|
You don't need to deny that women have agency in order to scrutinize the beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes of the individuals they may be interested in. I know little-to-nothing about Braff but given how weird and gross older men are about young women, on first glance it doesn't look good.
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:26 |
|
|
In 2006 an episode of Scrubs has JD date Mandy Moore, a younger woman. All if his friends give him poo poo over it. She was 23.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:17
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/glinner/status/1215610131695751168?s=12 "Bisexuals are just attention seeking", but for the zoomer age.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:20
|
|
luxury handset posted:the replies to that tweet getting hung up about three year age differences are extremely not getting the joke This is the truest thing I've seen related to this.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:28
|
|
|
Regarde Aduck posted:She is an adult and can date who she likes. There might be an argument to be made that you shouldn't make the first move in that situation. But 23 year old's definitely have agency. yeah, but, she's not the one people are pointing at as being a creepster
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:29
|
|
|
TinTower posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/glinner/status/1215610131695751168?s=12 Not content to be the bane of every trans person, the eye of Glinner now turns to the rest of the LGBT community.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:38
|
|
|
Hihohe posted:Unless it's under the legal age limit or theres signs of grooming, y'all should just mind your own drat loveless lives.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:38
|
|
|
Jesus, that last panel is pretty much just a direct quote
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:47
|
|
|
I wouldn’t date someone who is 23 not necessarily because that is a lot younger than me, but also because there is no way in hell that person is in the same developmental point in their life as I am and I cannot see how our lives would be congruent in any way other than superficial or physical.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:50
|
|
|
Hihohe posted:Unless it's under the legal age limit or theres signs of grooming, y'all should just mind your own drat loveless lives. But these two legal adults are in a relationship with an age gap!
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 00:50
|
|
|
23 year olds are insufferable. Zach Braff is pretty annoying too, so at least they have that in common.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:02
|
|
|
Clerical Terrors posted:Not content to be the bane of every trans person, the eye of Glinner now turns to the rest of the LGBT community. He got dragged by a Disney+ parody account yesterday https://twitter.com/getdisneyprime/status/1216557801117491205?s=21 https://twitter.com/getdisneyprime/status/1216541807984640000?s=21 https://twitter.com/getdisneyprime/status/1216552673723502592?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:08
|
|
|
Krispy Wafer posted:23 year olds are insufferable. “Nobody likes you when you’re 23.” - blink182
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:18
|
|
|
A 21 year age gap speaks to a wide gulf in life experience between people. A 44 year old is, and should be, in a different place in his life than a 23 year old. If two people are dating with that big an age gap, then either: 1. They are somehow in the same place in their life despite their age difference and can make it work, or 2. The older individual is taking advantage of the younger, either through increased money, increased life experience, or increased influence, and it's an inherently imbalanced relationship, even if the younger is not aware of the power imbalance between them and believes they are making a free choice. Option 1 is not impossible. It happens. Someone's unusually mature or unusually immature, and things can work, more power to them. But option 2 is much more common, and can also be a highly gendered situation as men typically hold more economic and social power than women their own age, much less women young enough to be their daughter. We're also in an era where having a significant amount of power over your spouse is considered inappropriate and weird, which I at least think is a good change. So yeah, it raises eyebrows, and for a good reason. Also, no one should date twenty-year-olds other than other twenty-year-olds. Have you met one? Do you remember how dumb you were in your early twenties? Yikes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:18
|
|
|
RoboRodent posted:Have you met one? Do you remember how dumb you were in your early twenties? Yikes. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:21
|
|
|
RoboRodent posted:1. They are somehow in the same place in their life despite their age difference and can make it work, or A couple, uh, couples I know are in that situation and they've both been together for the better part of a decade so I'm honestly not quite sure where things shake out along those lines. Apparently it can work, but I just get a real  feeling every time I think about the dynamics where the guy has children the same age or older than the woman he's marrying.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:22
|
|
|
RoboRodent posted:A 21 year age gap speaks to a wide gulf in life experience between people. A 44 year old is, and should be, in a different place in his life than a 23 year old. If two people are dating with that big an age gap, then either: Whilst I can appreciate this, most marriages are between people no more than 6 years apart and divorce is at an all time high. Ergo, the larger the difference in age the more likely the relationship will last
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:33
|
|
|
oldpainless posted:Whilst I can appreciate this, most marriages are between people no more than 6 years apart and divorce is at an all time high. Ergo, the larger the difference in age the more likely the relationship will last What are you comparing to? Marriages of antiquity, where divorce was hard or impossible to get? Do you think it's easier or harder to get a divorce if your spouse is wealthier and more influential than you are? Edit: Actually, full confession, I'm in a class right now (Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Literature, if you're curious) and I probably should not let academic debate filter onto Something Awful. This is probably not the right place for this. Sorry. RoboRodent has a new favorite as of 01:41 on Jan 14, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:38
|
|
|
gently caress me lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:39
|
|
|
RoboRodent posted:What are you comparing to? Marriages of antiquity, where divorce was hard or impossible to get? Do you think it's easier or harder to get a divorce if your spouse is wealthier and more influential than you are? More like oldusernameawareless
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:40
|
|
|
I wouldn't even want to meet 23-year-old me I wouldn't want to meet me today either but still
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:41
|
|
|
Captain Hygiene posted:More like oldusernameawareless oh poo poo i'm dumb
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:41
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/michellemalkin/status/1216779905326694400?s=20 In case she deletes it although I doubt she will because she revels in being a piece of human poo poo 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:44
|
|
|
I read through the whole thing, and a) he's flat-out lying here (every trans person he identifies, he either calls a "fraud" or a "con man"), b) he consistently misgenders trans women, and c) he admits to being a lovely comedy writer who literally can't write jokes if trans people are part of the new normal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:51
|
|
|
I don't even get what she's trying to say with those pics. It's just two married people standing next to each other at events.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:52
|
|
|
Scratch Monkey posted:https://twitter.com/michellemalkin/status/1216779905326694400?s=20 Emasculation caused by wearing different clothes and standing next to a woman. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:54
|
|
|
Suits are so emasculating. You're no man unless you wear camo all the time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:56
|
|
|
Jollity Farm posted:Emasculation caused by wearing different clothes and standing next to a woman. Emasculation is caused by close contact with women's microfauna. It's highly contagious.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:56
|
|
|
It's very damaging to traditional masculinity to *checks notes* marry a woman
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:58
|
|
|
True manly men never ever get within 5 feet of a woman. It’s 365/24/7 dudes for real men.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:59
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Suits are so emasculating. You're no man unless you wear camo all the time. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 01:59
|
|
|
Jollity Farm posted:Emasculation caused by wearing different clothes and standing next to a woman. youre not a real man unless you gently caress and are hosed by other men. loving women is gay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpFtnIIWN1s TinTower posted:People are upset a TV show said "maybe climate change bad?" snergle has a new favorite as of 02:37 on Jan 14, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 02:00
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:It's very damaging to traditional masculinity to *checks notes* marry a woman I always wonder about this "traditional masculinity" - its proponents say that it's the key to a healthy and stable society, but they also say that it's destroyed very easily, by marrying an insufficiently feminine woman, or by wearing the wrong clothes, or by a thousand other things that might strike at any time. Doesn't seem to me that it's up to the challenge of providing the essential bedrock of our society if the wrong colour tie can knock it off course.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 02:06
|
|
|
Scratch Monkey posted:https://twitter.com/michellemalkin/status/1216779905326694400?s=20 "Man joins Army, fights in war, survives and is lauded as a noble hero, falls in love with glamorous and attractive woman, marries and starts a family" What is this postmodern Cultural Marxist filth? Where are all our traditional narratives of successful Alpha males? Seriously, what planet do these people live on? I know the answer is racism  Edit: Jollity Farm posted:I always wonder about this "traditional masculinity" - its proponents say that it's the key to a healthy and stable society, but they also say that it's destroyed very easily, by marrying an insufficiently feminine woman, or by wearing the wrong clothes, or by a thousand other things that might strike at any time. Doesn't seem to me that it's up to the challenge of providing the essential bedrock of our society if the wrong colour tie can knock it off course. Exactly. Same goes for 'national identity' or 'culture'. You can cause gammon-brains to melt by saying "If the Great British National Identity can be threatened by a 3% rise in foreign cider sales, then it's clearly not a very strong or worthwhile identity, is it?" BalloonFish has a new favorite as of 02:13 on Jan 14, 2020 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 02:06
|
|
|
look at this fuckin nerd
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 02:31
|
|
|
JT Smiley posted:I don't even get what she's trying to say with those pics. It's just two married people standing next to each other at events.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Guess how this idiot posting on this goes. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DewaynePerkins/status/1216911887910092800
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 04:10
|
|
|
Inceltown posted:Guess how this idiot posting on this goes. Ah yes, grimsby, the number one terrorist target in the world
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 04:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:26 |
|
|
The lack of bullet trains is all that stands between the roiling hellslime of Terrorist London and utter devastation for the rest of Merrie England
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 04:41
|
|