|
https://twitter.com/sovietvisuals/status/1188823227629481990
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 19:29 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2020 23:46
|
|
|
I'm hating it
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 00:39
|
|
|
how many people has communism served? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOnIp69r6vg&t=1s
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 00:52
|
|
|
"revisionism!" i scream into my mcflurry
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 03:23
|
|
|
R. Guyovich posted:“Not Trotskyist, eh?” said the small voice. “Are you sure? You could be a neocon, you know, it’s all here in your head, and Trotsky will help you on the way to Fox News punditry, no doubt about that — no? Well, if you’re sure — better be MARCYITE!” lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 03:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/christapeterso/status/1224203556858654721?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 06:50
|
|
|
seize the means of producing mcchickens
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2020 16:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/1224560156182294529?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 07:53
|
|
|
I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 07:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:13
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections Turns out it's a lot easier to take down the master's house without his tools if it's rotting and also on fire
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:19
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections 
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:30
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections All the hype around Sanders' ground game the past couple weeks, and voter turnout didn't really budge if preliminary numbers are correct. https://twitter.com/aseitzwald/status/1224541132631281665?s=19 You can bet it going to take another major hit after this fiasco. On top of that, something similar just happened with Labour over in the UK not even 3 months ago.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 08:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 10:01
|
|
|
bernie panders
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 10:03
|
|
|
freckle posted:La Riva/Peltier 2020
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 10:04
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections Maybe, but you've got a lot of people just saying dig in and on to New Hampshire. Like Sanders can't get totally hosed there too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 10:24
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I think from a revolutionary socialist perspective the Iowa caucus was a big victory for us because it's a not insignificant blow to the perceived legitimacy of US elections idk how this is the huge blow when 2000 already happened
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 14:26
|
|
|
🎵I got hosed🎵 🎶i got hosed🎶 🎵In different area codes🎵 🎶Area codes🎶
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 14:29
|
|
|
Terrorist Fistbump posted:All the hype around Sanders' ground game the past couple weeks, and voter turnout didn't really budge if preliminary numbers are correct. This seems to be true and its very worrying if so; what should be done about it? Is it just electoral politics or is it apathy in general?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 15:39
|
|
|
Terrorist Fistbump posted:All the hype around Sanders' ground game the past couple weeks, and voter turnout didn't really budge if preliminary numbers are correct. Sanders' supporters came out (especially youths), it's the participation of the olds that fell.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 15:53
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:This seems to be true and its very worrying if so; what should be done about it? Is it just electoral politics or is it apathy in general? name two candidates in this primary field a normal well-adjusted person could possibly be excited about supporting
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:03
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:This seems to be true and its very worrying if so; what should be done about it? Is it just electoral politics or is it apathy in general? The point is that it's not merely worrying, if it is worrying at all. The bourgeois electoral system is in crisis due to (at least) 20 years of constant bullshit... #BEB!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:28
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:This seems to be true and its very worrying if so; what should be done about it? Is it just electoral politics or is it apathy in general? IIRC something like 30% of caucus-goers this year had never caucused before, so it's possible for Bernie's theory of voter activation to have been true, even if other demographics sat it out and that's to say nothing of how we don't have full numbers yet (because the IDP hosed up!!!) and how some people were locked-out of being able to attend because of disinformation, shifting caucus locations, and a strict cannot-participate-after-7-PM rule
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:36
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:idk how this is the huge blow when 2000 already happened I didn't say huge. Anyway, I like to think that the erosion of confidence is something that accumulates over time. I think people today in general are a lot more cynical about US electoral politics than before 2000, for instance
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:38
|
|
|
the 2000 election is where a guy won the popular vote, had his ballots thrown away by the republican party and declared the loser and the supreme court agreed with the republicans. This is small scale by comparison.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:45
|
|
|
Peanut President posted:the 2000 election is where a guy won the popular vote, had his ballots thrown away by the republican party and declared the loser and the supreme court agreed with the republicans. This is small scale by comparison. I agree?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:46
|
|
|
Actually, if we look at Buttigeig's numbers: He got 37,667 voters, which was 25% of the total, so the total was 150,668 but that's only 70% of precincts, so extrapolating the full count would give us 215,240 voters total According to AP, 2016 had 170,000 votes
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 16:53
|
|
|
these people don't deserve the guillotine, it's too merciful for them. draw and quarter the fucks
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:05
|
|
|
Percelus posted:these people don't deserve the guillotine, it's too merciful for them. draw and quarter the fucks I understand your bloodlust, but the guilotine isn't about what people deserve, it's about what is best for society. One swift chop, and they're not our problem anymore. Anything more encourages bad instincts, which as socialists we should be principally opposed to structurally and personally
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:08
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Actually, if we look at Buttigeig's numbers: A conservative estimate is about 200k, so it's still better than 2016. Seems like the ground game did make a difference.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:08
|
|
|
Mr. Lobe posted:I understand your bloodlust, but the guilotine isn't about what people deserve, it's about what is best for society. One swift chop, and they're not our problem anymore. Anything more encourages bad instincts, which as socialists we should be principally opposed to structurally and personally tbh i wouldn't support any executions i'm just fired up today i'm fine just stripping them entirely of their wealth and power
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
Percelus posted:tbh i wouldn't support any executions i'm just fired up today Oh. I want the ruling class to lose their heads and die.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:13
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:*spit is flying out of my mouth between clenched teeth, as i punch my right fist into the palm of my left hand*
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:17
|
|
|
I never said I had the power to do so or that I was especially qualified to be their executioner, I just sincerely want them dead.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:19
|
|
|
Dreylad posted:A conservative estimate is about 200k, so it's still better than 2016. Seems like the ground game did make a difference. That's a good sign for the campaign and for the theory of mobilizing dormant or non-voters. It would be better if we were seeing at least 2008 numbers, but after Obama's many, many capitulations, it's understandable that people just aren't going to be that enthusiastic again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 19:29 |
|
|
lucky page 888
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2020 18:00
|
|