Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
gwrtheyrn
Oct 21, 2010

AYYYE DEEEEE DUBBALYOO DA-NYAAAAAH!

Zero VGS posted:

The seller might be perfectly happy keeping the house and has set up a "make me move" price (read: I don't actually want to sell the house but if you reallllly wanna overpay I won't stop you).

If it's actually as overpriced as you feel it is, offer them what you actually think is fair. Maybe if they sit on it for a few months with no offers they'll come straight to you when they decide to get realistic. The most important thing is you're living rent free so you shouldn't feel compelled to offer more than you're comfortable with while you can keep stacking bills and biding your time.

The sellers are retiring and have an offer on another property contingent on the sale of their current one. My head canon right now is that they were promised some number by their listing agent and want that amount or similar to cover their retirement home. I'm thinking about waiting a while and making an offer closer to what I think it's worth, but I have no clue how long to wait. Does their current contigency even put any pressure on them to sell? FWIW the listing is about 2 weeks old now, and well priced homes frequently sell that quickly here.

It's that or I can just offer lower now and hope they come back to me later, but I don't see how that's better than just waiting.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

H110Hawk
Dec 28, 2006

gwrtheyrn posted:

The sellers are retiring and have an offer on another property contingent on the sale of their current one. My head canon right now is that they were promised some number by their listing agent and want that amount or similar to cover their retirement home. I'm thinking about waiting a while and making an offer closer to what I think it's worth, but I have no clue how long to wait. Does their current contigency even put any pressure on them to sell? FWIW the listing is about 2 weeks old now, and well priced homes frequently sell that quickly here.

It's that or I can just offer lower now and hope they come back to me later, but I don't see how that's better than just waiting.

Offer what you think it's worth and what you're willing to pay. The worst thing is they say yes. Make sure you have all the contingencies. Make your realtor figure out some other comps in the area and show you the adjustments. Does this town really only have 20 units at all in it?

Being contingent does put pressure on them if they need the capital from this sale.

hobbez
Mar 1, 2012

Don't care. Just do not care. We win, you lose. You do though, you seem to care very much

I'm going to go ride my mountain bike, later nerds.
I received a windfall recently and suddenly have enough capital to make a substantial downpayment on a home. It's enough where we could put down a payment that would allow for us to take on an affordable 15 year mortgage on a pretty nice home in a fairly desirable area. Just for context... the downpayment I have access to is large relative to our annual income, at least in the short run. I could accomplish this and still have a significant cash emergency fund and some decent funds left over to invest towards retirement.

I think I want a home for the right reasons. We're not moving any time soon, and kids could be in the relatively-near-future.

What's keeping me back is I live in a pretty expensive, seller's market. Going totally on gut it seems like it has room to continue to fill in and grow but I could also be buying into a size-able bubble. That being said, I see the purchase as more of an investment in long term stability/predictability/freeing up future cash flow, not necessarily something I absolutely need to make money on.

EDIT1: I researched some things and it seems like our metro area bottomed out on cyclical inventory, days on market, new listings, in 2017... All trending up now.

Anyway. Should I do it?

i just don't want to squander what i have received please help :ohdear:

hobbez fucked around with this message at 06:20 on Feb 26, 2020

HycoCam
Jul 14, 2016

You should have backed Transverse!

Zero VGS posted:

But the seller's agent (I have her as a dual agent) is telling me there's one offer above mine at $680k, and that bidder would be willing to go up to $690k.

Now, I picked her as a dual agent knowing that it's another 20k in her pocket worth of closing costs (she obviously knows that too since she agreed on it) and she's married to the seller (renovator, so it's a flipper+lister married couple team), so I feel like my offer is worth around 20k
I, personally, hate a dual agency situation. I don't know the MA laws on agency. In most states, dual agency means the agent has no fiduciary duty to either side and becomes a transactional agent. You mentioned having other properties so not your first rodeo. Sharing competitive offers is not a function of the agent in my state--the seller has to the authorize the sharing of offers. But since your agent is married to the seller--all that crap about fiduciary duty and impartial representative go out the window.

You are basically at a poker table. Unless you've seen the competing offer--it is Schrodinger's offer. These folks are flipping. They want the maximum money. My cynical opinion? If the other offer was really better, you would have been told thanks for your offer but we've accepted another offer. Not coming back to squeeze you for more.

Zero VGS
Aug 16, 2002
ASK ME ABOUT HOW HUMAN LIVES THAT MADE VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERS ARE WORTH MORE
Lipstick Apathy

hobbez posted:

I received a windfall recently and suddenly have enough capital to make a substantial downpayment on a home. It's enough where we could put down a payment that would allow for us to take on an affordable 15 year mortgage on a pretty nice home in a fairly desirable area. Just for context... the downpayment I have access to is large relative to our annual income, at least in the short run. I could accomplish this and still have a significant cash emergency fund and some decent funds left over to invest towards retirement.

I think I want a home for the right reasons. We're not moving any time soon, and kids could be in the relatively-near-future.

What's keeping me back is I live in a pretty expensive, seller's market. Going totally on gut it seems like it has room to continue to fill in and grow but I could also be buying into a size-able bubble. That being said, I see the purchase as more of an investment in long term stability/predictability/freeing up future cash flow, not necessarily something I absolutely need to make money on.

Should I do it?

edit: i just don't want to squander what i have received please help :ohdear:

Don't do a 15 year when you can do a 30 year. The interest rates on 30 are so low that they're practically synced up with the average rate of inflation each year... it's effectively a 0% loan when you account for that, positive when you account for homes always appreciating over the long term.

But the main thing with the 30 year is you have half the monthly payment you would have with a 15 year, so if you find yourself with less income (laid off, huge medical bill etc.) you're not nearly as hosed as you would have been. You can always pay off the mortgage extra, but that's saving you 3-ish% interest... nearly any other investment on the planet can do better. Hell, instead of paying off early there's bank CDs that will guarantee you 4%+ and you're already ahead. I know plenty of people go with 15-year but to me that seems like a charity to the bank who's champing at the bit to foreclose on your rear end the second you're late.

HycoCam posted:

I, personally, hate a dual agency situation. I don't know the MA laws on agency. In most states, dual agency means the agent has no fiduciary duty to either side and becomes a transactional agent. You mentioned having other properties so not your first rodeo. Sharing competitive offers is not a function of the agent in my state--the seller has to the authorize the sharing of offers. But since your agent is married to the seller--all that crap about fiduciary duty and impartial representative go out the window.

You are basically at a poker table. Unless you've seen the competing offer--it is Schrodinger's offer. These folks are flipping. They want the maximum money. My cynical opinion? If the other offer was really better, you would have been told thanks for your offer but we've accepted another offer. Not coming back to squeeze you for more.

I get the feeling like the other offer is really close. I don't think they're lying about it. They certainly CAN lie but the agent can lose her realtor license if caught doing that; she's still accountable to an actual agency. In fact she replied back to me and said like "We understand, we'll let you know if the other bidder falls through" so I think they were hoping I'd jack up my offer more but at the same time they don't sound desperate like I was calling their bluff. They'll probably go with the other people and it's too bad I'm back to the drawing board but it was right at the point where it's not worth an extra $100 a month in payments to me. I felt like I had ever so slightly overbid in the first place.

gwrtheyrn
Oct 21, 2010

AYYYE DEEEEE DUBBALYOO DA-NYAAAAAH!

H110Hawk posted:

Make your realtor figure out some other comps in the area and show you the adjustments. Does this town really only have 20 units at all in it?

It's not difficult to find somewhat similar listings if you ignore the fact that it is on the water. I can tell you that if it was across the street, it would probably list in the high 600s or slightly lower if the seller wanted to move fast. The problem is assigning value to the water access and the right build a personal dock--there isn't really that much waterfront SFH development within 5 miles in either direction and most of the stuff in the area don't have listed sales in the last 10 years. Honestly if this was across the street and in the 600s I wouldn't be here second guessing myself.

Ultimately

quote:

Yes, prices are made up, or rather something is worth what someone else is sucker enough to pay for.

quote:

Offer what you think it's worth and what you're willing to pay. The worst thing is they say yes. Make sure you have all the contingencies.

Dik Hz
Feb 22, 2004

Fun with Science

gwrtheyrn posted:

It's not difficult to find somewhat similar listings if you ignore the fact that it is on the water. I can tell you that if it was across the street, it would probably list in the high 600s or slightly lower if the seller wanted to move fast. The problem is assigning value to the water access and the right build a personal dock--there isn't really that much waterfront SFH development within 5 miles in either direction and most of the stuff in the area don't have listed sales in the last 10 years. Honestly if this was across the street and in the 600s I wouldn't be here second guessing myself.

Ultimately
It's worth what the highest bidder is willing to pay on the open market. If you're willing to pay it, it's worth that much. When you go to sell, it's worth what the next highest bidder is willing to pay.

Personally, I would value water access plus personal dock at the premium you're looking at, so I don't think you're off-base.

Dik Hz
Feb 22, 2004

Fun with Science

Zero VGS posted:

Don't do a 15 year when you can do a 30 year. The interest rates on 30 are so low that they're practically synced up with the average rate of inflation each year... it's effectively a 0% loan when you account for that, positive when you account for homes always appreciating over the long term.

But the main thing with the 30 year is you have half the monthly payment you would have with a 15 year, so if you find yourself with less income (laid off, huge medical bill etc.) you're not nearly as hosed as you would have been. You can always pay off the mortgage extra, but that's saving you 3-ish% interest... nearly any other investment on the planet can do better. Hell, instead of paying off early there's bank CDs that will guarantee you 4%+ and you're already ahead. I know plenty of people go with 15-year but to me that seems like a charity to the bank who's champing at the bit to foreclose on your rear end the second you're late.
Your math sucks and you should not give advice.

A 30-year note has a monthly payment that is ~63% of a 15-year note at the same rate. ~75% if the rates are 100 basis points apart. Paying a 30-year note at the same rate as a 15-year note will necessitate paying an extra 2-3 years of your mortgage, given the interest rate difference.

30-year T-notes, the closest thing to sure money out there, are currently at 1.85%, so a guaranteed return of 3-4% is attractive compared to that.

If you can afford the payment on a 15-year note, and investing in your property suits your investment portfolio, a 15-year note makes a lot of sense.

HycoCam
Jul 14, 2016

You should have backed Transverse!
On the whole 15 vs 30 year debate. Do the 15 if you can. Dik Hz has it right.

Putting numbers to it: 15 year rates are 2.75% and 30 year rates 3.375%

If you borrow $250,000 @ 2.75% you'll pay about $1,700/mo and at the end of the 15 years you'll have paid about $55,000 in interest.

If you borrow $250,000 @ 3.375% you'll pay about $1,100/mo and at the end of 30 years you'll have paid about $150,000 in interest.

If you make the extra payment to pay off the 30year note fast, assuming you match the $1,700/mo--you'll pay off the 30 year loan just short of 16 years and pay about $75,000 in interest. Or $25,000 more than you would with a 15 year note.

The 15 year note is a great thing for two reasons: You build equity in your home at a much faster rate and your giving the bank less of your money.


The 15 year notes are the lowest any banker has seen. All the rates are at historically lows. If you've been on the fence about buying a home--now is a great time to get that loan. And if you already own a home, don't think you'll be moving in the next three years, and haven't refinanced--now is the time. People's jaws are literally dropping when they learn about their new rates.

H110Hawk
Dec 28, 2006
I am firmly in the 30 year camp and pay extra if you want to pay less interest. It's purely risk mitigation on my side not absolute interest paid. I like the lower payment.

DaveSauce
Feb 15, 2004

Oh, how awkward.
I dunno, I think having a significant down payment should necessitate a 15-year loan. I feel like the temptation to pay the minimum would be too much. If it's going to be a low monthly payment anyhow, just take the 15-year loan.

But at the same time, with interest rates where they are it's probably a better idea to shuffle that extra cash to retirement/investments/etc. instead of paying down the mortgage. Locking in historically low mortgage interest rates for 30 years seems like a win.

Inner Light
Jan 2, 2020



This is a pretty specific question.. I'm using the Redfin iPhone app and I can't for the life of me get it to stop showing completed/sold non-active listings on the map. I have it set to show only active listings, but it ignores the setting and completed listings still flood the map. Am I missing something?

e: Nevermind, fixed it somehow. Still kinda buggy.

Inner Light fucked around with this message at 18:34 on Feb 26, 2020

HycoCam
Jul 14, 2016

You should have backed Transverse!
Why do people in this thread use Redfin for property searches over Realtor.com?

gwrtheyrn
Oct 21, 2010

AYYYE DEEEEE DUBBALYOO DA-NYAAAAAH!

HycoCam posted:

Why do people in this thread use RedfinGoogle for property searches over RealtorAsk.com?

I've used trulia, zillow, and redfin search at times, but the rest of my family has used redfin so it's easier to share things on that. They're all practically the same

EdEddnEddy
Apr 5, 2012



Where is the difference coming from when looking up Mortgage rates, I find a handful of Online/Digital only ones that are as low as 3.2~% for 30 year, and then you get to normal mortgage companies/banks that are all the way up to 3.9%.

Our mortgage broker seems to be lumping everything into the estimate and we are getting a 3.75% rate which compared to all the other places we have looked with physical locations, is better, but then you see those online offers and have to pause for a second. Is it because they only offer the Mortgage itself and nothing else, are going to sell you loan immediately once its closed, etc?

Inner Light
Jan 2, 2020



EdEddnEddy posted:

Where is the difference coming from when looking up Mortgage rates, I find a handful of Online/Digital only ones that are as low as 3.2~% for 30 year, and then you get to normal mortgage companies/banks that are all the way up to 3.9%.

Our mortgage broker seems to be lumping everything into the estimate and we are getting a 3.75% rate which compared to all the other places we have looked with physical locations, is better, but then you see those online offers and have to pause for a second. Is it because they only offer the Mortgage itself and nothing else, are going to sell you loan immediately once its closed, etc?

I am also curious about this. I'm seeing the exact same thing, 3.75 for traditional or large online focused lenders (Bank of America and Guaranteed Rate, specifically), then ~3.2 for no-name online lenders. Is it worth it to go with the bigger guys? My gut feeling says yes.

Hadlock
Nov 9, 2004

H110Hawk posted:

I am firmly in the 30 year camp and pay extra if you want to pay less interest. It's purely risk mitigation on my side not absolute interest paid. I like the lower payment.

Yeah exactly. If in 10 years you decide to start a business you can start paying the 30 year rate. Or if you want to buy a boat, different car, lake house, pay for grad school, pay for kids private school etc. There's a bunch of luxuries that each cost about $1000/mo. Also gives you the option to work part time to help care for a sick spouse/parent etc run

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

Inner Light posted:

I am also curious about this. I'm seeing the exact same thing, 3.75 for traditional or large online focused lenders (Bank of America and Guaranteed Rate, specifically), then ~3.2 for no-name online lenders. Is it worth it to go with the bigger guys? My gut feeling says yes.
If you are looking purely at rate and not at costs, you are not comparing apples to apples.

Also your gut feeling is based on what? You should not expect better service from the large banks vs. the online-only lenders. Nor should you expect either to actually hold your loan after you close, loans are more often sold to another bank than not.


e. In the 15 vs. 30 year debate, it comes down to personal preference: you are deciding to pay more in interest in order to buy the convenience of a lower minimum payment. For some folks this is worth that money, for other folks it isn't. And that's the correct way to present it, rather than an absolute "you should do an x year loan or you're doing it wrong."

Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Feb 26, 2020

EdEddnEddy
Apr 5, 2012



Right and I think that was what the difference seemed to be.

The more normal lenders appear to include loan cost, things like insurance, warranty, etc all in the loan paperwork, and the online only places didn't seem to give you either as much or weren't letting me see as much without signing up and running a check which I was hesitant to do.

Outside of a "Feeling" is there anyone with more experience in this realm to inform us what the difference is?

Alarbus
Mar 31, 2010

HycoCam posted:

Why do people in this thread use Redfin for property searches over Realtor.com?

Because Redfin lets you set the HOA Fee filter to Zero. That's why.

HycoCam
Jul 14, 2016

You should have backed Transverse!
What kind of rates are you seeing at Chase?

https://www.chase.com/personal/mortgage/mortgage-rates

I'm in North Carolina and seeing 3.375% for 30yr and 2.875% for 15yr.


The first few home purchases--dealing with getting the loan, getting through underwriting, and understanding the myriad of charges associated with a loan is indeed daunting. A few years ago, we got a new Federal law in the USA called the Truth in Lending Act--or TILA for short. The purpose of the law was to make easier for the average consumer to shop for a loan. In theory you should be able to contact multiple lenders, apply for a loan, go through a short interview process, and a day or so later get a TILA document from the lender.

What goes into the TILA document is a pretty long list. I don't have a form in front of me--but some of the highlights:
The biggie: The loan amount, the interest rate, payment period, and monthly payment.

The part that rocks everyone's world, the closing costs: The biggest charge typically either going to be the loan origination charge or unpaid taxes. For some reason walking into a bank and asking to speak to a loan officer scares the poo poo out of so many people when they are buying their first home. That loan origination fee is why the bank officer jumps out of their chair to shake your hand when you enter their office! Loan officers want to do everything they can to get you a loan--it is how they get paid!
To clear a properties title--all back taxes will need to be paid. Plus all taxes have to be figured out. If the tax bill has been paid for the year and you are moving at the end of the year--you're going to owe the seller some money. Conversely, if the seller has been living there for the first few months before the bill is due--the seller gives up some money at closing.

There will also be interest charges to make sure the bank doesn't miss a single day of interest. And there will be escrow charges if your lender wants to pay your insurance and taxes. Also, if you're down payment isn't large enough there will be a PMI (mortgage insurance for the bank) line item. There will be some estimated charges if there are things like fuel/propane tanks on the property--someone will figure out how much fuel remains and that will be a line item.

I'm probably missing a few things... Oh I know--attorney fees for closing the loan, title insurance, a fee to record the deed, and another fee for overnight mail/courier.

The big charges: Mortgage origination fee, taxes, escrow items & PMI, and the attorney fees.

e: Forgot the appraisal fee and the credit report fee! The appraisal fee--because the bank wants to know what your house is worth--around $500. The credit report fee is typically about $25. Lots of times the credit report fee will covered by a loan application fee, if the lender charges a fee.

HycoCam fucked around with this message at 20:41 on Feb 26, 2020

gvibes
Jan 18, 2010

Leading us to the promised land (i.e., one tournament win in five years)
Huh, I just realized the summer place I bought a couple years ago has property taxes about twice as high as I thought. Most have only been looking at taxes for one of the three PINs. I am smart.

NyetscapeNavigator
Sep 22, 2003

I did a 20 year. Seemed like a happy medium between the lower interest of 15yr, and lower monthly payment of 30yr. I think it's real easy to tell yourself you're going to take the 30yr and pay extra when you can afford it and then just not follow through on that.

hobbez
Mar 1, 2012

Don't care. Just do not care. We win, you lose. You do though, you seem to care very much

I'm going to go ride my mountain bike, later nerds.
Interesting thoughts on the 15 v 30 yr debate. I think it's ultimately true it comes down to personal preference and situation.

Really my question was if my reasoning for buying a home was sound. I was never expecting to be able to get into a mortgage at this point in life and am just looking for some perspective if it makes sense to make this move (especially in a hot, expensive, sellers market) as an investment in equity and long term familial stability.

LLSix
Jan 20, 2010

The real power behind countless overlords

What's a good way to track down crime statistics for a neighborhood?

My wife has heard some scary anecdotes from neighbors, but she works, and we therefor live, on the more crimey side of Houston. Anywhere less than an hour from her work is going to have at least the national average of yearly crimes, so it's not about finding a good town, but finding a less bad part of town.

Areavibes has a pretty crime heat map (click on the heat map link to the side, it won't let me link directly to it). That appears to be just a sum of all crime reports in a given area, not normalized in any way so she doesn't feel like it provides enough information to make a decision.

The neighborhood looks nice and there's no bars on the windows. Most of the houses do have aftermarket security cameras and the subdivision is only 2 years old.

crazypeltast52
May 5, 2010



Meant to post this here:

crazypeltast52 posted:

The 15 vs 30 year amortization debate also shows up in investment property.

Assuming 75% ltv, 3.75% for the 30 year/3.5% for the 15 year, a 6.5% cap rate and 2% value/income/expense inflation and a 5-year hold period, you get a levered IRR of 18.4% on the 15 year, but 19.8% on the 30 year, plus a lot better debt service coverage along the way if a big repair needs to happen.

Edit: wrong thread

Dik Hz
Feb 22, 2004

Fun with Science

crazypeltast52 posted:

Meant to post this here:
Yeah, inflation makes the numbers weird, given that a dollar 30 years from now is worth less than $0.50 in current dollars. If you correct 15 and 30 year mortgages to current dollars, the total paid is about the same for either note, given that mortgage rates right now are so close to inflation rates.

wolfs
Jul 17, 2001

posted by squid gang

If I get a mortgage on a piece of land with a cement anchored prefabricated home on it, in doing the mortgage deal could selling the pre-existing prefab and then putting in a new one be part of the sum?

I'm trying to wrap my head around what's possible with the purchase of a mostly vacant lot with a manufactured home on it already.

This FAQ makes me think yes? https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/faq-manufactured-housing

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

wolfs posted:

If I get a mortgage on a piece of land with a cement anchored prefabricated home on it, in doing the mortgage deal could selling the pre-existing prefab and then putting in a new one be part of the sum?

I'm trying to wrap my head around what's possible with the purchase of a mostly vacant lot with a manufactured home on it already.

This FAQ makes me think yes? https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/faq-manufactured-housing

The FAQ you linked indicates that it's possible at all to get a mortgage on a manufactured home, and that's correct.

However. A mortgage is a secured loan. The security is the home and land, and the lender is assuming that the home and land will continue to secure the loan in the future. If you intentionally devalue the property, such as by demolishing the home that is sitting on your land, you have just undermined the security, and the bank tends to frown on that sort of thing!

BUT! You can totally get a mortgage that includes an intention to build something like a home, and borrow money to build that home and roll it into the mortgage. Typically you have to already have a builder lined up, and the lender typically pays money directly to the builder, and monitors the whole process to ensure that the end result is a property that is worth enough to still adequately secure your loan. This is called a "construction loan."

AND there's a particular type of construction loan in which you just borrow money to pay for construction yourself, and then essentially refinance at the end to get a single loan that covers your whole new property and pays off the first loan.

See: https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/construction-loans-explained/

I think what you'd be trying to do might be difficult to finance with a single construction loan because of the complication of it being manufactured housing, but it can't hurt to ask some banks and see what they can do for you. I imagine people have done this in the past, so it has to be possible, it's just a question of how many banks will want to bother doing this with a single person (rather than, say, a developer), and how much they'll charge you/what kind of rate you can get to do it.

Zero VGS
Aug 16, 2002
ASK ME ABOUT HOW HUMAN LIVES THAT MADE VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERS ARE WORTH MORE
Lipstick Apathy

Alarbus posted:

Because Redfin lets you set the HOA Fee filter to Zero. That's why.

Redfin lets me filter by multifamilies at X bathrooms or more, and if units are actively rented it tells you the actual rent amounts on page. It also lets me put together an accurate monthly PITI (it's property taxes/insurance are very accurate to reality). Once in a while there might be condo fees they don't catch so you still have to double check but it's better than anything else I've used.

Speaking of multifamilies, I was condering an FHA loan... their guidelines state that they can allow 5% down on a 4-unit, but when I called Wells Fargo they said (yes that's the FHA guideline, but we have an additional layer of our own guidance which is stricter so you need 20%). It's incredibly hard to search online to see if anyone has an FHA product that honors the 5%; most numbers on BankRate etc seem like entirely bait-and-switch fabrications.

B-Nasty
May 25, 2005

Zero VGS posted:

Hell, instead of paying off early there's bank CDs that will guarantee you 4%+ and you're already ahead.

I'm going to need a link to a CD paying 4%+.

The whole invest vs. mortgage debate hinges on your risk tolerance. Getting antsy and pulling money out of the market during drops (cough, the last 3 days) could end up costing you much more than paying down a mortgage. Most investors just don't have the stomach for buy-and-hold when the market takes a dump, so it's not always a purely numbers discussion.

SabinBlitz
May 19, 2015

Firm believer that muscles conquers all
My fiancée and I are in the process of buying a house owned by my parents. Hayden home built in Bend Oregon in 2017. Hoping Appraisal comes in at $374,000 but realistically it could be $360,000. Parents will give gift of equity to $290,000 which they will keep as net profit as that is what they paid for the house in 2017 when it was built.

My mortgage lender is only offering a 4.125% 30 year conventional but I keep reading about people getting under 4%.

Is it because he’s using my lowest FICO score at 689 so I’m not able to obtain the lowest rate? I haven’t locked in yet because I’m hoping rates keep falling by end of next week. Planning on closing March 31st.

Dik Hz
Feb 22, 2004

Fun with Science

SabinBlitz posted:

My fiancée and I are in the process of buying a house owned by my parents. Hayden home built in Bend Oregon in 2017. Hoping Appraisal comes in at $374,000 but realistically it could be $360,000. Parents will give gift of equity to $290,000 which they will keep as net profit as that is what they paid for the house in 2017 when it was built.

My mortgage lender is only offering a 4.125% 30 year conventional but I keep reading about people getting under 4%.

Is it because he’s using my lowest FICO score at 689 so I’m not able to obtain the lowest rate? I haven’t locked in yet because I’m hoping rates keep falling by end of next week. Planning on closing March 31st.
If you are seeing a higher rate because of your credit score, you lender must tell you that and why. Shop around. Get other quotes.

Inzombiac
Mar 19, 2007

PARTY ALL NIGHT

EAT BRAINS ALL DAY


Well, we had a plumber come out to check the water heater. The sediment issue was so bad that not even the pressure release was working.

Obviously we replaced it right away. He thankfully cut us a great deal and had it done in about an hour.

Also, this is next to it. In the basement in the laundry room and I think I'm too stupid to know what it is. I'm not going to open it unless I know.

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

I'd say most probably a sewer cleanout. Possibly a well, sump, or access to a septic system?

Inzombiac
Mar 19, 2007

PARTY ALL NIGHT

EAT BRAINS ALL DAY


Hmmm, there used to be an old septic tank that got removed a while ago.
Unless I can see differently, I'll go with that.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

^^^

It's probably a soil line or drain tile clean out access if it's in the basement floor.

It could be as simple as a capped off floor drain also. It wouldn't be the first one capped off because it's almost never used so the trap dries out and it starts stinking, so somebody "smart" decided to pull it up and cap it rather than to fill the trap with mineral oil........

Inzombiac
Mar 19, 2007

PARTY ALL NIGHT

EAT BRAINS ALL DAY


Soooo... I shouldn't use it as a floor drain out of sheer laziness.

Hmm, I must meditate on what I've learned.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

Inzombiac posted:

Soooo... I shouldn't use it as a floor drain out of sheer laziness.

Hmm, I must meditate on what I've learned.

I mean - you could check and see if it has a trap under there and/or have it scoped to figure out what/where it goes, but nah, don't just assume. If it's a drain tile clean out you'd be duping water into your foundation/sump pit for example.....

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

HycoCam
Jul 14, 2016

You should have backed Transverse!
Borescope cameras are awesome. And they are cheap now too. Sub-$40 gets a cheapo you'll love to have when you need to look somewhere weird in your house.

https://smile.amazon.com/NIDAGE-Automotive-Inspection-Semi-Rigid-Smartphones/dp/B07C9C6P5D

The difference between the $1,000 plumber borescopes and the $40 Amazon deals starts with the stiffness. (Better lighting, fancier cameras, different ends all make them cost more. :) ) But that is the #1 issue with a $40 scope over a pro scope--stuffing what is basically a long, wet noodle though a trap and down a plumbing line is a challenge.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply