Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

It's still not clear to me what exactly happened in regards to Ash becoming a Klingon.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.

kidkissinger posted:

It's still not clear to me what exactly happened in regards to Ash becoming a Klingon.

The Ash we have now was originally a Klingon named Voq. There was a real Ash Tyler who was captured and then had his body and memories transformed to turn Voq into a sleeper agent who would appear anatomically human. Ash as he exists now has both his Klingon memories and the real Ash’s human memories. I guess he’s also still genetically human?

In the end it doesn’t matter because that character sucked and we probably won’t see him again




until the Section 31 show starts :suicide:

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer
Yeah Discovery must have been really popular I'm sure that's why they pivoted towards a bunch of fanservice halfway through its first season and literally made the ending an unconnected cliffhanger where the Enterprise shows up for no reason, that certainly smells like confidence in their creative approach

The Star Trek MMO is still running and presumably generating money, we have a long way to go before they shut this poo poo down for lack of interest. Voyager and Enterprise together ran for over a decade because they were on UPN, I guess we'll find out how much Trek material they are willing to spam for their streaming service because as we all will know these things are decided purely based on pragmatism and logic

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Was Disco the first show with a major romance subplot like that? I guess Worf/Dax, but that never seemed obtrusive. But I liked them also so

Tighclops posted:

Yeah Discovery must have been really popular I'm sure that's why they pivoted towards a bunch of fanservice halfway through its first season and literally made the ending an unconnected cliffhanger where the Enterprise shows up for no reason, that certainly smells like confidence in their creative approach

The Star Trek MMO is still running and presumably generating money, we have a long way to go before they shut this poo poo down for lack of interest. Voyager and Enterprise together ran for over a decade because they were on UPN, I guess we'll find out how much Trek material they are willing to spam for their streaming service because as we all will know these things are decided purely based on pragmatism and logic

Hey, the other guy said no one was making these arguments even implicitly so pay attention please.

Mal-3
Oct 21, 2008
I think you could argue Worf/Troi as the starting point but that's more of a prototype for Worf/Dax I think.

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.
Riker/Troi kinda even if both of them spent the majority of the show seeing other people.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Imzadi...

I don't recall melodramatic tear filled capital-C Conversations in those, like they'd be on a date in the cold open or something.

https://i.imgur.com/Na814Hz.mp4

What was the first episode where Worf and Troi were even hinted at being a thing? It wasn't Parallels was it?

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

zoux posted:

We're talking about this because you guys are doing some sort of epistemological stoner "what can we really know about anything man" thing without offering a shred of counter evidence. But if you want to say that streaming show viewership numbers are opaque, yes they are, on purpsoe, and these arguments apply to every streaming show ever made. Is the Mandalorian popular? Well, Disney says so, but they would wouldn't they. Stranger Things? Who can say?

Both of those things have overwhelmingly positive user scores and are cultural phenomenons approaching Game of Thrones levels. Discovery's with it 42% audience score can only reliably be described as mixed.

Again to stress, this does say anything about the quality of any of them.

zoux posted:

Hey, the other guy said no one was making these arguments even implicitly so pay attention please.

I never said this, I was referring to the five or so people on that page (well before our friend Mr Tighclops showed up) who were discussing streaming platform models.

You're being disingenuous. I'm going to stop arguing with you. Feel free to have the last word.

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

Big Mean Jerk posted:

Riker/Troi kinda even if both of them spent the majority of the show seeing other people.

Early Riker/Troi feels extremely Decker/Ilia. I'm assuming if Phase 2 had been a thing, their romance would have been a big part of the show.

Zaroff
Nov 10, 2009

Nothing in the world can stop me now!

zoux posted:

What was the first episode where Worf and Troi were even hinted at being a thing? It wasn't Parallels was it?

I think it was Parallels and Eye of the Beholder which started it, but both of those were alternate realities or something 'fake'. IIRC the first episode when it was a proper thing was Emergence and then followed up in All Good Things (more so in the alternate future where Worf and Riker were sulky with each other because of her death).

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

Lizard Combatant posted:

Again to stress, this does say anything about the quality of any of them.

Nobody is saying that it does, people are just reacting against people who are convinced that Disco failed to meet expectations, against all the evidence we have.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

I'm perusing the observations of minutiae for the new Picard episodes over at EAS. One of the many tiny details he spotted:



Computer, zoom to grid 47 and enhance...



Should have known.

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

Zaroff posted:

I think it was Parallels and Eye of the Beholder which started it, but both of those were alternate realities or something 'fake'. IIRC the first episode when it was a proper thing was Emergence and then followed up in All Good Things (more so in the alternate future where Worf and Riker were sulky with each other because of her death).

Parallels had Worf married to Troi in an alternate reality, but he notices that she actually knows him quite well the end of the episode where she's just being thoughtful and nice and it was really sweet.

Nullsmack
Dec 7, 2001
Digital apocalypse

galenanorth posted:

I am toward the end of Star Trek: Discovery's first season, and this show would be so much better without Ash Tyler, who is the worst character. All his scenes are boring, predictable, and gross for the sake of shock imagery. Star Trek should be amenable toward viewing with family, whereas this Trek has plenty of scenes where someone could walk past and you'd have to be like "I swear it's not like this all the time" or else they'd think you like to watch Klingon torture porn. Stametts is great, and Mirror Stamett's initial prank on his counterpart made me laugh out loud. Burnham, Tilly, and (Mirror) Lorca are all right, though it probably would have been better to have a season with Georgiou beforehand, for actual Star Trek instead of wartime corrupted-by-mirror-Lorca Star Trek. Lorca can be a good character while making the show worse, in a context where everyone is afraid the show has been taken over by millionaires who will give the show a neoliberal or even neoconservative voice.

I was rewatching Nemesis not too long ago for the first time probably since I saw it in the theater. Of course my wife walks in during the Troi mind-rape scene instead of literally any other time of the movie.

...

I got it in a bluray set with all of the other movies. It's not like I purposely bought that movie.

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

marktheando posted:

Nobody is saying that it does, people are just reacting against people who are convinced that Disco failed to meet expectations, against all the evidence we have.

Oh I know, I just don't want anyone to think I'm advocating for using review aggregators as an indication of worth. I really don't like how Rotten Tomatoes scores things but unfortunately in the absence of actual data it's really all we have outside speculation.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

galenanorth posted:

Star Trek should be amenable toward viewing with family, whereas this Trek has plenty of scenes where someone could walk past and you'd have to be like "I swear it's not like this all the time"

What's the most embarrassing scene in each series to be caught watching?

For DS9 it must surely be the scene from prophet and lace where they do a panning shot of quark's drag from foot to head

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Jungle Gym fight in Code of Honor

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

What's the most embarrassing scene in each series to be caught watching?

"It's been a loooooong time... Getting from there to here..."

I also accidentally used my friend's Netflix profile (we share accounts) to look up the Voyager episode with Ray Wise and he must have been logged in because I immediately got the most shame inducing text message that just said "voyager LC, really?"

Most embarrassing scene out of context?
God there's so many... But drag Quark is up there. Lwaxana in the tub maybe?

e: \/\/\/ no, it's that

Lizard Combatant fucked around with this message at 20:24 on Feb 25, 2020

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

What's the most embarrassing scene in each series to be caught watching?

For Enterprise I have to go with the decontamination scene with T'Pol and Phlox where she has her Ponn Farr and they have to massage the goop all over each others bodies.

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007

Horizon Burning posted:

People are going to look back on this little time period of media, where everything has to be super didactic and beat you over the head with a Very Important Message About Hope Because The Orange Man Won as one of the most embarrassing time periods in pop culture writing. It'll be up there with Post-9/11 Insanity and the 2007 Writer's Strike as having a deleterious effect on the stories people were telling. It's like people need their entertainment media to swaddle them in clothes and pat them on the back and tell them, hush hush, that it'll be okay. But like, not by creating new media - no, that'd be a financial risk. By taking old properties and twistin them so you can Make A Point.

Media and art are supposed to reflect the times they were made in. Personally I think we'll be looking at these times very differently than you seem to imply, I think we'll see our past selves as destructively naive. The old properties thing is just simple capitalism. Profit motive means wringing the poo poo out of anything that ever appeared to be in any way profitable.

Powered Descent posted:

I'm perusing the observations of minutiae for the new Picard episodes over at EAS. One of the many tiny details he spotted:



Computer, zoom to grid 47 and enhance...



Should have known.
drat, that's a really cool pattern actually. Surprised we don't see more of things like that. Or maybe it's out there but just for rich people.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

That's a uniform isn't it?

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

zoux posted:

That's a uniform isn't it?

Yeah the network was really big on getting those repeating Starfleet arrows on the uniforms in Discovery, I think overruling Fuller when he wanted TOS style uniforms, so not surprised to see they are also on the uniforms in Picard.

Khanstant posted:

drat, that's a really cool pattern actually. Surprised we don't see more of things like that. Or maybe it's out there but just for rich people.

Yeah IIRC the Disco uniforms cost a fortune.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?
The tiny logos all over the uniforms is such a bizarre thing. I really want to hear the production story behind it.

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

skasion posted:

The tiny logos all over the uniforms is such a bizarre thing. I really want to hear the production story behind it.

"You know how every Star Trek show blew time and money on some detail nobody can see on their TV, yet left other elements glaringly unpolished?"

"Yeah?"

"Why don't we really lean into that tradition"

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Setting Disco ten years before TOS, I have no idea why they didn't try to do an updated take on the 60s aesthetics. What we saw of the Enterprise bridge and unis looked pretty good, dunno why they went with the blue and gold jumpsuits. (It's fuller I'm sure)

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer
I talked to somebody who worked on the sets shortly before the show premiered and they told me they were going for a 60's bond movie look. Personally I didn't see it

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Brawnfire posted:

"You know how every Star Trek show blew time and money on some detail nobody can see on their TV, yet left other elements glaringly unpolished?"

"Yeah?"

"Why don't we really lean into that tradition"

They delayed production over these freakin things. I remember Harberts(?) talking about how they had to fly someone to Switzerland to pick up the material

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

skasion posted:

They delayed production over these freakin things. I remember Harberts(?) talking about how they had to fly someone to Switzerland to pick up the material

Someone at CBS must have had a hard-on for them, Fuller just wanted TOS style uniforms for his season 1 pitch.

But he also wanted an anthology style show that told radically different stories in different times each season with creative directors to helm the pilots and set the tone.

I've gotten different mileages out his other shows, but that sounded like a fantastic idea.

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

zoux posted:

Setting Disco ten years before TOS, I have no idea why they didn't try to do an updated take on the 60s aesthetics. What we saw of the Enterprise bridge and unis looked pretty good, dunno why they went with the blue and gold jumpsuits. (It's fuller I'm sure)

Nah, Fuller talks about what his original vision for Discovery was in this article- https://ew.com/tv/2017/07/28/bryan-fuller-star-trek-discovery/

quote:

Some of Fuller’s ideas were tossed — from the more heavily allegorical and complex storyline to his choice of uniforms (a subdued spin on The Original Series trio of primary colors).

Someone else really wanted those uniforms. I like them, but it's weird they went to so much effort and expense over them.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Tighclops posted:

I talked to somebody who worked on the sets shortly before the show premiered and they told me they were going for a 60's bond movie look. Personally I didn't see it

I guess I can see it, knowing that, but it's not executed well. The Incredibles nails that aesthetic.

marktheando posted:

Someone else really wanted those uniforms. I like them, but it's weird they went to so much effort and expense over them.

Does anyone know the whereabouts of one Rick Berman

piratepilates
Mar 28, 2004

So I will learn to live with it. Because I can live with it. I can live with it.



Lizard Combatant posted:


I've gotten different mileages out his other shows, but that sounded like a fantastic idea.

Fantastically expensive too. The first things that people who sign budgets would gasp at is constructing all new sets each year.

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

piratepilates posted:

Fantastically expensive too. The first things that people who sign budgets would gasp at is constructing all new sets each year.

No doubt. But they did that anyway.

They built new sets for the Enterprise, made new costumes for Disco and Enterprise (including the needlessly expensive jumpsuits) and spent a gently caress load on vfx. And that's just Discovery.

Then they made Picard with new costumes, sets, etc...

It's basically the same cost outlay over three seasons.

You don't have to be Berman/Braga levels of cheap, but there's plenty of ways to reduce cost by redressing existing sets, etc...

e: it seems like a lot of what lost him the project was scheduling and the push to launch the platform with Discovery.

Lizard Combatant fucked around with this message at 21:56 on Feb 25, 2020

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer
I noticed that they covered up the side cockpit windows on Picard show's ship so they wouldn't have to VFX in space outside just like they did with the extra windows on ds9's runabouts

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.
I like Disco, but I still wonder if Fuller’s The Cage-inspired aesthetic and anthology structured version of the show would have been better or worse.

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

Big Mean Jerk posted:

I like Disco, but I still wonder if Fuller’s The Cage-inspired aesthetic and anthology structured version of the show would have been better or worse.

It's hard to say. He can get really self indulgent but maybe having to start fresh each season and have a tight self contained story would have tempered that.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Big Mean Jerk posted:

I like Disco, but I still wonder if Fuller’s The Cage-inspired aesthetic and anthology structured version of the show would have been better or worse.

Well it would’ve had an amazing first season and then he would’ve gotten bored/mad and quit.

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.
Anthologies are expensive, so I have no doubt Fuller still would have been fired after 1.5 seasons for eating up six seasons worth of budget and delaying each season by two years.

Lizard Combatant
Sep 29, 2010

I have some notes.

Big Mean Jerk posted:

Anthologies are expensive, so I have no doubt Fuller still would have been fired after 1.5 seasons for eating up six seasons worth of budget and delaying each season by two years.

They are, but Discovery is reportedly over $8 mill per episode. Which is a lot but also lower than other services flagship shows.

The Expanse seems like an obvious comparison in terms of the amount of sets needed for an anthology style trek since they have a ridiculous amount of locations built ground up (though they're smart and reuse things) including extensive sfx rigs for weightlessness and space (seriously how the gently caress did this show ever get made?!)

There's no official figures, but estimates hit around the $5 mill average ep cost (some say lower, and higher estimates have been rejected by people in the show).

I don't fully buy that the anthology idea was nixed for budget reasons (it's your flagship show, go big or go home and they're clearly willing to spend a lot), it was probably a part but Fuller’s idiosyncrasies, the desire to make a safer, traditional show and the insistence on a release date coinciding with their planned platform release seem more plausible to me.

Lizard Combatant fucked around with this message at 23:00 on Feb 25, 2020

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

More Chabon on what he's going for

quote:

Concerns about the level violence in Picard:

I am not unambivalent about the violence, myself. The choice was not made lightly, though it was made collaboratively, and therefore with a good deal of conversation and debate among the creators. And so I assure you that it is not there simply “because we can,” or because we are trying, as you somewhat uncharitably put it, to be “in.” My partners would all have their own reasons for its presence in this story, as some of us had our own reasons for shying away from it. For me, it came down to this: there has always been violence (and even torture) in Star Trek. Sometimes that violence has been implicit, sometimes explicit, according to the dictates of censorship, the nature of the situation being depicted, the aesthetic of individual creators, or technical and/or budgetary limitations. And the reason that there has always been violence in Trek is that Trek is art, and there has always been violence—implicit and explicit—in art. It belongs there. It belongs in any narrative about human beings, even human beings of the future. Violence, often, *is* the narrative. Its source. Its engine. The question of whether it’s “too much” or not is ultimately a matter of taste. Personally, I come out closer to the “less is more” end. But that is just me. In the end, I saw how little time and space we had to convey a sense of Seven’s history post-Voyager, and the things that drive and haunt her. I decided, with my partners, that intensity was warranted. Seven lives outside the rational confines of the Federation, because that is where she finds her sense of purpose. But life is hard, out there. If it wasn’t, people wouldn’t need her help so badly. And she wouldn’t have found such a compelling reason to carry on, in spite of her history of trauma. But, I hear you.

Trek and positivity (or lack thereof) and reflecting current times:

First of all, I think that the phrase (or a version of it) “Star Trek has always reflected its time” is open to multiple, potentially conflicting interpretations. It can mean, “Individual Star Trek series have always (consciously) reflected thematically many of the most pressing issues of the time when they were made.” I think that’s the sense intended by people involved with making the two current series, and it’s pretty obviously true—starting with persistent themes of nuclear annihilation, racial prejudice, mechanization, totalitarianism vs liberal democracy, on TOS, through DS9 with its themes of individual vs group identity, chosen family, reason vs faith, and the inevitable moral compromises of war. (That’s only the *conscious* ways in which Trek has reflected the times in which it was made.) But the phrase could also be taken the way (I think) you take it: that the world, the milieu depicted by Star Trek—the characters and their interactions, their capabilities and limitations as individuals, the social institutions and mores and technologies and economics and culture—reflects the world and era in which it was made. I think you’re saying that this is wrong, that here is exactly where Trek doesn’t, hasn’t. and *shouldn’t* reflect the world and times. That it has always presented its crews, Starfleet, and the Federation as improvements, as realizations of our best potential, as aspirational. If Trek has reflected our world, it’s in a kind of utopian funhouse mirror, where everything looks better. I would say that by and large that has been true, though possibly not as to the degree that many Trek fans claim, or feel. But there’s another side to the world—the people and society—depicted in Star Trek, which is all the characters, planets, cultures, mores and interactions that take place outside of Starfleet, the Federation. Many of these “outside” cultures and characters—the empires and alliances and unions— *have* deliberately reflected aspects of our world, with its all imperfection, intolerance, brutality, its humiliations and injustices, its evils. I don’t mean just in a thematic sense, but in the behavior of individual non-Federation, non-Starfleet characters, in the construction of societies around prejudices and inequalities, violence, lust for power, etc.

That brings us to Picard. In the one, long, ten-part story we’re telling, we’re asking two questions about the greater world of Star Trek (i.e, the Federation *and* everything outside the Federation). One—a venerable Star Trek question, with a long pedigree in previous series and films: What happens when the Federation, the Roddenberry Federation with all its enlightened and noble intentions, free from want, disease, (internal) war, greed, capitalism, intolerance, etc., is tested by forces inimical to its values? What happens when two of its essential principles; (security and liberty, say) come into conflict? The answer has to be—at first, it buckles. It wobbles. It may, to some extent, compromise or even betray its values, or at the very least be sorely tempted to do so. If not, there’s no point asking the question, though it’s a question that any society with aspirations like ours or the Federation’s needs to ask. If nothing can ever truly test the Federation, if nothing can rock its perfection, then it’s just a magical land. It’s Lothlorien, in its enchanted bubble, untouchable by the Shadow. And, also, profoundly *inhuman*. To me it’s the humanity of the Federation—which means among many admirable things, its imperfection, its vulnerability and the constant need to defend it from our own worst natures—that makes it truly inspiring. The other, related question we’re asking is: What about the people who live outside, at the edges (or even within) the Federation but who, for various reasons, aren’t quite *of* it. Ex-Starfleet officers, refugees, people like Seven who served on a Starfleet ship but was never actually in Starfleet. People who have fallen through the cracks, or fallen victim to their own weaknesses. What is life like for people who, for whatever reason, live beyond the benevolent boundaries of the Federation—where, for example, post-scarcity is a dream, and there is a monetary economy? Again, there is precedent for this kind of story on Trek, but the fact that our story only resolves over ten episodes, not one, or two, or four out of a season of 23, might make it feel, sometimes, that there is more darkness, more trauma in our characters’ lives. More *struggle.* This show unquestionably has darker tonalities than some others (DS9 is the standout exception). It lives more in the shadows, where the Federation’s light can’t always reach. That isn’t to condemn, criticize, undo, break or, god knows, betray the Federation or Gene Roddenberry’s vision. Shadow defines light.

Every new Trek series since TNG has sought to escape what can feel like the confines of previous series, not simply of canon (which can also be a strangely liberating force) but of the kinds of stories, about the kinds of characters and societies, that have already been told. Each new series has expressed this impulse to “light out for the territories” in a different way. TNG went a century into the future of TOS. DS9 went onto a station full of aliens that was both beyond the edge of the Federation and next to a wormhole that led to the Gamma Quadrant. VOY put 70k light-years between it and its predecessors, and introduced a raft of new species and worlds. ENT went deep into the early past of the Federation. Next season’s DIS goes to the Trek universe’s far-future.
The space we found for Picard is not “dark Federation.” It’s one of people who live and work at or beyond the margins of the Federation who travel beyond its boundaries to find the truth.

Also Frakes says Riker was added in later in the writing process

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer

I get what he's saying but I can't be the only person that read that whole thing and got douche chills

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply