oh you're missing the best bit. The reason we got them hooked on opium was literally all of our silver was being spent on tea from China, and China refused to import anything from us to allow us to get the silver back. So we muscled all of the local opium growers and smugglers out of the trade and flooded the black market with cheap, industrially-produced, opium. Quite a few people point to the Opium Wars as the reason why China has, since the 1970s, been so careful to buy up enough US bonds to prevent a significant trade imbalance to occur (something that has massively insulated the American economy from the consequences of its own stupidity for years), and a few others - well my mate Kev - reckon that all those fun research chemicals are their payback.

Oh and when I say "we", I actually mean the East India Company, a corporation powerful enough to not only basically own the entire Indian subcontinent it also had it's own army and navy, both of which were considerably larger than the actual British forces, and whose ownership of the national debt gave them basically completely free reign to do whatever they wanted (from hooking an entire nation on opium to assessing their own customs duties on imports), just in case you thought there was anything new under the sun.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
RLB's officially in with a good article, and Lavery swallowed his pride, dropped out, and endorsed her. Seems like the best-case scenario right there, and makes the leadership vote really easy.

Apraxin
Feb 22, 2006

General-Admiral
In amongst the endorsement of 'the limits of liberalism' and declaring friendship with an anti-semite:
https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/1214289860623777798
I wonder which bit No.10 is mad at him for?

Flipswitch
Mar 30, 2010



This is a really lovely read. If you haven't read it, please do.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Purple Prince posted:

On drug chat, I've been reading about the opium wars.

The UK got a ton of Chinese people hooked on opium then declared war when the Qing government had the temerity to try to stop us pushing drugs on them.

And now our drug policy is one of the more draconian in the West.

Just... what ?
Funnily enough there was a series of 'Opium Debates' in China just before the war between legalizers who claimed the real issues with opium were organized crime and the silver drain that was ruining the economy and that legalizing opium and taxing it would generate huge revenues, and the moralists who claimed that disregard for the law was no reason to repeal it and that legalization would result in everyone smoking erry day.

The later faction won mostly because of splitters from another faction and the Emperor dismissed all of the former and appointed Lin Tseh-Sen to be a giant dickweed and have bunch of people killed and set a bunch of stuff in international bonded warehouses on fire, providing the casus belli for Britain.

Then in the aftermath of the war, after Britain enforced legalization, it turned out that consumption didn't increase and that the actual cause of the silver drain was army corruption and a weakened regional bureaucracy, and opium was just a convenient scapegoat.

Then Britain kept opium illegal domestically anyway, because learning from things is for foreigners.

Then the entire of the Fens ignored Britain anyway, because malaria.

Plus ça change.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
Lowtax killed FYAD :toot:

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

^^^ saves me a job lol

ok it's good to see RLB isn't pulling any punches, plus she sounds way more up for a fight than Jeremy. Probably gonna be a huge backlash now but she's already not giving a gently caress

somebody tell dude from Novara that Salford rhymes with Walford

goddamnedtwisto posted:

Prospero's safely above all of Musk's bullshit at least, but atmospheric drag, even at that altitude, will eventually do for her.

it would be cool if someone could crack the codes before then, unless the fools did something like actual good security

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Rarity posted:

Lowtax killed FYAD :toot:

Never got the place tbh given I only really post here and games.

Endjinneer
Aug 17, 2005
Fallen Rib

Guavanaut posted:

But using gels or dispensers or capsules to reduce the risk of abuse of medicines is like half of pharmaceutical design (the other half being covering the packaging in red arrows so that people pay 8x as much for the same thing)

He said nothing: Merely knelt beneath the machine as it whirred and ejected the gel onto his outstretched tongue, like hand sanitiser. A very gross tableau. I wondered what would happen if some Kingston Trio/young stockbroker type might wander in and catch us in the act. gently caress him, I thought. With a bit of luck, it’ll ruin his life – forever thinking that just behind some narrow door in all his favorite bars, men in red Pendleton shirts are getting incredible kicks from things he’ll never know. Would he dare to suck the teat? Probably not. Play it safe. Pretend you never saw it. …

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


OwlFancier posted:

Never got the place tbh given I only really post here and games.

Post in Rowdy Ring Sports. It's good.

njsykora posted:

Lavery's being smart it seems. The party left might end up actually getting behind a single candidate.
https://twitter.com/benglaze/status/1214317953509969926

Someone tell me how that Rachel Swindon character has taken this news because just today she was raving about RLB being a stooge of Jon Lansman.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
Pretty sure all Lavery's doing the last week or so has been maneuvering himself to get a decent Cabinet gig out of RLB and I can't really see any problems with that outcome

OwlFancier posted:

Never got the place tbh given I only really post here and games.

There was nothing there to get

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

forkboy84 posted:

Post in Rowdy Ring Sports. It's good.

My name is scoopsgal and I approve this message :hai:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

goddamnedtwisto posted:

Oh you're missing the best bit.
The best best bit is that the entirety of the Opium Wars need never have happened if Palmerston had known the first loving thing about Imperial court politics and figured out how to back off slightly until he could bypass Lin and appeal directly to the legalizer faction.

It wouldn't have been easy, it would have required study and intrigue in an unwelcoming environment, but instead he considered himself adequately knowledgable of 'the East' due to his experience in the Mediterranean, because of course he did, and promptly tripped over his own dick.

Smeef
Aug 15, 2003

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!



Pillbug
Are there any rumors on what's going to happen with DFID? After the election there were some articles suggesting it would be merged into FCO, but I haven't seen anything since then.

RockyB
Mar 8, 2007


Dog Therapy: Shockingly Good

Purple Prince posted:

On drug chat, I've been reading about the opium wars.

The UK got a ton of Chinese people hooked on opium then declared war when the Qing government had the temerity to try to stop us pushing drugs on them.

And now our drug policy is one of the more draconian in the West.

Just... what ?

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 had diverse political, economic, military, religious and social causes.

An uprising in several sepoy companies of the Bengal army was sparked by the issue of new gunpowder cartridges for the Enfield rifle February, 1857. The cartridges were made from cow and pig fat. Loading the Enfield required tearing open the greased cartridge with one's teeth. This purposely insulted both Hindu and Muslim religious practices; cows were considered holy by Hindus, while pigs were considered unclean by Muslims. Underlying grievances over British taxation and recent land annexations by the BEIC were ignited by the sepoy mutineers, and within weeks, dozens of units of the Indian army joined peasant armies in widespread rebellion. This is the main cause of revolt (The religious provocation) for both Muslim and Hindu, who were seeing their power steadily eroded by the East India Company, also rebelled against British rule. Another important source of discontent among the Indian rulers was that the British policies of conquest had created unrest among many Indian rulers. The policies like the doctrine of lapse, Subsidiary Alliance deprived Indian rulers of their power. One of the main reasons for the revolt was that the British east India company also started meddling with India’s political and financial system. So the people of India broke out for revolt in 1857.

After the rebellion, there was rumour in Britain that Russia was responsible

1800s Britain was a loving trash fire. The more things change...


E: Wouldn't mind getting my hands on a bit of Laudanum tho.
EE: In honour of the Brexiting, maybe I should go read the Aubrey/Maturin novels again to really get into the Laudanum soaked pre-boomer mindspace.

RockyB fucked around with this message at 01:09 on Jan 7, 2020

mehall
Aug 27, 2010


Smeef posted:

Are there any rumors on what's going to happen with DFID? After the election there were some articles suggesting it would be merged into FCO, but I haven't seen anything since then.

DEFRA, the Environment Agency, and Natural England were all merged years ago, and let me tell you they're only getting round to integrating systems now, and have barely started on processes.

They won't announce the merger until they've done sufficient groundwork with the top level civil servants on where they want to take the merged department.

Coohoolin
Aug 5, 2012

Oor Coohoolie.

mehall posted:

RLB has formally announced her candidacy for leadership, and this article is fire -

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/01/rebecca-long-bailey-labour-leadership-socialism

Choice quotes -

Holy poo poo that's the first time I've seen a prominent labour figure acknowledge Better Together was a mistake. Good stuff RLB.

The Question IRL
Jun 8, 2013

Only two contestants left! Here is Doom's chance for revenge...

Guavanaut posted:

I think what made this case such a big deal was that the perpetrator was able to continue for so long and that people (even the survivors) didn't even know what was happening. Drugs that completely interfere with memory will always be in a strange place in a judicial system that relies heavily on testimony (and a human experience that relies heavily on memory), and I guess it was inadvertently very considerate of him to keep mobile videos and stolen photographic ID cards as trophies.


At the risk of sounding disrespectful towards the victims, to me they are the bigger part of this story than Sinaga's use of drugs.

I've read and listened to a lot of true crime podcasts and stories. And as part of my job, I have had a ton of experience with crime and the victims of crime.

What Sinaga did is very much straight out of the play book of all serial rapists. (In fact I wouldn't be at all surprised if he read about them.)
The difference was his targets all seemed to be non sex worker men.
His approach (go to an isolated man. Offer assistance, bring him to back to his home.) These are all things that women have been warned to avoid all their lives. But men don't get that advice.
Even the described aftermath of the crimes are one that women would end up reporting/being suspicious of (since it's a huge fear for all women.)
With Sinaga, he picked a group that wouldn't recognize the signs of what had happened. (This is borne out by how many never knew they had been the victims of crime until they were told by the authorities.)

Even taking into account his use of G (which rapists have been using on women and men since the 90's and much earlier with other substances. ) had he been targeting women, I think he would have been detected much sooner.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Smeef
Aug 15, 2003

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!



Pillbug

mehall posted:

DEFRA, the Environment Agency, and Natural England were all merged years ago, and let me tell you they're only getting round to integrating systems now, and have barely started on processes.

They won't announce the merger until they've done sufficient groundwork with the top level civil servants on where they want to take the merged department.

Have they continued operating business as usual in the meantime, or did it just quickly devolve?

Any idea what's likely to happen with foreign aid budgets and commitments?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply