numeracy This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
s*x n*mb*r | 69 | 0.22% | |
w@@d n_mb_r | 420 | 1.34% | |
Jeb! number | 538 | 1.72% | |
Biden numbr | 30330 | 96.72% | |
Total: | 31357 votes |
|
Harrow posted:I don't think he's technically qualified yet. correct. he needs 10% in at least one more poll before end of the day tomorrow.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:15 |
|
Harrow posted:I don't think he's technically qualified yet. Yeah he is, they changed the rules specifically to put him on stage.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:58 |
|
freckle posted:do you think bloomberg will show up for the debate? I think he needs one or two more qualifying polls but I'm not sure from which states, considering he isn't on the ballot in NV or SC
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:58 |
Thoguh posted:Yeah he is, they changed the rules specifically to put him on stage. I thought they removed the number of donors rule but not the poll rule?
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:59 |
|
Joementum posted:correct. he needs 10% in at least one more poll before end of the day tomorrow. I hope the multi billionaire gets lucky and one drops soon
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:59 |
|
Thoguh posted:Yeah he is, they changed the rules specifically to put him on stage. He doesn't yet have enough qualifying polls. He probably will but he doesn't yet.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:59 |
|
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/483292-speculation-swirls-around-whether-bloomberg-will-make-las-vegas-debate They changed the individual diner requirement but he still needs another 10% poll
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 19:59 |
|
I guess I stand corrected. Honestly at this point I want him there so that Bernie can tell him to eat poo poo even though I think Chuck Todd's presence makes the entire debate worthless.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:00 |
|
eric ciaramella posted:I hope the multi billionaire gets lucky and one drops soon
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:01 |
|
I look forward to Bernie telling mike he doesnt deserve to be on the debate (he's right)
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:02 |
|
eric ciaramella posted:I hope the multi billionaire gets lucky and one drops soon I hope both drop.....dead!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:02 |
|
Oh god, please let them be so incompetent that they couldn't even change the rules right.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:02 |
|
There's a debate on wednesday but there's also one a week from tomorrow (and then no more until March 15th)
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:05 |
|
is it a good idea from his insidious billionaire campaign's point of view to even put Bloomberg on stage have a feeling it'd be like Biden where the less he talks/publicly appears the better he would poll
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:06 |
|
Random rear end in a top hat posted:Oh my god, Bloomberg hiring all these fucks is going to kneecap his campaign (even more) because they're totally disconnected from reality and have no idea what motivates actual voters. How had I not considered this possibility. Look closer
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:06 |
|
shame on an IGA posted:Look closer Wow. I guess I never considered that some of these people genuinely consider decorum so vital, I assumed it was all a cynical strategy. That makes them even more useless, you can't even pitch to them without them considering it divisive.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:12 |
|
Random rear end in a top hat posted:Oh god, please let them be so incompetent that they couldn't even change the rules right. how hard is it to release a "poll" showing him over 10% - all you have to do is poll 65+ and no one else
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:12 |
Deceptive Thinker posted:how hard is it to release a "poll" showing him over 10% - all you have to do is poll 65+ and no one else it has to be from a certain set of pollsters otherwise we could just commission schnorkles
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:17 |
Deceptive Thinker posted:how hard is it to release a "poll" showing him over 10% - all you have to do is poll 65+ and no one else They limit which pollsters qualify, so Bloomberg can't just directly bribe some fly-by-night pollster, he needs to totally-not-bribe one of the more reputable ones instead.
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:19 |
Azathoth posted:They limit which pollsters qualify, so Bloomberg can't just directly bribe some fly-by-night pollster, he needs to totally-not-bribe one of the more reputable ones instead. excuse me schnorkles is not a fly-by-night poll plane, he isn't IFR certified
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:19 |
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:23 |
|
Hello friends https://mobile.twitter.com/jackallisonLOL/status/1228824479322607616
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:24 |
|
if there is one thing socialists love it’s incrementalism
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:24 |
|
is there a reason to put "not affiliated with Pete's campaign" in their bio or is is just a blatant, pointless lie
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:26 |
|
Bernie Bros 4 Pete!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:26 |
|
incredible
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:27 |
|
Pete, putting the CIA in Socialist!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:30 |
|
Working on my Bloombo impression. https://vocaroo.com/bZj0dQGVprh
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:30 |
Feldegast42 posted:Bloomberg is doing something useful to us though -- every pundit who praises him can be safely ignored and every democrat who endorses him can be safely primaried the mayor of SF who is an ultra succ (succ in disguise for low info types too, because shes young, black, and grew up in the projects, and is even an SF native on top of it) that just barely won the election over the true progressive candidate (who looked succ as an oldish white guy, but was good), endorsed bloomberg. She did it before anyone was taking him seriously at all too. People were expecting warren or biden or buttman. I bet she even would have picked bloomberg over hometown succ candidate Kamala harris, if she got that far. Anyways, in addition to supporting mini mike for those sweet bloomberg bucks she also just admitted to taking bribes from a corrupt city official that just resigned due to an FBI investigation into his corruption. And her idea of damage control was to reveal that she used to date him and actually the money was to fix her car (she gets paid hundreds of thousands as mayor lol) and then she was gonna sell the car to pay him back lol i dont think shes gonna get reelected
|
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:32 |
|
Crusader posted:throw anyone working on the bloomberg campaign into the dumpster forever No the people who are intentionally doing gently caress-all to collect a paycheck are American heroes.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:33 |
|
Holy poo poo. They really are incompetent failsons running these campaigns
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:36 |
|
VR Native American posted:Pete, putting the CIA in Socialist!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:37 |
|
VR Native American posted:Pete, putting the CIA in Socialist!
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:39 |
|
cool, cool https://twitter.com/EEdgelady/status/1229460033236295681?s=20
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:40 |
|
Rah! posted:the mayor of SF who is an ultra succ (succ in disguise for low info types too, because shes young, black, and grew up in the projects, and is even an SF native on top of it) that just barely won the election over the true progressive candidate (who looked succ as an oldish white guy, but was good), endorsed bloomberg. She did it before anyone was taking him seriously at all too. People were expecting warren or biden or buttman. I bet she even would have picked bloomberg over hometown succ candidate Kamala harris, if she got that far. breed sucks so bad. lets not forget she publicly rallied against a proposition that added a meager 0.1% tax on corporate income over like 25 million that was specifically earmarked for homeless services. like how loving bad do you have to be, this was also right after trump tax cuts gave $2 trillion away to the richest shareholders and elite. i hope she loses next time. mark leno should have won but there are too many low-info idpol-addicted yass kween libs who fall for idpol poo poo like that and now shes incumbent, so we'll see
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:46 |
|
baaaaahahahahaha
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:47 |
|
new york tuxedo guys SUCK rear end
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:47 |
|
what in the unbearable gently caress is this
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:48 |
|
Xaris posted:breed sucks so bad. lets not forget she rallied against a proposition that added a meager 0.1% tax on corporate income over like 25 million that was specifically earmarked for homeless poo poo. like how loving bad do you have to be, this was also right after trump tax cuts gave $2 trillion away to the richest shareholders and elite. go figure SF would have a idpol capitalist mayor
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:15 |
|
A Gnarlacious Bro posted:new york tuxedo guys SUCK rear end NYC needs to apologize for all of this
|
# ? Feb 17, 2020 20:49 |