Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
djssniper
Jan 10, 2003


pro starcraft loser posted:

Sounds easier to just put him on a flight to Toronto.

Can't have your own people doing the dirty work

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

Fojar38 posted:

Oh you don't say? Maybe the blame for the result of pulling the trigger should be placed on the people who pulled the trigger perhaps?

Hmm, perhaps so. But the people who pulled the trigger are some officers in an AA nest in the Iranian countryside who hosed up, whereas you're content to simply say "Iran" as if Rouhani said "yeah gently caress those Canadians" and ordered the plane downed.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
The key to negligently killing civilians is to do it in smaller batches for years and years on end. Not one big oopsie.

eighty-four merc
Dec 22, 2010


In 2020, we're going to make the end of Fight Club real.

Fojar38 posted:

If Iran's pride didn't dictate that it respond to the death of Soleimani with ineffective missile strikes that could have provoked a response, hence necessitating hair trigger AA batteries, those people would also likely be alive.

So what you're saying is

Fojar38 posted:

Nothing in that post is factually incorrect.

?

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
Fojar literally doesn't believe that Iran is a sovereign nation, which means the US is justified in assassinating its SecDef while Iran is not justified in responding.

Kawasaki Nun
Jul 16, 2001

by Reene
Holy poo poo this derail is immensely stupid, as is all the personal sniping. It's incredibly ghoulish for everyone involved to use the death of these civilians to take aim at their posting rivals. Get a grip

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

OctaMurk posted:

If the United States hubris didnt dictate that it bomb a foreign war hero that could have provoked a response, those people would also likely be alive.

We could play this game all the way back to 1953 and before, what is the point you're trying to make? War is complicated?

Why stop in 53!

Surely the invasion in 41 and subsequent removal of the shah to be replaced by his more easily controllable son by the combined Anglo-Soviet forces had a major impact?

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.

OctaMurk posted:

Hmm, perhaps so. But the people who pulled the trigger are some officers in an AA nest in the Iranian countryside who hosed up, whereas you're content to simply say "Iran" as if Rouhani said "yeah gently caress those Canadians" and ordered the plane downed.

Responsibility rests with everyone within a chain of command when soldiers kill civilians because they made a whoopsie. Incredible that the Iranians are shooting pinpoint missiles with terrifying accuracy to avoid any injury but can't get their aerial monitoring right and killed volumes of non combatants.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

freeasinbeer posted:

Why stop in 53!

Surely the invasion in 41 and subsequent removal of the shah to be replaced by his more easily controllable son by the combined Anglo-Soviet forces had a major impact?

Hadrian should never have given up Mesopotamia! Trajan's legionaries should not have died in vain!

Berke Negri
Feb 15, 2012

Les Ricains tuent et moi je mue
Mao Mao
Les fous sont rois et moi je bois
Mao Mao
Les bombes tonnent et moi je sonne
Mao Mao
Les bebes fuient et moi je fuis
Mao Mao


when the poster is right, they're right

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)

Did they explain to the Times why they were outside at night, already filming in the exact direction of a plane being shot down and didn't seem to react at all?

VoltairePunk
Dec 26, 2012

I have become Umlaut, destroyer of words

WhiskeyWhiskers posted:

Did they explain to the Times why they were outside at night, already filming in the exact direction of a plane being shot down and didn't seem to react at all?

Probable combination of a guy having a smoke (or at least some smoke can be seen while exhaling, might be just vapor), heard the missile being fired (there's a military base just a few km away) and there you go.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

Karmalis posted:

Probable combination of a guy having a smoke (or at least some smoke can be seen while exhaling, might be just vapor), heard the missile being fired (there's a military base just a few km away) and there you go.

The BBC and US press reported satellite detections of two AA missile launches, so after the first one went up I think a lot of people would pull out their phones and keep filming, especially as AA missiles would be fired in short succession.

I don't know why someone would expect someone to react, while by themselves at 6am, to seeing an explosion in the sky. They're not going to yell "oh gently caress" in Farsi. I remember with videos of the Chelyabinsk meteor striking Russia a few years ago, with tons of dashcam videos with audio, and like none of them had any reaction from the drivers, and that was a way larger explosion.

Also there are like 10 million people in the Tehran area, of which probably at least a few hundred thousand are within adequate filming distance of the AA strike, it would seem pretty unlikely if there was no one up and outside at 6:15 am (i.e. perfect time to start going to work to get to downtown Tehran to beat morning rush hour), and that none of them would bother using their cell phone to film weird things going on in the sky.


E: Chelyabinsk video compilation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpmXyJrs7iU . Nearly all the videos have audio, but notice the utter lack of reactions from anyone driving by to seeing a giant burning light streaking across the sky. People don't tend to react until they hear the explosion (or obviously, feel, if they're close enough).

Saladman fucked around with this message at 09:11 on Jan 10, 2020

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

RandomBlue posted:

If we hadn't assassinated an Iranian general those people would likely be alive.

If Soleimani had converted to Buddhism and moved to Madagaskar then we would have had a very boring week.

WorldsStongestNerd
Apr 28, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

Fojar38 posted:

If Iran's pride didn't dictate that it respond to the death of Soleimani with ineffective missile strikes that could have provoked a response, hence necessitating hair trigger AA batteries, those people would also likely be alive.

It's not a pride thing. Iran has to show there are consequences for what the US did or else America will keep pressing. Showing weakness could legit result in senior officials getting killed or sites in Iran getting bombed.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

WorldsStongestNerd posted:

It's not a pride thing. Iran has to show there are consequences for what the US did or else America will keep pressing. Showing weakness could legit result in senior officials getting killed or sites in Iran getting bombed.

Thank goodness for strong ayatollah and his peace missiles :swoon:

VoltairePunk
Dec 26, 2012

I have become Umlaut, destroyer of words

Saladman posted:

The US press reported satellite detections of multiple AA missile launches (3?), so after the first one went up I think a lot of people would pull out their phones and keep filming, especially as AA missiles would be fired in short succession.

I don't know why someone would expect someone to react, while by themselves at 6am, to seeing an explosion in the sky. They're not going to yell "oh gently caress" in Farsi. I remember with videos of the Chelyabinsk meteor striking Russia a few years ago, with tons of dashcam videos with audio, and like none of them had any reaction from the drivers, and that was a way larger explosion.

Also there are like 10 million people in the Tehran area, of which probably at least a few hundred thousand are within adequate filming distance of the AA strike, it would seem pretty unlikely if there was no one up and outside at 6:15 am (i.e. perfect time to start going to work to get to downtown Tehran to beat morning rush hour), and that none of them would bother using their cell phone to film weird things going on in the sky.


E: Chelyabinsk video compilation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpmXyJrs7iU . Nearly all the videos have audio, but notice the utter lack of reactions from anyone driving by to seeing a giant burning light streaking across the sky. People don't tend to react until they hear the explosion (or obviously, feel, if they're close enough).

I think you might be making the mistake by viewing at Iran as if it was a free, civilized, western country. It's not. I bet there's more videos, but it's not that easy to "share information" when you're in Iran. I'm pretty sure that soon enough, we will start to see more videos emerging. With the missile or without.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

Karmalis posted:

I think you might be making the mistake by viewing at Iran as if it was a free civilized western country. It's not. I bet there's more videos, but it's not that easy to "share information" when you're in Iran. I'm pretty sure that soon enough, we will start to see more videos emerging. With the missile or without.

Eh? What are you quoting? I never said it was easy to share videos. I was agreeing with you and responding to WhiskeyWhiskers, so not sure what you’re responding to. I imagine there are more videos that will come out, but they’re not ones I’d personally want to upload to LiveLeak or whatever if I were living in Iran, since it goes against the official story. I’d be scared as hell to share that video. I wasn’t expecting tons of dashcam videos since that seems to be a Russian cultural exclusive, but rather the Russia video was to counteract the claim that the video is false because the guy filming isn’t screaming "oh gently caress oh gently caress oh gently caress" or whatever the other poster thought is an appropriate response.

Saladman fucked around with this message at 09:17 on Jan 10, 2020

Sharkie
Feb 4, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Nenonen posted:

If Soleimani had converted to Buddhism and moved to Madagaskar then we would have had a very boring week.

If you call someone and tell them their child has been shot and is about to die, and they drive too fast on the way to where you told them their kid is at, and get into an accident, you're *at least* partially at fault. It's not good to speed but you're the one that precipitated the entire series of events that led to the accident. If you ponder this you may begin to understand why America is at fault :)

Nenonen posted:

Thank goodness for strong ayatollah and his peace missiles :swoon:

Heck yeah! It would be a horrific tragedy if America did to Iran what it did to Iraq

Sharkie
Feb 4, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Nenonen posted:

If Soleimani had converted to Buddhism and moved to Madagaskar then we would have had a very boring week.

Also this sounds like some poo poo the Joker would tell Batman to justify crushing Robin's skull with a crowbar

"Ahahaha, should have taken a vacation, Bats!"

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

WorldsStongestNerd posted:

It's not a pride thing. Iran has to show there are consequences for what the US did or else America will keep pressing. Showing weakness could legit result in senior officials getting killed or sites in Iran getting bombed.

If this was their goal then they completely and utterly failed considering their response was a wet fart that actively resulted in them self-owning by shooting down a civilian airliner.

It was absolutely a pride thing. The goal wasn't to deter the US, it was to maintain a strong image to the Iranian public, who if you recall were actively protesting against the regime en masse two months ago. This is why immediately after the strikes Iranian state media switched tack to "dozens of American dead and hundreds of injuries; American bases in flames!"

A secondary goal may have been to intimidate the Iraqis into forcing the US out, but apparently nobody told the Ayatollah that attacking someone is generally a poor way to get them to drop their military alliance with the world's sole superpower.

And of course, all you need to do is switch around a few proper nouns and your post becomes justification for the US taking out Soleimani, or in fact retaliating against Iran's retaliation if they wanted to. It'd be just as lovely in that context.

Fojar38 fucked around with this message at 09:44 on Jan 10, 2020

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

i doubt that weird psychoanalysis of shooting down this jet is at all fruitful. at the moment we cannot even be certain that it *was* shot down (though it seems very likely), and if it was it almost certainly was not a policy decision beyond iranian air defence being overly trigger-happy, which is certainly not an unreasonable posture in a situation of elevated tension - which was created pretty unilaterally by the USA in this instance

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Nenonen posted:

If Soleimani had converted to Buddhism and moved to Madagaskar then we would have had a very boring week.

Iran is on America's crosshair because it has large oil and gas reserve, and try to sell them outside of the petrodollar system, not because of its religion.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Sharkie posted:

If you call someone and tell them their child has been shot and is about to die, and they drive too fast on the way to where you told them their kid is at, and get into an accident, you're *at least* partially at fault. It's not good to speed but you're the one that precipitated the entire series of events that led to the accident. If you ponder this you may begin to understand why America is at fault :)

Are you comparing Iran's government and military to a panicked parent? If they acted at that level of rationality then Iran definitely should be demilitarized.

I really don't understand why you are trying so hard to absolve the people who shot down an airliner from their responsibility. Do you also feel that someone other than United States was ultimately responsible for US Navy shooting down Iran Air 655? In my mind you are always responsible for your own actions, especially when you are operating loving surface to air missiles near international flight routes.

VoltairePunk
Dec 26, 2012

I have become Umlaut, destroyer of words

Saladman posted:

Eh? What are you quoting? I never said it was easy to share videos. I was agreeing with you and responding to WhiskeyWhiskers, so not sure what you’re responding to. I imagine there are more videos that will come out, but they’re not ones I’d personally want to upload to LiveLeak or whatever if I were living in Iran, since it goes against the official story. I’d be scared as hell to share that video. I wasn’t expecting tons of dashcam videos since that seems to be a Russian cultural exclusive, but rather the Russia video was to counteract the claim that the video is false because the guy filming isn’t screaming "oh gently caress oh gently caress oh gently caress" or whatever the other poster thought is an appropriate response.

Hm, I possibly misunderstood your post. Cheers for clarifying.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

In other news.

https://twitter.com/rengels11/status/1215568844930109440

Mercrom
Jul 17, 2009

Nenonen posted:

Are you comparing Iran's government and military to a panicked parent? If they acted at that level of rationality then Iran definitely should be demilitarized.
thats a great argument to make against americas enemies. any of your soldiers afraid the big orange man is gonna wake up one day and order a b52 to drop a nuke on their home? if so, you are truly an uncivilized culture

Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost
The question now, more than what led that AA group to launch the missiles, is why air traffic was still allowed in the area given the dispersal of AA units (with their own individual radars not linked to anything larger), the known threat and heightened tension.

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Mozi posted:

The question now, more than what led that AA group to launch the missiles, is why air traffic was still allowed in the area given the dispersal of AA units (with their own individual radars not linked to anything larger), the known threat and heightened tension.

Poor co-ordination between military and civilian ATC is quite believable.

If the Iranian government expected no escalation from the USA, then they might not shut down their own airspace. Which as far as I can tell, was a valid assumption - I don't see any reports the US had air assets anywhere NEAR Tehran in the hours after the Iranian missile salvo. Maybe they saw no response was coming after some hours and made a decision not to close it, maybe they never intended to close it... I agree it would have been *entirely* prudent to pause flight activity.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

https://twitter.com/RealAlexRubi/status/1215465616649392128

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Fojar38 posted:

Oh you don't say? Maybe the blame for the result of pulling the trigger should be placed on the people who pulled the trigger perhaps?

I, too, am incapable of comprehending any case where multiple parties could be liable for an event.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

This is from a 2018 Jane's article

quote:

Air defence is one of the primary pillars of Iranian military strategy, yet until recently Iran’s air defence units had a reputation for aggression as opposed to effectiveness. In 2012 the New York Times cited a classified US intelligence report stating that the Iranians were so anxious about Israeli airstrikes on their nuclear facilities during 2007–08 that they mistakenly fired on civilian aircraft, as well as an Iranian air force F-14 fighter. One incident involved a Tor-M1 mobile surface-to-air missile (SAM) system firing on an airliner in June 2007. The report noted that Iranian communications and training were so poor that “misidentification of aircraft will continue”.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

More confirmation the site is bulldozed

https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1215633920961785862

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
Also recall that last year or maybe 2018, Syrian air defenses, already engaged in defending against an Israeli air strike, mistakenly shot down a Russian IL-20 Coot reconnaissance aircraft, killing something like 20 people.

Herostratus
May 1, 2013
It is fairly impressive that the syrians managed not to shoot down any civilian airliners with the amount of AA missiles they've fired at israeli planes over the last few years. Though they did accudentally shot down a large russian military plane and at one point accifentally hit the island of cyprus.

Edit: beaten

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
Syrians did bag an F-16I, though.

Herostratus
May 1, 2013
Yes, with an ancient s-200 system too. Got to hand it to them.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Footage from the crash site confirms it's been completely cleared of wreckage

https://twitter.com/RuptlyVU/status/1215655709603442688

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
Iran: "Oh yeah? Where's your evidence it was a missile???" *quickly removes all possible evidence of a missile*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

Footage from the ground confirms the geolocation we did of the video that showed the apparent missile strike:

https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1215660228391460864
https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1215661629842608129

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply