|
numeracy This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| s*x n*mb*r |
|
69 | 0.22% |
| w@@d n_mb_r |
|
420 | 1.34% |
| Jeb! number |
|
538 | 1.72% |
| Biden numbr |
|
30330 | 96.72% |
| Total: | 31357 votes | ||
|
GATOS Y VATOS posted:Another change: Only members of nonviable groups will be allowed to realign. In the past, candidates who had initially hit 15 percent could lose supporters in the realignment. But for this cycle, the initial 15 percent support gets locked in." e: nevermind. They can have 40 rounds of non-viable outcomes until every voter supports a viable or goes home Corky Romanovsky has issued a correction as of 14:43 on Feb 3, 2020 |
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:25 |
|
|
Epic High Five posted:it will never stop being funny to me that Omar knew what a gundam was and was totally on board instantly, but it had to be explained to her teen daughter the kids are alright 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:34
|
|
|
if non-viable voters can congeal behind a single candidate to turn them viable, then it's clear why the DNC made that change: * they assume Bernie has a hardcore base, gets to 20% or whatever, and then they're all locked in * everyone else slums it out in the sub-15% basement because there are too many centrists and shitlibs all trying to draw from the same brain-poisoned base, so all of them are unviable, except they all back a single candidate, which then comes out to a higher total than Bernie's * in the event that one of the non-Bernies does get above 15%, then they become the candidate of choice of course, this is all going to backfire because none of the non-Bernies are going to be able to decide between themselves who should be the single winner also because Bernie's just gonna win outright
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:35
|
|
|
broken clock
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:35
|
|
|
zegermans posted:lol did the Register seriously not release a poll because Buttchug got mad at it They said they just realized they were bad at polling 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:36
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:No, that was definitely all Biden staffers in that article. Because one they don't have enough people to do a real time count and two Biden's chance at a win is in round two so they want to downplay round one. imo biden staffers = dnc
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:37
|
|
|
DNC not realizing that everyone in Yang Gang would vote Bernie after the realignment.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:37
|
|
|
Trump is trying to pied piper sanders lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:37
|
|
|
the julian assange angle, a classic for demanding tastes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:37
|
|
|
It also assumes the others are just gonna go 100% to a non Bernie which they won’t.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:38
|
|
|
ahahahahahahaha JESUS CHRIST
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:38
|
|
|
Is trump double bluffing the pied piper poo poo to get 4d chess obsessed poo poo libs to get suspicious? Many are asking this
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:38
|
|
|
Dean of Swing posted:DNC not realizing that everyone in Yang Gang would vote Bernie after the realignment. And pissing them off with the Bloomberg debate change.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:38
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:if non-viable voters can congeal behind a single candidate to turn them viable, then it's clear why the DNC made that change: Most actual Democratic primary voters don't see this as some grand operation to keep Bernie out of the nomination, he's the most common second choice among both Biden and Warren supporters. It's more likely that the second round would maintain or increase his lead if he ended up in front.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:40
|
|
|
temple posted:broken clock It is so transparent even Neanderthals can do the math.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:40
|
|
|
shut the gently caress up you segregationist
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:40
|
|
|
Can't wait for Biden to lose Iowa and New Hampshire and campaign in South Carolina wearing an Obama mask and insisting it doesn't count as blackface.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:41
|
|
|
happy caucus day
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:42
|
|
|
if bernie comes within 10 points of biden in south carolina he's unstoppable
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:42
|
|
|
I lust for mass lib suicide Pete Buttigieg, do a Bud Dwyer Hail Satan Consume the flesh of Tom Perez
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:44
|
|
|
i can't believe it's here I'm just gonna avoid the news all day, get home at 6, and then enjoy reading the results of bernie's victory
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:44
|
|
|
are there results yet
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:45
|
|
|
zegermans posted:are there results yet we're 10 hours away from it starting
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:45
|
|
|
man thank god trump never hoped into politics before his brain became completely mush. imagine if he had run in 2012
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:45
|
|
|
Stories Thats all any transgressive action is to any bourgeois liberal just stories to be used as weepy inspiration porn Sentimentalized repackaged experiences of the afflicted consumed by the aloof and comfortable so they can simulate feeling something approaching human emotions
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:46
|
|
|
Serf posted:if buttchug and klobb are unviable but high in enough places, their combined support goes to biden, who then surpasses bernie yea, but that would have happened anyway even if this rule wasn't in place. only thing the rule does is prevent the succ from uniting in case there are multiple viable succ candidates, which is a good thing no matter how you look at it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:47
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:man thank god trump never hoped into politics before his brain became completely mush. imagine if he had run in 2012 If Sanders isnt the nominee he is just gonna say it was stolen 24/7 during the general.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:48
|
|
|
Serf posted:we're 10 hours away from it starting yeah but do we have any results yet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:50
|
|
|
anyhow iowa is especially loving dumb because tonight’s caucuses barely have anything to do with the amount of delegates candidates get. this just decides the delegates that go to county caucuses next month who then decide who goes to the state caucus the month after which is where the actual delegates are decided
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:50
|
|
|
Rodatose has issued a correction as of 01:02 on Jul 5, 2020 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:50
|
|
|
Minrad posted:i can't believe it's here Hooray! Hooray! It's caucsmas! *throws spreadsheets in the air*
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:51
|
|
|
TeenageArchipelago posted:yeah but do we have any results yet? The Data Hogs are hungry
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:52
|
|
|
oh wait, cram a district caucus between the county and state caucus god iowa is so dumb
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:52
|
|
|
TeenageArchipelago posted:yeah but do we have any results yet? yeah and its a serious case of Oops! All Bernies
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:53
|
|
|
Nothus posted:I bring you tomorrow's headlines today: Can someone who is not blocked by this Hill Shill ask him why he needed to make a longass Twitter thread to say Bernie is going to win Iowa
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:54
|
|
|
guys I am going to have a nervous breakdown today
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:54
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:anyhow iowa is especially loving dumb because tonight’s caucuses barely have anything to do with the amount of delegates candidates get. this just decides the delegates that go to county caucuses next month who then decide who goes to the state caucus the month after which is where the actual delegates are decided 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:56
|
|
|
gonna be thinking about Iowa all day
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:57
|
|
|
iowa, it’s bad folks
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 09:25 |
|
|
There will be no second round.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 14:59
|
|